Development and preliminary experience with an ease of extractability rating system for prescription opioids.

One important factor in the abuse potential of an opioid product is the ease with which active drug can be extracted. There are currently no standards for testing or reporting extractability. This article describes the development of an Extractability Rating System for use by the pharmaceutical industry and regulators. Despite several limitations, this effort serves as a call for standardized testing and reporting so that products can be accurately rated, and should help establish goals for drug developers who wish to develop "abuse-resistant" opioid products.

Initial validation of a computer-administered Addiction Severity Index: the ASI-MV.

The Addiction Severity Index--Multimedia Version (ASI-MV) is a CD-ROM-based simulation of the interviewer-administered Addiction Severity Index (ASI). Clients in treatment (N = 202) self-administered the ASI-MV to examine the test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and convergent-discriminant validity of the ASI-MV. Excellent test-retest reliability was observed for composite scores and severity ratings. Criterion validity, tested against the interviewer-administered ASI, was good for the composite scores. For severity ratings, variable agreement was observed between the ASI-MV and each interviewer, suggesting poor interrater reliability among interviewers. This conclusion was bolstered by a finding of superior convergent-discriminant validity for both composite scores and severity ratings compared to the standard ASI. The ASI-MV is a viable alternative to the expensive and potentially unreliable interviewer-administered version.

Behavioral health care dot-com and beyond: computer-mediated communications in mental health and substance abuse treatment.

Computer-mediated communications (CMC) such as e-mail, websites, and CD-ROM and DVD programs, both on and off the Internet, will play an ever larger role in the future of behavioral health care. This address describes the current rapid expansion of CMC and some profound changes that are likely in the future. The reasons for using such CMC programs are addressed, and an example of a new multimedia version of the Addiction Severity Index is described. Issues and concerns about future uses of CMC are raised, as are possible implications for psychology.

Group psychotherapy and managed behavioral health care: current trends and future challenges.

The rising cost of health care within the private and public sectors has created an increased demand for the management of benefit dollars. This trend has significant implications for group psychotherapists, as group modalities offer cost-effective ways of delivering services to traditional outpatient and inpatient populations. Continued cost-containment pressures and increasing attention to outcome studies will fuel trends toward briefer, manualized group treatments and intensive group outpatient programs as alternatives to hospitalization. Quality-based demands will challenge payors to (a) address biases against group psychotherapy among providers and patients and (b) integrate recent process-and-outcome research in determining the appropriateness of group versus individual modalities for particular patients and presenting problems.

A model of time-effective group psychotherapy for patients with personality disorders: the clinical model.

This article describes a model of time-limited psychotherapy for patients with personality disorders that emphasizes the group as a social microcosm. The patient population described is relatively high functioning, although the majority of the group members meet DSM-III-R (American Psychiatric Association, 1987) criteria for an Axis II diagnosis. The clinical model's key theoretical concepts, for example, interpersonal focus; active therapist stance; emphasis on group interaction and processes; use of time limits; primary care/intermittent treatment philosophy; and emphasis on patients' strengths, goals, and resources are described. The relationships between the phases of group therapy and the key theoretical concepts are delineated.

Time-limited group psychotherapy for patients with personality disorders: outcomes and dropouts.

This study reports on the time-limited (18-month long) group therapy of 49 outpatients, most of whom were diagnosed with DSM-III-R, Axis II personality disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 1987). Although many patients did not complete the full course of treatment, those who did experienced many areas of change. Completers reported substantial changes in self-esteem, symptomatology, and diagnosability on Axis II. This type of group treatment appears to be a promising mode of intervention for those with personality disorders.

Therapist's experience, training, and skill in brief therapy: a bicoastal survey.

California and Massachusetts psychologists (N = 850, 58% response rate) returned a questionnaire to ascertain clinicians' brief-therapy experience, training, self-assessed skill, and attitude. Results indicate respondents spend a considerable portion (40%) of their clinical time doing brief therapy. A disturbing finding is that one-third of those presently doing brief therapy reported that they had received little or no training in brief-therapy theory or techniques. Self-rated skill in brief therapy was found to be best predicted by a combination of one's experience, training, and attitude. We conclude that, while the number of therapists using brief therapy has increased rapidly and apparently will continue to increase due to the expansion of managed health care, many psychologists do not have adequate training to use brief therapy successfully. Implications of this finding in terms of its potentially harmful effects and suggestions for future training are discussed.

Successful recruitment strategies for school-based health promotion: experiences from CATCH.

School-based research designs in the 1990s often require that a large number of schools be recruited to participate in studies. Therefore, effective recruitment and maintenance of schools becomes an important activity for ensuring the integrity of the study design. The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) is the largest school-based health promotion research project yet undertaken; 96 schools (24 per field site) were successfully recruited and retained for this cardiovascular disease risk reduction project. This article describes general recruitment strategies used at the four CATCH sites, a description of how Social Learning Theory guided these activities, a discussion of logistical considerations, and recommended recruitment strategies for future school-based research.

CATCH: challenges of conducting process evaluation in a multicenter trial.

This paper discusses the challenges faced when collecting process evaluation information in a school-based, multicenter field trial. Experiences from the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) are shared as a means of illustrating the challenges that are presented and ways of meeting the challenges. The scope and magnitude of the trial (96 schools across four sites) and the diverse population participating in the trial (including children and adults representing a cultural and socioeconomic mix) present challenges that are compounded by conducting research in a highly structured school setting. In such a trial, thoughtful consideration must be paid to what data should be collected, how data should be collected, how to collect data on tailored interventions, gaining and maintaining schools' cooperation, collecting data in year-round schools, and assuring data quality.

CATCH: physical activity process evaluation in a multicenter trial.

This paper presents the process evaluation model for the physical activity intervention component of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) and describes the major procedures used to monitor CATCH PE, the physical education intervention. The paper focuses on CATCH PE teacher training and in-service support as well as on the curriculum implementation. Monitoring training and support included assessing the in-service training workshops and the follow-up on-site assistance provided by staff. Monitoring the implementation included assessing the quantity and quality of CATCH PE instruction in terms of student physical activity engagement and lesson context, the fidelity of the curricular implementation, and the opportunities for other physical activity by children throughout the school day.

CATCH: family process evaluation in a multicenter trial.

The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) is an elementary school cardiovascular health education field trial in progress in San Diego, California, New Orleans, Louisiana, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Austin, Texas. Because a significant part of a child's health behaviors are shaped within the home, CATCH is evaluating whether the effects of the school-based program are enhanced by the inclusion of a home-based program. A 7 x 7 x 10 randomized design with 7 school-only and 7 school-plus-family intervention schools, along with 10 control schools is implemented at each site. The CATCH family intervention is implemented during Grades 3 through 5 and consists of home-based curricula and Family Fun Nights focusing on healthier eating and increased physical activity during Grades 3 and 4, along with a smoking prevention curriculum in Grade 5. CATCH is examining the effectiveness of family (household) involvement through changes in students' dietary intake of fat and sodium. This paper describes the process evaluation methods used to document the extent of participation in the family program. Data reported for the third-grade Family Fun Nights held in the 28 family schools across all sites reflected an average student participation rate of 67%. The average family member to student ratio was approximately 2:1. Participation by all third-grade teachers and the majority of physical education specialists was observed.

Brief therapy for managed mental health companies: becoming a learning organization.

Nearly all of the services offered through managed behavioral health care companies are brief or time effective in nature. It is often the view of these companies that many of their providers have insufficient backgrounds in doing such treatment and have been trained in longer, less efficient modes of service delivery. Although this is often the case, what is frequently not recognized is that most managed behavioral health care companies themselves lack knowledge and clarity about such therapies. We address the critical need for behavioral health care companies to become learning organizations focused on research and development and internal as well as external training in time-efficient therapies. Such activities will allow for creativity and enhancement of the substance abuse and mental health care areas.

Beyond the interpersonal circumplex in group psychotherapy: the structure and relationship to outcome of the Individual Group Member Interpersonal Process Scale.

Development of a new scale to measure patient behavior in group psychotherapy, the Individual Group Member Interpersonal Process Scale (IGIPS), is described. This scale captures clinically important aspects of how patients act in group, including how they respond to the other group members. The IGIPS was applied to videotapes of the first four sessions of seven 15-session outpatient therapy groups (52 patients) in the Mental Health Department of a health maintenance organization. The scale was found to have five factors (Activity, Interpersonal Sensitivity, Comfort with Self, Self-Focus, and Psychological Mindedness). Patient behavior that was moderate on two IGIPS dimensions was connected with better outcome than was that of patients with more extreme behavior in either direction.

Diagnostic agreement between the Personality Disorder Examination and the MCMI-II.

In an attempt to compare different methods for assessing personality disorder, this study compared the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II (MCMI-II; Millon, 1987), a self-report questionnaire, and the Personality Disorder Examination (PDE; Loranger, 1988), a semistructured clinical interview. Subjects (N = 97) were mental health outpatients of a health maintenance organization in New England. The instruments were compared in terms of the presence of personality disorder, the number of diagnoses assigned to a patient, and agreement in specific diagnoses and in cluster assignment. Agreement between the two instruments was low; the two instruments exhibited greater agreement in predicting the absence of diagnoses than their presence. Agreement was best for the borderline and avoidant diagnoses. Correlations between scales exhibited somewhat better agreement than was evident for diagnoses. Analyses at the cluster level resulted in moderate correlations between the instruments. Very high intracluster correlations were found for the MCMI-II, but not for the PDE.

Effectiveness of methods used to teach breast self-examination.

The efficacy of breast self-examination (BSE) is limited by the extent to which women can be taught to perform a frequent and proficient examination. We randomized 783 women from a health maintenance organization into group instruction, individual instruction, individual instruction with a reminder system, or minimal intervention designed to simulate an office encounter where BSE was encouraged but not taught. The percentage of lumps 1 cm and smaller detected in silicone breast models, the number of false-positive detections, the search technique, and the self-reported BSE frequency were measured before and four months after intervention. Multiple tests for comparisons of interventions showed that the interventions containing BSE instruction were comparable in increasing true- and false-positive detection of lumps and in improving search technique, but the minimal intervention resulted in lower scores for all three outcomes (P less than .0001). Women in all four intervention groups increased their BSE frequency over the four-month follow-up period, but the greatest improvement in frequency was reported among women receiving reminders.

Patient activity and outcome in group psychotherapy: new findings.

The relation of patient verbal activity to pretherapy symptom status and outcome was examined for ninety patients in time-limited group psychotherapy. For each half-hour segment the most verbally active member, or main actor (MA), was identified. Verbal activity was measured by counting the number of times each patient was MA during the course of the group. Outcome was assessed by administering a battery of instruments pre- and posttherapy and by obtaining direct ratings of patient benefit from the patient, therapist, and an independent rater: the number of times MA was found to be significantly correlated with four pretherapy measures, indicating that the most disturbed patients were most active in these groups; the number of times MA was also correlated with patient and therapist benefit ratings, indicating that therapists and patients themselves agreed that those who spoke the most benefited the most. However, partial correlations between number of times MA and other outcome measures did not produce any significant relationships. Thus, it does not appear that patient verbal activity is related to outcome, as measured by objective instruments.

Cohesion, alliance and outcome in group psychotherapy.

Cohesiveness has been viewed as the group psychotherapy equivalent of the therapeutic alliance in individual treatment. Although researchers have attempted to study the concept of cohesion in group treatment, understanding of this so-called "curative" group factor remains quite primitive. In this study of 12 time-limited psychotherapy groups, with a total of 90 nonpsychotic outpatients, we explore the relationships between cohesion, alliance and treatment outcome. Our cohesion measure is a new instrument, the Harvard Community Health Plan Group Cohesiveness Scale, developed for use with group therapy videotapes. To measure alliance we have modified the Penn Helping Alliance Scale (Group Alliance Scale) to be scored from videotapes of group sessions. Both of these instruments use trained observers to make ratings for the group-as-a-whole. The outcome battery for patients in these groups included a widely varied set of measures, enabling us to view change from a number of perspectives. Our findings indicate that cohesion and alliance as measured here are related concepts. We also find that both cohesion and alliance appear to have strong relationships with improved self-esteem and reduced symptomatology for patients in these groups. In addition, it appears that outcome is most related to cohesion in the first 30 minutes of a group session. Implications of these and other findings are discussed.