Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 67(1): 76-85, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36263897

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have an increased risk of thromboembolic complications. We describe the occurrence of thromboembolic and bleeding events in all ICU patients with COVID-19 in Denmark during the first and second waves of the pandemic. METHODS: This was a sub-study of the Danish Intensive Care Covid database, in which all patients with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to Danish ICUs from 10th March 2020 to 30th June 2021 were included. We registered coagulation variables at admission, and all thromboembolic and bleeding events, and the use of heparins during ICU stay. Variables associated with thrombosis and bleeding and any association with 90-day mortality were estimated using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 1369 patients in this sub-study; 158 (12%, 95% confidence interval 10-13) had a thromboembolic event in ICU and 309 (23%, 20-25) had a bleeding event, among whom 81 patients (6%, 4.8-7.3) had major bleeding. We found that mechanical ventilation and increased D-dimer were associated with thrombosis and mechanical ventilation, low platelet count and presence of haematological malignancy were associated with bleeding. Most patients (76%) received increased doses of thromboprophylaxis during their ICU stay. Thromboembolic events were not associated with mortality in adjusted analysis (hazard ratio 1.35 [0.91-2.01, p = .14], whereas bleeding events were 1.55 [1.18-2.05, p = .002]). CONCLUSIONS: Both thromboembolic and bleeding events frequently occurred in ICU patients with COVID-19. Based on these data, it is not apparent that increased doses of thromboprophylaxis were beneficial.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Trombose , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Cuidados Críticos , Hemorragia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 65(1): 68-75, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32929715

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most data on intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19 originate in selected populations from stressed healthcare systems with shorter term follow-up. We present characteristics, interventions and longer term outcomes of the entire, unselected cohort of all ICU patients with COVID-19 in Denmark where the ICU capacity was not exceeded. METHODS: We identified all patients with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to any Danish ICU from 10 March to 19 May 2020 and registered demographics, chronic comorbidities, use of organ support, length of stay, and vital status from patient files. Risk factors for death were analyzed using adjusted Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 323 ICU patients with confirmed COVID-19. Median age was 68 years, 74% were men, 50% had hypertension, 21% diabetes, and 20% chronic pulmonary disease; 29% had no chronic comorbidity. Invasive mechanical ventilation was used in 82%, vasopressors in 83%, renal replacement therapy in 26%, and extra corporeal membrane oxygenation in 8%. ICU stay was median 13 days (IQR 6-22) and hospital stay 19 days (11-30). Median follow-up was 79 days. At end of follow-up, 118 had died (37%), 15 (4%) were still in hospital hereof 4 in ICU as of 16 June 2020. Risk factors for mortality included male gender, age, chronic pulmonary disease, active cancer, and number of co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide, population-based cohort of ICU patients with COVID-19, longer term survival was high despite high age and substantial use of organ support. Male gender, age, and chronic co-morbidities, in particular chronic pulmonary disease, were associated with increased risk of death.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Idoso , COVID-19/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Revisão Concomitante , Demografia , Dinamarca , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Sinais Vitais
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 358, 2019 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31035964

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis is a deep infection of the fascia and subcutaneous tissue with a high mortality rate. Meningitis is an infection of the membranes surrounding the brain with a likewise high mortality rate. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most frequent cause of bacterial meningitis and it is an extremely rare cause of necrotizing fasciitis. Different subcapsular serotypes of S. pneumoniae are known to have diverse virulence. The serotype 9 N is associated with a high risk of death. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a previously healthy 68-year-old female who presented at our clinic with complaints of pain in her left calf since having experienced a very painful leg cramp 3 weeks prior. Within a few hours after admission, she developed fever, neck stiffness and an altered mental state. Concurrently, the pain in her leg worsened. Upon further examination it was found that she suffered from both meningitis and necrotizing fasciitis due to S. pneumoniae, serotype 9 N. The patient survived and avoided leg amputation. CONCLUSIONS: The patient suffered from two very lethal infections simultaneously. Both of them were caused by S. pneumoniae. We believe that her favorable outcome was, a result of prompt surgical intervention and appropriate antibiotic treatment. Our case underlines the importance of continuous reevaluation of the symptoms and clinical findings in patients with unclear causes of severe illness, especially if the patient's condition changes.


Assuntos
Fasciite Necrosante/diagnóstico , Meningite/diagnóstico , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética , Idoso , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , DNA Bacteriano/metabolismo , Fasciite Necrosante/microbiologia , Fasciite Necrosante/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Meningite/tratamento farmacológico , Meningite/microbiologia , Sorogrupo , Transplante de Pele , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação
4.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 51(1): 121-8, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26153059

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In patients with perforated peptic ulcer, surgical delay has recently been shown to be a critical determinant of survival. The aim of the present population-based cohort study was to evaluate the association between surgical delay by hour and mortality in high-risk patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery in general. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All in-patients aged ≥ 18 years having emergency abdominal laparotomy or laparoscopy performed within 48 h of admission between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010 in 13 Danish hospitals were included. Baseline and clinical data, including surgical delay and 90-day mortality were collected. The crude and adjusted association between surgical delay by hour and 90-day mortality was assessed by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2803 patients were included. Median age (interquartile range [IQR]) was 66 (51-78) years, and 515 patients (18.4%) died within 90 days of surgery. Over the first 24 h after hospital admission, each hour of surgical delay beyond hospital admission was associated with a median (IQR) decrease in 90-day survival of 2.2% (1.9-3.3%). No statistically significant association between surgical delay by hour and 90-day mortality was shown; crude and adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval 1.016 (1.004-1.027) and 1.003 (0.989-1.017), respectively. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the primary finding. CONCLUSIONS: In the present population-based cohort study of high-risk patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery, no statistically significant adjusted association between mortality and surgical delay was found. Additional research in diagnosis-specific subgroups of high-risk patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery is warranted.


Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparotomia/métodos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 47(1): 28-35, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22126610

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the ability of four clinical prediction rules to predict adverse outcome in perforated peptic ulcer (PPU): the Boey score, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, and the sepsis score. DESIGN: an observational multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: a total of 117 patients surgically treated for PPU between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2009 in seven gastrointestinal departments in Denmark were included. Pregnant and breastfeeding women, non-surgically treated patients, patients with malignant ulcers, and patients with perforation of other organs were excluded. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: 30-day mortality rate. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: the ability of four clinical prediction rules to distinguish survivors from non-survivors (discrimination ability) was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and adjusted relative risks. RESULTS: Median age (range) was 70 years (25-92 years), 51% of the patients were females, and 73% of the patients had at least one co-existing disease. The 30-day mortality proportion was 17% (20/117). The AUCs: the Boey score, 0.63; the sepsis score, 0.69; the ASA score, 0.73; and the APACHE II score, 0.76. Overall, the PPVs of all four prediction rules were low and the NPVs high. CONCLUSIONS: The Boey score, the ASA score, the APACHE II score, and the sepsis score predict mortality poorly in patients with PPU.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/mortalidade , APACHE , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/cirurgia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...