[Preoperative evaluation of the body concept of donors and recipients of living kidney donations]. / Präoperative Evaluation des Körperkonzepts von Nierenlebendspendern und -empfängern.

OBJECTIVES: The psychosocial evaluation of the body concept of living kidney donors and recipients is part of a general psychosocial assessment as well as the early detection of organ integration disorders. METHODS: From 2010 to 2011 we investigated the eligibility for living kidney donation in 36 living kidney donors and 36 recipients using a semistructured clinical interview and the German version of the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS). In addition, we used the Fragebogen zum Körperbild (FKB-20) to evaluate body concept. RESULTS: Living kidney donors and recipients differed in their body concept. Living kidney recipients described a body-centered disturbance stemming from a reduction of body-intensive activities including destabilization of body concept. CONCLUSION: The psychological coping process involved in living kidney donation demands a reconstitution of the body self. The coping/health behavior and the affective state of living kidney recipients are protective factors that influence successful organ integration.

Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to heart transplantation: what remains? Long-term emotional sequelae in patients and spouses.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of a ventricular assist device (VAD) reduces short-term mortality and morbidity and provides patients with reasonable quality of life even though it may also be a long-lasting emotional burden. This study was conducted to analyze the long-time emotional consequences of VAD implantation, followed by heart transplantation in patients and spouses. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) Version, recording avoidance, intrusion, and hyperarousal, to investigate symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and VAD-related fears and concerns. The study cohort comprised 38 patients (36 men, 2 women) and 27 spouses (26 women, 1 man), 6 to 135 months post-operatively. RESULTS: Seven (26%) of the 27 spouses but none of the patients met the criteria for PTSD. Patients who were operated at the early stage of our VAD program (82.0 +/- 31.4 months between implantation and evaluation) were significantly more likely to have a spouse with PTSD syndromes than those whose operation took place later on (42.1 +/- 31.1 months, p = 0.007). Patients with higher avoidance scores and a higher level of hyperarousal were significantly more often affiliated with a PTSD spouse than those with lower avoidance (p = 0.008) and hyperarousal scores (p = 0.001). Spouses displayed significantly higher scores in all IES-R dimensions, and they worried more about device-related problems (malfunctioning, pain, infection, and stroke) than the patients themselves. The noise of the device system was not a crucial issue. CONCLUSION: Our study found that implantation of a VAD, followed by transplantation, does not lead to PTSD in patients but it does in their spouses in the long run. Their emotional well being deserves much closer attention.

[Changes in partner relationship after organ transplantation: comparison between heart, liver, and kidney transplantation]. / Veränderung der Paarbeziehung nach Organtransplantation: Vergleich von Herz-, Leber- und Nierentransplantation.

AIM: This study was conducted to delineate partnership-relation functioning over time and specifically matched to various organs such as heart, liver, and kidney. METHOD: Prospective, paralleled case-control-study including patients and their respective partners before and one year after organ transplantation in 23 heart-transplant recipients, 19 liver-transplant patients, and 16 kidney-transplant recipients. To assess partnership functioning, the FB-Z (family assessment measure) of Cierpka and Frevert was used. Statistics included descriptive methods, correlations, and analysis of variance including the items "organ" and "time". RESULTS: Heart-transplant recipients and their partners show significant better overall measures in their partnership ratings (sum-value) in comparison to liver or kidney patients and their partners. In all patient and partner groups, except in kidney-transplant recipients a significant deterioration over time is discernible in the subscales role performance and emotionality. In respect to the item "organ" significant differences were found in overall functioning and the subscale communication where heart-transplant recipients and their partners have significant better functioning compared to kidney or liver transplant patients. In kidney patients and their partners only communication changes to the better in the time course. CONCLUSION: In any organ transplantation the two sides of the coin are important to bear in mind, the one is the live-saving act of transplantation as such, the other is the important distress in the phase before but equally after the operation, mainly in the first year where patients and their respective partners have to be followed and treated even in respect to psychosocial and marital functioning.

[Integration process and organ-related fantasies in patients undergoing organ transplantation]. / Integrationsprozesse und Organphantasien im Rahmen der Organtransplantation.

This review deals with an important aspect of organ transplantation, namely the process of psychic organ integration and organ-related fantasies. The body schema and body self are two important concepts in the integration of a transplanted organ. Different models and theories on organ integration are presented and will be discussed. There is evidence that beside the emotional impact and the influence on well-being, organ integration depends closely on psychic processes involving in the incorporation of the transplanted organ and the respective organ-related fantasies. Therefore, these organ fantasies - whether unconscious or conscious - may play an important role in the future development of the instinctive and highly individual relation the patients elaborate with the new organ. Beside the concern with the new organ, a bereavement to the lost old and sick organ may also influence the patients thoughts. Moreover, the good resolving of all these issues evokes the "good practice" patients develop towards the new situation. This will bring up issues as compliance, infections, rejection episodes and - most important - also organ survival.