Needling and open filtering bleb revision after XEN-45 implantation-a retrospective outcome comparison.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and safety of needling and open bleb revision after XEN-45 surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study represents real-life data of patients who underwent XEN-45 surgery between November 2014 and June 2018 in the Vienna General Hospital. The following groups were formed for data evaluation: (PSEA) primary surgery secondary intervention allowed (n = 268); (PS) primary surgery until secondary intervention (n = 268); (N) first needling until additional secondary intervention (n = 55); (BR) first bleb revision until additional secondary intervention (n = 105). Main outcome measures were pre- and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medication (GM), Kaplan-Meier success rates, and secondary intervention rates. Success was defined as postoperative IOP < 21 mmHg and < 18 mmHg together with ≥ 20% IOP reduction with medication allowed. RESULTS: IOP (and GM) was lowered from 23.5 ± 8.0 (GM 3.1 ± 1.0) to 14.9 ± 8.2 mmHg (1.2 ± 1.4) in group PSEA and 18.1 ± 8.2 mmHg (1.5 ± 1.4) in group PS, in group N from 23.2 ± 10.1 (1.5 ± 1.0) to 19.3 ± 8.5 mmHg (2.2 ± 1.3) and in group BR from 22.0 ± 8.0 mmHg (2.5 ± 1.1) to 15.5 ± 6.4 mmHg (1.3 ± 1.5) after a median follow-up of 16.0, 8.4, 4.8, and 7.3 months, respectively. Success rates at 1 year were significantly higher in group BR (50.7%) compared to PS (37.7%, p = 0.019) and N (24.3%; p = 0.015). An additional intervention was required less frequently in group BR (17.1%) compared to group PS (49.6%, p < 0.001) and group N (54.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data appear to indicate favorable outcomes for open XEN bleb revision in terms of Kaplan-Meier success rates and secondary intervention rate compared to the needling procedure.

Heparin-coated versus uncoated extracorporeal circuit in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of heparin-coated circuits on bleeding, transfusion, and platelet count in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting with full heparinization. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) without previous sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received either a heparin-coated or an uncoated extracorporeal circuit for CPB. Heparin, 300 micro/kg, was administered, and supplemental amounts were administered to maintain an activated coagulation time of greater than 480 seconds. Platelet counts were determined during CPB. Mediastinal chest tube drainage was collected in the intensive care unit for 24 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean platelet counts were similar between the groups during CPB. There was no significant difference in 24-hour mediastinal chest tube drainage (mean +/- standard deviation; median) between the heparin-coated (n = 44, 1096 +/- 401, 1015 mL) and uncoated group (n = 44, 1150 +/- 548, 1040 mL; p = 0.91). The heparin-coated group received less allogeneic packed red blood cells (0.9 +/- 1.6, 0.0 v 1.5 +/- 1.8, 1.0 U; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a heparin-coated or uncoated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and full heparinization marginally reduced only red blood cell transfusion but was not associated with platelet sparing or reduced perioperative bleeding.