Community based participatory research as a promising practice for addressing vaccine hesitancy, rebuilding trust and addressing health disparities among racial and ethnic minority communities.

The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected racial and ethnic minority communities across the United States (U.S.). Despite the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 faced by communities of color, Black and Hispanic communities are less likely to be fully vaccinated than White non-Hispanic Persons. Health inequity and vaccine hesitancy are complex phenomena that require multilevel responses tailored to the unique needs of each community, a process that inherently necessitates a high level of community engagement in order to develop the most effective health interventions. Building on the principles of community based participatory research (CBPR) and with the support of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Project 2VIDA! was born. A multidisciplinary collaborative of academic researchers, community members, and clinicians whose aim is to foster sustainable partnerships to reduce the burden of COVID-19 in Hispanic and Black communities across Southern California. Our model was designed to meet our community members where they were - whether on their lunch break or picking their children from school. This CBPR model has been well received by community members. Future health interventions focused on reducing health disparities should prioritize the role of the community, leverage the voices of key community partners, and be grounded in equitable power sharing.

Study protocol: Project 2VIDA! SARS-CoV-2 vaccine intervention delivery for adults in Southern California.

Background: To date, the United States (US) leads the world in the number of infections and deaths due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality are staggering. Age-adjusted data show that AA and Latino individuals have had higher rates of death over most of the pandemic and during surges. Project 2VIDA! is community-based participatory research (CBPR) that was developed to address individual, social, and contextual factors related to access and acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among African American and Latino communities in Southern California. This paper describes the study protocol and overarching objectives. Methods and design: Project 2VIDA! is a multilevel intervention that builds on the principals of CBPR and is designed to increase uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among African American and Latino individuals (≥16 years and older) in San Diego County. The intervention was developed with a working group comprised of representatives from community and academia and centers on targeted COVID-19 individual awareness and education, linkage to medical and supportive services, COVID-19 community outreach and health promotion and offering the COVID-19 vaccine through community pop-up clinics. Discussion: Findings from 2VIDA! will provide data on the impact, feasibility, and acceptability of the intervention which are all crucial for the adaptation, refinement, and improvement of vaccine outreach interventions for COVID-19 and other vaccine preventable infectious diseases that severely impact African American and Latino communities. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05022472?term=Project+2VIDA&draw=2&rank=1, NCT05022472.

Therapist Strategies for Managing Midtreatment Problems in Evidence-based Interventions in Community Settings.

The National Institute of Health has made it a priority to identify, develop, and refine strategies to disseminate and implement effective interventions (National Institute of Health, 2015). This study examined qualitative reports of the strategies therapists used to manage common implementation problems they encountered during midtreatment in Multisystemic Therapy® (MST) and Functional Family Therapy (FFT), two widely disseminated evidence- and family-based treatments for substance abusing and delinquent adolescents. Experienced therapists from dissemination sites across the U.S. described cases in which they encountered midtreatment problems they perceived as serious threats to treatment success. They indicated why each case terminated and rated the outcome of the case. Qualitative analyses examined 16 treatment failures and then 16 treatment successes to identify contextual obstacles that accompanied the problems therapists identified, along with strategies they reported using with families that ultimately succeeded or failed. Therapists reported that midtreatment problems were often embedded in additional related difficulties and that they employed multiple relationship techniques and process-focused strategies to try to resolve these problems. For the most part, therapists described obstacles and strategies for successful and unsuccessful families in similar ways. Patterns of themes and subthemes suggested, however, that therapists in successful cases may be more likely to report "on-script" strategies and therapists in unsuccessful cases may describe more "off-script" strategies as well as more generic relationship building and advice-giving strategies.

Los Institutos Nacionales de Salud (NIH, por sus siglas en inglés) han priorizado la detección, el desarrollo y la perfección de estrategias para difundir e implementar intervenciones eficaces (National Institute of Health, 2015). Este estudio analizó los informes cualitativos de las estrategias que usaron los terapeutas para manejar los problemas comunes de implementación que encontraron durante la mitad del tratamiento en la terapia multisistémica (Multisystemic Therapy® , MST) y en la terapia familiar funcional (Functional Family Therapy, FFT), dos tratamientos factuales y basados en la familia ampliamente difundidos para adolescentes con problemas de delincuencia y de abuso de sustancias. Un grupo de terapeutas experimentados de centros de difusión de todo Estados Unidos describió casos en los cuales encontraron problemas en la mitad del tratamiento que ellos percibieron como amenazas graves para el éxito del tratamiento. Estos terapeutas indicaron por qué cada caso terminó y calificaron el resultado del caso. Los análisis cualitativos analizaron 16 fallas del tratamiento y luego 16 aciertos del tratamiento para detectar obstáculos contextuales que acompañaban a los problemas mencionados por los terapeutas, junto con estrategias que informaron haber usado con familias y que finalmente fueron satisfactorias o fallaron. Los terapeutas informaron que los problemas en la mitad del tratamiento generalmente formaban parte de otras dificultades relacionadas y que ellos emplearon varias técnicas relacionales y estrategias centradas en los procesos para intentar resolver estos problemas. En su mayoría, los terapeutas describieron los obstáculos y las estrategias utilizadas con las familias favorables y con las desfavorables de maneras similares. Sin embargo, los patrones de temas y subtemas indicaron que los terapeutas de los casos favorables pueden ser más propensos a informar estrategias "dentro del libreto" y que los terapeutas de los casos desfavorables pueden describir más estrategias "fuera del libreto", así como estrategias más genéricas de construcción de relaciones y de asesoramiento.

Midtreatment Problems Implementing Evidence-based Interventions in Community Settings.

Multisystemic Therapy® (MST) and Functional Family Therapy (FFT) are two widely disseminated evidence-based family-based treatments for substance abusing and delinquent adolescents. This mixed-method study examined common implementation problems in midtreatment in MST and FFT. A convenience sample of experienced therapists (20 MST, 20 FFT) and supervisors (10 MST, 10 FFT) from dissemination sites across the United States participated in semistructured telephone interviews. Participants identified retrospectively serious midtreatment process problems they perceived as threats to treatment success. Coders extracted descriptions of problems from interview transcripts and coded them into 12 categories that fell into five major themes: engaging families in treatment; difficulties implementing strategies; family relational and communication problems; complications external to therapy; and youth problem behavior. Analyses examined caregiver, therapist, and youth variables as predictors of these common midtreatment problems and whether treatment outcomes varied depending on the type of problem, therapy model, and race/ethnic match of therapist and family. MST and FFT therapists and supervisors identified many similar problems. There were, however, model-specific differences consistent with differing features of the models (e.g., FFT participants identified more family relational problems and fewer follow-through problems than their MST counterparts). Results underscore the need to consider both common and specific factors in treatment process.

La terapia multisistémica (Multisystemic Therapy®, MST) y la terapia familiar funcional (Functional Family Therapy, FFT) son dos tratamientos factuales familiares ampliamente difundidos para adolescentes con problemas de abuso de sustancias y delincuencia. Este estudio de métodos combinados analizó los problemas de implementación comunes a mediados del tratamiento en la MST y la FFT. Una muestra de conveniencia de terapeutas experimentados (20 MST, 20 FFT) y supervisores (10 MST, 10 FFT) de centros de difusión de todo EE. UU. participaron en entrevistas telefónicas semiestructuradas. Los participantes reconocieron retrospectivamente graves problemas en el proceso a mediados del tratamiento que percibieron como amenazas para el éxito del tratamiento. Los codificadores extrajeron las descripciones de problemas de las transcripciones de las entrevistas y los codificaron en 12 categorías que comprendían cinco temas principales: interés de las familias por el tratamiento; dificultades para implementar estrategias; problemas de comunicación y relacionales con la familia; complicaciones ajenas a la terapia; y comportamiento problemático de los jóvenes. Los análisis examinaron las variables de cuidador, terapeuta y joven como predictores de estos problemas comunes a mediados del tratamiento y si los resultados del tratamiento variaron según el tipo de problema, el modelo de terapia y la coincidencia étnica/racial entre el terapeuta y la familia. Los terapeutas y los supervisores de la MST y la FFT detectaron varios problemas similares. Sin embargo, hubo diferencias específicas de los modelos que coincidieron con las distintas características de los modelos (p. ej.: los participantes de la FFT reconocieron más problemas de relaciones familiares y menos problemas para terminar el tratamiento que sus homólogos de la MST). Los resultados subrayan las necesidad de tener en cuenta tanto los factores comunes como específicos del proceso de tratamiento.