[How does the surgical society (DGAV) support the continuing medical training in general and visceral surgery?] / Wie unterstützt die Fachgesellschaft (DGAV) die ärztliche Weiterbildung in der Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie?

The medical councils (Ärztekammern) develop the contents of the further training regulations with the support of the specialist society. The hospitals with the training supervisors have to implement these contents for the trainees in continuing education and confirm the acquisition of competence for the individual tasks. Surveys of young surgeons in recent years have shown that many participants do not receive structured continuing education, so that there is general dissatisfaction. Therefore, the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) is required to provide assistance to its members to improve continuing education in the departments. For example, the DGAV organizes more than 100 surgical courses annually on all topics of visceral surgery, anatomy, skills courses and revision courses with the Further Education and Advanced Training Quality Center (WeiFoQ). This year a continuing education curriculum was developed over the 6­year continuing education period, so that a structured continuing education is achievable. The contents of the continuing education regulations are included in this continuing education curriculum with explanations, video clips, and graphics, thus providing quick information on each individual surgical clinical picture. A digital surgical catalog provides a quick overview of the status of personal continuing education. It is planned to set up an interface to the eLogbook of the medical councils.

[Impact of the COVID pandemic on treatment of bariatric patients in Germany-An analysis of the national StuDoQ/MBE register]. / Auswirkungen der COVID-Pandemie auf die Versorgung bariatrischer Patienten in Deutschland ­ eine Analyse des nationalen StuDoQ/MBE-Registers.

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic the standard inpatient care of patients was restricted to increase overall and intensive care capacity reserves for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected persons. OBJECTIVE: This article presents the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical and postoperative care of bariatric patients in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A statistical analysis of the national StuDoQ/MBE register data for the period from 1 May 2018 until 31 May 2022 was performed. RESULTS: Throughout the entire study period there was a continuous increase in documented operations, which continued even during the COVID-19 pandemic. A significant intermittent decline in surgery performed was observed only during the imposition of first lockdown in the months of March to May 2020, with a minimum number of 194 cases performed monthly in April 2020. The pandemic had no measurable effect on the surgically treated patient population, the type of surgical procedure, the perioperative and postoperative outcomes and follow-up care. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the StuDoQ data and the current literature, it can be deduced that bariatric surgery can be carried out with no increased risk during the COVID-19 pandemic and the quality of postoperative care is not impaired.

[Statement of the surgical working group upper gastrointestinal tract (CAOGI) and the quality committee of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) on the modified minimum caseload requirements for esophagus resection]. / Stellungnahme der Chirurgischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft oberer Gastrointestinaltrakt (CAOGI) sowie der Qualitätskommission der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV) zu der geänderten Mindestmenge für die Ösophagusresektion.

A positive association between the number of operations and postoperative hospital mortality, the so-called caseload-treatment result relation, has been confirmed many times in the literature; however, the definition of the underlying volumes is not uniform. The number of 26 resections/year/institution, which has now been established by the Federal Joint Committee as the future minimum caseload requirement, is discussed in this statement of the surgical working group upper gastrointestinal tract (CAOGI) and the quality committee of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), taking the treatment situation in Germany and the current data situation into account.

[Advanced training of general and visceral surgeons in life-saving emergency surgery : Results of a survey among participants of a surgery course]. / Fortbildung von Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgen in der lebensrettenden Notfallchirurgie : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter Operationskursteilnehmern.

BACKGROUND: Due to a decreasing number of emergency procedures for body cavity injuries, surgical training is inadequate and current educational concepts must be reconsidered. The German Society for General and Visceral Surgery has set up a surgical training course in 2014 to overcome this shortage. In order to assess the eligibility, needs, benefits and success of such a training format, participants were asked to evaluate the program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All participants evaluated the course during participation and were later asked to answer an online survey regarding their age, gender, level of surgical education, surgical discipline, level of care of the hospital, emergency surgical experience and frequency of performing emergency surgery, participation in other programs, experiences after participating in the course, rating of the current training curriculum and funding of such courses. RESULTS: Out of 142 participants 83 replied to the online survey. Over 90% reported a lasting positive influence of the course on emergency surgical skills. More than half of the responders remembered a clinical situation which they successfully managed due to the skills they gained during the course. Surgeons experienced in emergency treatment felt significantly more benefit than less experienced colleagues. A consultancy position, the level of care of the hospital, age and sex of the participants did not influence the overall benefits reported. The majority of responding surgeons were in favor of including such a training course in surgical education and stipulated public financial support. CONCLUSION: Course formats that mediate emergency surgery strategies and skills are established and well accepted. Training of surgeons in life-saving emergency surgery is in the public interest and is also partly the responsibility of society.

[German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) risk calculator of interventions for colorectal cancer : Presentation of a surgical algorithm on patient participation and quality assurance]. / DGAV-Risikorechner für Eingriffe beim Kolon- und Rektumkarzinom : Vorstellung eines chirurgischen Algorithmus zur Patientenpartizipation und Qualitätssicherung.

Algorithms are increasingly being developed on the basis of large data sets, also in the field of health, whether for predicting treatment outcomes or life-expectancy. In surgery it is also becoming increasingly more important to analyze complications at an early stage and to subsequently reduce them. The aim is to improve the quality of treatment and quality of life and thus to improve patient well-being. The German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) has developed 12 StuDoQ registers in which pseudonymized data from a total of 150,000 patients are recorded. Risk models were developed and validated at the Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE) of the Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich using the collected data from the StuDoQ|colon cancer and StuDoQ|rectal cancer registers. Based on the collected patient data, the risk calculator determines the statistical probability of the individual complication profile of the patient who is to undergo surgery. The aim is to support surgeons and patients in the decision making process for the individual procedure. The surgeon with his individual experience ultimately remains responsible for the patient.

MTL, a composite measure for objectively profiling hospitals on surgical performance in colorectal cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: MTL is a composite outcome measure based on routine administrative data defined as (a) postoperative mortality and/or (b) postoperative transfer to another hospital and/or (c) length of hospital stay ≥ the prespecified time period. Aim of the present study was to investigate MTL for profiling hospitals on surgical performance in colorectal cancer surgery, using data from the national registers of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) and to determine the time interval for length of stay with the highest accuracy regarding major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3). METHODS: All patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection between January 2010 and February 2017 were included. MTL rates were calculated and compared to well-established single outcome measures using multivariate regression analysis. For each outcome measure, postoperative complications were tested regarding their predictability. RESULTS: Data from 14,978 patients were analyzed. Length of stay was significantly prolonged if postoperative complications occurred (p < 0.0001). Thirty-day mortality and the indication for a transfer to another hospital mainly resulted from cardiopulmonary complications. MTL occurs significantly more often than any of the single-outcome parameters. The time interval of 22 days demonstrated the highest accuracy regarding severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3). CONCLUSIONS: MTL reflects the complete spectrum of postoperative complications. Compared to individual surgical outcome parameters, MTL may have a better discriminatory power and is therefore suitable to mirror surgical quality. Because of its high accuracy regarding surgical major morbidity, 22 days is the best cut-off for length of stay within the German healthcare system.

[Bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery in Germany 2017 : Results of a survey among members of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery]. / Darmvorbereitung bei elektiven kolorektalen Resektionen in Deutschland 2017 : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter den Mitgliedern der DGAV.

BACKGROUND: The morbidity after colorectal resection is still high. Perioperative i.v. antibiotic administration has become established as the standard to decrease the wound infection rate. An ongoing discussion is the status of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation. There seems to be evidence that mechanical bowel preparation in combination with administration of oral non-resorbable antibiotics significantly decreases the rate of anastomotic leakage and postoperative wound infections. OBJECTIVE: In order to obtain an overview on the state of preoperative preparation before elective colorectal surgery in Germany, a survey was initiated among the members of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In March 2017 the 5200 members of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) received via email a link to an online survey on bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery. RESULTS: A total of 557 colleagues answered the questionnaire online. Mechanical bowel preparation with orthograde lavage was the predominant method for bowel preparation prior to colon resection in over 50%. In rectal surgery with primary anastomosis and planned protective stoma, mechanical bowel preparation with orthograde lavage dominated with 76.5%. An oral antibiotic administration alone and in combination with mechanical bowel preparation for colon resection was used by less than 10% and 2%, respectively and ca. 11 % for rectal surgery both with and without mechanical bowel preparation. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the evidence in the current literature to carry out preoperative mechanical preparation of the bowel in combination with an oral antibiotic administration prior to colorectal resection, in practice these recommendations have not become established among the participants of this survey.

[Quality indicators for pancreatic surgery : Scientific derivation and clinical relevance]. / Qualitätsindikatoren für die Pankreaschirurgie : Wissenschaftliche Herleitung und klinische Relevanz.

Quality indicators are by definition indirect measures of quality. The selection for the field of pancreatic surgery was based on the clinical relevance and controllability, scientific evidence and the practicability of data acquisition. In terms of outcome quality, hospital mortality, the composite endpoint MTL30 (mortality-transfer-length of stay), and major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grades 3b and 4) were chosen as being essential. With respect to structural quality, the presence of interventional radiology with constant availability was considered essential. To evaluate target values two strategies were used: a systematic literature search and evaluation of the current numbers from the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) StuDoQ|Pancreas registry for the years 2014-2016. The results are presented in the following consensus statement.

[Quality indicators for metabolic and bariatric surgery in Germany : Evidence-based development of an indicator panel for the quality of results, indications and structure]. / Qualitätsindikatoren für die metabolische und Adipositaschirurgie : Evidenzbasierte Entwicklung eines Indikatorensets für die Ergebnis­, Indikations- und Strukturqualität.

An expert committee was appointed by the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery to develop a panel of appropriate quality indicators to collate the quality of results, indications and structure in metabolic and bariatric surgery. This entailed assimilating the available evidence (systematic literature search), results from the national registry of the society (StuDoQ|MBE) and specific socioeconomic aspects (e. g. severely limited access to metabolic and bariatric surgery in Germany). These quality parameters were to be incorporated into the national guidelines and the rules of procedure for certification in the future. The committee concluded that mortality, MTL30 and severe complications needing intervention (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) are suitable indicators to measure surgical outcome quality due to their relevance, scientific soundness and practicability. As a systematic follow-up is mandatory after bariatric surgery, a minimum follow-up quota is now required using reported quality of life data as an indicator of process quality. As intestinal bypass procedures have been shown to be superior in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, these procedures should be offered to eligible patients and also be performed. The proposed threshold values based on the results of the available literature and StuDoQ registry are to be considered as preliminary and need to be validated and adjusted if necessary in the future. The StuDoQ|MBE is considered a valuable tool to gather this information and also represents the appropriate infrastructure for the collation of relevant risk adjustors.

[Quality indicators for surgery of rectal cancer : Evidence-based development of a set of indicators for quality]. / Qualitätsindikatoren für die Chirurgie des Rektumkarzinoms : Evidenzbasierte Entwicklung eines Indikatorensets für die Ergebnisqualität.

The definition of valid quality indicators is an essential task of medical self-administration and quality assurance. Based on the literature and the results of the Study, Documentation, and Quality Center (StuDoQ) Rectal Cancer Registry, we suggest the following QIs: rate of circumferential resection margin (CRM) positive resected material, rate of anastomotic leak in patients with anastomoses, rate of abdominal wound healing disorders and rate of patients with newly established permanent urinary diversion. Additionally, a new marker, the MTL30, which subsumes patient death within 30 days after the index operation, patient transfer to another acute hospital within 30 days after the index operation or a length of inpatient hospital stay of more than 30 days.

[Quality indicators for colon cancer surgery : Evidence-based development of a set of indicators for the outcome quality]. / Qualitätsindikatoren für die onkologische Kolonchirurgie : Evidenzbasierte Entwicklung eines Indikatorensets für die Ergebnisqualität.

BACKGROUND: Quality assessment in surgery is gaining in importance. Although sporadic recommendations for quality indicators (QI) in oncological colon surgery can be found in the literature, these are usually not systematically derived from a solid evidence base. Moreover, reference ranges for QI are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this initiative was the development of evidence-based QI for oncological colon resections by an expert panel invited by the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV). Reference ranges from the literature and reference values from the Study, Documentation, and Quality Center (StuDoQ)|Colon Cancer Register were compared in order to deduce recommendations which are tailored to the German healthcare system. RESULTS: Based on the most recent scientific evidence and agreed by expert consensus, five QI for oncological colon surgery were defined and evaluated according to the QUALIFY tool. Mortality, MTL30 (mortality, transfer to another acute care hospital, or length of stay ≥30 days), anastomotic leakage requiring reintervention, surgical site infections necessitating reopening of the wound and ≥12 lymph nodes in the specimen qualified as QI owing to their relevance, scientific nature, and practicability. Based on the results of the systematic literature search and the statistical analysis of the StuDoQ|Colon Cancer Register, preliminary reference values are proposed for each QI. CONCLUSION: The presented set of QI seems appropriate for quality assessment of oncological colon surgery in the context of the German healthcare system. The validity of the QI and the reference values must be reviewed within the framework of their implementation. The StuDoQ|Colon Cancer Register provides a suitable infrastructure for collecting clinical data for quality assessment and risk adjustment.

Risk factors for reoperation after ileostomy reversal - Results from a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Ileostomy reversal is frequently performed in abdominal surgery. Postoperative complications after ileostomy reversal are encountered in around 20% of patients. Data regarding risk factors for reoperation after ileostomy closure are scarce. The purpose of this prospective trial was to determine risk factors for operative revision after ileostomy closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an additional post hoc analysis of a two center prospective trial. After enrollment, patient characteristics and intraoperative details were analyzed. Patients were followed up at one postoperative visit before discharge and at a three months postoperative visit by standardized questionnaire. All reoperations occurring in the three months period after surgery were analyzed, and immediate reoperations which were directly related to the ileostomy reversal were analyzed separately. RESULTS: 118 patients with elective ileostomy reversal were included in the trial. 12 out of 106 patients (11.3%) underwent any reoperation within three months after surgery (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb). On multivariate analysis, anemia was associated with any reoperation p = 0.004; OR 6.93 (95% CI 1.37-30.07). Six out of 114 patients (5.3%) required an immediate reoperation (small bowel perforation, anastomotic leakage, postoperative ileus, deep wound infection) due to surgical complications directly related to the ileostomy reversal. Higher body mass index and anemia were associated with immediate reoperations (BMI: p = 0.038; OR 0.73 (95% CI 0.55-0.98); anemia: p = 0.001; OR 25.50 (95% CI 3.87-168.21). CONCLUSION: Surgical complications after ileostomy reversal occurred to a substantial extent. Rate of reoperations was associated with anemia and high body mass index. Optimizing patients in terms of preoperative hemoglobin and BMI may reduce surgical complications after ileostomy closure.

Necessity of subcutaneous suction drains in ileostomy reversal (DRASTAR)-a randomized, controlled bi-centered trial.

PURPOSE: Data regarding length of hospital stay of patients undergoing ileostomy reversal are very heterogeneous. There are many factors that may have an influence on the length of postoperative hospital stay, such as postoperative wound infections. One potential strategy to reduce their incidence and to decrease hospital stay is to insert subcutaneous suction drains. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the insertion of subcutaneous suction drains on hospital stay and postoperative wound infections in ileostomy reversal. Risk factors for postoperative wound infection were determined. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled two-center non-inferiority trial with two parallel groups. The total length of hospital stay as primary endpoint and the occurrence of a surgical site infection, the colonization of the abdominal wall with bacteria, and the occurrence of hematomas/seromas as secondary endpoints were monitored. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients with elective ileostomy reversal were included. Fifty-nine patients were randomly assigned to insertion of a subcutaneous suction drain, and 59 patients were randomly assigned to receive no drain. After 3 months of follow-up, 50 patients in the group with drain and 53 patients in the group without drain could be analyzed. Median total length of hospital stay was 8 days in the SD group and 9 days in the group without SD (p = 0.17). Fourteen percent of patients with SD and 17 % without SD developed SSI, p = 0.68. Multivariate analysis revealed anemia (p < 0.01), intraoperative bowel perforation (p = 0.02) and resident (p = 0.04) or fellow (p = 0.048) performing the operation as risk factors for SSI. CONCLUSIONS: This trial shows that the omission of subcutaneous suction drains is not inferior to the use of subcutaneous suction drains after ileostomy reversal in terms of length of hospital stay, surgical site infections, and hematomas/seromas.

[Watchful waiting vs surgical repair of oligosymptomatic incisional hernias: Current status of the AWARE study]. / Beobachtung vs. Operation oligosymptomatischer Narbenhernien : Aktueller Stand der AWARE-Studie.

INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernias are one of the the most frequent complications in visceral surgery and incisional hernia repair has a relevant complication rate. Therefore, there have to be solid indications before carrying out incisional hernia repair. To date, there is a lack of evidence concerning the correct indications for surgical repair of incisional hernias. The AWARE trial compares watchful waiting to surgical repair of incisional hernias. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The AWARE trial is a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Patients with asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic incisional hernia are randomized into the watchful waiting or the surgical repair group with a follow-up of 2 years. The primary endpoint is pain during normal activities due to the hernia or the hernia repair after 2 years measured on the hernia-specific surgical pain scale (SPS). RESULTS: In this study 36 centers are participating throughout Germany, more than 1600 patients had been screened up to 31 December 2014 and 234 (14.6%) of the screened patients could be recruited. CONCLUSION: The AWARE study will provide evidence concerning the two therapeutic options of watchful waiting and surgical repair of incisional hernia.

[Reading behavior and preferences regarding subscriptions to scientific journals : Results of a survey of members of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery]. / Leseverhalten und Präferenzen hinsichtlich Abonnements wissenschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter den Mitgliedern der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of surgical literature is to publish the latest study results and to provide continuing medical education to readers. For optimal allocation of resources, institutional subscribers, professional societies and scientific publishers require structured data on reading and subscription preferences of potential readers of surgical literature. OBJECTIVES: To obtain representative data on the preferences of German general and visceral surgeons regarding reading of and subscription to scientific journals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All members of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) were invited to participate in a web-based survey. Questions were asked on the affiliation and position of the member, individual journal subscriptions, institutional access to scientific journals, preferences regarding electronic or print articles and special subscriptions for society members. Answers were descriptively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 630 out of 4091 (15 %) members participated in the survey and 73 % of the respondents had at least 1 individual subscription to a scientific journal. The most frequently subscribed journal was Der Chirurg (47 % of respondents). The institutional access to journals was deemed insufficient by 48 % of respondents, predominantly in primary care hospitals and outpatient clinics. Almost half of the respondents gave sufficient importance to reading printed versions of articles for which they would pay extra fees. A group subscription for society members was perceived as advantageous as long as no relevant extra costs were incurred. CONCLUSION: This structured survey among members of the DGAV provides data on preferences regarding reading of and subscription to scientific journals. Individual subscriptions to journals are still common, possibly due to suboptimal institutional access particularly at smaller non-academic institutions. In an age of online publications it seems surprising that many respondents place a high value on printed versions. The results are relevant for potential institutional subscribers, professional societies and scientific publishers.

[Are there too many conferences for general and visceral surgery in Germany? : A survey of DGAV members]. / Gibt es in Deutschland zu viele Kongresse in der Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie? : Eine Befragung der DGAV-Mitglieder.

BACKGROUND: Human and financial resources are increasingly bound due to economic pressure and the working hours Act whereby the already restricted further training times are further limited. The industry also has less funding available for sponsorship of conferences and workshops. Against this background the question arises whether a reduction or focusing of the conferences is necessary; therefore, the aim of this survey was to obtain an opinion from members of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) and possibly to derive a need for action to submit to the board members. METHODS: From 7 February to 18 March 2015 an online survey was conducted by the DGAV with their members regarding the number of necessary congress events in Germany. RESULTS: A total of 670 responses were received (return rate 16 %). In total, 56 % of participants felt that there are too many conferences. A differentiation according to the position of the respondent and the level of the associated hospital resulted in the following: 69.3 % of the participating head physicians (HP) shared this opinion, compared to 48.6 % of senior physicians (SP) and 34.4 % of residents (RP). Of the participants from basic and standard care hospitals (B/SC) 50 % shared this opinion, compared to 59.2 % from maximum care hospitals (MC) and 63.6 % from university hospitals (UH). In addition, a total of 75 % of the participants (HP 82.9 %, SP 78.4 %, RP 70.5 %) were in favor of keeping the congress of the DGAV (annual meeting of the German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases in conjunction with the Autumn meeting of the DGAV) in its previous form, regardless of the underlying level of care of the associated hospital (B/SC 77 %, MC 79 %, UC 68 %). CONCLUSION: More experienced surgeons in particular tended to favor a reduction of events with a focus on the major conferences; however, younger colleagues preferred a wider spectrum of meetings. In order to comply with both positions a wide range of events should be continued to be provided in the future so that surgeons can choose which to attend according to the individual preferences.

[Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in Germany: Data from the German NOTES registry]. / "Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery" in Deutschland : Daten aus dem deutschen NOTES-Register.

BACKGROUND: The German NOTES registry (GNR) was initiated by the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) as a treatment and outcome database for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). AIM: The aim of this study was the descriptive analysis of all GNR data collected over a 5-year period since its start in 2008 with more than 3000 interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The GNR is an online database with voluntary participation available to all German-speaking clinics. Demographic data, therapy details, complications and data on the postoperative course of patients are recorded. All cases in the GNR between March 2008 and November 2013 were included in the analysis. RESULTS: From a total of 3150 data sets 2992 (95 %) were valid and suited for the analysis. Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy was the most frequently used procedure (88.7 %), followed by hybrid transvaginal/transgastric appendectomy (6.1 %) and hybrid transvaginal/transrectal colon procedures (5.1 %). Intraoperative complications occurred in 1.6 %, postoperative complications in 3.7 % and conversions were reported in 1.5 %. Intraoperative bladder injuries and postoperative urinary tract infections were identified as method-specific complications of transvaginal procedures. Bowel injuries occurred as a rare (0.2 %) but potentially serious complication of transvaginal operations. CONCLUSION: The German surgical community ensures a safe and responsible introduction of the new NOTES operation techniques with its active participation in the GNR. Despite an overall low complication rate, the high number of procedures in the GNR permitted the identification of method-specific complications. This knowledge can be used to further increase the safety of NOTES in practice.

Therapy of complicated Crohn's disease during pregnancy--an interdisciplinary challenge.

BACKGROUND: Severe courses of Crohn's disease (CD) during pregnancy are rare. However, if occurring, the risk of miscarriage and low birth weight is increased. At present, only limited data is available on the treatment of CD during pregnancy. In particular, there are no standard guidelines for surgical therapy. Nevertheless, surgery is often unavoidable if complications during the course of the disease arise. PURPOSE: This study provides a critical overview of conventional and interventional treatment options for CD complications during pregnancy and analyses the surgical experience gained thus far. For illustrative purposes, clinical cases of three young women with a severe clinical course during pregnancy are presented. METHODS: After treatment-refractory for conservative and interventional measures, surgery remained as the only treatment option. In all cases, a split stoma was created after resection to avoid anastomotic leaks that would endanger the lives of mother and child. The postoperative course of all three patients was uneventful, and pregnancy remained intact until delivery. No further CD specific medication was required before birth. CONCLUSIONS: The management of CD patients during pregnancy requires close interdisciplinary co-operation between gastroenterologists, obstetricians, anaesthetists and visceral surgeons. For the protection of mother and child treatment should thus be delivered in a specialised centre. This article demonstrates the advantages of surgical therapy by focusing on alleviating CD complaints and preventing postoperative complications.