Benefits of the selective invasive strategy guided by CTA and CTA-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has high diagnostic accuracy in ruling out significant stenosis of coronary arteries. The additional use of CTA- derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) further enhances diagnostic utility of coronary CTA. Some patients interrogated non-invasively have diseased coronary arteries and undergo further diagnostic testing, including invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Patients with one-vessel disease may benefit from invasive interrogation limited to the diseased vessel only. AIMS: We analyzed the impact of a "diseased-vessel-only" selective invasive diagnostic approach in 100 patients undergoing ICA following coronary CTA (and CT-FFR) as compared to the traditional "full ICA" approach. We aimed to compare contrast volume and radiation dose used during ICA in both scenarios, seeking potential benefits for the patient in reducing those values by the "dis-eased-vessel-only" approach. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CTA in prediction of subsequent revascularization were 96%, 75%, 51%, and 99%, respectively, and for CT-FFR 90%, 90%, 69%, and 97%, respectively. Using CTA as a method to guide ICA would reduce contrast volume and estimated radiation dose (ED) by 35% and 42.0%, respectively (P <0.0001 for both). Taking into consideration CT-FFR results, contrast volume would be reduced by 57% and ED by 69% (P <0.0001 for both). CONCLUSION: These real-world data support the concept that vessels with <50% diameter stenosis on quantitative computed tomography and with hemodynamically insignificant CTA-derived FFR result may be omitted during ICA. Such an approach would result in substantial reductions in con-trast media volume used, as well as patients' exposure to radiation during ICA, while not leading to misdiagnoses.

Coronary computed tomography angiography equals invasive angiography for the prediction of coronary revascularization.

INTRODUCTION: Growing role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) as a diagnostic tool in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) calls for better recognition of its value in clinical decision making as compared to the gold standard of invasive coronary angiography (ICA). AIM: To assess the diagnostic value of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography (QCT) as compared to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) for the prediction of coronary revascularization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study we included 100 patients who underwent ICA following CTA. Quantitative diameter stenosis analysis (qCTA) was performed with Syngo.via (Siemens Medical Systems) software by an experienced investigator blinded to results of ICA. Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) was chosen to define %DS in a repetitive manner. ICA images were submitted to Qangio XA (Medis, Leiden, The Netherlands) software for QCA analysis. RESULTS: Eighty out of 400 analysed vessels were revascularized. Per-vessel diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV an NPV were 80%, 98%, 73%, 48% and 99% for QCT and 81%, 99%, 73%, 48% and 100% for QCA, respectively, for the prediction of revascularization. AUC was similar: 0.88 for QCT and 0.89 for QCA (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: These real-world data support the concept that CTA is as precise in prediction of coronary revascularization as ICA. This may add to the discussion about CTA having the potential to replace ICA for diagnosing vessels qualified for intervention, reserving the invasive diagnostic approach for those with the highest probability of revascularization.

Device Thrombosis After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Is Related to Patient and Procedural Characteristics but Not to Duration of Postimplantation Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage occlusion is a worrisome finding with little knowledge about when to expect it and how to prevent it. This study sought to investigate correlates of DRT after left atrial appendage occlusion, its time of diagnosis, and particularly, association with postimplantation dual antiplatelet therapy duration. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n=102) after left atrial appendage occlusion with AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug/Amulet (n=59) or WATCHMAN (n=43) were included in a prospective registry (October 2011-May 2016). Follow-up was done at 1.5, 3 to 6, and 12 months postimplantation. DRT was classified as early (at 1.5 month), late (at 3-6 month), or very late (at 12-month follow-up). Postimplantation dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended for 30 to 180 days and decided independently by attending physicians. Final analysis included 99 patients, 42 (42.4%) females, with median CHA2DS2-VASc of 4.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-5.0) and median HAS-BLED score of 2.0 (IQR, 1.0-3.0). DRTs were observed in 7 (7.1%) patients: 2 (28.6%) early, 2 (28.6%) late, and 3 (42.9%) very late. When compared with patients without DRT, those with DRT presented more often with a history of prior thromboembolism (5 [71.4%] versus 28 [30.4%]; P=0.04), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (50.0 [IQR, 35.0-55.0] versus 60.0 [IQR, 55.0-66.0]; P<0.01), and had greater proportion of patients with deep device implantation (6 [85.7%] versus 36 [39.1%]; P=0.04) and with larger devices implanted (30.0 mm [IQR, 27.0-33.0] versus 25.0 mm [IQR, 24.0-28.0]; P<0.01). Postimplantation dual antiplatelet therapy duration was not different between the 2 groups (12.4 weeks [IQR, 6.0-49.7] with DRT versus 13.0 weeks [IQR, 7.3-26.0] without DRT; P=0.77). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world series, DRT was observed early, late, and very late after left atrial appendage occlusion. It was related to patient and procedural characteristics but not to postimplantation dual antiplatelet therapy duration.

Percutaneous retrieval of centrally embolized fragments of central venous access devices or knotted Swan-Ganz catheters. Clinical report of 14 retrievals with detailed angiographic analysis and review of procedural aspects.

INTRODUCTION: Totally implantable venous access systems (TIVAS), Swan-Ganz (SG) and central venous catheters (CVC) allow easy and repetitive entry to the central cardiovascular system. Fragments of them may be released inadvertently into the cardiovascular system during their insertion or as a result of mechanical complications encountered during long-term utilization. AIM: To present results of percutaneous retrieval of embolized fragments of central venous devices or knotted SG and review the procedural aspects with a series of detailed angiographies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2012 there were 14 (~0.025%) successful retrievals in 13 patients (44 ±16 years, 15% females) of embolized fragments of TIVAS (n = 10) or CVC (n = 1) or of dislodged guide-wires (n = 2) or knotted SG (n = 1). RESULTS: Foreign bodies with the forward end located in the right ventricle (RV), as well as those found in the pulmonary artery (PA), often required repositioning with a pigtail catheter as compared to those catheter fragments which were located in the right atrium (RA) and/or great vein and possessed an accessible free end allowing their direct ensnarement with the loop snare (57.0% (4/7) vs. 66.7% (2/3) vs. 0.0% (0/3); p = 0.074 respectively). Procedure duration was 2-3 times longer among catheters retrieved from the PA than among those with the forward edge located in the RV or RA (30 (18-68) vs. 13.5 (11-37) vs. 8 min (8-13); p = 0.054 respectively). The SG catheter knotted in the vena cava superior (VCS) was encircled with the loop snare introduced transfemorally, subsequently cut at its skin entrance and then pulled down inside the 14 Fr vascular sheath. CONCLUSIONS: By using the pigtail catheter and the loop snare, it is feasible to retrieve centrally embolized fragments or knotted central venous access devices.