Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation on mortality after hip fracture surgery / Efecto de la luxación de la prótesis parcial de cadera en la mortalidad tras la cirugía de fractura de cadera

Introduction: Hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures among the older population. The hip prosthesis dislocation is one of the most pointed potential complications after hip arthroplasty, but there is a lack of updated information on the effect of dislocation on the survival of older hip fracture patients so treated by hip hemiarthroplasty. We aim to evaluate the standalone effect of hip prosthesis dislocation after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty on patients’ survival outcomes. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study, including 6631 femoral neck fracture patients over 65 surgically treated by hemiarthroplasty. We made follow-up cut-offs 30-days, 6 weeks, 90-days, and one year after hospital discharge determining hip dislocation rate and patients’ survival. Results: The women population represented 78.7%, and the mean age of the population was 85.2±6.7 years. Hip prosthesis dislocation incidence was 1.9% in the first 90-days after discharge, representing 91.54% of primary dislocations yearly noted. We reported statistically significant increased mortality rates of patients presenting at least one hip prosthesis dislocation event (from 16.0% to 24.6% at 90-day after discharge, and 29.5% to 44.7% at one year), and also significantly decreasing patient survival function at 90-day (p=0.016) and one-year follow-up (p<0.001). The recurrent dislocation events (26.15%) showed even higher mortality rates (up to 60.6%, p<0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model determined that prosthesis dislocation was the only significant variable (p=0.035) affecting patient survival, increasing the risk of dying before one year of follow-up by 2.7 times. Discussion: Our study stands for the standalone hip prosthesis dislocation entailing a higher risk of death after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty in the older population.(AU)

Introducción: La artroplastia de cadera es el tratamiento de elección para las fracturas desplazadas del cuello de fémur en la población de edad avanzada. La luxación de la prótesis de cadera es una de las complicaciones potenciales tras la artroplastia de cadera, pero falta información actualizada sobre el efecto de la luxación en la supervivencia de los pacientes mayores con fractura de cadera tratados mediante hemiartroplastia de cadera. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar el efecto de la luxación de la prótesis de cadera (hemiartroplastia) como factor aislado, en la función de supervivencia de los pacientes. Materiales y métodos: Realizamos un estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo, que incluyó a 6.631 pacientes mayores de 65 años con fractura de cuello de fémur tratados quirúrgicamente mediante hemiartroplastia. Se realizaron cortes de seguimiento a los 30 días, 6 semanas, 90 días y un año del alta hospitalaria, determinando la tasa de luxación de cadera y la supervivencia de los pacientes. Resultados: La población femenina representó el 78,7%, y la edad media de la población fue de 85,2±6,7 años. La incidencia de luxación de la prótesis de cadera fue del 1,9% en los primeros 90 días tras el alta, lo que representa el 91,54% de las luxaciones primarias observadas anualmente. Se registró un aumento estadísticamente significativo de las tasas de mortalidad de los pacientes que presentaban al menos un evento de luxación de la prótesis de cadera (del 16,0 al 24,6% a los 90 días del alta, y del 29,5 al 44,7% al año), y también una disminución significativa de la función de supervivencia de los pacientes a los 90 días (p=0,016) y al año de seguimiento (p<0,001). Los eventos de luxación recurrente (26,15%) mostraron tasas de mortalidad aún más altas (hasta el 60,6%, p<0,001). El modelo multivariante de regresión de Cox determinó que la luxación de la prótesis de cadera es la única variable significativa (p=0,035) que afecta a la...(AU)

[Artículo traducido] Efecto de la luxación de la prótesis parcial de cadera en la mortalidad tras la cirugía de fractura de cadera / Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation on mortality after hip fracture surgery

Introducción: La artroplastia de cadera es el tratamiento de elección para las fracturas desplazadas del cuello de fémur en la población de edad avanzada. La luxación de la prótesis de cadera es una de las complicaciones potenciales tras la artroplastia de cadera, pero falta información actualizada sobre el efecto de la luxación en la supervivencia de los pacientes mayores con fractura de cadera tratados mediante hemiartroplastia de cadera. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar el efecto de la luxación de la prótesis de cadera (hemiartroplastia) como factor aislado, en la función de supervivencia de los pacientes. Materiales y métodos: Realizamos un estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo, que incluyó a 6.631 pacientes mayores de 65 años con fractura de cuello de fémur tratados quirúrgicamente mediante hemiartroplastia. Se realizaron cortes de seguimiento a los 30 días, 6 semanas, 90 días y un año del alta hospitalaria, determinando la tasa de luxación de cadera y la supervivencia de los pacientes. Resultados: La población femenina representó el 78,7%, y la edad media de la población fue de 85,2±6,7 años. La incidencia de luxación de la prótesis de cadera fue del 1,9% en los primeros 90 días tras el alta, lo que representa el 91,54% de las luxaciones primarias observadas anualmente. Se registró un aumento estadísticamente significativo de las tasas de mortalidad de los pacientes que presentaban al menos un evento de luxación de la prótesis de cadera (del 16,0 al 24,6% a los 90 días del alta, y del 29,5 al 44,7% al año), y también una disminución significativa de la función de supervivencia de los pacientes a los 90 días (p=0,016) y al año de seguimiento (p<0,001). Los eventos de luxación recurrente (26,15%) mostraron tasas de mortalidad aún más altas (hasta el 60,6%, p<0,001). El modelo multivariante de regresión de Cox determinó que la luxación de la prótesis de cadera es la única variable significativa (p=0,035) que afecta a la...(AU)

Introduction: Hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures among the older population. The hip prosthesis dislocation is one of the most pointed potential complications after hip arthroplasty, but there is a lack of updated information on the effect of dislocation on the survival of older hip fracture patients so treated by hip hemiarthroplasty. We aim to evaluate the standalone effect of hip prosthesis dislocation after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty on patients’ survival outcomes. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study, including 6631 femoral neck fracture patients over 65 surgically treated by hemiarthroplasty. We made follow-up cut-offs 30-days, 6 weeks, 90-days, and one year after hospital discharge determining hip dislocation rate and patients’ survival. Results: The women population represented 78.7%, and the mean age of the population was 85.2±6.7 years. Hip prosthesis dislocation incidence was 1.9% in the first 90-days after discharge, representing 91.54% of primary dislocations yearly noted. We reported statistically significant increased mortality rates of patients presenting at least one hip prosthesis dislocation event (from 16.0% to 24.6% at 90-day after discharge, and 29.5% to 44.7% at one year), and also significantly decreasing patient survival function at 90-day (p=0.016) and one-year follow-up (p<0.001). The recurrent dislocation events (26.15%) showed even higher mortality rates (up to 60.6%, p<0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model determined that prosthesis dislocation was the only significant variable (p=0.035) affecting patient survival, increasing the risk of dying before one year of follow-up by 2.7 times. Discussion: Our study stands for the standalone hip prosthesis dislocation entailing a higher risk of death after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty in the older population.(AU)

Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation on mortality after hip fracture surgery. / [Artículo traducido] Efecto de la luxación de la prótesis parcial de cadera en la mortalidad tras la cirugía de fractura de cadera.

INTRODUCTION: Hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures among the older population. The hip prosthesis dislocation is one of the most pointed potential complications after hip arthroplasty, but there is a lack of updated information on the effect of dislocation on the survival of older hip fracture patients so treated by hip hemiarthroplasty. We aim to evaluate the standalone effect of hip prosthesis dislocation after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty on patients' survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study, including 6631 femoral neck fracture patients over 65 surgically treated by hemiarthroplasty. We made follow-up cut-offs 30-days, 6 weeks, 90-days, and one year after hospital discharge determining hip dislocation rate and patients' survival. RESULTS: The women population represented 78.7%, and the mean age of the population was 85.2 ± 6.7 years. Hip prosthesis dislocation incidence was 1.9% in the first 90-days after discharge, representing 91.54% of primary dislocations yearly noted. We reported statistically significant increased mortality rates of patients presenting at least one hip prosthesis dislocation event (from 16.0% to 24.6% at 90-day after discharge, and 29.5% to 44.7% at one year), and also significantly decreasing patient survival function at 90-day (P = .016) and one-year follow-up (P < .001). The recurrent dislocation events (26.15%) showed even higher mortality rates (up to 60.6%, p < .001). The multivariate Cox regression model determined that prosthesis dislocation was the only significant variable (P = .035) affecting patient survival, increasing the risk of dying before one year of follow-up by 2.7 times. DISCUSSION: Our study stands for the standalone hip prosthesis dislocation entailing a higher risk of death after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty in the older population.

Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation on mortality after hip fracture surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures among the older population. The hip prosthesis dislocation is one of the most pointed potential complications after hip arthroplasty, but there is a lack of updated information on the effect of dislocation on the survival of older hip fracture patients so treated by hip hemiarthroplasty. We aim to evaluate the standalone effect of hip prosthesis dislocation after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty on patients' survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study, including 6631 femoral neck fracture patients over 65 surgically treated by hemiarthroplasty. We made follow-up cut-offs 30-days, 6 weeks, 90-days, and one year after hospital discharge determining hip dislocation rate and patients' survival. RESULTS: The women population represented 78.7%, and the mean age of the population was 85.2±6.7 years. Hip prosthesis dislocation incidence was 1.9% in the first 90-days after discharge, representing 91.54% of primary dislocations yearly noted. We reported statistically significant increased mortality rates of patients presenting at least one hip prosthesis dislocation event (from 16.0% to 24.6% at 90-day after discharge, and 29.5% to 44.7% at one year), and also significantly decreasing patient survival function at 90-day (p=0.016) and one-year follow-up (p<0.001). The recurrent dislocation events (26.15%) showed even higher mortality rates (up to 60.6%, p<0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model determined that prosthesis dislocation was the only significant variable (p=0.035) affecting patient survival, increasing the risk of dying before one year of follow-up by 2.7 times. DISCUSSION: Our study stands for the standalone hip prosthesis dislocation entailing a higher risk of death after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty in the older population.

Ecografía cutánea y rellenos dermatológicos / Cutaneous ultrasound and dermal fillers

En la consulta diaria, cada vez es más frecuente la demanda de los pacientes para la realización de rellenos o implantes dermatológicos, en relación con la corrección de arrugas superficiales o pliegues cutáneos marcados por el envejecimiento o bien para aumentar volúmenes en determinadas áreas (pómulos, labios, etc.). En muchas ocasiones somos nosotros, los dermatólogos, los primeros profesionales en realizar estos tratamientos, pero en otras los pacientes ya han sido tratados previamente, y son muchos los que ignoran el tipo de material que se les ha implantado o incluso niegan haber sido tratados con anterioridad, cuando en la exploración clínica se percibe lo contrario. Es en estas ocasiones cuando el desarrollo de la ecografía cutánea ha resultado ser una herramienta eficaz y fiable para poder realizar un diagnóstico en tiempo real sobre el tipo de relleno implantado, su localización y el estudio de posibles complicaciones que pudieran presentarse

Requests for fillers or dermatological implants have dramatically increased in dermatology consultations in the last few years, either for the correction of superficial age-related wrinkles and cutaneous creases or to increase the volume of specific areas (cheeks, lips...). Dermatologists are often the first professionals to provide these treatments. Nevertheless, in other situations, the patients have already been treated, and many of them do not know the type of material that has been implanted or may even deny previous treatment, even when evident on clinical examination. In these occasions, cutaneous ultrasound is an effective and reliable tool for the real-time diagnosis of the kind of implant that has been used, its location, and the study of its possible complications

[Cutaneous ultrasound and dermal fillers]. / Ecografía cutánea y rellenos dermatológicos.

Requests for fillers or dermatological implants have dramatically increased in dermatology consultations in the last few years, either for the correction of superficial age-related wrinkles and cutaneous creases or to increase the volume of specific areas (cheeks, lips...). Dermatologists are often the first professionals to provide these treatments. Nevertheless, in other situations, the patients have already been treated, and many of them do not know the type of material that has been implanted or may even deny previous treatment, even when evident on clinical examination. In these occasions, cutaneous ultrasound is an effective and reliable tool for the real-time diagnosis of the kind of implant that has been used, its location, and the study of its possible complications.

Radioprotección en quirófanos de traumatología: ¿en qué situación estamos? / Radiation safety in orthopaedic operating theatres. what is the current situation?

Objetivo. Analizar la exposición a radiaciones ionizantes por parte de dos cirujanos ortopédicos en su práctica diaria y revisar las principales recomendaciones nacionales e internacionales al respecto. Material y método. Se efectúo un estudio retrospectivo de la actividad quirúrgica con uso de fluoroscopia realizado por dos cirujanos ortopédicos en un año. Se calculó la radiación recibida basándose en mediciones por procesos publicados en la bilbliografía. Revisión bibliográfica de recomendaciones y normativas internacionales. Resultado. La radiación recibida en un año por los dos cirujanos ortopédicos no sobrepasó el límite de la legislación actual ni el de las nuevas recomendaciones europeas e internacionales. La exposición fue asimétrica, siendo las manos la zona más radiada. Las nuevas recomendaciones rebajan los niveles permitidos de radiación en ojos. Discusión. La estimación de radiación recibida hace necesario proteger y vigilar especialmente las manos y los ojos. Son necesarios conocimientos del funcionamiento del fluoroscopio y de las medidas de radioprotección (AU)

Objective. To analyse the exposure of two Orthopaedic Surgeons to ionizing radiations in their daily work, and to review the main national and international recommendations on this subject. Material and methods. A retrospective study was conducted on the surgical treatments that use fluoroscopy performed by two Orthopaedic Surgeons during a one year period. An evaluation was made of the radiation received, based on measurements of the processes published in the bibliography section. A literature review of international recommendations and regulations is also presented. Results. The radiation received by the two Orthopaedic Surgeons during one year did not exceed the limits of present-day legislation or the new European and international recommendations. The exposure was asymmetrical, with the hands being the most radiated part. The new recommendations reduce the permitted level of radiation on eyes. Discussion. The evaluation of the radiation received demonstrates the need for radiation protection, paying particular attention to the hands and eyes. Good knowledge of operating a fluoroscope and radiation safety measures are also essential (AU)

[Radiation safety in orthopaedic operating theatres. What is the current situation?]. / Radioprotección en quirófanos de traumatología: ¿en qué situación estamos?

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the exposure of two Orthopaedic Surgeons to ionizing radiations in their daily work, and to review the main national and international recommendations on this subject. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on the surgical treatments that use fluoroscopy performed by two Orthopaedic Surgeons during a one year period. An evaluation was made of the radiation received, based on measurements of the processes published in the bibliography section. A literature review of international recommendations and regulations is also presented. RESULTS: The radiation received by the two Orthopaedic Surgeons during one year did not exceed the limits of present-day legislation or the new European and international recommendations. The exposure was asymmetrical, with the hands being the most radiated part. The new recommendations reduce the permitted level of radiation on eyes. DISCUSSION: The evaluation of the radiation received demonstrates the need for radiation protection, paying particular attention to the hands and eyes. Good knowledge of operating a fluoroscope and radiation safety measures are also essential.