[Analysis of failures of spinal anesthesia as a function of practice development in a university hospital]. / Analyse des échecs de la rachianesthésie en fonction de l'évolution de la pratique d'un hôpital universitaire.

This study is a retrospective analysis of 303 consecutive spinal anaesthesia performed in orthopaedic patients of a University Hospital between January and December 1990. Failure of spinal anaesthesia was defined as the requirement for general anaesthesia to perform surgery. The parameters studied as possible risk factors of failure were patients demographics, local anaesthetic agents and solutions and techniques of spinal anaesthesia (single injection versus continuous spinal anaesthesia). Failures were related to inadequate or incomplete extension of sensory blockade or to difficulties to perform spinal injection. Continuous spinal anaesthesia was performed in 209 patients mostly with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, while 94 patients received a single injection of either hyperbaric 0.5% tetracaine with adrenaline or 0.5% bupivacaine or 5% lidocaine. Failures occurred in 6.3% of the cases but were significantly less frequent with continuous spinal anaesthesia (4.8%) than with the conventional technique (9.6%). The incidence of failure was higher with hyperbaric tetracaine (11.1%) confirming its poor reliability. Inadequate extension of the anaesthetic block was the main cause of failure whatever the spinal anaesthetic technique. These results point out the reliability of continuous spinal anaesthesia but problems may occasionally occur due to spinal catheter misplacement.

Dose-related prolongation of hyperbaric tetracaine spinal anesthesia by clonidine in humans.

The effect of clonidine, an alpha 2 agonist, on sensory and motor blockade during spinal anesthesia was studied in 44 ASA physical status I II patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups given 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric tetracaine (HT), within group I (N = 14) 1 ml isotonic saline, in group II (N = 15) 0.5 ml saline solution and 0.5 ml clonidine (75 micrograms), and in group III (N = 15) 1 ml clonidine (150 micrograms). Sensory blockade (SB) was evaluated by pinprick and motor blockade (MB) according to Bromage's scale. The level of SB was comparable in the three groups but the duration was different. The 75 micrograms clonidine was associated with 25% prolongation of SB at L2 and 29% prolongation of grade 3 MB Clonidine 150 micrograms prolonged the time of SB at L2 by 72% and grade 3 MB by 96%. Colloid infusion and the decrease in diastolic blood pressure were significantly greater in the clonidine 150 micrograms group compared to group I. A dose related prolongation of spinal anesthesia is demonstrated with clonidine.

[Failure of spinal anesthesia. Evaluation of the practice at a university hospital]. / Echecs de la rachianesthésie. Evaluation de la pratique d'un hôpital universitaire.

There is little data concerning failures in spinal anaesthesia. A retrospective analysis of 337 spinal anaesthesias performed in a teaching hospital gave a 9.8% failure rate. A failure was defined as the need to carry out part or all of a surgical act under general anaesthesia when spinal anaesthesia had been carried out. The main causes of failure were insufficiently or excessively extended neural blockade, insufficient duration or a poor quality sensory blockade with the patient feeling surgical or tourniquet pain. The local anaesthetics used were hyperbaric 0.5% tetracaine with and without 0.1 mg metaraminol, hyperbaric 0.5% prilocaine and isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine. The failure rate was 19.4% with plain hyperbaric tetracaine, 7.6% with tetracaine with metaraminol, 5% with prilocaine and 2.9% with isobaric bupivacaine. This rate was related neither to the experience of the anaesthetist, nor to the clinical features of the patients, nor to the position nor to the needle size. Although there were more failures during orthopaedic procedures, probably because of tourniquet pain, this was not significant. These results confirmed that spinal anaesthesia was a reliable technique. Hyperbaric plain tetracaine did not always guarantee a successful anaesthesia and isobaric bupivacaine should be more commonly used.