In-hospital mortality of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from the MITRA (Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction) registry.

BACKGROUND: Advanced age remains one of the principal determinants of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to determine the in-hospital outcome of elderly (> 75 years) patients with AMI who were admitted to hospitals participating in the national MITRA (Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction) registry. METHODS: MITRA is a prospective, observational German multicenter registry investigating current treatment modalities for patients presenting with AMI. All patients with AMI admitted within 96 h of onset of symptoms were included in the MITRA registry. MITRA was started in June 1994 and ended in January 1997. This registry comprises 6,067 consecutive patients with a mean age of 65 +/- 12 years, of whom 1,430 (17%) were aged > 75 years. Patients were compared with respect to patient characteristics, prehospital delays, early treatment strategies, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: In the elderly patient population, the prehospital delay was 210 min, which was significantly longer than that for younger patients (155 min, p = 0.001). Although the incidence of potential contraindications for the initiation of thrombolysis was almost equally distributed between the two age groups (8.7 vs. 8.2%, p = NS), elderly patients (> 75 years) received reperfusion therapy less frequently (35.9 vs. 64.6%) than younger patients. Mortality increased with advanced age and was 26.4% for all patients aged > 75 years. If reperfusion therapy was initiated, in-hospital mortality was 21.8 versus 28.9% in patients aged > 75 years (p = 0.001) and 29.4 versus 38.5% in patients aged > 85 years (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this registry, elderly patients with AMI had a much higher in-hospital mortality than that expected from randomized trials. In MITRA, the mortality reduction with reperfusion therapy was found to be highest in the very elderly patient population.

[Use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction in Germany: a comparison of daily clinical practice with international guidelines. MITRA Study]. / Indikationsstellung zur Herzkatheteruntersuchung nach akutem Myokardinfarkt in Deutschland: Klinische Praxis vs. Richtlinien. MITRA-Studie.

OBJECTIVES: Two third of patients with acute myocardial infarction are admitted to hospitals without cardiac catheterization facilities. Whether a postinfarction patient will undergo cardiac catheterization or not is more often decided by general physicians than by cardiologists. The purpose of this presentation is to investigate the determinants for decision making to use cardiac catheterization in patients after myocardial infarction. METHODS: MITRA is a prospective, multicenter registry, which enrolls all consecutive patients with acute Q wave infarction admitted to 54 hospitals in Southwestern Germany. During the pilot phase 949 consecutive survivors of acute myocardial infarction were included, and inhospital outcome as well as therapeutic strategies were registered. RESULTS: Only half of the patients underwent cardiac catheterization regardless of whether a catheterization facility was available or not. In 63% of the patients under 65 years of age coronary angiography was performed; however, every fourth patient with age above 70 years was transferred to an invasive therapeutic strategy. The percentage of male patients was twice a high in the invasive group, whereas patients with prior infarction, clinical signs of congestive heart failure, patients with moderately or severely impaired left ventricular function, and finally patients with a prehospital delay of more than 4 hours were more frequent in the conservative group. The following three parameters were calculated to be independent determinants of an invasive strategy: pathological stress ECG (OR: 2.8; CI: 1.80-4.60), patients < 70 years without stress ECG (OR: 2.18; CI: 1.5-3.18), and male gender (OR: 1.45: CI: 1.10-2.00). Independent factors of a conservative strategy were primary PTCA (OR: 0.2; CI: 0.09-0.46), prehospital delay > 4 hours (OR: 0.71; CI: 0.51-0.97), and the combination of age > 70 years and the absence of a stress ECG (OR: 0.78; CI: 0.55-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: In Germany, patients with acute myocardial infarction are less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization compared to patients in other Western countries (e.g. , the United States). Despite recommended guidelines, invasive strategies are more frequent in low risk groups (younger patients, male gender) than in postinfarction patients at high risk (severely impaired left ventricular function, clinical signs of congestive heart failure, the elderly).

The 60 Minutes Myocardial Infarction Project. Characteristics on admission and clinical outcome in patients with reinfarction compared to patients with a first infarction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate parameters that characterize patients with myocardial reinfarction as compared to patients with a first infarction in clinical practice, and possibly to determine their clinical outcome. METHODS: The 60 minutes Myocardial Project is a German multicentre prospective observational study in which 136 hospitals are participating. Fourteen thousand, nine hundred and eighty consecutive patients with acute Q wave myocardial infarction were included from July 1992 to September 1994. RESULTS: Out of these 14,980 patients, there were 2854 (19%) with reinfarction and 12,126 (81%) with a first infarction. Patients with a reinfarction arrived at the hospital 24 min earlier than patients with a first infarction (pre-hospital delay 156 vs 180 min; P < 0.001); the door-to-needle time with reinfarction was longer (38 vs 30 min; P < 0.001); however, patients with reinfarction were older (69 vs 66 years; P < 0.001), had a lower rate of a diagnostic first ECG (54 vs 71%; P < 0.001) and received thrombolytic therapy less frequently than patients with a first infarction (46 vs 52%; P < 0.001). A low number of patients received primary PTCA ( n = 205) since only a few hospitals offered a primary PTCA service at the time the study was performed. In patients with reinfarction, there were more reasons as to why thrombolytic therapy was not given (24 vs 21%; P < 0.001). Left bundle branch block occurred more frequently in patients with reinfarction (15 vs 8%; P < 0.001). The intra-hospital course in patients with reinfarction was associated with an increase of complications and intra-hospital death (23 vs 15%; P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Although reinfarction patients arrived earlier at hospital than patients with a first infarction, the former received thrombolytic therapy less frequently than the latter. Patients with reinfarction were older, more frequently had a non-diagnostic ECG on admission and had a higher rate of contraindications against thrombolytic therapy.

Impact of early risk stratification on the length of hospitalization in patients with acute Q-wave myocardial infarction. 'The 60-minutes myocardial infarction project'.

UNLABELLED: An assessment of individual risk factors may identify a subgroup of postinfarction patients at low risk, i.e. patients appropriate for early discharge. Using a large unselected population of the national registry, 'The 60-Minutes Myocardial Infarction Project', we (1) attempted to provide a retrospective analysis of clinical factors and in-hospital mortality in a population living on the 6th hospital day following admission to define a low-risk patient group with a residual in-hospital mortality of less than 1% eligible for early discharge, and (2) to analyze the current impact of risk stratification based on these clinical factors on the length of hospitalization. The study group consisted of 12,045 survivors on the 6th day after admission out of 14,980 patients of the registry with proven Q-wave myocardial infarction. Risk modeling was performed with multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 873 patients (7.3%) died after day 6 in hospital. The most important prognostic factors were cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to admission (odds ratio, OR: 7.2, confidence interval, CI: 5.11-10.22), thrombolysis complicated by severe bleedings (OR: 6.2, CI: 1.2-31. 2) and age >70 years (OR 4.7, CI 3.51-6.39). The other more significant independent predictors of increased mortality were end-stage renal disease, age between 56 and 70 years, systolic blood pressure <95 mm Hg on admission, history of trauma

Influence of the global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO-1) trial on the use of thrombolytics in Germany. ALKK Study Group. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Leitenden Kardiologischen Krankenhausärtze.

Our results show significant and independent influence of the GUSTO-1 trial on the use of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction in Germany. This influence started soon after the publication of the trial and was not restricted to subgroups who benefitted most from recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.

[Early treatment of acute myocardial infarct: implementation of therapy guidelines in routine clinical practice, MITRA pilot phase]. / Frühbehandlung des akuten Myokardinfarktes: Umsetzung von Therapierichtlinien in den klinischen Alltag, MITRA-Pilotphase.

The prognostic value of thrombolytics, aspirin, beta-blockers and ACE-inhibitors has been well documented in large clinical trials, but the application of these drugs in clinical practice is not known. MITRA is a multicenter study of 54 hospitals in a defined region in southwest Germany. The aim is to document actual clinical practice (pilot phase) and to establish an individually optimised prognostic therapy for acute myocardial infarction, considering only the absolute contraindications for each drug. In the pilot phase, 1303 consecutive patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction were enrolled. The median age was 66 years, the prehospital time was 2.7 hours. 47% had an anterior infarction. In the subgroup of patients without absolute contraindications, only 53.4% were treated with thrombolytics, 87.6% with aspirin, 37.1% with beta-blocker, and 17.4% with ACE-inhibitor. Out of these, patients were classified as "optimally treated" if they received thrombolysis, aspirin as well as beta-blocker. Patients were also included if any of these medications was withheld in the presence of absolute contraindications. Treatment was defined suboptimal, if the patients did not receive any of these three medications despite the absence of absolute contraindications. Only 29% (n = 383) received an optimal post-infarction therapy and 71% (n = 775) a suboptimal treatment. The univariate analysis revealed 10 variables influencing optimal therapy. In this subgroup patients were younger, they more often had clear ECG-findings or left bundle branch block, an anterior infarction, acute cardiac failure, AV-block, bradycardia, recent trauma or surgery (less then 2 weeks) and a severe chronic obstructive lung disease. The prehospital time was more often available. Early mortality after 2 days was 5.0% versus 9.3% in the suboptimal treated patients (OR: 0.5, CI: 0.30-0.86) the total inhospital mortality was 10.9% in the optimal versus 17.7% in the suboptimal group (OR: 0.6, CI: 0.38-0.84). In a multivariate analysis the parameter "optimal treatment" was found to be an independent predictor of the early (OR = 0.4; CI: 0.20-0.69) and the inhospital mortality (OR = 0.4; CI: 0.25-0.64). The following in-hospital events occurred: stroke 2.8%, reinfarction 12.9%, cardiac failure 21.5%, cardiogenic shock 10.4% and in-hospital mortality 18.1% (2-days mortality 9.5%). Pharmacological therapy for acute myocardial infarction is inconsistent with the recommendations suggested in recent clinical trials and needs to be individually optimised. Optimal treatment is an independent predictor of early and inhospital mortality.

The 60 minutes myocardial infarction project. Treatment and clinical outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Germany.

AIMS: To describe patient characteristics, pre-hospital delay, treatment, complications and outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was of prospective observational multicentre design. Those involved were consecutive patients with acute Q-wave myocardial infarction admitted within 96 h of onset of symptoms to 136 German hospitals between July 1992 and September 1994 (n = 14980, median age 66 (quartiles 57, 74) years, 68% male, 48% anterior wall infarction). Median pre-hospital delay was 170 (90, 475) min, with 17% arriving within the first hour and 61% within 4 h of onset of symptoms. The following patient groups had a short pre-hospital delay: males, those aged less than 65 years, those admitted at night or the weekend, those with a previous myocardial infarction, those in need of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and those with a diagnostic first ECG. The first ECG was diagnostic in 67.6% of cases. Reperfusion therapy was used in 53%, with thrombolytic therapy in 51.6%. Median time from admission to initiation of treatment was 30 (20, 55) min. Respective rates of treatment with aspirin, nitrates, and beta-blockers were 81%, 83%, and 16%. Major complications were cerebral bleeding (0.4%), bleeding requiring transfusions (0.9%), left ventricular rupture (0.6%) and anaphylactic shock (0.1%). Median hospital stay was 20 (13, 26) days. In-hospital death rate was 17.2%. Increased hospital mortality was observed with female gender, an unknown or long pre-hospital delay, a diagnostic first ECG, anterior wall infarction, trauma or major operation within the last 14 days, renal insufficiency and malignoma. CONCLUSIONS: 'Real-life' hospital mortality is much higher than previously reported in clinical trials. To reduce hospital mortality, the efficacy of thrombolysis should be increased by shortening the pre-hospital delay, and the use of concomitant therapy, especially beta-blockers, should be increased.

[Risk indicators of urinary calculus formation: value of oxalate and citrate excretion in comparison with the oxalate tolerance value]. / Risikoindikatoren der Harnsteinbildung: Aussagekraft von Oxalat- und Zitrat-Ausscheidung im Vergleich zum Oxalat-Toleranz-Wert.

Several methods for the measurement of crystallization conditions in urine, the so-called whole urine systems, have recently been of considerable interest in urolithiasis research. The diagnostic accuracy of the oxalate tolerance value (OTV) was therefore compared with the daily excretion of oxalate and citrate in normal persons and patients with urinary calculi. With the aid of the oxalate/citrate ratio, 77% of the patients could be classified correctly. After standardization of the experimental conditions (24-h urine sample, constant pH value, consideration of endogenous oxalate) we succeeded in correctly classifying 82% of patients using the OTV. These results favour the introduction of the OTV as a clinical chemical tool for the follow-up of patients with urinary calculi and for the screening of normal persons at risk.