Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr ; 201: 176-183.e2, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29891258

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the epidemiology of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in critically ill adolescents, which currently is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Adolescents aged 13-17 years who were admitted to 6 pediatric intensive care units and were anticipated to receive cardiopulmonary support for at least 48 hours were eligible, unless they were admitted with DVT or pulmonary embolism or were receiving or anticipated to receive therapeutic anticoagulation. While patients were in the unit, serial sonograms of the lower extremities were performed, then centrally adjudicated. Bayesian statistics were used to leverage the similarities between adults and adolescents. RESULTS: A total of 88 adolescents were enrolled, from whom 184 lower extremity sonograms were performed. Of these, 9 adolescents developed DVT, with 1 having bilateral DVT. The frequency of DVT was 12.4% (95% credible interval: 6.1%, 20.1%), which ranged from 6.3% to 19.8% with a variability of 41.0% across units. All cases of DVT occurred in adolescents who received invasive mechanical ventilation (frequency: 16.5%; 95% credible interval 8.1%, 26.6%). DVT was associated with femoral central venous catheterization (OR 15.44; 95% credible interval 1.62, 69.05) and severe illness (OR for every 0.1 increase in risk of mortality 3.11; 95% credible interval 1.19, 6.85). DVT appears to be associated with prolonged days on support. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the similarities and differences in the epidemiology of DVT between adults and adolescents. They support the conduct and inform the design of a trial of pharmacologic prophylaxis in critically ill adolescents.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Medição de Risco/métodos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose Venosa/etiologia
2.
Pediatr Radiol ; 46(2): 219-28, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26440129

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Compared with consultative US performed by the radiology department, point-of-care US performed by non-radiology physicians can accurately diagnose deep venous thrombosis in adults. OBJECTIVE: In preparation for a multicenter randomized controlled trial, we determined the accuracy of point-of-care US in diagnosing central venous catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children <18 years old with a central venous catheter who were admitted to the intensive care unit were enrolled. Consultative and point-of-care compression ultrasounds with Doppler were done on the vein where the catheter was inserted within 24 h after insertion. Repeat US was obtained within 24 h of removal of the catheter. All images were centrally, blindly and independently adjudicated for thrombosis by a team of pediatric radiologists. Chance-corrected agreement between readings was calculated. RESULTS: From 84 children, 152 pairs of consultative and point-of-care ultrasounds were analyzed. A total of 38 (25.0%) consultative and 17 (11.2%) point-of-care ultrasounds were positive for thrombosis. The chance-corrected agreement between consultative and point-of-care ultrasounds was 0.17 (standard error: 0.07; P = 0.008). With consultative US as a reference, the sensitivity of point-of-care US was 28.1% (95% confidence interval: 13.7%-46.7%) with a specificity of 91.8% (95% confidence interval: 84.4%-96.4%). A catheter in the subclavian vein was associated with discordant readings (adjusted odds ratio: 4.00; 95% confidence interval: 1.45-13.94). CONCLUSION: Point-of-care US, when performed by non-radiology physicians and centrally adjudicated by pediatric radiologists in the setting of a multicenter randomized controlled trial, may not accurately diagnose catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children.


Assuntos
Cateteres Venosos Centrais/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Imediatos/estatística & dados numéricos , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Trombose Venosa Profunda de Membros Superiores/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa Profunda de Membros Superiores/epidemiologia , Distribuição por Idade , Causalidade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Distribuição por Sexo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...