Age as a moderator in the interplay among locus of control, coping, and quality of life of people with chronic pain.

OBJECTIVE: Identifying the factors that determine the quality of life of patients with chronic pain is an integral part of developing interventions to reduce the negative impact of persistent pain. Locus of control (LoC) could play an important role in adaptation to prolonged pain, but the results of studies are inconsistent. We examined the link between pain LoC and quality of life. Moreover, we investigated whether the relationship between LoC and quality of life is mediated by passive and active coping, and whether age moderates the LoC-coping relationship. METHODS: The study was cross-sectional, and variables (internal, chance and powerful-others LoC, pain coping strategies, average pain intensity, and quality of life) were assessed via questionnaires in a sample of 594 individuals (67% females) with chronic pain who were 18-72 (mean: 36) years of age. RESULTS: Mediation and moderated mediation analyses were conducted. Internal and external LoC were associated, respectively, with better and with worse quality of life. Passive coping mediated the association between the powerful-others dimension of LoC and poor quality of life. Additionally, indirect effects of internal LoC on quality of life via passive and active coping were found. The relationship between the powerful-others dimension of LoC and coping was stronger for middle-aged and older individuals than for younger individuals. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to a better understanding of the mechanisms linking LoC with quality of life of patients with chronic pain. Depending on the age, control beliefs might translate differently into strategies used to cope with pain, and thus into quality of life.

Is Pain Contagious? Innocuous Stimulation Can be Transformed Into the Pain Experience by Observational Learning.

Studies indicate that classical and operant conditioning have potential to play a role in the formation of the allodynic effect. Only a few studies have examined the role of observational learning in pain induction. Due to some methodological challenges, evidence that the allodynic effect can be learned through observation is limited. In the present study, healthy participants (n = 88) received 2 series of innocuous electrocutaneous stimuli: at the beginning of the study and after observation of a model who rated all the stimuli as painful. Participants and the model rated all the stimuli alternately (real-time group), or the participant first observed the model and then rated the stimuli, while the model stayed in (post-hoc+ group) or left (post-hoc- group) the laboratory. There was no model in the control group. The study demonstrated that allodynia can be induced by observational learning. Furthermore, this effect was shown to be similar, regardless of whether stimuli were received during the observation of the model and rated immediately afterwards, or when the observation and stimuli reception were time-separated. The mere presence of the model during the stimuli reception also did not affect the magnitude of this effect. This research may contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms of chronic pain development and assist in the development of suitable treatment for it. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents study results on the role of observational learning in allodynia induction without tissue injury. The results may contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms of chronic pain development and assist in the development of suitable treatment for it.