Comparing Myofascial Pain Syndrome Treatment with Dry Needling Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis on Pain and Function of the Heel.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of dry needling (DN) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of plantar fasciitis (PF). The study included 55 patients with PF. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. The DN group applied 3 sessions of DN to the myofascial trigger points in the lower limb muscles. The ESWT group applied 3 sessions of ESWT to the plantar fascia. For clinical evaluation, we used a visual analog scale (VAS) (first step, rest, activity) and Foot Function Index (FFI) (pain, disability, activity). Assessments were done baseline, post-treatment first week, and fourth week. Maximum pain-free standing time (Max PfST) and maximum pain-free walking distance (Max PfWD) were recorded at baseline and post-treatment fourth week. In this study, we found significant improvement in VAS, FFI, Max PfST, and Max PfWD in both groups (p < .01). VAS-activity baseline-forth week change was significantly superior in the DN group compared to the ESWT group (p = .023). FFI-disability baseline-fourth week change was significantly superior in the DN group compared to the ESWT group (p = .048). There was no significant difference in other treatment-related changes between the groups (p > .05). However, VAS-rest baseline-fourth week change and FFI-pain baseline-fourth week change trended towards statistical significance between groups ((p = .056), (p = .052) respectively). This study showed that DN may be a good alternative treatment for patients with PF, with effects similar to or even superior to ESWT.

Carpal tunnel syndrome evaluation with ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

AIM: In this study, our primary aim was to compare ultrasound (US) findings of the median nerve between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) (RA(+)CTS), RA without CTS (RA(-)CTS) and healthy controls (HC) and to determine the optimal US parameters to detect the presence of CTS in RA patients. METHODS: 65 RA patients and 25 HC patients were included in this study. The diagnosis of CTS was made according to the clinical history and physical examination of the participants. Median nerve cross-sectional area(CSA) was measured at the carpal tunnel inlet(CTI), outlet(CTO), and forearm level by the US. In addition, anteroposterior(AP) and mediolateral(ML) diameters of the median nerve were measured. After the measurements, wrist-to-forearm ratio, wrist-to-forearm difference, and flattening ratio were calculated. The presence of tenosynovitis was investigated. RESULTS: CTS was detected in 26(40.0%) of 65 RA patients who participated in the study. CTS was detected in 43(35.2%) of 122 wrists of 65 RA patients. CTI CSA, CTO CSA, forearm CSA, anteroposterior/mediolateral diameter, wrist-to-forearm ratio, wrist-to-forearm difference, and flattening ratio were significantly higher in RA(+)CTS than in RA(-)CTS and HC(p<0.01). In addition, CDAI and CTI CSA(r=0.322, p<0.01), CTO CSA(r=0.301, p<0.01), CTI-to-forearm ratio(r=0.345, p<0.001), CTI-to-forearm difference(r=0.362, p<0.01) and CTO-Forearm difference(r=0.304, p<0.01) moderate correlation was found between. The frequency of tenosynovitis was higher in wrists with CTS than in wrists without CTS (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: While the presence of CTS in RA patients is sonographically evaluated, it may be useful to evaluate parameters such as CTI-to-forearm difference, ratio, and CTI ML diameter rather than just sticking to CTI CSA during diagnosis. Correlations of these parameters with disease activity can also be noted.