Infectious complications and long-term outcomes in patients with diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma and diabetes mellitus.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a major complication in patients with diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Diabetes mellitus (DM) has deleterious effects on the immune system resulting in an increased risk of infections. We evaluated patients with DLBCL who started frontline treatment with R-CHOP, and compared outcomes according to presence of DM comorbidity. Between 2013 and 2018, 218 patients with DLBCL were included. 46 patients (21%) had DM. Rate of admissions for FN was higher for patients with DM (0.7 vs. 0.46 admissions/patient, p = .016), also after age and gender-matched subgroup analysis (p = .004). Improved glycemic control during FN hospitalizations was associated with shorter hospitalizations. Metformin was associated with improved median overall survival in diabetic patients (89 vs. 64 months, p = .018). In conclusion, Patients with DLBCL and DM had higher rates of FN hospitalizations. Improved glycemic control during FN hospitalization was associated with shorter length of stay.

Efficacy and Safety of BRAF Inhibitors With or Without MEK Inhibitors in BRAF-Mutant Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Findings From a Real-Life Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Real-life comparative data on BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and BRAFi + MEK inhibitors (MEKi) combination in BRAF-mutant (BRAFm) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive BRAFm advanced NSCLC patients (n = 58) treated in 9 Israeli centers in 2009-2018 were identified. These were divided according to mutation subtype and treatment into groups A1 (V600E, BRAFi; n = 5), A2 (V600E, BRAFi + MEKi; n = 15), A3 (V600E, no BRAFi; n = 7), B1 (non-V600E, BRAFi ± MEKi; n = 7), and B2 (non-V600E, no BRAFi; n = 23); one patient received both BRAFi and BRAFi + MEKi. Safety, objective response rate, progression-free survival with BRAFi ± MEKi, and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: Objective response rate was 40%, 67%, and 33% in groups A1, A2, and B1, respectively (P = .5 for comparison between groups A1 and A2). In group B1, G469A and L597R mutations were associated with response to BRAFi + MEKi. Median progression-free survival was 1.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-5.3), 5.5 months (95% CI, 0.7-9.3), and 3.6 months (95% CI, 1.5-6.7) for groups A1, A2, and B1, respectively (log-rank for comparison between groups A1 and A2, P = .04). Median overall survival with BRAFi ± MEKi was 1.7 months (95% CI, 0.5-NR), 9.5 months (95% CI, 0.2-14.9), and 7.1 months (95% CI, 1.8-NR) in groups A1, A2, and B1, respectively (log-rank for comparison between groups A1 and A2, P = .6). Safety profiles differed slightly, and similar treatment discontinuation rates were observed with BRAFi and BRAFi + MEKi. CONCLUSION: In the real-life setting, activity and safety of BRAFi + MEKi in V600E BRAFm NSCLC are comparable to those observed in prospective clinical trials; the combination of BRAFi + MEKi is superior to monotherapy with a BRAFi. Further research should be done to explore the impact of BRAFi + MEKi treatment on the natural history of BRAFm NSCLC.

Rare targetable drivers (RTDs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Outcomes with immune check-point inhibitors (ICPi).

OBJECTIVES: Efficacy of immune check-point inhibitors (ICPi) in NSCLC with rare targetable drivers (RTDs) is largely unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with NSCLC and RTDs (non-EGFR/ALK, n-82) were selected from the Davidoff Cancer Center database. ORR, PFS, OS with ICPi, OS since advanced disease diagnosis, TMB, MSI, and PD-L1 expression were analyzed; uni- and multivariate PFS and OS analyses were done. OS with ICPi was compared between the RTD cohort and the non-selected NSCLC cohort (n-278). RESULTS: Of 50 tumors tested, 32%, 38%, and 30% were associated with ≥50%, 1-49% and <1% PD-L1 expression, respectively. Median TMB (n-48) comprised 4 muts/Mb (0-57); TMB ≥ 10 muts/Mb was seen in 19% of tumors. Both TMB and PD-L1 expression varied across different RTDs. All the 47 tumors were MSI stable. ORR with ICPi (n-44) was 16%, median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.0), median OS was 16.2 months (95% CI, 8.4-NR). No correlation was seen between OS with ICPi and PD-L1 expression (p > 0.4), TMB (p > 0.8), or RTD type (p > 0.3). In the multivariate analysis, ECOG PS (p-0.005), targeted agents exposure (p-0.005), and ICPi exposure (p-0.04) were the only variables which correlated with OS since advanced disease diagnosis. Median OS since advanced disease diagnosis comprised 32 months (95% CI, 19.9-44.9) and 13 months (95% CI, 6.6-15.9) for patients who were and were not exposed to ICPi, respectively (log-rank test-6.3; p-0.01). In the inter-cohort comparison, for patients matched for ECOG PS (0/1), median OS with ICPi comprised 17.5 months (95% CI, 8.1-NR) and 8.6 months (95% CI, 6.7-NR) for RTD and non-selected patients, respectively (log-rank test-2.4, p-0.1). CONCLUSION: In NSCLC with RTD, ICPi have favorable efficacy and independent impact on OS. NSCLC with RTD is associated with MSI stable status and variable levels of PD-L1 expression and TMB; their predictive value remains to be determined.