Enantioselective degradation of metalaxyl in soils: chiral preference changes with soil pH.

Chiral pesticides are often degraded enantio-/stereoselectively in soils. Degradation is typically studied with one or a small number of soils so that it is not possible to extrapolate the findings on chiral preference to other soils. For this study, the fungicide metalaxyl was chosen as a "chiral probe" to investigate its enantioselective degradation in 20 different soils, selected primarily to cover a wide range of soil properties (e.g., acidic/alkaline, aerobic/ anaerobic) rather than to consider soils of agricultural importance. Racemic metalaxyl was incubated in these soils under laboratory conditions, and the degradation of the enantiomers as well as the enantioselective formation/ degradation of the primary major metabolite, metalaxyl acid, was followed over time, using enantioselective GC-MS after ethylation with diazoethane. In aerobic soils with pH > 5, the fungicidally active R-enantiomer was degraded faster than the S-enantiomer (k(R) > k(S)), leading to residues with a composition [S] > [R]. However, in aerobic soils with pH 4-5, both enantiomers were degraded at similar rates (k(R) approximately k(S)), and in aerobic soils with pH < 4 and in most anaerobic soils, the enantioselectivity was reversed (k(R) < k(S)). These considerable soil-to-soil variations were observed with soils from locations close to each other, in one case even within a single soil profile. Liming and acidification of a "nonenantioselective" soil prior to incubation resulted in enantioselective degradation with k(R)> k(S) and k(R) < k(S), respectively. While the enantioselectivity (expressed as ES = (k(R) - k(S))/(k(R) + k(S))) of metalaxyl degradation in aerobic soils apparently correlated with soil pH, no such correlation was found for metalaxyl acid. Reevaluation of published kinetic data for the herbicides dichlorprop and mecoprop indicated similar correlations between soil pH and ES as for metalaxyl.

Caffeine, an anthropogenic marker for wastewater comtamination of surface waters.

The suitability of caffeine as a chemical marker for surface water pollution by domestic wastewaters was assessed in this study. Caffeine concentrations in influents and effluents of Swiss wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs, 7-73 and 0.03-9.5 microg/L, respectively) indicated an efficient elimination of 81-99.9%. Corresponding loads in untreated wastewater showed small variations when normalized forthe population discharging to the WWTPs (15.8 +/- 3.8 mg person(-1) d(-1)), reflecting a rather constant consumption. WWTP effluent loads were considerably lower (0.06 +/- 0.03 mg person(-1) d(-1)), apart from installations with low sludge age (< or = 5 d, loads up to 4.4 mg person(-1) d(-1)). Despite the efficient removal in most WWTPs, caffeine was ubiquitously found in Swiss lakes and rivers (6-250 ng/ L), except for remote mountain lakes (<2 ng/L; analytical procedure for wastewater and natural waters: SPE, GC-MS-SIM or GC-MS-MS-MRM, internal standard 13C3-labeled caffeine). Caffeine concentrations in lakes correlated with the anthropogenic burden by domestic wastewaters, demonstrating the suitability of caffeine as a marker. A mass balance for Greifensee revealed that approximately 1-4% of the wastewaters had been discharged without treatment, presumably on rainy days when the capacity of WWTPs had been exceeded. For Zürichsee, it could be shown that the monthly inputs of caffeine correlated with precipitation data. The depth- and seasonal-dependent concentrations in this lake were adequately rationalized by a numerical model considering flushing, biodegradation, and indirect photodegradation via HO. radicals as elimination processes and caffeine inputs as fitting variables.