Practices and opinions of New Zealand sheep farmers towards pain management in lambs during castration and/or tail docking.

AIMS: To collect baseline data from New Zealand sheep farmers on techniques for docking and castrating lambs, their perceptions of the level of pain lambs experience following these procedures, and their opinions about the use of pain relief. METHODS: From a voluntary cross-sectional survey of New Zealand sheep farmers, descriptive statistics were provided for quantitative study variables. Thematic analysis was performed on the free-text comments. Univariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with farmers indicating they would consider using a device allowing administration of pain relief simultaneously with castration and tail docking. RESULTS: There were 432 survey responses containing sufficiently complete data for analysis. Of the 340 individuals (77.5%) always or sometimes performing castration of ram lambs, 242 (72.2%) used rubber rings for complete castration, 23 (6.9%) used the short scrotum method for cryptorchid castration, and 75 (22.4%) used a combination of both methods. Of the 423 individuals (97.9%) who indicated that they always or sometimes performed tail docking, 245 (57.9%) used a hot iron only, 148 (35.0%) used a rubber ring only, 26 (5.8%) used both methods, 3 (0.7%) used a surgical knife, and 1 (0.2%) provided no response. Less than 2% of respondents always or sometimes used pain relief for these procedures. Of the 432 respondents, 139 (32.2%) and 180 (41.7%) strongly agreed that castration and tail docking do not cause sufficient pain to warrant using pain relief, respectively. Time and cost were identified as major barriers to providing pain relief. In the unadjusted logistic regression analyses, respondents who were female, had high levels of education, had been farming < 20 years, who believed lambs experienced high levels of pain following the procedures, and who believed pain lasted longer than 6 hours, were more likely to indicate willingness to use pain control devices. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results suggest very few New Zealand sheep farmers currently provide lambs with pain relief following tail docking or castration. This is likely due to the perception that the procedures are not painful enough to warrant pain relief, and concern over time and cost. This highlights the need to educate farmers about lamb pain and distress following tail docking and castration, and its negative impact on animal welfare. Farmers also need pain relief techniques and tools that can be administered simultaneously with these procedures to save time and labour cost.

[Eruptive xanthogranulomatosis in a trisomy 21 patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia]. / Xanthogranulomatose éruptive au cours d'une leucémie aiguë lymphoblastique chez un malade trisomique 21.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile xanthogranulomas may be associated with myeloproliferative disorders, usually juvenile chronic granulocytic leukemia. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 25-year-old man with Down's syndrome who presented eruptive xanthogranulomas. At this time, the patient was being treated for acute lymphocytic leukemia. The eruption increased with an extensive unusual "satellite" arrangement despite apparent remission of the acute leukemia. Leukemia relapse occurred some months later. DISCUSSION: This case had an unusual clinical presentation. It also suggests their might be a link between the clinical course of lymphocytic leukemia and juvenile xanthogranuloma.

Selenium reference ranges in New Zealand cattle.

AIM: To compare serum selenium and liver selenium concentrations with whole blood concentrations in samples taken at the same time from unsupplemented cattle, and to use these comparisons to establish a reference range for use in diagnosing selenium deficiency. METHODS: Selenium was measured in concurrent whole blood, serum and liver samples obtained from cattle in unsupplemented herds in the Manawatu, Waikato and Wairarapa regions of New Zealand. The results were statistically analysed. RESULTS: The revised reference ranges are as follows. [table: see text] CONCLUSION: The serum and liver selenium concentrations used as reference values prior to this study were inaccurate for the detection of selenium deficiency.