The Impact of a Small Private Online Course as a New Approach to Teaching Oncology: Development and Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Oncology involves complex care and multidisciplinary management of patients; however, misinformation and ineffective communication remain problematic. OBJECTIVE: The educational objective of our study was to develop a new teaching method to improve cancer treatment and management by emphasizing the link between hospitals (inpatients) and their surrounding communities (outpatients). METHODS: A team of 22 professionals from public and private institutions developed a small private online course (SPOC). Each offering of the course lasted 6 weeks and covered 6 topics: individual health care plans, cancer surgery, ionizing radiation, cancer medicines, clinical research, and oncological supportive care. For participants in the course, we targeted people working in the cancer field. The SPOC used an active teaching method with collaborative and multidisciplinary learning. A final examination was offered in each session. We evaluated participants' satisfaction rate through a questionnaire and the success of the SPOC by participants' completion, success, and commitment rates. RESULTS: Of the total participants (N=1574), 446 completed the evaluation form. Most participants were aged 31 to 45 years. Participants included 56 nurses, 131 pharmacists, 80 from the medical field (including 26 physicians), 53 from patients' associations, 28 health teachers, and 13 students (medical and paramedical). Among the participants, 24.7% (90/446) had an independent medical practice, 38.5% (140/446) worked in a public institution, and 36.8% (134/446) worked in a private institution. After completing the SPOC sessions, 85.9% (384/446) thought they had learned new information, 90.8% (405/446) felt their expectations were met, and 90.4% (403/446) considered that the information had a positive impact on their professional practice. The completion rate was 35.51% (559/1574), the success rate was 71.47% (1025/1574), and the commitment rate was 64.67% (1018/1574). Concerning the cost effectiveness of SPOC compared with a traditional classroom of 25 students, online education became more effective when there were more than 950 participants. CONCLUSIONS: SPOCs improved the management of oncology patients. This new digital learning technique is an attractive concept to integrate into teaching practice. It offered optimal propagation of information and met the students' expectations.

Use of iron sucrose and red blood cell transfusions in anaemic cancer patients in France (OncoFer study).

PURPOSE: This report describes the results of an observational, retrospective cohort study, evaluating the use of iron sucrose (IS) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in patients with cancer in routine clinical practice in France. A parallel investigated cohort treated with ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has been reported earlier. METHODS: Data of patients with a solid tumour or haematological malignancy who have received IS or an RBC transfusion during 2010 from 3 months prior (M-3) to 3 months post first treatment (M+3) were analysed. RESULTS: Data from 46 patients who had received IS (400 mg median total iron dose) and 357 patients who had received RBC transfusions as first treatment (baseline) were included. Median haemoglobin levels improved from 9.9 g/dL (interquartile range 9.2; 11.0 g/dL) at baseline to 12.4 g/dL (11.4; 13.1 g/dL) at M+3 in IS-treated patients and from 8.2 g/dL (7.8; 8.8 g/dL) at baseline to 10.1 g/dL (8.8; 11.1 g/dL) in transfused patients. An erythropoiesis-stimulating agent was given to 54.3 and 28.9% of patients in the IS and the RBC transfusion groups, respectively, resulting in slightly better mean haemoglobin increase in both groups (2.4 vs 1.5 g/dL and 2.0 vs 1.6 g/dL, respectively). No severe nor serious adverse reaction and no hypersensitivity reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: Both IS and RBC transfusions effectively increased Hb levels in patients with cancer. IS was safe and well tolerated in this population. Considering prior reported results with FCM, using FCM may reduce ESA dose requirements and the required number of infusions.

Clinical use of ferric carboxymaltose in patients with solid tumours or haematological malignancies in France.

PURPOSE: This study collected data on the use of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in a cancer patient population in France to evaluate the feasibility and the conditions of use of FCM in routine clinical practice beyond the limiting criteria of clinical trials. METHODS: This observational, prospective study of patients with a solid tumour or a haematological malignancy who have received treatment with FCM after 01 July 2011 evaluated data about the circumstances of iron administration, concomitant medication and laboratory tests in the period from 3 months prior to the first FCM administration (baseline) until 3 months post-baseline. RESULTS: Data from 367 FCM-treated patients were analysed. FCM was mainly given as a single dose at baseline (69.2%) and without additional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA, 64.3%). The median total iron dose was 1000 mg per patient. Median haemoglobin (Hb) levels of FCM-treated patients improved from 10.3 g/dL (interquartile range 9.5, 11.1 g/dL) at baseline to 11.8 g/dL (11.1, 13.0 g/dL) until the end of the 3-month observational period. Patients treated with FCM alone or additional ESA achieved similar median Hb increase (1.3 [0.4, 2.1] g/dL and 1.4 [0.4, 2.5] g/dL, respectively). Patients with baseline Hb up to 11.0 g/dL and serum ferritin up to 500 ng/mL and beyond achieved stable median Hb levels ≥11.0 g/dL without signs of iron overload. No severe or serious adverse reaction and no hypersensitivity reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this observational study confirm the effectiveness and tolerability of FCM when given in clinical routine practice alone or in combination with an ESA.

Diagnosis and management of anaemia and iron deficiency in patients with haematological malignancies or solid tumours in France in 2009-2010: the AnemOnHe study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of anaemia in 2009-2010 in France in patients with haematological malignancies (HM) or solid tumours (ST). METHODS: Retrospective observational study in 57 centres, enrolling adult patients with HM or ST treated for an episode of anaemia (duration of the episode ≥ 3 months occurring in the last 12 months). RESULTS: 220 patients with ST (breast, 18%; lung, 18%) and 56 with HM (lymphoma, 60%) were included (median age, 68 years; female, 53%). Mean haemoglobin level at anaemia diagnosis was 9.3 ± 1.4 g/dL (<8 g/dL for 16%) and 9.8 ± 1.1g/dL (<8 g/dL for 6%) in HM and ST patients, respectively. At least one parameter of iron deficiency (ferritin, transferrin saturation) was assessed in 26% of HM and 19% of ST patients. Treatment of anaemia included erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) for 98% of HM and 89% of ST patients. Iron was prescribed to 14% (oral, 12%; intravenous, 2%) of HM patients and to 42% (oral, 17%; intravenous, 25%) of ST patients. The rates of blood transfusions were high: 70% in HM and 46% in ST patients; transfusions alone or administrated with ESA were more frequent in patients with Hb <8 g/dL. CONCLUSION: Although recent guidelines recommend evaluating iron deficiency and correcting anaemia by using intravenous iron, our study in cancer patients evidenced that ESA and blood transfusions are still frequently used as the treatment of anaemia in cancer patients. Iron deficiency is insufficiently assessed (only one patient among five) and as a consequence iron deficiency is most likely insufficiently treated.

Evaluation of cost savings with ferric carboxymaltose in anemia treatment through its impact on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and blood transfusion: French healthcare payer perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic impact of intravenous iron (in the form of intravenous iron preparation of ferric carboxymaltose) in three different clinical settings of iron deficiency anemia: chemotherapy-induced anemia in breast cancer, chemotherapy-induced anemia in digestive cancer, and perioperative anemia in knee and hip surgery. METHODS: The economic model compared the usual therapeutic strategies of anemia without intravenous iron and strategies including intravenous iron, in each of the three clinical settings selected. Costs related to anemia treatment by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), blood transfusion, and intravenous iron were estimated and compared inside each setting. Cost savings were calculated from the French healthcare payer perspective. Data included in the economic model were obtained from scientific literature, public health agencies, and medical experts. RESULTS: The most prominent annual cost savings were observed in chemotherapy-induced anemia in breast cancer (€997 and €360 per patient for metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancers, respectively; global cost saving, €33.6 million). This large impact of intravenous iron on costs was mainly explained by both a lower number of women treated and lower ESA dosing. Mean annual cost saving in digestive cancers and knee and hip surgery were estimated to €168 and €216 per patient and global cost savings of €7.5 and €12.1 million, respectively. Overall, annual cost savings in these three settings were estimated to €53 million including €39 million for ESA cost savings. Sensitivity analysis showed that strategies including intravenous iron remained cost-effective even with wide variations in the assumptions, particularly for cost savings on ESA. LIMITATIONS: Economic model based on literature data and expert opinions. CONCLUSIONS: The present economic model suggests that use of intravenous iron, according to recommendations of international guidelines, is cost saving, particularly in chemotherapy-induced anemia in breast cancers.

Quality of life of palliative chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction treated with irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid: results of a randomised phase III trial.

PURPOSE: The quality of life (QL) of advanced gastric cancer patients receiving irinotecan, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (IF arm) or cisplatin with 5-FU (CF arm) is presented. METHODS: Patients with measurable or evaluable advanced gastric cancer received IF weekly for 6/7 weeks or CF q4 weeks. QL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, subsequently every 8 weeks until progression and thereafter every 3 months until death. The QL data were analysed using several statistical methods including summary measures and pattern-mixture modelling. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were randomised and treated (IF 170, CF 163). The time-to-progression for IF and CF was 5.0 and 4.2 months (P = 0.088), respectively. The overall compliance rates for QL questionnaire completion were 60 and 56% in the IF and CF arms, respectively. Significant treatment differences were observed for the physical functioning scale (P = 0.024), nausea\vomiting (P = 0.001) and EQ-5D thermometer (P = 0.020) in favour of the IF treatment arm. CONCLUSION: There was a trend in favour of IF over CF in time-to-progression. The IF group also demonstrated a better safety profile than CF and a better QL on a number of multi-item scales, suggesting that IF offers an alternative first-line platinum-free treatment option for advanced gastric cancer.

Combination chemotherapy of vinorelbine and cisplatin: a phase I pharmacokinetic study in patients with metastatic solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine (VRL)-cisplatin (CDDP) is an active doublet for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CDDP has a narrow therapeutic index and may produce a cumulative nephrotoxicity over the treatment period. This study was to assess the risks of drug-drug interaction (DDI) over 3 consecutive cycles of VRL-CDDP combined treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open-label, nonrandomised, phase I study was carried out. Patients with normal hepatic/renal functions. D1: CDDP 100 mg/m2--D1, D8: oral VRL 60 mg/m2 q3w. Pharmacokinetics (PK) over the first 3 cycles. PK comparison between cycles and between study vs. literature. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were evaluable for safety and PK. Adverse events were those frequently observed with CDDP or VRL, and consisted of hematological toxicities, nausea, vomiting and constipation. Concerning VRL and CDDP PK, no difference was detected between the 3 administrations nor between the study and reference values. CONCLUSION: The absence of DDI between CDDP and oral VRL was demonstrated over 3 consecutive cycles of therapy.

Patient-reported outcomes as a component of the primary endpoint in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in advanced pancreatic cancer.

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing gemcitabine+tipifarnib (G+t) or gemcitabine+placebo (G+p) in patients with pancreatic cancer, the primary endpoint of time to deterioration (TTD) was based primarily on patient-reported outcomes. Deterioration was defined as death or worsening of disease-related symptoms, based on patient-reported outcomes of pain intensity and analgesic use in a daily diary, plus investigator-rated weekly performance status. Secondary endpoints included survival and safety. Two hundred and forty-four patients were treated for a total of 4780 weeks, during which the diary was completed daily. Overall, the completion of the diary was found to be feasible: patients completed approximately 95% of scheduled diary entries. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms. The primary endpoint of TTD was not significantly different between the G+t arm (69 days) and the G+p arm (91 days, P=0.40). Survival was not significantly different between the G+t arm (202 days) and the G+p arm (221 days, P=0.66). The combination of G+t had an acceptable toxicity profile, with primarily neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Methodologically, measurement of patient-reported outcomes is feasible and useful in assessing the effect of anti-cancer therapy in pancreatic cancer if comprehensive initial and ongoing training is provided to all people involved, including not only the patients but also the study personnel.

Multicenter randomized trial of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid compared with surgery alone after resection of colorectal liver metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial.

PURPOSE: Complete resection of liver metastases of colorectal origin is the only potentially curative treatment. In order to decrease recurrences, the use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy after liver resection is controversial because no randomized study demonstrated its benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 173 patients with completely resected (R0) hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer to surgery alone and observation (87 patients) or to surgery followed by 6 months of systemic adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluorouracil and folinic acid monthly regimen (86 patients). The main outcome criterion was disease-free survival. Secondary outcome measures were overall survival and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis was based on 171 patients, after a median follow-up of 87 months (SE = 5.8). The 5-year disease-free survival rate, after adjustment for major prognostic factors, was 33.5% for patients in the chemotherapy group and 26.7% for patients in the control group (Cox multivariate analysis: odds ratio for recurrence or death = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.96; P = .028). With regard to secondary outcome measures, a trend towards increased overall survival was observed but did not reach statistical significance (5-year overall survival: chemotherapy group, 51.1% v control group, 41.1%; odds ratio for death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.10; P = .13). CONCLUSION: Despite a suboptimal regimen, which was the standard at the beginning of the study, adjuvant intravenous systemic chemotherapy provided a significant disease-free survival benefit for patients with resected liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU in second line treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results of a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and benefit of second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has never been demonstrated although it is regularly used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized phase II study evaluating oxaliplatin alone (OXA), infusional 5-fluorouracil alone (5-FU) and an oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU combination (OXFU) in untreated advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been conducted. In this trial, a second-line treatment with the OXFU regimen (OXA 130 mg/m2 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion combined with 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v., days 1-4), every 3 weeks) was offered to patients progressing after single agent treatment. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 32 patients (12 males, median age 57 years) treated in the single agent arms received the OXFU combination in second-line treatment. WHO performance status was at least 2 in 61% of the patients. There was no objective response and 3 patients (17%) had a disease stabilisation. Median time to progression from the start of second-line treatment was 0.9 months. Median overall survival was 4.9 months from the start of front-line therapy and 1.3 months from the start of second-line therapy. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial bring arguments to support a modest value of second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

In vivo and in vitro antitumor activity of oxaliplatin in combination with cetuximab in human colorectal tumor cell lines expressing different level of EGFR.

This study aimed to assess the effect of cetuximab (C225, Erbitux, a chimeric anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody) in combination with oxaliplatin in vitro and in vivo on four colon cancer cell lines (HCT-8; HT-29, SW620, HCT-116) expressing different levels of EGFR. In vitro, cetuximab combined with oxaliplatin significantly decreased the IC50 values of oxaliplatin in HCT-8 (EGF-R moderate) and HT-29 (EGF-R weak) cell lines, while SW620 (EGF-R negative) and HCT-116 (EGFR strong) cell lines remained unresponsive. This combination was synergistic in HCT-8 and HT-29 cell lines while cetuximab induced no major modification of the IC50 of oxaliplatin in HCT-116 or SW620 cell lines. We then determined the effect of cetuximab on the EGF-induced EGFR phosphorylation and we highlight a correlation between the basal level of phospho-EGFR and the response to the combination. In vivo, the combination of cetuximab plus oxaliplatin significantly inhibited tumor growth of HCT-8 and HT-29 (tumor delay or Td = 21.6+/-2.9 and 18.0+/-2.9 days respectively, synergistic effect) compared to either oxaliplatin (Td=12.6+/-2.3 and 14.4+/-3.2 days respectively) or cetuximab (Td=13.4+/-2.9 and 14.5+/-2.4 days, respectively) alone in xenograft models. The combination had no effect on HCT-116 and SW-620 cell lines. The observed responses are strictly dependent on the cell type, and are not correlated with the level of EGFR expression but related to the basal level of phospho-EGFR. This study provides promising preclinical results for a possible clinical investigation of the combination of oxaliplatin plus cetuximab in chemorefractory colorectal tumors.

Phase-I study of a new schedule based on increasing days of topotecan administration associated with dose individualisation.

BACKGROUND: The most commonly prescribed schedule of topotecan administration is daily for five days, every 21 days. Both pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest that a more protracted schedule may increase its therapeutic index. The current study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated number of days with 30-minute i.v. infusion of topotecan daily at fixed area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) (i.e., 35 microg/Lxh). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan was administered i.v. over 30 min. The planned levels of number of days of administration were: 7, 10, 13, 15 and 17. The dose was individualized according to the patient's individual topotecan clearance observed after the first infusion of each cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled and received 71 cycles of therapy. The 13-day level was defined as the maximum number of days of administration. The main side effects were thrombocytopenia and anaemia, whereas neutropenia was infrequent. The mean (coefficient of variation) observed AUC was 34.6 (21%), and 33.4 (19%) microg/Lxh, for the last day of cycle 1, and of cycle 2, respectively. Confirmed partial responses were observed in one patient with metastatic desmoplastic tumour and in two patients with small round metastatic endocrine carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The recommended number of topotecan administration is 10 days. Beyond the potential clinical interest of topotecan administered for a 10-day period, this is the first trial showing the feasibility of a phase-I study exploring a number of administrations of daily AUC rather than a total dose in mg/m(2).

Cystatin C as a new covariate to predict renal elimination of drugs: application to carboplatin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The individual dosing of drugs that are mainly eliminated unchanged in the urine is made possible by assessing renal function. Most of the methods used are based on serum creatinine (SCr) levels. Cystatin C (CysC) has been proposed as an alternative endogenous marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Carboplatin is one of the drugs for which elimination is most dependent on the GFR. A prospective clinical trial including 45 patients was conducted to assess the value of serum CysC as a predictor of carboplatin clearance (CL). METHODS: The patients were receiving carboplatin as part of established protocols. Carboplatin was administered as a daily 60-minute infusion at doses ranging from 290 to 1700mg. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the nonlinear mixed effect modelling NONMEM program according to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: Data from 30 patients were used to test the relationships between carboplatin CL and morphological, biological and demographic covariates previously proposed for prediction of the GFR. The interindividual variability of carboplatin CL decreased from 31% (no covariate) to 14% by taking into account five covariates (SCr, CysC, bodyweight [BW], age and sex). Prospective evaluation of these relationships using the data from the other 15 patients confirmed that the best equation to predict carboplatin CL was based on these five covariates, with a mean absolute percentage error of 13% as an assessment of precision. NONMEM analysis of the whole dataset (n = 45 patients) was performed. The best covariate equation corresponding to the overall analysis was: CL (mL/min) = 110 x (SCr/75)-0.512 x (CysC/1.0)-0.327 x (BW/65)0.474 x (age/56)-0.387 x 0.854sex, with SCr in micromol/L, CysC in mg/L, BW in kilograms, age in years and sex = 0 if male and 1 if female. To put the value of CysC as an endogenous marker of the GFR into perspective, covariate equations without SCr were also evaluated; a better prediction was obtained by considering CysC together with age and BW (interindividual variability of 16.6% vs 23.3% for CysC alone). CONCLUSION: CysC is a marker of drug elimination that is at least as good as SCr for predicting carboplatin CL. The model based on five covariates was superior to those based on only four covariates (with BW, age and sex combined with either SCr or CysC), indicating that CysC and SCr are not completely redundant to each other. Further pharmacokinetic evaluation is needed to determine whether SCr or CysC is the better marker of renal elimination of other drugs.

[Recommendations for the management of GIST patients]. / Recommandations pour la prise en charge des tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales (GIST).

BACKGROUND: The management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has evolved very rapidly in the last years. A national consensus meeting was therefore organized in order to identify the optimal management procedures for patients with GIST in localized and advanced stages. METHODS: A panel of different specialties, including pathology, molecular biology, imaging, surgery, gastroenterology, medical oncology reviewed the current literature, in particular the recent Lugano conference, to identify consensus points and topics for future research in four different working groups: pathology and molecular biology, early management of small tumors and imaging, surgery, and medical treatment. Consensus points were categorized according to the Standard Options Recommendations (SOR) of the French Federation of Cancer Centers. RESULTS: The standard histological examination with immunohistochemical analysis using CD117, CD34, PS100, desmin and smooth muscle actin is considered standard. Molecular biology for the identification of KIT and PDGFRA mutation is advisable for GIST with negative CD117 staining, and otherwise is considered a research procedure. Complete tumor resection with negative tumor margins is the standard surgical treatment. Adjuvant imatinib after optimal tumor resection as well as neo-adjuvant imatinib remain experimental approaches to be performed within prospective clinical studies. Imatinib should be started at the date of diagnosis of metastatic relapse and given until development of intolerance or progressive disease. Resection of metastases is also considered as an experimental procedure which can not be recommended routinely. The criteria for tumor response to imatinib should include not only tumor size reduction or disease stabilization, but also reduction of tumor density (Hounsfield units) on computed tomography, metabolic activity (i.e. reduction of FDG uptake on positron emission tomography), and reduction of vascularisation of the tumors using contrast enhanced ultrasound evaluation. An increase in tumor size may be associated with pathologic response to imatinib therapy, and available survival data indicate that the survival of these patients is similar to that of patients with conventional tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus points in clinical management of GIST in this national conference adopted the majority of consensus points published in the Lugano conference. This multidisciplinary work will be published in the reference oncology, gastroenterology, and pathology journals in French languages.

Irinotecan plus oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer--a Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate response rate and toxicity of irinotecan and oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (Folfirinox) in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically proven APA and bidimensionally measurable disease were treated with Folfirinox therapy every 2 weeks, which comprised oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) plus leucovorin 400 mg/m(2) followed by bolus FU 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, then FU 2,400 mg/m(2) as a 46-hour continuous infusion. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were entered, and 46 received treatment. Thirty-five patients (76%) had metastatic disease. A total of 356 cycles were delivered, with a median of eight cycles per patient (range, one to 24 cycles). All patients were assessable for safety. No toxic death occurred. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurred in 52% of patients, including two patients with febrile neutropenia. Other relevant toxicities included grade 3 to 4 nausea (20%), vomiting (17%), and diarrhea (17%) and grade 3 neuropathy (15%; Levi's scale). The confirmed response rate was 26% (95% CI, 13% to 39%), including 4% complete responses. Median time to progression was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 11.6 months), and median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 14.4 months). Between baseline and end of treatment, patients had improvement in all functional scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30, except cognitive functioning. Responders had major improvement in global QOL. CONCLUSION: With a good safety profile, a promising response rate, and an improvement in QOL, Folfirinox will be further assessed in a phase III trial.

Pharmacokinetics of platinum after oral or intravenous cisplatin: a phase 1 study in 32 adult patients.

AIMS: To develop a population pharmacokinetic model for simultaneous analysis of oral/intravenous cisplatin data in order to estimate the mean population pharmacokinetic parameters, mainly the bioavailability, of cisplatin and to evaluate the influence of covariates on the pharmacokinetic variability. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic and demographic data were collected from 32 adult patients (20 males/12 females, age range 47-76 years) receiving 30-min infusions or an oral formulation of cisplatin, 10-30 mg/m2, for various malignancies. Both total plasma and ultrafilterable or unbound platinum concentrations were determined. RESULTS: Unbound and total platinum concentrations were ascribed to a two-compartment model, with first-order absorption and elimination. The oral bioavailability (F) population estimates were, respectively, 0.39 and 0.30 with associated intersubject variabilities (ISV) of 24% and 26%. Peak concentrations following oral dosing occurred at 1.0 h and 1.6 h for unbound and total platinum, respectively. Clearance (CL) and central distribution volume (V1) of unbound platinum were significantly related to body surface area (BSA). The CL and V1 mean estimates were, respectively, 37 l/h and 23 l with an associated ISV of 15%. The final pharmacokinetic models were validated using 1000 bootstrap samples of the original datasets. CONCLUSIONS: Both unbound and total platinum data allowed a fair evaluation of oral cisplatin disposition, with close estimations for both absorption rates and oral bioavailability. These results also support the conventional dose adjustment of cisplatin based on BSA.

Mechanism-based models for topotecan-induced neutropenia.

OBJECTIVE: A semiphysiologic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was applied to describe topotecan-induced neutropenia, to quantify interindividual and intraindividual pharmacodynamic variability, and to study the effect of covariates on the model. METHODS: Data were obtained from patients treated with topotecan given either orally (118 patients) or intravenously (71 patients), according to different schedules (5 to 21 consecutive days), with or without cisplatin. The model mimics the maturation chain of neutrophils. Topotecan concentration-time profiles affected the proliferation of neutrophil precursors (sensitive cells) through an inhibitory linear model (topotecan is assumed to induce cell loss by a function, E drug, proportional to the topotecan concentration in the central compartment: E drug = Slope . Concentration). The topotecan plasma concentration versus time profile was generated for each patient by modeling the data according to a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model and first-order absorption for oral administration by use of NONMEM. RESULTS: The model described the time course of neutrophil values well. Topotecan neutropenic effect exhibited a large interpatient variability (coefficient of variation of 82% for the slope values). The oral route was associated with a 43% lower value for slope, corresponding to a lower toxicity. The combination with cisplatin increased the neutropenic effect compared with topotecan alone by a factor 3.5. The intrapatient variability between cycle 1 and cycle 2 on slope was lower for the intravenous administration than for the oral administration. By application of the model to a new weekly schedule of topotecan, neutrophil values at the nadir were consistent with those observed during a phase I study of this regimen. CONCLUSION: This model can be used to describe both the duration and intensity of neutropenia; the area between the curve of neutrophil count versus time and a critical neutrophil count (such as 0.500 x 10(3) /mm 3 ) would be a better toxic endpoint than the unique observed value of neutrophil at nadir. The model may be used to predict neutropenia corresponding to regimens of topotecan not yet explored.

[For a coordination of the supportive care for people affected by severe illnesses: proposition of organization in the public and private health care centres]. / Coordination des soins de support pour les personnes atteintes de maladies graves: proposition d'organisation dans les etablissements de soins publics et privés.

The concept of continuous and global care is acknowledged today by all as inherent to modern medicine. A working group gathered to propose models for the coordination of supportive care for all severe illnesses in the various private and public health care centres. The supportive care are defined as: "all care and supports necessary for ill people, at the same time as specific treatments, along all severe illnesses". This definition is inspired by that of "supportive care" given in 1990 by the MASCC (Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer): "The total medical, nursing and psychosocial help which the patients need besides the specific treatment". It integrates as much the field of cure with possible after-effects as that of palliative care, the definition of which is clarified (initial and terminal palliative phases). Such a coordination is justified by the pluridisciplinarity and hyperspecialisation of the professionals, by a poor communication between the teams, by the administrative difficulties encountered by the teams participating in the supportive care. The working group insists on the fact that the supportive care is not a new speciality. He proposes the creation of units. departments or pole of responsibility of supportive care with a "basic coordination" involving the activities of chronic pain, palliative care, psycho-oncology, and social care. This coordination can be extended, according to the "history" and missions of health care centres. Service done with the implementation of a "unique counter" for the patients and the teams is an important point. The structure has to comply with the terms and conditions of contract (Consultation, Unit or Centre of chronic pain, structures of palliative care, of psycho-oncology, of nutrition, of social care). A common technical organization is one of the interests. The structure has to set up strong links with the private practitioners, the networks, the home medical care (HAD) and the nurses services at home (SSIAD), when they exist, to guarantee the continuity of the supportive care under all its aspects and in order to take into account the preferences of the patients. According to Hospital 2007 propositions, the extended, flexible and general purpose Group of Sanitary Cooperation (GCS) meets the necessities inherent to the structures of supportive care within the territories of health because it can be established between one or several health care centres and the private health professionals, thus favouring the cooperation between public and private health care centres. PSPH and general medicine.

[Demography of oncologic practitioners working in France. Projection elements for the next 30 years]. / Démographie des oncologues praticiens en exercice en France. Eléments de projection pour les trente prochaines années.

In the early eighties, French medical regulatory authorities have decided to control the access to medical studies by restricting the number of admittances. From that date, the numerous clauses was unchanged, leading the physicians to observe a deep reduction in the number of young oncologists. The goal of this study was to define precisely the demography of French medical oncologists and the needs for new specialists. Our model used data from a wide range of sources was developed under the guidance of epidemiologists. We determined current and projected numbers and demographics of oncologists in France workforce from 2002 to 2032. The number of oncologists and physicians implicated in oncology (organ specialists, radiotherapists and paediatricians) entering the marked in the next few years will not be modified. Consequently, the number of physicians will dramatically decrease in the next 15 years resulting in a 25% global working-age population reduction. Our present analysis indicates that the number of oncologists will not be sufficient to meet future demand. Our data suggests that steps should be taken to stop the ongoing decline in the number of physicians involved in oncology and the decline of physicians in training. Consideration should be given to actions designed to increase the number of oncologists in practise in the years ahead.