CAPECO: Cost evaluation of community acquired pneumonia managed in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Estimating the economic burden of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) managed in ambulatory setting is needed in France since no data are available. METHOD: A retrospective study (CAPECO) was conducted based on a prospective French study describing patients with suspected CAP managed in primary care (CAPA). The aim of the CAPECO study was to estimate and explain medical costs of a disease episode in CAP patients only followed in ambulatory care and in hospitalised patients. Primary endpoints were the direct medical costs, impact on productivity and costs of incident CAP over one year. Secondary endpoint was to describe predictive factors of costs, hospital admission and stay length. RESULTS: In this cohort of 886 patients, resulting in an incidence of CAP of 400 per 100,000 inhabitants per year, the mean direct medical cost of a disease episode of CAP was € 118.8 for strictly ambulatory patients with an equal weight for medical time, drugs, diagnostic procedures and tests. This direct cost was € 102.1 before admission for patients who were finally hospitalised. The mean cost of hospital admissions was € 3522.9. Main predictive factors of hospital admission and stay length were respectively a history of chronic respiratory disease and older age. Factors of direct medical cost were prescribing X-ray examination and having a positive X-ray. The impact of a disease episode on productivity was € 1980 (sd 1400) per ambulatory episode and € 5425 (sd 4760) per episode leading to hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Costs per ambulatory episode were modest but increased substantially in hospitalised patients, who were more numerous when chronic respiratory disorders were present and in the elderly. Indirect costs were significant. Deciders should thus consider both direct and indirect costs when assessing preventive interventions in the context of this disease.

Are French general practitioners consulted before travel to developing countries? A cross-sectional study conducted in a French airport.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) could play a central role in preventing travel-related health issues. The aim of this study was to assess, in travellers departing to developing countries from a French airport, the proportion of individuals having sought GP counseling before departure and to identify determinants for having consulted a GP. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted between November 2012 and July 2013, in all adults living in France. Sociodemographic, health characteristics, type of travel and resources consulted before departure were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed. Determinants for having consulted a GP before departure were investigated using a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 360 travellers included, 230 (64%) sought health counseling before departure. GPs were the main source of information for 134 (58%) travellers having sought health information and the only one for 49 (21%). Almost half of the travellers (48%) departing to sub-Saharan countries did not seek health counseling from a medical doctor (GP, non-GP specialist, specialist consulted in an international vaccination center or occupational physician). Individuals significantly more likely to travel without having consulted a GP were young and male, held foreign nationality, had travelled more than five times before, rarely consulted their GP and were travelling to a non-malarious area. CONCLUSION: GPs were the main but not the only source of information and counseling before traveling to a developing country. This study helps identify the characteristics of individuals likely to travel without having consulted a GP before departure.