Detection of interaural delay in bands of noise: effects of spectral interference combined with spectral uncertainty.

This study concerns two situations that could limit a listener's sensitivity to interaural temporal delay (ITD). The first is having to detect a "target" ITD in one spectral region when diotic energy is also present in remote and/or adjacent spectral regions. In such a situation, sensitivity to ITD is typically degraded, as compared to when no remote and/or adjacent diotic energy is present. Both the outcome and the paradigm are commonly termed "spectral interference." In the present study, spectral interference was measured using a broadband (100 Hz to 9 kHz) noise that was diotic, save for a restricted spectral region that was interaurally delayed. The portion of the noise that contained the ITD had a center frequency (CF) of either 300, 1200, 2400, or 4800 Hz and a bandwidth that was 40% of the CF. The second situation of interest was "spectral uncertainty." Here, the center frequency of the portion of the noise containing the ITD was varied (chosen from one of four possible CFs) on a trial-by-trial basis. Consequently, the listener was uncertain about which spectral region could contain the ITD. Data were also collected with one of four narrow bands of noise with the CFs and bandwidths identical to the interaurally delayed spectral regions used in the spectral interference and spectral uncertainty conditions. Within a block of trials, the center frequency of the narrow band of noise was either held constant or was randomly chosen from the set of four CFs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lateralization of bands of noise as a function of combinations of interaural intensive differences, interaural temporal differences, and bandwidth.

Listeners indicated the intracranial position of bands of noise (from 50 to 400 Hz in width) for several combinations of interaural intensive differences (IID), and interaural temporal differences (ITD), and/or interaural phase differences (IPD). All ITD and IPD combinations produced an interaural delay of 1500 microseconds at the center frequency of the noise. The interaural phase spectra were constructed to produce several patterns of putative cross-correlation functions. Potency of IIDs depended greatly on particular combinations of bandwidth, ITD and IPD. For some combinations, changing the IID by only 3 dB resulted in large shifts in laterality (sometimes moving the image from near one ear to near the other). The complex interactions observed make the results incompatible with the traditional notion that IIDs simply act as weights or scalars. Rather, IIDs act in two distinct manners: (1) as independent scalar quantities and (2) by interacting with specific combinations of bandwidth and ITD/IPD, which is believed to reflect an action within the cross correlation surface.

Interaural temporal discrimination using two sinusoidally amplitude-modulated, high-frequency tones: conditions of summation and interference.

This paper concerns sensitivity to interaural temporal delays (ITD) in the envelopes of two, sometimes simultaneously presented, sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones. The SAM tones were fully modulated (typically at a rate of 250 Hz) and had carrier frequencies of either 2 or 4 kHz. Of particular interest were cases in which the delay to be detected (target ITD) occurred in only one spectral region or in both. The reference ITD, to which the target ITD was added, was either 0, 300, or 600 microseconds. There were three general outcomes: (1) When both regions contained a target ITD, there was an improvement in sensitivity that was quantitatively consistent with an optimal use of independent information. This type of summation was seen even when the target ITDs were added to a pair of SAM tones with two different reference ITDs; (2) when the target ITD was restricted to the higher spectral region, sensitivity was reduced, indicating interference. Interference occurred when the two spectral regions had the same or different reference ITDs and the same or different rates of modulation; (3) sensitivity was unaffected (i.e., no interference occurred) when the target ITD was restricted to the lower spectral region of the pair of SAM tones. These results supplement the observations of Buell and Hafter [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 1894-1900 (1991)], who used low-frequency tones.

Lateralization of low-frequency tones: relative potency of gating and ongoing interaural delays.

Several types of interaural delay can affect the lateral position of binaural signals. Delays can occur within the gating (onset and/or offset) or ongoing portions of the signal, or both. Extent of laterality produced by each of these delays was measured for low-frequency tones with an acoustic pointing task. Relative potency was assessed by presenting the delays singly or in combinations (where the types of delay were consistent or in opposition). Rise/decay time, duration, and frequency of the tonal targets were also varied. The major finding was that ongoing delays were much more potent than gating delays in determining extent of laterality. Gating delays were most effective when the interaural phase of the ongoing portion of the tones was more or less ambiguous with respect to which ear was leading. Many of our findings are qualitatively well described by considering properties of patterns of activity produced within a cross-correlation network by such interaurally delayed signals.

Combination of binaural information across frequency bands.

Perceptual grouping of the frequency components from a source into a single auditory object is needed when localizing a complex sound in an environment where other sounds are also present. Two acoustic regularities that might allow for such grouping are a harmonic relation among the components and a commonality of their spatial positions. The utility of these cues was examined in a forced choice psychophysical task by measuring sensitivity to interaural differences of time (IDT) for low-frequency stimuli presented via earphones. In the first experiment, stimuli were composed of either one, two, or three frequencies. A signal detection analysis used to predict the effects of combining information across frequencies found summation to be optimal, regardless of the harmonicity of the complex. A second experiment presented two-frequency complexes in which one tone, the target, contained the IDT to be detected while the other, the distractor, was constant across all three intervals of the forced choice. For inharmonic complexes, performance for the target-distractor combinations was equivalent to that found for targets presented alone, suggesting segregation of the targets and distractors into separate auditory objects. However, for harmonic target-distractor combinations, performance was diminished. A signal detection analysis of these data supports the idea that for purposes of lateralization, the interaural information in the targets and distractors was combined into a variance-weighted value, even though it meant a lowering of performance. Thus it seems that for the grouping of complex acoustic stimuli in space, harmonic structure is more important than commonality of spatial position.

Restarting the adapted binaural system.

Previous experiments using trains of high-frequency filtered clicks have shown that for lateralization based on interaural difference of time or level, there is a decline in the usefulness of interaural information after the signal's onset when the clicks are presented at a high rate. This process has been referred to as "binaural adaptation." Of interest here are the conditions that produce a recovery from adaptation and allow for a resampling of the interaural information. A train of clicks with short interclick intervals is used to produce adaptation. Then, during its course, a treatment such as the insertion of a temporal gap or the addition of another "triggering" sound is tested for its ability to restart the binaural process. All of the brief triggers tested are shown to be capable of promoting recovery from adaptation. This suggests that, while the binaural system deals with the demands of high-frequency stimulation with rapid adaptation, it quickly cancels the adaptation in response to stimulus change.

On the use of adaptive procedures in binaural experiments.

Adaptive psychophysical procedures have been routinely used in monaural experiments for many years, but only sparsely used in binaural experiments. In this letter, (1) the increasing use of adaptive procedures in binaural experiments is documented; (2) factors that determine their appropriateness are discussed; and (3) data that attest to their usefulness are presented.

Discrimination of interaural differences of time in the envelopes of high-frequency signals: integration times.

Listeners detected interaural differences of time in trains of high-frequency clicks. The manipulated variables were the number of clicks in the train and the period between clicks. Thresholds were compared to an optimal integrator, where the binaural information accrued from each click in the stimulus train is equivalent. In agreement with data reported in the past, integration is optimal only when the period between clicks exceeds approximately 10 ms and when the duration of the entire stimulus train is less than about 250 ms. The first constraint represents a limitation due to a form of "binaural adaptation" and the second is due to a limited "integration period."

Judgments of sound volume: effects of signal duration, level, and interaural characteristics on the perceived extensity of broadband noise.

While auditory stimuli are often described in terms of their apparent extensity, such descriptions have usually not been collected systematically. Moreover, the few deliberate attempts to evaluate image size have rarely gone beyond the classic parameters of stimulus frequency and intensity. In the present study a direct magnitude estimation procedure was employed. Seventeen subjects numerically estimated the apparent size of images produced by broadband noise stimuli. Under earphone listening conditions, signals were presented either dichotically (uncorrelated noise), diotically (correlated noise), or monaurally (noise led to a single earphone). The signals in each of these modes varied in duration (100, 300, 1000, and 3000 msec) and intensity level (60, 75, and 90 dB A weighted). Size estimates were plotted as power functions and analyzed with a repeated measures design analysis of variance. Consistent with previous research, the main effects of duration and intensity were both highly significant (p less than 0.001). In addition, a highly significant effect for mode of presentation was found (p less than 0.001). Across conditions, dichotic stimulation produced the largest images and monaural stimulation the smallest (about half the size of the diotic images). This last result is the first quantification of previous anecdotal observations. General implications of these results were discussed.