RESUMO
Consciousness and impulsivity are multidimensional constructs related to the control of thoughts and behavior. Impulsivity is a complex personality trait characterized by: acting without thinking, inability to plan ahead of time and poor attention or vigilance. Consciousness is a construct that encompasses a variety of physiological processes related to the experience of awareness and the acquisition of knowledge in human beings. With respect to the control of human behavior, consciousness and impulsivity appear to be related to opposite behaviors. Historically, efforts to understand these constructs by different disciplines have resulted in the development of divergent definitions and a variety of measures, thus causing confusion. The purposes of this article are to: 1) describe examples of solutions to this confusion within impulsivity research and discuss how consciousness research can benefit from the study of impulsivity; 2) discuss how consciousness and impulsivity can be measured within a laboratory and treated as experimental variables; 3) Summarize the lessons learned by comparing impulsive and premeditated acts from an integrated, multidimensional perspective; 4) Discuss the implications of a multidisciplinary model for pursuing consciousness research.
Conciencia e impulsividad son dos constructos multidimensionales relacionados con el control del pensamiento y comportamiento humano. Impulsividad es un rasgo de personalidad complejo caracterizado por una elevada tendencia a actuar sin pensar, incapacidad para planear actividades futuras y disminución de la capacidad de concentración. Conciencia por su parte, es un constructo que cobija una serie de procesos fisiológicos relacionados con la generación de experiencia conciente y la adquisición de conocimientos. Con respecto al control sobre la acción humana, conciencia e impulsividad parece estar relacionados con comportamientos opuestos. Históricamente, los esfuerzos realizados por diversas disciplinas con el fin de estudiar estos constructos han llevado al desarrollo de definiciones divergentes y a una serie de medidas, causando una mayor confusión. Los propósitos de este artículo son: 1) describir ejemplos de posibles soluciones al estado de confusión en el campo de la investigación sobre impulsividad y discutir como el estudio de la conciencia puede beneficiarse de la investigación de la impulsividad; 2) discutir algunas de las maneras utilizadas para medir impulsividad en el laboratorio y cómo hacer de estos constructos variables experimentales; 3) resumir algunas de las lecciones derivadas de la comparación de los actos impulsivos con los premeditados desde una perspectiva integral y multidimensional; 4) discutir las implicaciones derivadas del uso de un enfoque multidimensional para el estudio de la conciencia.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Long-duration space missions, as well as emerging civilian tourist space travel activities, prompted review and assessment of data available to date focusing on cardiovascular risk and available risk mitigation strategies. The goal was the creation of tools for risk priority assessments taking into account the probability of the occurrence of an adverse cardiovascular event and available and published literature from spaceflight data as well as available risk mitigation strategies. METHODS: An international group of scientists convened in Bellagio, Italy, in 2004 under the auspices of the Aerospace Medical Association to review available literature for cardiac risks identified in the Bioastronautics Critical Path Roadmap (versions 2000, 2004). This effort led to the creation of a priority assessment framework to allow for an objective assessment of the hazard, probability of its occurrence, mission impact, and available risk mitigation measures. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Spaceflight data are presented regarding evidence/ no evidence of cardiac dysrhythmias, cardiovascular disease, and cardiac function as well as orthostatic intolerance, exercise capacity, and peripheral resistance in presyncopal astronauts compared to non-presyncopal astronauts. Assessment of the priority of different countermeasures was achieved with a tabular framework with focus on probability of occurrence, mission impact, compliance, practicality, and effectiveness of countermeasures. Special operational settings and circumstances related to sensitive portions of any mission and the impact of environmental influences on mission effectiveness are addressed. The need for development of diagnostic tools, techniques, and countermeasure devices, food preparation, preservation technologies and medication, as well as an infrastructure to support these operations are stressed. Selected countermeasure options, including artificial gravity and pharmacological countermeasures need to be systematically evaluated and validated in flight, especially after long-duration exposures. Data need to be collected regarding the emerging field of suborbital and orbital civilian space travel, to allow for sound risk assessment.
