Perceptions and use of phenylbutyrate metabolite testing in urea cycle disorders: Results of a clinician survey and analysis of a centralized testing database.

The nitrogen scavengers sodium and glycerol phenylbutyrate (PB), approved for chronic treatment of urea cycle disorders (UCDs), undergo hepatic conversion to phenylacetate (PAA), which conjugates glutamine to form phenylacetylglutamine for urinary nitrogen excretion. Elevated PAA has been associated with reversible neurological toxicity, with symptoms similar to hyperammonemia. Plasma PB metabolite analysis can assess for toxicity and therapeutic drug levels. An online survey was undertaken to assess US clinician perceptions and use of the test in addition to an analysis of centralized US laboratory records. Survey responses from 52 clinicians were analyzed, including 58% who reported using plasma PB metabolite testing. Test users reported managing more UCD patients than nonusers. Users rated the test as "often helpful" for ruling out PAA toxicity (44%), informing PB dosing decisions (42%), and assessing adherence (28%). Test results were reported as most often unremarkable (61%) or suggestive of poor adherence (13%); 46% of users had never encountered results indicative of PAA toxicity. Analyses of laboratory records for 1668 plasma metabolite tests determined that only 5% of samples had plasma PAA-to-phenylacetylglutamine ratios associated with increased risk of PAA toxicity. Nearly half of surveyed clinicians were unsure of metabolite targets; those conducting ad hoc (versus regular) testing were significantly more likely to be unsure of targets. One-fifth of test users identified uncertainties, including questions about test validation, timing, and interpretation. Increased awareness of published PB metabolite data and further clinician education on test interpretation may help to inform the use of metabolite testing to optimize UCD care.

Perspectives on urea cycle disorder management: Results of a clinician survey.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are rare inborn errors of urea synthesis. US and European consensus statements on the diagnosis and treatment of UCDs were last published in 2001 and 2019, respectively. Recommendations are based primarily on case reports and expert opinion and there is limited agreement or consistency related to long-term management approaches. A clinician survey was conducted to assess current real-world practices and perspectives on challenges and unmet needs. METHODS: A 14-item multiple-choice survey was administered to physicians in 2017. Clinicians who reported actively managing at least 1 patient with UCD were eligible to participate. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each survey item (frequencies for categorical variables; means, standard deviations, medians, and ranges for continuous variables). RESULTS: Sixty-six US clinicians completed the survey (65 geneticists; 1 pediatric neurologist). Over 90% of responders agreed or strongly agreed that even modest elevations in ammonia could cause physiological and functional brain damage; >80% of respondents agreed that asymptomatic UCD patients are at risk of brain damage over time due to mild/subclinical elevations in ammonia. Eighty-six percent of clinicians agreed or strongly agreed with recommending genetic testing for female relatives when a patient is diagnosed with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency. Ninety-four percent of respondents agreed that patients have better disease control when they are more adherent to their UCD therapy. Nearly 90% indicated that clinicians and patients would benefit from updated UCD management guidance. More than half (53%) of respondents rated the symptoms of UCDs as extremely or very burdensome to the everyday lives of patients and their families; only 8% rated UCD symptoms as slightly or not at all burdensome. The majority of clinicians agreed (48%) or strongly agreed (32%) that caring for a child or family member with a UCD has a negative impact on the quality of life and/or health of family members/guardians (e.g. stress, relationships, ability to work). CONCLUSIONS: This self-reported survey suggests a need for updated and expanded clinical guidance on the long-term treatment and management of UCD patients.

Social support for self-management behaviors among people with epilepsy: a content analysis of the WebEase program.

Social support is an important component in managing epilepsy; however little is known about support provided to people with epilepsy. This study examined whom people with epilepsy identify as supportive, and how those individuals support people with epilepsy's self-management efforts. Data come from the WebEase project, an effective online epilepsy self-management program. People with epilepsy who participated in the pilot (n=35) and efficacy trials (n=118) were included. A content analysis was conducted on responses to open-ended questions related to support. The majority of participants provided information about their supporters. The number of support providers ranged from 0 to 6, with about 12% indicating no support. Parents and significant others were most commonly listed as supporters. Support providers mainly offer emotional and instrumental support, reminders and aid for taking medication, and support for self-management strategies. These results could be useful for interventions aimed at bolstering support in order to improve self-management.