Unleashing excellence: using a project management approach to effectively implement a simulation curriculum to improve residents' preparedness.

BACKGROUND: Integrating innovative, simulation-based training programs into medical curricula frequently encounters familiar challenges, including scepticism, limited faculty time, and financial constraints. Recognized for its success in business projects, the Harvard Project Management Theory emerges as a promising approach to optimizing the implementation process and achieving sustainable success. This study endeavours to elucidate the application of project management theory in our implementation process and assess its impact on the clinical preparedness of novice residents. METHODS: The research utilized a structured four-phase implementation strategy-Planning, Build-up, Execution, and Closing-to develop a simulation-based education curriculum. Incorporating project management tools like project charters and risk management tools played a crucial role in facilitating the effective implementation of standardized processes and improved clinical outcomes. Essential components of this innovative management approach encompass stakeholder engagement, milestone definition, and the alignment of institutional policies and processes. RESULTS: A collective of 395 residents actively engaged in eight monthly simulation-based events, reflecting an average participation rate of 39 residents per lecture (± 19). A noteworthy enhancement was observed in the average rating for knowledge gain, with a significant improvement from 5.9/10 to 8.8/10 (p = 0.0001). Participants highlighted the program's considerable impact on future clinical practice (4.7/5) and teamwork (4.8/5) as particularly valuable aspects. The introduction of a novel organizational structure received favourable feedback from faculty members, with a notable rating of 4.8/5 for predictive time planning. Qualitative insights from the evaluation highlighted the significance of targeted incentive schemes in optimizing the implementation process. CONCLUSION: This project underscores the constructive influence of project management principles in designing simulation-based curricula, explicitly focusing on stakeholder engagement, faculty motivation, and data utilization. Adopting the Harvard Project Management Approach emerges as a catalyst for heightened success in curriculum design, contributing to enhanced emergency preparedness among novice residents. The positive outcomes observed in this study provide valuable insights for future implementations, offering a foundation for refining and optimizing medical education programs to meet the evolving needs of learners and stakeholders alike.

Norepinephrine Infusion in the Emergency Department in Septic Shock Patients: A Retrospective 2-Years Safety Report and Outcome Analysis.

Hemodynamic optimization during sepsis and septic shock is based on a prompt and large fluid resuscitation strategy associated with early administration of norepinephrine. In our hospital, norepinephrine is administered in the emergency department (ED), within a protocol-guided management context, to reduce norepinephrine infusion timing due to central line insertion. This choice, however, can be associated with side effects. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a retrospective analysis regarding the safety of norepinephrine in the ED. We also appraised the association between in-hospital mortality and predefined ED variables and patients' admission severity scores. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective analysis of electronic sheets of the ED of a tertiary hospital in the North of Italy. Outcomes measure and analysis: Electronic documentation was assessed to identify local and systemic side effects. We considered two subgroups of patients according to the in-hospital clinical paths: (1) those admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU); and (2) those who received a ceiling of care decision. We collected and considered variables related to septic shock treatment in the ED and analyzed their association with in-hospital mortality. MAIN RESULTS: We considered a two-year period, including 108,033 ED accesses, and ultimately analyzed data from 127 patients. Side effects related to the use of this drug were reported in five (3.9%) patients. Thirty patients (23.6%) were transferred to the ICU from the ED, of whom six (20.0%) died. Twenty-eight patients (22.0%) received a ceiling of care indication, of whom 21 (75.0%) died. Of the 69 (54.3%) finally discharged to either medical or surgical wards, 21 (30.4%) died. ICU admission was the only variable significantly associated to in-hospital mortality in the multivariable analysis [OR (95% CI) = 4.48 (1.52-13.22); p-value = 0.007]. CONCLUSIONS: Norepinephrine peripheral infusion in the ED was associated with a low incidence of adverse events requiring discontinuation (3.9%). It could be considered safe within <12 h when a specific line management protocol and pump infusion protocol are adopted. None of the variables related to septic shock management affected in-hospital mortality, except for the patient's ICU admission.