Effect of a Law Requiring Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use on Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing: A Single-Center Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare opioid prescribing behavior of emergency medicine providers following the enactment of Connecticut Public Act (PA) 15-198 at a large academic tertiary medical center. METHODS: This study is a single-center pre and postlaw retrospective cohort of ED patients discharged with opioid prescriptions. Patients discharged from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2015, were analyzed as the prelaw cohort, and patients discharged from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2016, were analyzed as the postlaw cohort. The primary outcome was the cumulative dose of solid dosage forms of opioids per prescription, calculated in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). RESULTS: A total of 10,307 prescriptions included in the final analysis. A statistically significant decrease in the primary outcome was seen in the postlaw cohort compared with the prelaw cohort, respectively (75 MME [interquartile range, IQR: 60-100) vs 80 MME [IQR: 75-150]; P < .001). The postlaw cohort also saw 1289 (22.2%) fewer opioid prescriptions, primarily driven by a reduction in the number of schedule II opioids prescribed. In a posthoc analysis, the primary outcome remained statistically significant even when opioid prescriptions were only included if their prebuilt settings were unchanged between pre and postlaw cohorts, respectively (85.1%; 95.6 MME (±56.0); n = 5041 vs 86.7 MME (±39.6); n = 3713; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The passage of PA 15-198 was associated with a decrease in the cumulative dose of opioids per prescription of solid dosage form products. This drop was precipitated by a transition from using opioids in schedule II to opioids in schedule IV and a modest decrease in prescribed opioid quantity.

Patient preferences for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Limited research has assessed patient preferences for treatment disposition and antibiotic therapy of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) in the emergency department (ED). Understanding patient preference for the treatment of ABSSSI may influence treatment selection and improve satisfaction. METHODS: A survey was conducted across 6 US hospital EDs. Patients with ABSSSI completed a baseline survey assessing preferences for antibiotic therapy (intravenous versus oral) and treatment location. A follow-up survey was conducted within 30-40 days after ED discharge to reassess preferences and determine satisfaction with care. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients completed both baseline and follow-up surveys. Sixty (63.8%) participants had a history of ABSSSI, and 69 (73.4%) were admitted to the hospital. Treatment at home was the most common preference reported on baseline and follow-up surveys. Patients with higher education were 82.2% less likely to prefer treatment in the hospital. Single dose intravenous therapy was the most commonly preferred antibiotic regimen on baseline and follow-up surveys (39.8 and 19.1%, respectively). Median satisfaction scores for care in the ED, hospital, home, and with overall antibiotic therapy were all 8 out of a maximum of 10. CONCLUSIONS: In these patients, the most common preference was for outpatient care and single dose intravenous antibiotics. Patient characteristics including higher education, younger age, and current employment were associated with these preferences. Opportunities exist for improving ABSSSI care and satisfaction rates by engaging patients and offering multiple treatment choices.

Variability in Emergency Medicine Provider Decisions on Hospital Admission and Antibiotic Treatment in a Survey Study for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Opportunities for Antimicrobial Stewardship Education.

BACKGROUND: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a frequent cause of emergency department (ED) visits. Providers in the ED have many decisions to make during the initial treatment of ABSSSI. There are limited data on the patient factors that influence these provider decisions. METHODS: An anonymous survey was administered to providers at 6 EDs across the United States. The survey presented patient cases with ABSSSIs ≥75 cm2 and escalating clinical scenarios including relapse, controlled diabetes, and sepsis. For each case, participants were queried on their decision for admission vs discharge and antibiotic therapy (intravenous, oral, or both) and to rank the factors that influenced their antibiotic decision. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 130 providers. For simple ABSSSI, the majority of providers chose an oral antibiotic and discharged patients home. The presence of recurrence or controlled diabetes resulted in more variation in responses. Thirty-four (40%) and 51 (60%) providers chose intravenous followed by oral antibiotics and discharged the recurrence and diabetes cases, respectively. Presentation with sepsis resulted in initiation with intravenous antibiotics (122, 95.3%) and admission (125, 96.1%) in most responses. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in responses to certain patient scenarios suggests opportunities for education of providers in the ED and the development of an ABSSSI clinical pathway to help guide treatment.