Buccal Bone Thickness in the Esthetic Zone of Postmenopausal Women: A CBCT Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare bone thickness buccal to the teeth in the esthetic zone of postmenopausal women, premenopausal women, younger men and older men. METHODS: Retrospective data were randomly selected from 4 groups: 59 premenopausal women, 60 postmenopausal women, 60 men less than age 50, and 60 men more than 50. Half-root and bone crest landmarks were identified on each participant's cone beam computed tomography for teeth 7 to 10 and 23 to 26. Buccal bone thickness was measured by calibrated examiners. Group averages were calculated and compared between groups using analysis of variance (P < 0.05). RESULTS: When comparing premenopausal to postmenopausal women and postmenopausal women to older men, anterior bone thickness was significantly different for tooth maxillary and mandibular lateral incisors and overall maxillary and mandibular central incisors. In addition, significant differences were observed between these groups within the maxilla comparing lateral incisors, central incisors (P < 0.05), and within the mandible when comparing lateral and central incisors at (P < 0.05) at bone crest and half-root, respectively. CONCLUSION: Buccal bone in the anterior esthetic zone bone is thin in all segments of the population, but significantly thinner in postmenopausal women. In this cohort, when anterior implants are planned, it is essential to make informed treatment planning decisions. Strategies are available to manage the thinner bony housing, but require further research specific to this growing consumer cohort.

Is long-term bisphosphonate therapy associated with benefits to the periodontium in postmenopausal women?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the periodontium of postmenopausal women with known low bone mineral density who are receiving long-term bisphosphonate therapy with those who are not. METHODS: The periodontal status of 28 white postmenopausal women with low bone density using bisphosphonate therapy for at least 2 years was compared with that of a matching group not using such therapy. All women underwent a cone-beam CT scan of the jaw and a complete periodontal examination evaluating for plaque score, periodontal probing depth, clinical attachment loss, bleeding on probing, and alveolar bone height. RESULTS: Bisphosphonate users had higher plaque score, lower probing depth, and lesser clinical attachment loss compared with the controls. These differences were determined to be significant by both t test and Wilcoxon's tests. Bleeding on probing was lower and the alveolar bone height was higher in the bisphosphonate group than in controls, but these differences were not statistically significant. Linear models showed no significant interactions between plaque score and bisphosphonate use, suggesting that the association of periodontal status and outcome measures was constant across all levels of plaque scores. Bisphosphonate use was a significant factor for probing depth but was not significant for the other parameters when adjusted for plaque score. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term bisphosphonate use seems to have some beneficial effects on the periodontium of postmenopausal women with low bone density, across all levels of plaque score.