The Impact of COVID-19 on Plastic Surgery Training in the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background Surgical trainees worldwide have been thrust into a period of uncertainty, with respect to the implications COVID-19 pandemic will have on their roles, training, and future career prospects. It is currently unclear how plastic surgery trainees are being affected by COVID-19. This study examined the experience of plastic surgery trainees in Canada, the UK, and Australia to determine trainee roles during the early COVID-19 emergency response and how training changed during this time. Methods A cross-sectional survey-based study was designed for plastic surgery trainees in the UK, Canada and Australia. In total, 110 trainees responded to the survey. Statistical tests were conducted to determine differences in responses, based on year of training and country of residence. Results In total, 9.7% (10/103) of respondents reported being deployed to cover another service. There was a significant difference between redeployment based on country ( p = 0.001). Within the UK group, 28.9% of respondents were redeployed. For trainees not deployed, 95.5% (85/89) reported that there has been a reduction in operative volume. Ninety-seven (94.1%) respondents reported that there were ongoing teaching activities offered by their program. The majority of trainees (66.4%) were concerned about their training. There was a significant difference between overall concern and country ( p < 0.05). Conclusion In these unprecedented times, training programs in plastic surgery should be aware of the major impact that COVID-19 has had on trainees and will have on their training. The majority of plastic surgery trainees have experienced a reduction in surgical exposure but have maintained some form of regular teaching.

The Utility and Efficiency of a Resident Hand Clinic for the Management of Acute Hand Trauma at the University of Alberta.

BACKGROUND: The University of Alberta established a resident-run hand clinic in 2005 to expeditiously manage the growing numbers of patients with traumatic hand injuries. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical volume and types of cases assessed and treated in the clinic, as well as gauge patient satisfaction with care received. METHODS: A retrospective chart review and patient satisfaction questionnaire were conducted for patients assessed in the hand clinic in 2015. Demographic data, referral data, and treatment required were recorded. Patients were asked to complete a survey on their experience at the end of their visit. RESULTS: A total of 1022 charts were reviewed. The most common reason for referral was a fracture or dislocation (57%), followed by tendon injury (18%). The average wait time to be seen in clinic was 2.97 ± 2.13 days in the winter and 4.12 ± 2.14 days in the summer. Forty-seven percent of patients required splinting, 17% required a procedure, and 21% of patients were referred for surgery. Patient satisfaction on average was 9.29 ± 0.87 on a satisfaction scale of 10. CONCLUSION: In a 6-month period, residents attending hand clinic assessed and treated 1022 patients, providing timely management of acute injuries. A resident-run hand clinic is an effective model to decrease wait times for patients, to decrease time spent assessing nonemergent injuries in the emergency department, and to concentrate hand trauma in a setting conducive to resident training, while still maintaining high patient satisfaction.

HISTORIQUE: En 2005, l'université de l'Alberta a mis sur pied une clinique de la main dirigée par des résidents pour accélérer la prise en charge du nombre croissant de patients ayant des lésions traumatiques des mains. La présente étude visait à examiner le volume clinique et le type de cas évalués et traités en clinique, ainsi qu'à évaluer la satisfaction des patients à l'égard des soins reçus. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont procédé à une analyse rétrospective des dossiers et ont distribué un questionnaire sur la satisfaction des patients qui avaient été évalués dans la clinique de la main en 2015. Ils ont consigné les données démographiques, les données sur l'envoi vers un médecin et le traitement requis. Les patients ont été invités à remplir un sondage sur leur expérience à la fin de leur rendez-vous. RÉSULTATS: Au total, les chercheurs ont examiné 1 022 dossiers. La principale raison de l'orientation vers un médecin était une fracture ou une dislocation (57 %), suivie d'une lésion du tendon (18 %). Le temps d'attente moyen pour être vu en clinique était de 2,97 ± 2,13 jours pendant l'hiver et de 4,12 ± 2,14 jours pendant l'été. De plus, 47 % des patients ont eu besoin d'une attelle, 17 % ont eu besoin d'une intervention et 21 % des patients ont été envoyés en chirurgie. En moyenne, la satisfaction des patients était de 9,29 ± 0,87 sur une échelle de satisfaction de 10. CONCLUSION: Sur une période de six mois, les résidents qui ont travaillé à la clinique de la main ont évalué et traité 1 022 patients, assurant une prise en charge rapide des lésions aiguës. Une clinique de la main dirigée par des résidents est un modèle efficace pour réduire les temps d'attente pour les patients, réduire le temps passé à évaluer des blessures non urgentes à l'urgence et concentrer les traumatismes de la main dans un milieu favorable à la formation des résidents tout en assurant une satisfaction élevée des patients.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Osseointegrated Orbital Prosthetic Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Osseointegrated implants have been used for craniofacial prosthetic reconstruction since 1979. The authors sought to review long-term outcomes of osseointegrated orbital reconstruction at the Institute for Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine (iRSM). METHODS: Twenty-six patients have undergone osseointegrated orbital prosthetic (OOP) reconstruction at iRSM since 1991. A retrospective chart review was performed and patient satisfaction assessed through a questionnaire used in previous osseointegration studies. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between smoking, age, sex, and previous radiation treatment with the occurrence of skin reactions and implant failures. A χ test was used to assess the relationship between implant position within the orbit and development of a skin reaction or implant failure. RESULTS: Patients received an average of 5.8 implants during the course of treatment. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 24 years (mean = 10.6 years). A statistically significant correlation was found between skin reaction and age (P = 0.022), with younger patients more likely to develop a reaction. No variables in our model were significant for predicting implant failure. Overall, there were 39 failures of 155 osseointegrated implants, for a success rate of 74.8%. There was no relationship between skin reaction and implant failure compared to implant position within the orbit. Survey responses were received from 11 of 19 patients (58% response rate). Ninety-one percent of patients were overall satisfied with their prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: There are minimal contraindications for consideration of OOP reconstruction. Patients find their prosthesis comfortable, report increased self-confidence, and are happy to have undergone reconstruction.

Why do surgeons teach? A qualitative analysis of motivation in excellent surgical educators.

INTRODUCTION: Given that teaching is so vital to the maintenance of the medical profession, it is surprising that few authors have examined the factors which motivate physicians and surgeons to engage in this activity. AIM: It was the aim of this study to examine the factors which motivate excellent surgical educators to teach. METHODOLOGY: Grounded theory methodology was used to analyze transcribed semi-structured interviews. The top 20 ranked surgical educators at the University of Alberta were invited to participate. In total, 15 surgeons of various specialties were interviewed. RESULTS: There were five main factors which motivate surgeons to teach. These were: (1) a sense of responsibility to teach future physicians (2) an intrinsic enjoyment of teaching (3) the need to maintain and expand one's own knowledge base (4) watching students develop into competent practicing physicians and playing a role in their success, and (5) fostering positive lifelong professional relationships with learners. DISCUSSION: This is the first study in surgery to use an explorative qualitative methodology. This framework of motivating factors can be used to guide professional development activities. The framework represents motivating factors for those known to be effective teachers only. We plan to use this information to engage more surgeons in teaching by providing a basis for promoting education as part of a busy surgical practice.