CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) versus cnf (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil) as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II lymph-node positive breast cancer: a phase III randomized multicenter study.

A multicenter phase III randomized study compared the efficacies of two adjuvant polychemotherapeutic regimens in 145 patients with stage II node-positive breast cancer. The standard chemotherapy combination, CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil), was administered to 77 women. The experimental protocol, CNF (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, 5-FU), in which mitoxantrone (Novantrone) replaced methotrexate, was given to 68 patients. Follow-up of the 145 patients by six participating hospitals showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.6) between the two treatment regimens during a median follow-up of 4.5 years in terms of overall survival. There was, however, a significant advantage (p = 0.04) in the disease-free survival for those receiving mitoxantrone (mean survival 4.4 years for CNF versus 2.7 years for CMF). Toxic side effects associated with CNF (particularly alopecia and myelotoxicity) were relatively more frequent but acceptable and did not lead to dose reduction. In light of its association with improved disease-free survival in this study, larger studies should be undertaken on the role of mitoxantrone as adjuvant treatment in stage II breast cancer.

Correlation of toxicity with pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in metastatic breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Doxil (ALZA Corp., Mountain View, CA) is a formulation of doxorubicin in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes with a prolonged circulation time and unique toxicity profile. As yet, the effect of the dose schedule on toxicity and the correlation of toxicity with pharmacokinetics have not been directly addressed. METHODS: The objectives of this study were to examine the toxicity profile and pharmacokinetics of various dose schedules of Doxil in a group of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) previously treated with chemotherapy. Forty-five patients received a total of 268 courses of Doxil (median per patient, 5; range, 1-19). Six dose schedules were investigated: 35 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (11 patients), 45 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (5 patients), 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks (5 patients), 60 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks (6 patients), 65 mg/m(2) every 5 weeks (6 patients), and 70 mg/m(2) every 6 weeks (12 patients). Doxil pharmacokinetics was examined in 24 of these patients at the dose levels of 35, 45, 60, and 70 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Stomatitis was dose related, with higher incidence and severity at doses of 60-70 mg/m(2). Skin toxicity in the form of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) developed usually after two or more courses of treatment and was schedule dependent with shorter dosing intervals leading to increased frequency and severity of skin manifestations. Myelosuppression, mainly as leukopenia/neutropenia, was dose dependent but mild and uncomplicated in most cases. Hair loss was infrequent (< 7%) and always of limited extent. Despite high cumulative doses up to 1500 mg/m(2), cardiac toxicity was observed in only 1 patient who received prior mitoxantrone and mediastinal radiotherapy. Objective responses, improvements, and durable stabilizations were observed in 9, 6, and 14 patients, respectively, indicating significant antitumor activity of Doxil in previously treated MBC patients. Doxil pharmacokinetics was well described by a monoexponential elimination curve with a long T(1/2) (median, 79 hours), a slow clearance (median, 40 mL/hour), and a small volume of distribution (median, 3.9 L). Cmax (peak plasma concentration) and AUC (area under the concentration*time curve) increased linearly with dose with a statistically significant correlation. Correlation analysis of dose and pharmacokinetic parameters with Doxil toxicites revealed that stomatitis grade and leukocyte nadir were correlated strongly with dose and Cmax, and weakly with AUC, whereas PPE grade was correlated significantly with only 1 parameter, T(1/2). CONCLUSIONS: The toxicity of Doxil is dose and schedule dependent and well correlated with pharmacokinetic parameters. Pharmacokinetic guidance of Doxil dosing may be a useful tool.

Toxicity of fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: effect of administration schedule and prognostic factors.

PURPOSE: Fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion is superior to 5-FU bolus in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but the survival difference between the two treatments is small and, therefore, the difference in toxicity profile is crucial in choosing a treatment for individual patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomized trials that compared 5-FU bolus with 5-FU CI, based on individual data from 1,219 patients, to compare the toxicity of the two schedules of 5-FU administration and to identify predictive factors for toxicity. The toxicities considered were World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 to 4 anemia, thrombopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, and hand-foot syndrome. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity, mainly neutropenia, was more frequent with 5-FU bolus than with 5-FU CI (31% and 4%, respectively; P < .0001). Hand-foot syndrome was less frequent with 5-FU bolus than with 5-FU CI (13% and 34%, respectively; P < .0001). There was no difference between the two treatment groups in terms of other nonhematologic toxicities. Independent prognostic factors were age, sex, and performance status for nonhematologic toxicities, performance status, and treatment for hematologic toxicities, and age, sex, and treatment for hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSION: Based on a large data set, this study confirmed and quantified the toxicity profile of the two schedules of administration of 5-FU and allowed the identification of clinical predictors of toxicity.

Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The administration of fluorouracil (5-FU) by continuous intravenous infusion (CI) is an alternative to the bolus administration of 5-FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Although more than 1,200 patients have been enrolled onto randomized trials that compared these two treatment modalities, there is still no definitive evidence of an advantage of 5-FU CI, and the magnitude of this advantage, if any, is also controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to assess this benefit in terms of tumor response and survival, and to compare the toxicity profiles of these two modalities of administration of 5-FU. DESIGN: Individual data of 1,219 patients included in six randomized trials served as the basis for this meta-analysis, which was conducted by an independent secretariat in close collaboration with the investigators. RESULTS: Tumor response rate was significantly higher in patients assigned to 5-FU CI than in patients assigned to 5-FU bolus (22% v 14%; overall response odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.41 to 0.75; P = .0002). Overall survival was also significantly higher in patients assigned to 5-FU CI (overall hazards ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.99; P = .04), although the median survival times were close. Multivariate analyses showed that randomized treatment and performance status were the only two significant predictors of tumor response, whereas the same plus primary tumor site were independent significant predictors of survival (patients with rectal cancer did somewhat better). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was more frequent in patients assigned to 5-FU bolus (31% v 4%; P < 10(-16)), whereas hand-foot syndrome was more frequent in the 5-FU CI group (34% v 13%; P < 10(-7)). CONCLUSION: 5-FU CI is superior to 5-FU bolus in terms of tumor response and achieves a slight increase of overall survival. The hematologic toxicity is much less important in patients who receive 5-FU CI, but hand-foot syndrome is frequent in this group of patients.

Doubling epirubicin dose intensity (100 mg/m2 versus 50 mg/m2) in the FEC regimen significantly increases response rates. An international randomised phase III study in metastatic breast cancer. The Epirubicin High Dose (HEPI 010) Study Group.

PURPOSE: A phase III study was performed in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to evaluate the effect on response rate and survival of a doubling of the epirubicin dose intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred fifty-six patients were randomised to receive either epirubicin 100 mg/m2 or 50 mg/m2 in combination with 5-FU (500 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) (FEC 100 vs. FEC 50) i.v., every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles (eight in case of CR). RESULTS: Of 456 patients, 390 were evaluable for efficacy. Objective response (CR + PR) was seen in 57% (FEC 100) vs. 41% (FEC 50) of the evaluable patients (P = 0.003). The CR rate was higher in the FEC 100 arm (12% vs. 7%, P = 0.07). FEC 100 produced significantly higher response rates in patients with visceral localisation (50% vs. 34%, P = 0.011) and in patients with more than two metastatic organ sites (64% vs. 37%, P = 0.001). Median time to progression (7.6 vs. 7 months) and overall survival (18 months vs. 17 months) were similar. Myelosuppression was the principal toxic effect, with grade IV neutropenia observed in 57% of the patients treated with FEC 100 vs. 9% of those on FEC 50. Grade IV infection or febrile neutropenia were observed in 8% (FEC 100) vs. 0.4% (FEC 50), but the incidence of septic death was the same in the two arms (two patients each). Cardiac toxicity was similar in the two treatment groups, with 5% vs. 3% of the patients taken off study due to cardiac events, primarily due to a decline in LVEF. Only three patients (two in FEC 100) experienced congestive heart failure. CONCLUSION: This trial shows that FEC with epirubicin at 100 mg/m2 can be administered for repeated cycles without bone marrow support with increased, though acceptable, toxicity and with a significant increase of antitumor effect (especially in visceral and/or high-burden disease), but no increased survival.

Multiple parenchymal liver metastases as the first site of recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature.

The incidence of clinically detectable parenchymal liver metastases in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma has been infrequently reported, but autopsy findings indicate that they are the second most common site of distant metastases in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The case of a 58-year-old patient who developed parenchymal liver metastases as the first site of recurrent ovarian carcinoma is presented. The different spreading routes of this malignancy, as well as a review of the incidence of liver metastases are discussed.

Megestrol acetate in advanced breast carcinoma after failure to tamoxifen and/or aminoglutethimide.

Seventy-three patients with metastatic breast cancer, whose disease progressed on hormonal therapy with tamoxifen or aminoglutethimide, were treated with megestrol acetate, 160 mg/day. No complete responses were observed. Partial response was achieved in 3 patients (4%), for a median of 9 months (range 5-13). Thirty-five patients (48%) remained stable, for a median of 8 months (3-26). The remaining 35 patients (48%) had clear progression of their metastatic disease on therapy. Response to megestrol acetate was achieved in patients with metastases in bone and pleura only. There was no correlation between response to megestrol acetate and response to prior chemotherapy, prior tamoxifen therapy, previous treatment with aminoglutethimide, or hormone receptor status. The actuarial 24-month survival for all patients was 37%. The main side effects of megestrol acetate included weight gain (20% or over), pruritus, elevation of blood pressure, weakness, and vaginal bleeding; they were only occasionally observed. The objective improvement observed during this trial is disappointing; the only reasons to justify the use of megestrol acetate as second- or third-line hormonal therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer, would be the relatively long duration of disease stabilization in a large proportion of patients, and the low toxicity observed with the drug.

Prognostic factors affecting response to aminoglutethimide in advanced breast cancer.

An analysis of 122 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with aminoglutethimide was carried out. Forty-one patients (34%) achieved a complete response or partial response (CR + PR), while 81 patients (66%) remained stable or progressed (S + P). A number of variables were analyzed for their prognostic importance in terms of response to aminoglutethimide. These variables were dominant site of metastases, disease-free survival, estrogen receptor status, age, response to prior tamoxifen, response to chemotherapy administered for metastatic disease, and dose of aminoglutethimide. The most important factors in predicting response were found to be prior response to tamoxifen and a longer disease-free survival after diagnosis.

A preliminary report of a pilot randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone and 5-fluorouracil in the adjuvant therapy of stage II breast cancer with four or more positive axillary nodes.

Thirty-eight patients with stage II breast cancer with four or more positive axillary lymph nodes were randomized to receive CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil, every 3 weeks) or CXF (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone and 5-fluorouracil, every 3 weeks). Pretreatment characteristics were similar for both groups. The actuarial 5 year disease-free survival (DFS) was 36% for the CMF group and 23% for the CXF group. The actuarial 5 year survival was 60% for the CMF arm and 66% for the CXF arm. These differences were not statistically significant. Partial alopecia was observed in 42% of patients in the CMF arm and in 100% of those receiving CXF (p = 0.0002). No episodes of leucopenic fever were observed in patients receiving CMF, while they were present in 53% of patients treated with CXF (p = 0.0006). No stomatitis occurred in the CMF group, but it was observed in 90% of patients who received CXF (p < 0.0001). Treatment with CXF had to be discontinued in two patients because of toxicity. In this small group of patients with poor prognosis, it seems that CXF at the doses given here is more toxic but not more effective than CMF, as represented by a similar DFS and survival.

Second-line chemotherapy with mitoxantrone as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer.

Ninety-three evaluable patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with chemotherapy, received mitoxantrone as a single agent (14 mg/m2, by rapid intravenous infusion, once every 3 weeks). Patients received a median of 7 courses (range 2 to 18), with a mean cumulative total dose of 133 mg (range 36 to 342). A complete response (CR) was achieved in 2 patients (2%). Partial response (PR) was observed in 23 patients (25%). The overall response rate (CR+PR) was thus 27%, with a median duration of 9 months (range 3 to 18). Responses were observed in all metastatic sites, except for brain and peritoneum. Stabilization (S) occurred in 26 patients (28%). The remaining 42 patients (45%) showed clear progression of their metastatic disease while on therapy. The actuarial 24-month survival for the whole group was 13%, increasing to 29% in responders (CR+PR), as compared with only 10% for non-responders (S+P; P < 0.0001). Mitoxantrone was generally well tolerated; nausea, vomiting and hair loss were mild. Nine out of 625 treatment cycles resulted in leukopenic fever with uneventful recovery. All patients had serial MUGA scans; 3 patients (cumulative total doses of 200, 250 and 342 mg, respectively) developed a significant drop in the left ventricular ejection fraction. Clinical evidence of congestive heart failure was observed in one patient who had received prior doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Mitoxantrone seems to be as effective as other drugs given singly or in combination as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Its low morbidity makes its use attractive in this setting.

The effect of tamoxifen on the endometrium.

Tamoxifen is one of the most important treatments for breast cancer, especially in postmenopausal patients. It acts primarily as an anti-estrogenic agent, due to its cytoplasmic estrogen receptor binding capacity. However, it also exerts a mild estrogenic effect. Since the prolonged use of estrogen has been reported to increase the rate of benign and malignant changes in the endometrium, we evaluated whether there is a correlation between tamoxifen therapy and endometrial benign and malignant conditions. The study group comprised 95 patients with breast cancer who were treated with tamoxifen. No control group was examined. Patients underwent vaginal ultrasonography and endometrial biopsy in order to evaluate any changes in the endometrium occurring during tamoxifen therapy. Pathological changes were observed in 14 patients, 13 of whom were treated with tamoxifen for more than 12 months. Of these women, 3 were diagnosed with endometrial cancer, 3 had mild dysplasia, 3 had endometrial hyperplasia, and 4 had a benign endometrial polyp. Our findings indicate a significant correlation between long-term tamoxifen administration and endometrial proliferation. We therefore recommend that women treated with tamoxifen for more than 12 months have an annual vaginal ultrasonography and endometrial biopsy.

Fetal hemoglobin screening in whole blood and in plasma of cancer patients.

Fetal hemoglobin (HbF) screening was performed on 296 cancer patients. In almost 80% of the patients with active disease (n = 197) and 35-60% of those with inactive disease (n = 99), the concentration of HbF in the blood was above the normal range. Among patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (n = 27), 89% had a high HbF concentration. The HbF level was significantly higher (p less than 0.001) in patients with active disease than in those with inactive disease. There is evidence of an ectopic production of HbF into the plasma of patients, but it will be necessary to develop a method for the prevention of hemolysis in order to establish this claim.

Radiation therapy for locally advanced breast cancer: prognostic factors and complication rate.

A retrospective analysis was carried out in 100 patients with locally advanced breast cancer without distant metastases treated by radiotherapy between 1960 and 1979. The primary tumor was irradiated to a total dose of 60 Gy in 76 patients and to doses ranging between 60 and 80 Gy in 24 patients. The regional lymphatics were treated with doses between 50 and 60 Gy. Following radiotherapy, chemotherapy was administered to 58 patients and hormonal therapy to 29, while 13 patients received no further therapy. Locoregional recurrences were documented in 29% and distant metastases in 49% of patients. The actuarial survival was 56% at 5 years, 21% at 10 years and 14% at 15 years. At 10 years 90% of the surviving patients had some degree of radiation damage.

Second line hormonal therapy with aminoglutethimide in metastatic breast cancer.

One hundred and twenty patients with metastatic breast cancer, whose disease progressed on hormonal therapy with tamoxifen, were treated with aminoglutethimide. The overall response rate was 34% and the median duration of response 9.5 months. Response to aminoglutethimide was achieved in all metastatic sites except lung and brain. Even 25% of patients who had failed to respond to prior tamoxifen did respond objectively to aminoglutethimide. The actuarial survival for all patients at 30 months was 22%. Although initial toxicity was high (70%), side effects of aminoglutethimide were transient, and treatment had to be discontinued in only four patients. The results of this trial confirm that aminoglutethimide is an effective treatment in metastatic breast cancer.

Methylprednisolone and chlorpromazine in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: a prospective non-randomized study.

Seventy-six consecutive patients receiving chemotherapy were evaluated for the antiemetic efficacy and side-effects of the combination of chlorpromazine (CPM) and methylprednisolone (MPN). All patients had previously received the same chemotherapy with metoclopramide in conventional dosage and experienced severe emesis. A significant antiemetic response was achieved in 70% of the patients, and in 28% of them the antiemetic protection was complete. The most common side effects were drowsiness, dry mouth and headache. The combination of CPM and MPN is effective, well tolerated and is recommended for outpatients receiving chemotherapy for cancer.

Chlorpromazine and dexamethasone versus high-dose metoclopramide and dexamethasone in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy, particularly cis-platinum: a prospective randomized crossover study.

Sixty-nine patients with malignant tumors receiving cancer chemotherapy, 90% including cis-platinum, were evaluated in a randomized crossover study for the antiemetic efficacy and the side effects of two antiemetic regimens: chlorpromazine (CPM) 2.5 mg/kg in 5 doses plus dexamethasone (DXM) 0.2 mg/kg in 2 doses, and high-dose metoclopramide (HD-MCP) 10 mg/kg in 5 doses plus the same dose of DXM. In 69% of 173 courses of chemotherapy, antiemetic response was achieved, and in 26% emesis was completely prevented. There was no statistical difference in the response to the antiemetic regimens, but 65% of the patients who completed 3 courses of chemotherapy preferred HD-MCP plus DXM. The main side effects of the treatment were drowsiness, nervousness, diarrhea and extrapyramidal reactions. HD-MCP plus DXM is recommended as a first line antiemetic treatment in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Patients resistant to this treatment should receive CPM plus DXM treatment.

Combination chemotherapy in metastatic tumors of unknown origin. 5-Fluorouracil, adriamycin and mitomycin C for adenocarcinomas and adriamycin, vinblastine and mitomycin C for anaplastic carcinomas.

Twenty-nine evaluable patients with metastatic carcinomatosis in whom initial workup failed to reveal the primary site were entered into this trial. Patients with histological evidence of adenocarcinoma (n = 15) received FAM, while patients with anaplastic carcinomas (n = 14) were given AVM. Pretreatment characteristics were similar for the FAM- and AVM-treated patients with regard to age and sex, but 47% of patients on FAM had liver metastases as compared with 36% for the AVM group. Of the 14 patients on AVM, 1 (7%) achieved a complete response lasting 16 months, and 3 patients (22%) achieved a partial response for 10, 12 and 20 months, respectively. No patient on FAM reached a complete response, and only two patients (13%) showed a partial remission for 7+ and 24 months, respectively. The median survival for the AVM patients was 8.5 months, not significantly different from a median of 5 months for the FAM-treated group. AVM caused substantial myelotoxicity, resulting in five hospitalizations for leukopenia and fever; the FAM regimen was better tolerated with no episodes of leukopenic fever. AVM appears to be more effective than FAM in the treatment of carcinomas of unknown origin. A higher response rate was achieved with AVM, despite the fact that patients on this combination had undifferentiated carcinomas and a larger proportion of three or more metastatic sites (36 vs. 13% on FAM), and received a lower percent of the planned dose than did the FAM patients. Further clinical trials to fully establish the role of vinblastine in the treatment of metastatic carcinomatosis of unknown origin seem warranted.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with and without radiotherapy in stage II breast cancer.

The influence of several variables on the effectiveness of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy given to 87 patients with stage II breast cancer was retrospectively analyzed. CMF was given in optimal doses (greater than or equal to 85% of the planned dose) to 17% of the patients; in intermediate doses (66-84% of the planned dose) to 50% of the patients; and in low doses (less than or equal to 65% of the planned dose) to 33% of the patients. Radiotherapy before CMF was given to 68% of the patients; simultaneous radio- and chemotherapy to 17% of the patients; and the remaining 15% received CMF only. At a median follow-up of 8 yr, 61% of the patients were still alive; 54% of them were disease-free. Patients receiving radio- and chemotherapy concomitantly had a higher relapse-free survival (RFS) than those given both treatments sequentially (77% versus 46%; P = 0.05). Dose levels of CMF did not influence RFS. Delay in initiation of CMF, mainly due to the administration of prior radiotherapy was deleterious: patients started on CMF within 3 months of diagnosis had a 77% 8 yr RFS, as compared with 44% for those with a delay of over 3 months (P = 0.01). No differences in local relapse rates were observed between irradiated and non-irradiated patients, although 87% of all distant failures occurred in patients who received radio- and chemotherapy sequentially. The data of this study indicate that delay in onset of CMF is deleterious, and can be avoided by the simultaneous administration of both treatment modalities, since this approach was well tolerated, without significant myelotoxicity.

Evaluation of fetal hemoglobin in various malignancies with reference to the patients' age.

Concentration of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) was measured in the blood of 172 cancer patients with solid tumors. The patients' age groups were compared with matched age groups of normal controls. Above the age of 50, a significant difference was found between patients and normal controls. In 70% of the patients with active disease, the concentration of HbF was above the normal range. There were indications that by reducing HbF concentrations irradiation of patients interferes with the evaluation of the results. In addition to whole blood, HbF was also measured in the plasma of 35 patients; the average HbF concentration in this group was found to be twice as high as that of the controls.

Functional and morphological alterations following isolated rat stomach irradiation. A model for estimation of radiation injury.

Exposure of the stomach to tumoricidal doses of radiation is associated with functional and morphological changes. The experimental data have been mainly obtained from studies of whole body irradiation of the stomach. We investigated the separate effect of irradiation on the surgically exposed stomach with doses of between 3 and 30 Gy. A dose-dependent decrease in free and total acidity was observed with relatively low doses (5-9 Gy). Serum pepsinogen and serum gastrin levels increased following irradiation with doses ranging from 5 to 15 Gy. Two phases of increased regenerative activity were documented (between the 1st and 3rd weeks and between the 4th and 8th weeks). No radioprotective effect was observed when sucralfate or misoprostol were utilized. Further investigations are mandatory in order to find an effective radioprotector for the irradiated stomach.