RESUMO
BACKGROUND: One in five adults in Sri Lanka has either diabetes or prediabetes, and one-third of those with diabetes are undiagnosed. Diabetic foot is a debilitating condition affecting up to 50% of patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The risk of nontraumatic lower limb amputations is 15 times higher in diabetic patients when compared with nondiabetics. Patient education about correct foot care practices is the cornerstone of prevention of diabetic foot disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of diabetic foot disease, knowledge, and practices about diabetic foot care among diabetic patients. METHODS: 334 patients attending the diabetic clinic in Colombo South Teaching Hospital were recruited according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were collected using 3 questionnaires, and they were filled using the foot examination findings, patients' medical records, and direct interviewing of the patients. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 58.23 ± 10.65 years while the median duration of diabetes was 10.54 ± 7.32 years. 34.1% patients had peripheral neuropathy, and 29.5% had peripheral vascular disease. Diabetic foot disease according to the WHO definition was present only in 23 (6.9%) patients. There was a significant association between peripheral neuropathy and current or past foot ulcer which took more than 2 weeks to heal (p < 0.05). Knowledge about foot care was less among the studied population, and it was associated with poor foot care practices. Presence of diabetic foot and current or past foot ulcer which took more than 2 weeks to heal were significantly associated with the foot care knowledge and practices (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Improvement of patients' knowledge about foot care and their practices have a significant impact on the reduction of diabetic foot disease.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: In animal models, fat removal results in compensatory weight gain. No study has reported measurement of weight following lipectomy in humans. We have examined changes in weight in patients who underwent lipectomy. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, 16 patients who had abdominoplasty and 17 patients who underwent bilateral breast reduction were compared with 16 patients who had carpal tunnel syndrome release. Following this, a prospective study was carried out on 7 subjects awaiting abdominoplasty and 12 subjects awaiting bilateral breast reduction surgery. RESULTS: In the retrospective study, all three patient groups gained weight following surgery. The abdominoplasty group was heavier before surgery and showed greatest weight gain but there was no statistically significant difference in weight gain between the groups. In the prospective study, the abdominoplasty group had a mean fat removal of 1.77 kg and breast reduction group had a mean of 3.22 kg. Eighteen months following surgery the abdominoplasty group showed a significant mean increase in body weight (mean increase: 4.82 kg) and body mass index (BMI) (mean increase: 1.66 kg/m(2)). In the bilateral breast reduction group, there was a non-significant mean gain in weight (mean increase: 0.67 kg) and BMI (mean increase: 0.21 kg/m(2)). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing lipectomy during abdominoplasty and bilateral breast reduction will gain weight in the long term. This weight gain probably reflects the expected gain in weight without surgery as a similar finding is observed in patients who have undergone surgery without lipectomy. These results highlight the limitation of lipectomy as a weight control measure.
