Quantification of static magnetic field effects on radiotherapy ionization chambers.

Integrated magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radiotherapy (RT) delivery machines are currently being developed, with some already in clinical use. It is anticipated that the strong magnetic field used in some MR-RT designs will have a significant impact on routine measurements of dose in the MR-linac performed using ionization chambers, which provide traceability back to a primary standard definition of dose. In particular, the presence of small air gaps around ionization chambers may introduce unacceptably high uncertainty into these measurements. In this study, we investigate and quantify the variation attributable to air gaps for several routinely-used cylindrical ionization chambers in a magnetic field, as well as the effect of the magnetic field alone on the response of the chambers. The measurements were performed in a Co-60 beam, while the ionization chambers were positioned in custom-made Perspex phantoms between the poles of an electromagnet, which was capable of generating magnetic fields of up to 2 T field strength, although measurements were focused around 1.5 T. When an asymmetric air gap was rotated at cardinal angles around the ionization chambers investigated here, variation of up to 8.5 ± 0.2 percentage points (PTW 31006 chamber) was observed in an applied magnetic field of 1.5 T. The minimum peak-to-peak variation was 1.1 ± 0.1% (Exradin A1SL). When the same experiment was performed with a well-defined air gap of known position using the PTW 30013 chamber, a variation of 3.8 ± 0.2% was observed. When water was added to the phantom cavity to eliminate all air gaps, the variation for the PTW 30013 was reduced to 0.2 ± 0.01%.

Electron beam quality control using an amorphous silicon EPID.

An amorphous silicon EPID has been investigated to determine whether it is capable of quality control constancy measurements for linear accelerator electron beams. The EPID grayscale response was found to be extremely linear with dose over a wide dose range and, more specifically, for exposures of 95-100 MU. Small discrepancies of up to 0.8% in linearity were found at 6 MeV (8-15 MeV showed better agreement). The shape of the beam profile was found to be significantly altered by scatter in air over the approximately 60 cm gap between the end of the applicator and the EPID. Nevertheless, relative changes in EPID-measured profile flatness and symmetry were linearly related to changes in these parameters at 95 cm focus to surface distance (FSD) measured using a 2D diode array. Similar results were obtained at 90 degrees and 270 degrees gantry angles. Six months of daily images were acquired and analyzed to determine whether the device is suitable as a constancy checker. EPID output measurements agreed well with daily ion chamber measurements, with a 0.8% standard deviation in the difference between the two measurement sets. When compared to weekly parallel plate chamber measurements, this figure dropped to 0.5%. A Monte Carlo (MC) model of the EPID was created and demonstrated excellent agreement between MC-calculated profiles in water and the EPID at 95 and 157 cm FSD. Good agreement was also found with measured EPID profiles, demonstrating that the EPID provides an accurate measurement of electron profiles. The EPID was thus shown to be an effective method for performing electron beam daily constancy checks.

Analysis of the measurement precision of an amorphous silicon EPID used for MLC leaf position quality control and the long-term calibration stability of an optically controlled MLC.

Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been shown to be suitable for multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf positioning quality control (QC). In our centre, a continuous dataset is available of 2 years of film measurements followed by 3 years of EPID measurements on five MLC-equipped linear accelerators of identical head design. The aim of this work was to analyse this unique dataset in order to determine the relative precision of film and EPID for MLC leaf positioning measurements and to determine the long-term stability of the MLC calibration. The QC dataset was examined and periods without MLC adjustments that contained at least four successive collimator position measurements (a minimum of 6 months) were identified. By calculating the standard deviations (SD) of these results, the reproducibility of the measurements can be determined. Comparison of the film and EPID results enables their relative measurement precision to be assessed; on average film gave an SD of 0.52 mm compared to 0.13 mm for EPIDs. The MLC and conventional collimator results were compared to assess MLC calibration stability; on average, for EPID measurements, the MLC gave an SD of 0.12 mm compared to 0.14 mm for a conventional collimator. The long-term relative individual leaf positions were compared and found to vary between 0.07 and 0.15 mm implying that they are stable over long time periods. These results suggest that the calibration of an optically controlled MLC is inherently very stable between disturbances to the optical system which normally occur on service days.

Use of an amorphous silicon EPID for measuring MLC calibration at varying gantry angle.

Amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) are used to perform routine quality control (QC) checks on the multileaf collimators (MLCs) at this centre. Presently, these checks are performed at gantry angle 0 degrees and are considered to be valid for all other angles. Since therapeutic procedures regularly require the delivery of MLC-defined fields to the patient at a wide range of gantry angles, the accuracy of the QC checks at other gantry angles has been investigated. When the gantry is rotated to angles other than 0 degrees it was found that the apparent pixel size measured using the EPID varies up to a maximum value of 0.0015 mm per pixel due to a sag in the EPID of up to 9.2 mm. A correction factor was determined using two independent methods at a range of gantry angles between 0 degrees and 360 degrees . The EPID was used to measure field sizes (defined by both x-jaws and MLC) at a range of gantry angles and, after this correction had been applied, any residual gravitational sag was studied. It was found that, when fields are defined by the x-jaws and y-back-up jaws, no errors of greater than 0.5 mm were measured and that these errors were no worse when the MLC was used. It was therefore concluded that, provided the correction is applied, measurements of the field size are, in practical terms, unaffected by gantry angle. Experiments were also performed to study how the reproducibility of individual leaves is affected by gantry angle. Measurements of the relative position of each individual leaf (minor offsets) were performed at a range of gantry angles and repeated three times. The position reproducibility was defined by the RMS error in the position of each leaf and this was found to be 0.24 mm and 0.21 mm for the two leaf banks at a gantry angle of 0 degrees . When measurements were performed at a range of gantry angles, these reproducibility values remained within 0.09 mm and 0.11 mm. It was therefore concluded that the calibration of the Elekta MLC is stable at all gantry angles.

Daily monitoring of linear accelerator beam parameters using an amorphous silicon EPID.

An amorphous silicon EPID has been investigated to test its suitability as a daily check device for linac output and to provide daily monitoring of beam profile parameters such as flatness, symmetry, field size and wedge factor. Open and wedged 6 and 8 MV photon beams were collected on a daily basis for a period of just over a year and analysed in software to determine daily values of these parameters. Daily output results gave agreement between EPID measured dose and ion chamber measurements with a standard deviation of 0.65%. Step changes in flatness, symmetry and field size were readily detected by the EPID and could be correlated with adjustments made on service days and QC sessions. The results could also be used to assess the long term beam stability. Recalibration of the EPID required new baseline values of the parameters to be set. Wedge factors measured at one collimator angle proved stable but sensitive to changes in beam steering. The EPID proved to be a useful daily check device for linac output which can simultaneously be used for daily monitoring of beam profiles and field sizes.

Improving IMRT quality control efficiency using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imager.

An amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) has been investigated to determine its usefulness and efficiency for performing linear accelerator quality control checks specific to step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Several dosimetric parameters were measured using the EPID: dose linearity and segment to segment reproducibility of low dose segments, and delivery accuracy of fractions of monitor units. Results were compared to ion chamber measurements. Low dose beam flatness and symmetry were tested by overlaying low dose beam profiles onto the profile from a stable high-dose exposure and visually checking for differences. Beam flatness and symmetry were also calculated and plotted against dose. Start-up reproducibility was tested by overlaying profiles from twenty successive two monitor unit segments. A method for checking the MLC leaf calibration was also tested, designed to be used on a daily or weekly basis, which consisted of summing the images from a series of matched fields. Daily images were coregistered with, then subtracted from, a reference image. A threshold image showing dose differences corresponding to > 0.5 mm positional errors was generated and the number of pixels with such dose differences used as numerical parameter to which a tolerance can be applied. The EPID was found to be a sensitive relative dosemeter, able to resolve dose differences of 0.01 cGy. However, at low absolute doses a reproducible dosimetric nonlinearity of up to 7% due to image lag/ghosting effects was measured. It was concluded that although the EPID is suitable to measure segment to segment reproducibility and fractional monitor unit delivery accuracy, it is still less useful than an ion chamber as a tool for dosimetric checks. The symmetry/flatness test proved to be an efficient method of checking low dose profiles, much faster than any of the alternative methods. The MLC test was found to be extremely sensitive to sudden changes in MLC calibration but works best with a composite reference image consisting of an average of five successive days' images. When used in this way it proved an effective and efficient daily check of MLC calibration. Overall, the amorphous silicon EPID was found to be a suitable device for IMRT QC although it is not recommended for dosimetric tests. Automatic procedures for low monitor unit profile analysis and MLC leaf positioning yield considerable time-savings over traditional film techniques.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning from limited anatomical information: is Sim-CT sufficient for planning women with breast cancer receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy?

AIMS: To investigate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for women with carcinoma of the breast, using a small number of Sim-CT slices, thus avoiding changing the patient's position and potential problems with CT capacity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten CT scans of women with breast cancer were obtained for use in the study. IMRT plans based on an open tangent pair and additional top-up segment fields were created using the full CT scan, and represented the gold standard treatment plan for comparison purposes. Five-slice CT simulator scans were artificially created by omitting intermediate slices from the full CT scans. Additionally, the intermediate CT slices were recreated via interpolation of the five slices using a standard interpolation algorithm. IMRT plans were created in the same way as for the full CT scans. To allow a suitable plan comparison to be made, the beam segments and monitor units were transferred to the full CT scans, and the dose distribution calculated. RESULTS: The interpolated five-slice plans showed no significant difference in the volume of tissue receiving dose outside the range 95-105%, compared with the IMRT plans created using the full CT data set (1.3 +/- 2.2%, P = 0.092). In contrast, the discrete slice CT simulator plans increased by 6.3 +/- 5.4%, P = 0.0054, showing a statistically significant difference in the dose distribution produced and a clinically inferior plan. CONCLUSIONS: Plans created using five discrete slice CT scans were inferior to full CT-derived IMRT treatment plans, and are therefore not acceptable for IMRT. However, interpolating five CT simulator slices provides adequate anatomical information to produce comparable IMRT plans to those created by full CT scans of the patient. This allows the introduction of IMRT for this patient group without the need to change treatment position to accommodate CT scanning.

Use of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for multileaf collimator quality control and calibration.

Multileaf collimator (MLC) calibration and quality control is a time-consuming procedure typically involving the processing, scanning and analysis of films to measure leaf and collimator positions. Faster and more reliable calibration procedures are required for these tasks, especially with the introduction of intensity modulated radiotherapy which requires more frequent checking and finer positional leaf tolerances than previously. A routine quality control (QC) technique to measure MLC leaf bank gain and offset, as well as minor offsets (individual leaf position relative to a reference leaf), using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) has been developed. The technique also tests the calibration of the primary and back-up collimators. A detailed comparison between film and EPID measurements has been performed for six linear accelerators (linacs) equipped with MLC and amorphous silicon EPIDs. Measurements of field size from 4 to 24 cm with the EPID were systematically smaller than film measurements over all field sizes by 0.4 mm for leaves/back-up collimators and by 0.2 mm for conventional collimators. This effect is due to the gain calibration correction applied by the EPID, resulting in a 'flattening' of primary beam profiles. Linac dependent systematic differences of up to 0.5 mm in individual leaf/collimator positions were also found between EPID and film measurements due to the difference between the mechanical and radiation axes of rotation. When corrections for these systematic differences were applied, the residual random differences between EPID and film were 0.23 mm and 0.26 mm (1 standard deviation) for field size and individual leaf/back-up collimator position, respectively. Measured gains (over a distance of 220 mm) always agreed within 0.4 mm with a standard deviation of 0.17 mm. Minor offset measurements gave a mean agreement between EPID and film of 0.01+/-0.10 mm (1 standard deviation) after correction for the tilt of the EPID and small rotational misalignments between leaf banks and the back-up collimators used as a reference straight edge. Reproducibility of EPID measurements was found to be very high, with a standard deviation of <0.05 mm for field size and <0.1 mm for individual leaf/collimator positions for a 10x10 cm2 field. A standard set of QC images (three field sizes defined both by leaves only and collimators only) can be acquired in less than 20 min and analysed in 5 min.

Quantitative analysis of patient-specific dosimetric IMRT verification.

Patient-specific dosimetric verification methods for IMRT treatments are variable, time-consuming and frequently qualitative, preventing evidence-based reduction in the amount of verification performed. This paper addresses some of these issues by applying a quantitative analysis parameter to the dosimetric verification procedure. Film measurements in different planes were acquired for a series of ten IMRT prostate patients, analysed using the quantitative parameter, and compared to determine the most suitable verification plane. Film and ion chamber verification results for 61 patients were analysed to determine long-term accuracy, reproducibility and stability of the planning and delivery system. The reproducibility of the measurement and analysis system was also studied. The results show that verification results are strongly dependent on the plane chosen, with the coronal plane particularly insensitive to delivery error. Unexpectedly, no correlation could be found between the levels of error in different verification planes. Longer term verification results showed consistent patterns which suggest that the amount of patient-specific verification can be safely reduced, provided proper caution is exercised: an evidence-based model for such reduction is proposed. It is concluded that dose/distance to agreement (e.g., 3%/3 mm) should be used as a criterion of acceptability. Quantitative parameters calculated for a given criterion of acceptability should be adopted in conjunction with displays that show where discrepancies occur. Planning and delivery systems which cannot meet the required standards of accuracy, reproducibility and stability to reduce verification will not be accepted by the radiotherapy community.

Improved delivery efficiency for step and shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy using a fast-tuning magnetron.

The delivery efficiency of step and shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been improved by the installation of fast-tuning magnetrons into three travelling wave linear accelerators. The IMRT delivery efficiency and the beam start-up performance have been compared before and after installation. Start-up and inter sub-field times were reduced by an average of 3.0 s. A typical start-up time from depression of the start button to beam on is now around 4 s. Delivery efficiency for a variety of clinical and quality control prescriptions was improved by an average of 30.7% (range 7.4-60.9%), depending on a complex combination of the number of sub-fields, distance moved by leaves and dose rate. For the oldest accelerator (7 years old), dosimetric accuracy was significantly improved for low dose sub-fields. The dose output was within 2% for a 1 monitor unit (MU) sub-field and 1% for a 2 MU sub-field. The two newer accelerators displayed similar or better dose characteristics even before fast-tuning magnetron installation. Beam symmetries and flatnesses were acceptable at all energies and dose rates, and showed no obvious degradation in low dose sub-fields. It is recommended that fast-tuning magnetrons are adopted for accelerators of this design performing step and shoot IMRT.

Prediction of scattered dose to the testes in abdominopelvic radiotherapy.

Radical abdominal radiotherapy in men runs the risk of impairing their fertility owing to scattered dose to the testes, outside of the treated volume. In patients for whom this is a concern it is important to be able to predict the dose to the testes before treatment in order to determine whether semen cryopreservation should be undertaken and testicular shielding performed during treatment. Measurements have been made on an anthropomorphic phantom to determine the magnitude of these doses for a four-field treatment consisting of an anterior-posterior parallel pair and a lateral parallel pair. A dataset is presented, which, together with a correction for patients size, allows an estimate of testicular dose to be made given only the photon energy, interfield distances and the distance from the testes to the nearest beam edge. Thermoluminescent dosimetry has been carried out in 17 patients to validate the use of the data tables. The results indicate that testicular doses may be estimated with a standard deviation corresponding to 1%-2% of the tumour dose, which is sufficient for the purpose of determining whether fertility is threatened by a planned treatment.

Clinical implementation of dynamic multileaf collimation for compensated bladder treatments.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To describe the clinical implementation of dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC). Custom compensated four-field treatments of carcinoma of the bladder have been used as a simple test site for the introduction of intensity modulated radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Compensating intensity modulations are calculated from computed tomography (CT) data, accounting for scattered, as well as primary radiation. Modulations are converted to multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf and jaw settings for dynamic delivery on a linear accelerator. A full dose calculation is carried out, accounting for dynamic leaf and jaw motion and transmission through these components. Before treatment, a test run of the delivery is performed and an absolute dose measurement made in a water or solid water phantom. Treatments are verified by in vivo diode measurements and real-time electronic portal imaging. RESULTS: Seven patients have been treated using DMLC. The technique improves dose homogeneity within the target volume, reducing high dose areas and compensating for loss of scatter at the beam edge. A typical total treatment time is 20 min. CONCLUSIONS: Compensated bladder treatments have proven an effective test site for DMLC in an extremely busy clinic.

Leaf position verification during dynamic beam delivery: a comparison of three applications using electronic portal imaging.

The use of a dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) to deliver intensity-modulated beams presents a problem for conventional verification techniques. The use of electronic portal imaging to track MLC leaves during beam delivery has been shown to provide a solution to this problem. An experimental comparison of three different verification systems, each using a different electronic portal imaging technology, is presented. Two of the systems presented are commercially available imagers with in-house modifications, with the third system being an in-house built experimental system. The random and systematic errors present in each of the verifications systems are measured and presented, together with the study of the effects of varying dose rate and leaf speed on verification system performance. The performance of the three systems is demonstrated to be very similar, with an overall accuracy in comparing measured and prescribed collimator trajectories of approximately +/-1.0 mm. Systematic errors in the percentage delivered dose signal provided by the accelerator are significant and must be corrected for good performance of the current systems. It is demonstrated that, with suitable modifications, commercially available portal imaging systems can be used to verify dynamic MLC beam delivery.

Requirements for leaf position accuracy for dynamic multileaf collimation.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy can be achieved by driving the leaves of a multileaf collimator (MLC) across an x-ray therapy beam. Algorithms to generate the required leaf trajectories assume that the leaf positions are exactly known to the MLC controller. In practice, leaf positions depend upon calibration accuracy and stability and may vary within set tolerances. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of potential leaf position inaccuracies on intensity modulated beams. Equations are derived which quantify the absolute error in delivered monitor units given a known error in leaf position. The equations have been verified by ionization chamber measurements in dynamically delivered flat fields, comparing deliveries in which known displacements have been applied to the defined leaf positions with deliveries without displacements applied. The equations are then applied to two clinical intensity modulations: an inverse planned prostate field and a breast compensating field. It is shown that leaf position accuracy is more critical for a highly modulated low-dose intensity profile than a moderately modulated high-dose intensity profile. Suggestions are given regarding the implications for quality control of dynamic MLC treatments.

Verification of dynamic multileaf collimation using an electronic portal imaging device.

High standards of treatment verification are necessary where complex new delivery techniques, such as intensity modulated radiation therapy using dynamic multileaf collimation, are being developed. This paper describes the use of a fluoroscopic electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to provide real-time qualitative verification of leaf position during delivery of a dynamic MLC prescription in addition to off-line quantitative verification. A custom-built circuit triggers the EPID to capture a series of snap-shot images at equally spaced dose points during a dynamic MLC prescription. Real-time verification is achieved by overlaying a template of expected leaf positions onto the images as they are acquired. Quantitative off-line verification is achieved using a maximum gradient edge detection algorithm to measure individual leaf positions for comparison with required leaf positions. Investigations have been undertaken to optimize image acquisition and assess the edge detection algorithm for variations in machine dose rate, leaf velocity and beam attenuation. On-line verification enables the operator to monitor the progress of a dynamic delivery and has been used for independent confirmation of accurate dynamic delivery during intensity modulated treatments. Off-line verification allows measurement of leaf position with a precision of 1 mm although image acquisition times must be less than or equal to 140 ms to ensure coincidence of the maximum gradient in the image with the 50% dose level.

Temporal resolution requirements for intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered by multileaf collimators.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy may be delivered via dynamic control of a multileaf collimator by defining dynamic leaf trajectories at a series of control points which are spaced at arbitrary intervals throughout an exposure. Leaves move linearly between the positions defined at the control points and hence leaf motion is a linear approximation to the planned trajectories. When many control points are used, very complex modulations can be defined accurately. If too few are used, dose errors are introduced which depend on the complexity of the modulation and the number of control points chosen. Proposed intensity modulations, of varying complexity, have been converted to trajectory plans where the number of equally spaced control points varied between 11 and 99. In each case the fluence map generated by the resulting leaf motions was computed, and this was quantitatively compared with the desired modulation by calculating the root mean square (RMS) error. It is shown that in no case can the RMS error be significantly reduced by increasing the number of control points beyond 50. Guidelines are derived such that compensators and simple modulations may be very accurately delivered with about 20 control points, moderately complex modulations require 30-35 control points and very complex modulations 50 control points. A similar analysis of the step and shoot technique suggests that very accurate deliveries are always achieved with a maximum of 25 equally weighted static fields and reasonable accuracy with 15 fields.

Customised compensation using intensity modulated beams delivered by dynamic multileaf collimation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This paper describes the development of customised compensation by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), delivered by dynamic application of a multileaf collimator (MLC), in order to improve dose homogeneity in treatments of the pelvic region. The introduction of this simple IMRT procedure will help facilitate the clinical implementation of more complex 3D conformal therapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Computer software is used to generate profiles of the intensity modulated beams which are required to deliver a uniform dose in a plane, passing through the isocentre and normal to the beam axis, under an irregular surface contour. These profiles are then operated on by interpreter software which determines the leaf trajectories that are necessary to deliver these beam profiles using a single, unidirectional sweep of the MLC leaves. A full dose calculation based on the calculated leaf positions is subsequently performed, allowing further fine adjustments to the modulation where required. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The compensation procedure has been successfully tested using films placed under a test phantom. The effect of the compensation procedure on dose distributions in the transverse plane has been investigated using an anthropomorphic phantom. Overall dose homogeneity has been improved through the use of customised compensation delivered by dynamic multileaf collimation.

Rectangular edge synchronization for intensity modulated radiation therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation.

The implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy by dynamic multileaf collimator control involves the use of interpreter software which creates leaf trajectory plans for each leaf pair. Interpreter software for use with an Elekta SL15 linear accelerator and dedicated multileaf collimator has been written and tested. In practice the ideal trajectory plans often predict contact between leaves from opposing leaf banks, but this is prohibited by control software on the Elekta system as it could lead to mechanical damage. If the modulation within the geometric limits of a shaped field is not to be compromised then strategies to avoid leaf contact result in additional unwanted doses outside the geometric edge. The magnitude of any such additional dose can be reduced to acceptable levels by a technique which we have called rectangular edge synchronization. The performance of interpreter software which incorporates rectangular edge synchronization has been compared with that of potentially more efficient software which does not. The option containing the rectangular edge synchronization algorithm was shown to work consistently well at high monitor unit rates, and without incurring leaf contacts, under a wide range of test conditions. It therefore provides a sound basis for using intensity modulation to replace mechanical wedges, to simulate customized patient shape compensators, or to implement the results of inverse treatment planning processes that require superimposed intensity modulated beams.

Quality assurance of the dose delivered by small radiation segments.

The use of intensity modulation with multiple static fields has been suggested by many authors as a way to achieve highly conformal fields in radiotherapy. However, quality assurance of linear accelerators is generally done only for beam segments of 100 MU or higher, and by measuring beam profiles once the beam has stabilized. We propose a set of measurements to check the stability of dose delivery in small segments, and present measured data from three radiotherapy centres. The dose delivered per monitor unit, MU, was measured for various numbers of MU segments. The field flatness and symmetry were measured using either photographic films that are subsequently scanned by a densitometer, or by using a diode array. We performed the set of measurements at the three radiotherapy centres on a set of five different Philips SL accelerators with energies of 6 MV, 8 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV. The dose per monitor unit over the range of 1 to 100 MU was found to be accurate to within +/-5% of the nominal dose per monitor unit as defined for the delivery of 100 MU for all the energies. For four out of the five accelerators the dose per monitor unit over the same range was even found to be accurate to within +/-2%. The flatness and symmetry were in some cases found to be larger for small segments by a maximum of 9% of the flatness/symmetry for large segments. The result of this study provides the dosimetric evidence that the delivery of small segment doses as top-up fields for beam intensity modulation is feasible. However, it should be stressed that linear accelerators have different characteristics for the delivery of small segments, hence this type of measurement should be performed for each machine before the delivery of small dose segments is approved. In some cases it may be advisable to use a low pulse repetition frequency (PRF) to obtain more accurate dose delivery of small segments.