Difelikefalin in Black/African American Hemodialysis Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Pruritus: Post hoc Analysis of KALM-1 and KALM-2.

INTRODUCTION: Black and African American (AA) people are over-represented in the kidney failure population; therefore, the safety and efficacy of difelikefalin in Black/AA patients was evaluated. METHODS: This was a post hoc, pooled exploratory subgroup analysis of the Phase 3 KALM-1 and -2 studies. Patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) who had moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) at enrollment were stratified into self-reported Black/AA or White subgroups. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous (IV) difelikefalin 0.5 µg/kg or placebo for 12 weeks. Difelikefalin efficacy was assessed with validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires: 24-h Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS), 5-D itch, and Skindex­10. RESULTS: There were 249 (29.3%) patients from the KALM studies that self-identified as Black/AA (n = 135 difelikefalin; n = 114 placebo). Clinically meaningful (≥3-point) reduction in WI-NRS score was achieved by 47.9% of Black/AA patients with difelikefalin versus 24.6% with placebo (p < 0.001). More Black/AA patients achieved a ≥5-point 5-D itch total improvement (54.9% vs. 35.7%; p = 0.013) and a ≥15-point Skindex-10 score improvement with difelikefalin versus placebo (49.0% vs. 28.9%; p = 0.006) compared with White patients. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was higher for Black/AA patients (difelikefalin: 78.5%; placebo: 70.8%) versus White patients (difelikefalin: 64.8%; placebo: 61.8%). CONCLUSION: In this post hoc analysis, difelikefalin was efficacious in the Black/AA population and had an acceptable safety profile.

Maintaining Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Treatment with Patiromer in Hyperkalaemic Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Comparison of a Propensity-Matched Real-World Population with AMETHYST-DN.

INTRODUCTION: Guideline-directed renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy is rarely achieved in clinical settings, often due to hyperkalaemia. We assessed the potassium binder, patiromer, on continuation of RAASi therapy in hyperkalaemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the AMETHYST-DN trial, propensity score-matched to a real-world cohort not receiving patiromer (Salford Kidney Study). METHODS: The phase 2, open-label AMETHYST-DN trial (NCT01371747) randomized 304 adults with CKD on RAASi, T2DM, hyperkalaemia (serum potassium [sK+] >5.0 mEq/L), and hypertension to receive patiromer, 8.4-33.6 g/day for 12 months. Patients underwent propensity score matching for systolic blood pressure (BP), heart failure status, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with 321 patients with CKD, T2DM, hyperkalaemia, and on RAASi from a prospective CKD cohort (Salford Kidney Study). Changes in RAASi utilization, sK+, BP, proteinuria, and eGFR during 12-month follow-up were assessed by Mann-Whitney U or χ2 tests. RESULTS: Matching produced 135:135 patients with no significant differences in age, sex, systolic BP, sK+, eGFR, or heart failure status, although differences in diastolic BP remained (p < 0.001). After 12 months, 100% of AMETHYST-DN patients receiving patiromer remained on RAASi therapy, whereas 38.5% of the Salford Kidney Cohort discontinued RAASi (p < 0.001); hyperkalaemia contributed in 16% of patients (42% of RAASi discontinuations). Significantly greater reductions in sK+ and BP, but not proteinuria or eGFR, were observed in AMETHYST-DN, compared with Salford Kidney Study patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the benefit of patiromer for sK+ management to enable RAASi use while revealing beneficial effects on BP.

Patiromer utility as an adjunct treatment in patients needing urgent hyperkalaemia management (PLATINUM): design of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalaemia is common, life-threatening and often requires emergency department (ED) management; however, no standardised ED treatment protocol exists. Common treatments transiently reducing serum potassium (K+) (including albuterol, glucose and insulin) may cause hypoglycaemia. We outline the design and rationale of the Patiromer Utility as an Adjunct Treatment in Patients Needing Urgent Hyperkalaemia Management (PLATINUM) study, which will be the largest ED randomised controlled hyperkalaemia trial ever performed, enabling assessment of a standardised approach to hyperkalaemia management, as well as establishing a new evaluation parameter (net clinical benefit) for acute hyperkalaemia treatment investigations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PLATINUM is a Phase 4, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants who present to the ED at approximately 30 US sites. Approximately 300 adult participants with hyperkalaemia (K+ ≥5.8 mEq/L) will be enrolled. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive glucose (25 g intravenously <15 min before insulin), insulin (5 units intravenous bolus) and aerosolised albuterol (10 mg over 30 min), followed by a single oral dose of either 25.2 g patiromer or placebo, with a second dose of patiromer (8.4 g) or placebo after 24 hours. The primary endpoint is net clinical benefit, defined as the mean change in the number of additional interventions less the mean change in serum K+, at hour 6. Secondary endpoints are net clinical benefit at hour 4, proportion of participants without additional K+-related medical interventions, number of additional K+-related interventions and proportion of participants with sustained K+ reduction (K+ ≤5.5 mEq/L). Safety endpoints are the incidence of adverse events, and severity of changes in serum K+ and magnesium. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A central Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Ethics Committee provided protocol approval (#20201569), with subsequent approval by local IRBs at each site, and participants will provide written consent. Primary results will be published in peer-reviewed manuscripts promptly following study completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04443608.

Patiromer Treatment in Patients With CKD, Hyperkalemia, and Hyperphosphatemia: A Post Hoc Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), hyperkalemia (serum potassium [sK+]>5.0 mEq/L), and hyperphosphatemia experience poor clinical outcomes. Patiromer, a potassium binder that uses calcium as the exchange ion, may also reduce serum phosphorus (sP). We characterized the effect of patiromer on sP in patients with CKD, hyperkalemia, and hyperphosphatemia. STUDY DESIGN: A post hoc pooled analysis of individual-level data from the AMETHYST-DN, OPAL-HK, and TOURMALINE trials of patiromer. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients with CKD and hyperkalemia. EXPOSURE: Patients treated with patiromer (8.4-33.6 g/day). OUTCOME: Mean changes from baseline in sP, sK+, serum calcium (sCa2+), and serum magnesium (sMg2+) after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive statistics to summarize pooled data on the study outcomes from the 3 studies. RESULTS: We included 578 patients in the analysis. Of these participants, 86 patients (14.9%) had baseline hyperphosphatemia of whom 75.6% (65 of 86) had CKD stage 4/5 and 31.1% (153 of 492) with sP≤4.5mg/dL had CKD stage 4/5. Among the patients with elevated sP and sK+at baseline, the mean±SD reduction in sP and sK+after 4 weeks of patiromer treatment was-0.62±1.09mg/dL and-0.71± 0.51 mEq/L, respectively. Additionally, the mean±SD reduction in sMg2+in these patients was -0.25±0.23mg/dL while sCa2+remained unchanged. Both sMg2+and sCa2+remained within the normal range. Patiromer was generally well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were considered related to patiromer. LIMITATIONS: These were post hoc analyses, no placebo comparison was performed due to the design of the original studies, and the follow-up period was limited to 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in sP and sK+to the normal range were observed after 2 weeks of patiromer treatment, and the reduction was sustained during 4 weeks of treatment among patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD, hyperkalemia, and hyperphosphatemia. Future controlled trials are needed to establish if patiromer is useful to reduce both sK+and sP in hyperkalemic patients with CKD and hyperphosphatemia.

Patiromer and Spironolactone in Resistant Hypertension and Advanced CKD: Analysis of the Randomized AMBER Trial.

Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists reduce mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and have become a standard of care in those with resistant hypertension (rHTN). Yet, their use is limited among patients with CKD, primarily due to hyperkalemia. Methods: AMBER was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study that reported that the use of the potassium-binding drug patiromer allowed a more persistent use of spironolactone in patients with CKD and rHTN. In this report, we compare the safety and efficacy of patiromer in advanced CKD as a prespecified analysis. Results: Of the 295 patients randomized, 66 fell into the eGFR 25 to <30 subgroup. In this subgroup, persistent use of spironolactone was seen in 19 of 34 (56%) in the placebo group and 27 of 32 (84%) in the patiromer group (absolute difference 29%; P<0.02). In the eGFR 30-45 subgroup, persistent use of spironolactone was seen in 79 of 114 (69%) in the placebo group and 99 of 115 (86%) in the patiromer group (absolute difference 17%; P=0.003). There was no significant interaction between eGFR subgroups (P=0.46). Systolic BP reduction with spironolactone in the eGFR 25 to <30 subgroup was 6-7 mm Hg; in the eGFR 30-45 subgroup, it was 12-13 mm Hg. There was no significant interaction between eGFR subgroups on BP reduction (P=0.79). Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events (59% in the eGFR 25 to <30 subgroup; 53% in the eGFR 30-45 subgroup). Conclusions: Patiromer facilitates the use of spironolactone among patients with rHTN, and its efficacy and safety are comparable in those with eGFR 25 to <30 and 30-45 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03071263.