RESUMO
This commentary describes the functioning of the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) from 1978 through 2011, when the Oregon Legislature altered the authority of the PSRB in regard to certain hospitalized insanity acquittees. Following the Hinckley verdict, the American Psychiatric Association recognized the PSRB as a possible future model for the management and treatment of insanity acquittees. The commentary provides an overview of the board from administrative and empirical viewpoints over this 34-year period and discusses the changes made in PSRB statutes in 2012 and the implication of these changes for the future management of insanity acquittees in Oregon.
Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos , Internação Compulsória de Doente Mental/legislação & jurisprudência , Crime , Psiquiatria Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Oregon , Transtornos PsicóticosRESUMO
In 2005, the Oregon Legislature passed a bill modifying the existing Psychiatric Security Review Board (PRSB) statute, creating a juvenile panel for management of juvenile insanity acquittees. Dubbed the Juvenile PSRB (JPSRB), it borrows heavily from the 30 years of experience of its adult predecessor. Statutory language was also modified to create a plea of "responsible except for insanity" for juveniles in Oregon. The authors discuss the similarities of the JPSRB to the adult PSRB system and highlight the differences that take into account the unique needs of juvenile defendants. They go on to discuss potential problems foreseen with implementation of the JPSRB system and to recommend possible solutions.