Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
West J Emerg Med ; 22(3): 636-643, 2021 Apr 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34125039

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to characterize the at-risk diabetes and prediabetes patient population visiting emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) centers in upstate South Carolina. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study at the largest non-profit healthcare system in South Carolina, using electronic health record (EHR) data of patients who had an ED or UC visit between February 2, 2016-July 31, 2018. Key variables including International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes, laboratory test results, family history, medication, and demographic characteristics were used to classify the patients as healthy, having prediabetes, having diabetes, being at-risk for prediabetes, or being at-risk for diabetes. Patients who were known to have diabetes were classified further as having controlled diabetes, management challenged, or uncontrolled diabetes. Population analysis was stratified by the patient's annual number of ED/UC visits. RESULTS: The risk stratification revealed 4.58% unique patients with unrecognized diabetes and 10.34% of the known patients with diabetes considered to be suboptimally controlled. Patients identified as diabetes management challenged had more ED/UC visits. Of note, 33.95% of the patients had unrecognized prediabetes/diabetes risk factors identified during their ED/UC with 87.95% having some form of healthcare insurance. CONCLUSION: This study supports the idea that a single ED/UC unscheduled visit can identify individuals with unrecognized diabetes and an at-risk prediabetes population using EHR data. A patient's ED/UC visit, regardless of their primary reason for seeking care, may be an opportunity to provide early identification and diabetes disease management enrollment to augment the medical care of our community.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Diabetes Mellitus/classificação , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Adulto Jovem
3.
Clin Diabetes ; 37(3): 203-210, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31371850

RESUMO

IN BRIEF This study investigates the combination of diabetes education, telehealth, a wireless enabled meter, and medication algorithms to improve care for a targeted population of employees with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. After more than 2 years of follow-up, mean A1C was reduced by 1.8%, and a reduction was observed in cost of care, along with an increase in visits with the managing physician provider. Thus, this study showed improved diabetes control using new technologies to provide remote monitoring and telehealth augmenting the outreach and education provided in a diabetes self-management program.

4.
Am J Med Sci ; 345(4): 296-301, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23531962

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a huge economic burden of diabetes in South Carolina. METHODS: The South Carolina Guidelines for Diabetes Care were based on the 2013 Standards of Medical Care from the American Diabetes Association. RESULTS: From a review of the Diabetes Quality Indicators in South Carolina 2007, Medicare claims data show: 65% of South Carolinians with diabetes insured by Medicare received 2 A1C test per year, 54% received an eye examination and 78% received a lipid panel. Only 42% of these individuals with diabetes had all 3 tests in the same year. In addition, only 50% of individuals with diabetes in South Carolina attended a diabetes self-management class. To improve the statistics and outcomes, the Diabetes Advisory Council provided the evidence-based South Carolina Guidelines for Diabetes Care. They are based on the 2013 Standards of Medical Care from the American Diabetes Association. These guidelines have been promoted at the continuing education programs sponsored by the Diabetes Initiative of South Carolina and the South Carolina Division of Diabetes Prevention and Control and distributed in the community sites by the Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health coalition. CONCLUSIONS: The South Carolina Guidelines for Diabetes will provide evidence-based therapy and monitoring to minimize complications from diabetes and promote a higher quality of life for those with diabetes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Programas Médicos Regionais , South Carolina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...