Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 109(2): 103250, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35181515

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous spine surgery is on the rise; the main drawback is iterative irradiation of the care team in theater. The aim of the present study was to compare intraoperative radiation dose in percutaneous posterior thoracolumbar internal fixation (PPTLIF) using impedancemetry-guided pedicle sighting by the PediGuard device (SpineGuard®) versus gold-standard free-hand sighting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center, single-surgeon continuous prospective randomized study was conducted from September 2017 to April 2018. Dose-area product (DAP, in cGy.cm2) was recorded at the end of pedicle sighting and end of surgery in the free-hand control group and the impedancemetry group. Pedicle screw position was studied on postoperative CT scan. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in either group after 2 had been excluded. The groups were comparable for age, gender, body-mass index (BMI), indication and number of instrumented levels. Mean DPA at end of sighting and end of procedure was respectively 147.4 cGy.cm2 and 230.9 cGy.cm2 in the control group and 171.1 cGy.cm2 and 280.7 cGy.cm2 in the PediGuard group (p> 0.05). Screw positioning on CT was comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the PediGuard device did not reduce intraoperative radiation dose. The correlation between radiation dose and BMI was confirmed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II; prospective randomized study.


Assuntos
Parafusos Pediculares , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/lesões , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Vértebras Torácicas/lesões , Doses de Radiação
3.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 105(6): 1171-1174, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31227462

RESUMO

The various techniques available for scoliosis surgery via the posterior approach involve positioning implants on either side of the curve and reducing the deformity by manoeuvres on the concave rod or simultaneously on both rods. Correction solely via a direct convex rod manoeuvre would eliminate the need for implants on the concave side. This technique was used to treat thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in 23 patients with a mean age of 14 years and 9 months. Low-dose biplanar EOS radiographs were obtained before surgery, on post-operative day 7, and at last follow-up (at least 2 years after surgery) to allow comparisons of Cobb's angle (72°, 33°, and 35°, respectively), thoracic kyphosis (21°, 29°, and 26°), lumbar lordosis (58°, 50°, and 55°), and apical vertebra rotation (-26°,-12°, and-11°). Although scoliosis requires corrections in all three dimensions, this technique seems to produce satisfactory outcomes while obviating the need for implants on the concave side, thereby decreasing the risk of iatrogenic adverse events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Criança , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Período Pós-Operatório , Radiografia , Escoliose/diagnóstico , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...