[Few ethnic differences in acute pediatric problems: 10 years of acute care in the Sophia Children's Hospital in Rotterdam]]. / Geringe etnische verschillen in spoedeisende problemen bij kinderen: 10 jaar acute hulp in het Sophia Kinderziekenhuis te Rotterdam.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether there are differences in acute general paediatric problems and their severity between children with different ethnic backgrounds. DESIGN: Descriptive. METHOD: The following information was registered for patients who visited the paediatric emergency department at the Sophia Children's Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands (1988 through to 1997): demographics, reason for encounter, diagnoses, diagnostics performed and follow-up. Ethnicity was determined by patient's surname. Analyses were performed using the chi 2 test, non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of all patients belonged to one of the ethnic minority groups. Infection-related problems were seen more often in Turkish (45%) and Moroccan (46%) children than in Dutch children (41%). Of those children with infection-related problems, the Turkish children were less likely to need X-rays (odds ratio: 0.73), laboratory diagnostics (0.72), an outpatient follow-up (0.79) or hospital admission (0.74). On the other hand, Moroccan paediatric patients were admitted slightly more frequently (to the intensive care department) and were more likely to have a lower respiratory tract infection (1.65). CONCLUSIONS: There were some differences between Dutch children and ethnic minorities in terms of the reasons for encounter and the severity of the problem. Compared with Dutch children, Turkish children presented with less severe infection-related problems, while Moroccan children had more severe infection problems.

Lack of benefit of laxatives as adjunctive therapy for functional nonretentive fecal soiling in children.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the combination of laxative treatment and biofeedback therapy (BF) is more effective for management of functional nonretentive fecal soiling than biofeedback therapy alone. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective nonblinded study, 48 children were randomized in 2 groups: treatment with oral laxatives (LAX) and 5 sessions of BF (BF + LAX) or 5 sessions of BF alone (BF) during a treatment intervention period of 7 weeks. Biofeedback was performed with perfused manometry catheters and rectal balloon distension. Training focused on awareness of balloon distension and instruction in correct defecation dynamics. Successful treatment was defined as <1 encopresis episode per 2 weeks. RESULTS: At the end of the intervention period, the number of encopresis episodes was significantly decreased in both groups: from 7 (2 to 24) to 2 (0 to 17) in the BF group and from 7 (3 to 25) to 2 (0 to 14) in the BF + LAX group. However, children given BF alone had significantly higher success rates than children treated with BF and additional oral laxatives (44% to 11%). CONCLUSIONS: There is no additional effect of laxative treatment in functional nonretentive fecal soiling. Children treated with BF in combination with laxatives showed a significantly lower success percentage compared with those treated with BF alone. These results suggest that children with functional nonretentive fecal soiling should be treated differently from children with constipation and encopresis.