Combination ethacizin and ethmozin treatment of resistant ventricular ectopy: theoretical, experimental, and clinical study.

Ethmozin (Moricizine HCl) and ethacizin are two class I antiarrhythmic drugs with different rate constants of interaction with the sodium channel. Computer simulation using the "guarded-receptor" model predicted that the combination of ethacizin and ethmozin should exert a greater decrease in excitability and conduction at short coupling intervals, but little effect at normal heart rates (HR). To test this prediction, we measured intraventricular conduction delay in canine hearts in vivo. In agreement with the model, the combination more potently prolonged the delay only at intervals < 600 ms as compared with ethacizin alone. Combination therapy was tested in 6 patients with idiopathic ventricular ectopic depolarizations (VEDs). Three patients were resistant to either ethmozin or ethacizin monotherapy, and three could not tolerate effective doses because of side effects. Quantitative continuous ECG monitoring showed that total VEDs in the resistant group decreased 0 and 17 +/- 13% for 400 and 800 mg/day ethmozin and 18 +/- 12 and 55 +/- 12% for 100 and 200 mg/day ethacizin, respectively. Combined therapy with ethmozin (400 mg/day) and ethacizin (100 mg/day) reduced the number of VEDs by 78 +/- 2% in these patients without side effects. In the "nonresistant" but intolerant group of patients, use of the combination allowed relief of symptomatic ectopy without side effects. A theoretical model correctly predicted an effective combination of class I antiarrhythmic drugs, one with "fast-off" and one with "slow-off" kinetics, which may provide a general rationale for choosing drug combinations.

Modulating intraventricular conduction through competition of two class 1 antiarrhythmic agents: experience with ethacizin and lidocaine in canine heart.

The frequency-dependent effects on the intraventricular conduction through the dog heart in situ produced by two class 1 antiarrhythmic drugs, ethacizin and lidocaine, with different kinetic properties were investigated. Conduction delay was measured using stimulation of the His-bundle after pharmacologically induced atrioventricular (AV) block. Electrical events were derived from local epicardial bipolar electrograms at the base of the right ventricle. The stimulation program consisted of several 50-pulse trains with progressively shorter interstimulus intervals (ISI) separated by a l-s pause. Ethacizin (1.5 mg/kg) increased conduction delay by 30% at ISI of 1000 ms, and the effect was enhanced when ISI was shortened to 200 ms; l-s pauses did not significantly increase conduction velocity. Addition of lidocaine (12 mg/kg) strongly potentiated the ethacizin effect at ISI shorter than 300 ms without any noticeable increase in conduction delay at longer intervals. The major result was dramatic acceleration of conduction during the l-s pauses while both drugs were infused. With this combination, conduction delay after pause was shorter than with ethacizin alone, which is consistent with the competition of the drugs for the same binding site inside the sodium channel. Combination of two class 1 compounds in clinical practice may enhance their antiarrhythmic effects without adversely inhibiting normal impulse conduction in the heart. Computer-predicted data were in reasonable agreement with experimental results. The "guarded receptor" model, thus, can provide a simple method for predicting local anesthetic drug interactions in man.