Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J. pediatr. (Rio J.) ; 97(6): 637-645, Nov.-Dec. 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1350972

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties of the Child Development Assessment Questionnaire (QAD-PIPAS). Methods: This methodological study was comprised of two axes. The first one aimed to analyze the instrument's construct validity (discriminant and concurrent validity) and internal consistency, and the second one examined test-retest reliability, involving two different samples and procedures. For construct validity and internal consistency, the sample was recruited in Embu das Artes-SP, Brasilia-DF and Recife-PE during the immunization campaign in 2017, involving caregivers of 2005 children under 60 months of age (1295 under 36 and 710 from 37 to 59 months). For the test-retest analysis the sample consisted of 30 children aged 0-59 months old that attended daycare centers in Embu das Artes-SP in 2018. Results: Multivariate analyses of construct validity showed that the QAD-PIPAS was able to identify the association between the outcome (suspected child development delays) and expected risk and protective factors based on Nurturing Care Framework (OMS/UNICEF). A significant positive correlation was achieved between the scores of the QAD-PIPAS and CREDI in six of the eight age groups analyzed, with the most significant correlations being in the age groups from 25 to 30 and 31-36 months. Acceptable internal consistencies were identified in all age groups, with better performance above 36 months of age (Cronbach's alpha between 0.61 to 0.80). We also found an adequate test-retest reliability (global Kappa 0.81). Conclusion: The QAD-PIPAS showed evidence of construct validity and reliability to be used in population studies involving children aged 0-59 months during multi-vaccination campaigns in Brazil.


Assuntos
Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Qualidade de Vida , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Psicometria , Brasil , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
J Pediatr (Rio J) ; 97(6): 637-645, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33626325

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the psychometric properties of the Child Development Assessment Questionnaire (QAD-PIPAS). METHODS: This methodological study was comprised of two axes. The first one aimed to analyze the instrument's construct validity (discriminant and concurrent validity) and internal consistency, and the second one examined test-retest reliability, involving two different samples and procedures. For construct validity and internal consistency, the sample was recruited in Embu das Artes-SP, Brasilia-DF and Recife-PE during the immunization campaign in 2017, involving caregivers of 2005 children under 60 months of age (1295 under 36 and 710 from 37 to 59 months). For the test-retest analysis the sample consisted of 30 children aged 0-59 months old that attended daycare centers in Embu das Artes-SP in 2018. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses of construct validity showed that the QAD-PIPAS was able to identify the association between the outcome (suspected child development delays) and expected risk and protective factors based on Nurturing Care Framework (OMS/UNICEF). A significant positive correlation was achieved between the scores of the QAD-PIPAS and CREDI in six of the eight age groups analyzed, with the most significant correlations being in the age groups from 25 to 30 and 31-36 months. Acceptable internal consistencies were identified in all age groups, with better performance above 36 months of age (Cronbach's alpha between 0.61 to 0.80). We also found an adequate test-retest reliability (global Kappa 0.81). CONCLUSION: The QAD-PIPAS showed evidence of construct validity and reliability to be used in population studies involving children aged 0-59 months during multi-vaccination campaigns in Brazil.


Assuntos
Desenvolvimento Infantil , Qualidade de Vida , Brasil , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Bull World Health Organ ; 98(6): 382-393, 2020 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32514212

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop a method to assess the cost of extending the duration of maternity leave for formally-employed women at the national level and apply it in Brazil, Ghana and Mexico. METHODS: We adapted a World Bank costing method into a five-step method to estimate the costs of extending the length of maternity leave mandates. Our method used the unit cost of maternity leave based on working women's weekly wages; the number of additional weeks of maternity leave to be analysed for a given year; and the weighted population of women of reproductive and legal working age in a given country in that year. We weighted the population by the probability of having a baby that year among women in formal employment, according to individual characteristics. We applied nationally representative cross-sectional data from fertility, employment and population surveys to estimate the costs of maternity leave for mothers employed in the formal sector in Brazil, Ghana and Mexico for periods from 12 weeks up to 26 weeks, the WHO target for exclusive breastfeeding. FINDINGS: We estimated that 640 742 women in Brazil, 33 869 in Ghana and 288 655 in Mexico would require formal maternity leave annually. The median weekly cost of extending maternity leave for formally working women was purchasing power parity international dollars (PPP$) 195.07 per woman in Brazil, PPP$ 109.68 in Ghana and PPP$ 168.83 in Mexico. CONCLUSION: Our costing method could facilitate evidence-based policy decisions across countries to improve maternity protection benefits and support breastfeeding.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/economia , Licença Parental/economia , Mulheres Trabalhadoras , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Gana , Humanos , México , Modelos Econométricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
5.
Adv Nutr ; 10(6): 931-943, 2019 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147672

RESUMO

The WHO recommends exclusive breastfeeding of infants for the first 6 mo of life (EBF-6). We reviewed the evidence behind concerns related to this recommendation. The risk of iron deficiency among EBF-6 infants can be significantly reduced if delayed cord clamping is performed in all newborns. At the moment there is no population-level evidence indicating that exclusive breastfeeding for 6 mo compared with <6 mo increases the risk of developing food allergies. Mild to moderate maternal undernutrition may reduce amounts of some nutrients in breast milk but does not directly diminish milk volume. Persistent reports of insufficient milk by women globally are likely to be the result of lack of access to timely lactation counseling and social support rather than primary biological reasons. All newborns should have their growth, hydration status, and development carefully monitored. In instances where formula supplementation is required, it should be done under the guidance of a qualified provider taking into account that early introduction of breast-milk supplements is a risk factor for early termination of exclusive breastfeeding and any breastfeeding. We found no evidence to support changes to the EBF-6 public health recommendation, although variability in inter-infant developmental readiness is recognized. We suggest that infant and young feeding guidelines make clear that complementary foods should be introduced at around 6 mo of age, taking infant developmental readiness into account.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente , Política Nutricional , Fatores Etários , Anemia Ferropriva/prevenção & controle , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Lactação , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição Materna , Leite Humano/química , Estado Nutricional , Valor Nutritivo , Fatores de Risco , Organização Mundial da Saúde
6.
Food Nutr Bull ; 40(2): 171-181, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31035773

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Investing in maternity protection for working women is an important social equity mechanism. Addressing the maternity leave needs of women employed in the informal sector economy should be a priority as more than half of women in Latin America, South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa are employed in this sector. OBJECTIVE: To develop a costing methodology framework to assess the financial feasibility, at the national level, of implementing a maternity cash transfer for informally employed women. METHODS: A World Bank costing methodology was adapted for estimating the financial need to establish a maternity cash transfer benefit. The methodology estimates the cash transfer's unitary cost, the incremental coverage of the policy in terms of time, the weighted population to be covered, and the administrative costs. The 6-step methodology uses employment and sociodemographic data that are available in many countries through employment and demographic surveys and the population census. The methodology was tested with data for Mexico assuming different cash transfer unitary costs and the benefit's time coverage. RESULTS: The methodological framework estimated that the annual financial needs of setting up a maternity cash transfer for informally working women in Mexico ranges between US$87 million and US$280 million. CONCLUSIONS: A pragmatic methodology for assessing the costs of maternity cash transfer for informally employed women was developed. In the case of Mexico, the maternity cash transfer for women in the informal sector is financially feasible.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Apoio Financeiro , Modelos Econômicos , Licença Parental/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Emprego , Feminino , Humanos , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
7.
Adv Nutr ; 10(4): 728-729, 2019 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31046095
8.
Adv Nutr ; 9(5): 572-580, 2018 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30060074

RESUMO

Breastfeeding is one of the most feasible and cost-effective maternal-child health interventions. Currently, global investments needed to achieve the WHO global nutrition target for exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) do not meet the recommended standards for economic investment and implementation of policies supporting mothers to breastfeed. Estimating implementation costs of high-quality, high-impact programs based on each country's enabling environment and specific context is essential for developing and prioritizing recommendations that can drive the successful scaling-up of breastfeeding programs globally. We provide a detailed comparison (strengths, limitations, and gaps) of the 2 most recent global cost analysis frameworks used to estimate financial needs for scaling-up breastfeeding interventions from World Breastfeeding Costing Initiative (WBCi) and the World Bank. Our comparison found that the World Bank presents the more advanced costing methodology for scaling-up breastfeeding programs. However, there is a need to adapt and improve this costing framework to guide individual countries based on key contextual factors that consider the complexity of health systems.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Saúde Global/economia , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/economia , Promoção da Saúde/economia , Política Nutricional/economia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Mães , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...