The impact of antifibrotic use on long-term clinical outcomes in the pulmonary fibrosis foundation registry.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a high mortality rate. The antifibrotic medications pirfenidone and nintedanib have been in use since 2014 for this disorder and are associated with improved rate of lung function decline. Less is known about their long-term outcomes outside of the clinical trial context. METHODS: The Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry was used for this study. Patients with an IPF diagnosis made within a year of enrollment were included. The treated group was defined as patients receiving either pirfenidone or nintedanib for at least 180 days. The untreated group did not have any record of antifibrotic use. Demographic data, comorbidities, serial lung function, hospitalization, and vital status data were collected from the registry database. The primary outcomes were transplant-free survival, time to first respiratory hospitalization, and time to 10% absolute FVC decline. Time-to-event analyses were performed utilizing Cox proportional hazards models and the log-rank test. Model covariates included age, gender, smoking history, baseline lung function, comorbidities, and oxygen use. RESULTS: The registry contained 1212 patients with IPF; ultimately 288 patients met inclusion criteria for the treated group, and 101 patients were designated as untreated. Patients treated with antifibrotics were significantly younger (69.8 vs. 72.6 years, p = 0.008) and less likely to have smoked (61.1% ever smokers vs. 72.3% never smokers, p = 0.04). No significant differences were seen in race, gender, comorbidities, or baseline pulmonary function between groups. The primary outcome of transplant-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups (adjusted HR 0.799, 95% CI 0.534-1.197, p = 0.28). Time to respiratory hospitalization was significantly shorter in the treated group (adjusted HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.05-4.30, p = 0.04). No significant difference in time to pulmonary function decline was seen between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study demonstrated 63% of newly diagnosed IPF patients had continuous antifibrotic usage. Antifibrotics were not associated with improved transplant-free survival or pulmonary function change but was associated with an increased hazard of respiratory hospitalization. Future studies should further investigate the role of antifibrotic therapy in clinically important outcomes in real-world patients with IPF and other progressive ILDs.

Real-World Clinical Outcomes Based on Body Mass Index and Annualized Weight Change in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Identification of clinical characteristics associated with prognosis for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) may help to guide management decisions. This analysis utilized data from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry to examine the relationships between clinical outcomes and both body mass index (BMI) at study enrollment (hereafter referred to as baseline BMI) and annualized percent change in body weight in patients with IPF in a real-world setting. METHODS: The following outcomes over 24 months were stratified by baseline BMI and annualized percent change in body weight: all-cause mortality; annualized change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC), percent predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, and 6-min walk distance; all-cause and respiratory-related hospitalizations; and acute exacerbations. RESULTS: Overall, 600 patients with IPF were included (baseline BMI: < 25 kg/m2, n = 120; 25 to < 30 kg/m2, n = 242; ≥ 30 kg/m2, n = 238; annualized percent change in body weight: no loss, n = 95; > 0% to < 5% loss, n = 425; ≥ 5% loss, n = 80). Enrollment demographics and characteristics were generally similar across subgroups. There was no association between mortality and BMI. All-cause mortality was lower among patients who experienced no annualized weight loss versus those with ≥ 5% (OR [95% CI] 3.28 [1.15, 10.95]) or > 0 to < 5% weight loss (OR [95% CI] 2.83 [1.14, 8.62]) over 24 months. Patients with baseline BMI < 25 kg/m2 had a significantly greater estimated annualized decline in %FVC versus patients with baseline BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (difference [95% CI] 1.47 [0.01, 2.93]). No relationship was observed between %FVC and weight loss. Other clinical outcomes were generally similar across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Some clinical outcomes may be worse in patients with IPF who have a low BMI (< 25 kg/m2) or who experience weight loss over 24 months, but the causation for these relationships is unknown. These results may help to inform management decisions for patients with IPF. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02758808.

Using forced vital capacity (FVC) in the clinic to monitor patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): pros and cons.

INTRODUCTION: Forced vital capacity (FVC) decline is predictive of mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and has been used as a clinical trial endpoint to define disease progression. How to interpret FVC findings in an individual patient with IPF in the real-world setting amid uncertainty about the measurement accuracy and variability has not been well established. AREAS COVERED: This review highlights the challenges and limitations of using FVC in the clinic to monitor disease progression in patients with IPF. Spirometry is noninvasive, relatively simple, and inexpensive. FVC measurements provide evidence for trends over time in patients with IPF. When using FVC in the clinic, several important challenges and limitations, including visit-to-visit variability, dependence on patient effort, inconsistent quality control, limitations on accuracy, and the influence of comorbidities and pretest factors, must be considered. Recent studies suggest the potential for home spirometry devices to facilitate more frequent collection of data and perhaps demonstrate more accurate trends. EXPERT OPINION: Measuring FVC decline in the clinic has an important role in monitoring disease progression in patients with IPF, but additional measures of disease progression should be considered along with FVC to facilitate decision-making about disease management.

The Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Rationale, Design, and Methods.

Detailed understanding of longitudinal behavior, response to therapy, and applicable biomarkers for interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) is lacking. There is a need for a large multicenter registry that provides researchers and clinicians access to well-characterized data not limited to patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (PFF-PR) is a database that collects baseline and longitudinal demographic and clinical information about patients with ILDs in the United States. The objective of this study is to describe the patient population, data collection process, and opportunities for retrospective and prospective research with the PFF-PR. Individuals 18 years or older who had ILD diagnosed and who were seen at PFF-PR centers who provided informed consent were eligible to participate. Baseline and longitudinal demographic, spirometric, radiographic, morbidity, and mortality data are recorded into a secure electronic data capture system. Starting in 2016, the PFF-PR has collected data on 2,003 patients at 42 clinical sites in the United States. At the time of enrollment, the mean age of participants was 68 years old. Most (62%) of participants were male, and 58% had a positive smoking history. The mean forced vital capacity was 69% predicted, and the mean diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was 43% predicted. Forty-one percent of patients were using supplemental oxygen, and 39% were on antifibrotic therapy. Reasons for attrition were mostly death or transplant, with low rates of loss to follow-up or withdrawal. The PFF-PR is a large multicenter United States-based registry that provides researchers and clinicians access to well-characterized ILD patient data.

Effect of pirfenidone on gastric emptying in a rat model.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) are commonly reported in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who are treated with pirfenidone. Taking pirfenidone with a substantial amount of food or dividing the dose over the course of a meal has been reported to reduce the frequency of GI AEs in clinical practice. In humans, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of pirfenidone was reduced when the drug was taken with food compared with the fasting state, and the lower Cmax was associated with a reduction in GI AE rates. In this study, the effects of the divided-dose approach and timing of pirfenidone administration relative to meal intake on gastric emptying were assessed using a rat model. The aim of this study was to investigate whether modification of dosing regimens could minimize pirfenidone's effect on inhibition of gastric emptying. METHODS: Gastric emptying was assessed in male Sprague-Dawley rats after administration of a test meal by weighing stomach contents at various time points up to 120 min after the meal. Pirfenidone was administered via oral gavage either as a single-bolus dose of 30 mg/kg or as divided doses of 3 × 10 mg/kg at intervals ranging from 10 to 30 min for a total duration of 30 to 90 min. In addition, the test meal was given either at 30 min before, coincident with, or 30 min following pirfenidone oral administration. RESULTS: Administration of an oral 30-mg/kg single-bolus dose of pirfenidone with a meal resulted in a statistically significant decrease in gastric emptying in a rat model. The effect of pirfenidone on decreasing gastric emptying was lessened when the same total dose (i.e., 30 mg/kg) was administered as 3 divided doses (i.e., 3 × 10 mg/kg) over intervals up to 30 min in between each divided dose. Pharmacokinetic simulation suggested that a divided-dosing regimen would decrease pirfenidone Cmax relative to single-bolus administration. When the same single-bolus dose of 30 mg/kg was administered 30 min following a meal rather than coincident with a meal, pirfenidone's effect on decreasing gastric emptying was reduced to the same extent as when the dose was divided as 3 × 10 mg/kg over a 90-min period. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of pirfenidone 30 min after a meal as a single-bolus dose or a divided dose over a 90-min period blunted pirfenidone's effect on inhibition of gastric emptying in rats compared with pirfenidone administration as a single-bolus dose coincident with a meal. Decreased gastric emptying, which is associated with pirfenidone administration, may be one of the contributing factors leading to GI tolerability issues associated with pirfenidone use in humans. Modification of the dosing regimen diminished this impact and may provide insight into possible mitigation strategies to minimize GI-related toxicities in the clinic.

An interprofessional approach to reducing the overutilization of stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult medical and surgical intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Overutilization of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is common. Acid-suppressive therapies routinely used for SUP are best reserved for patients with greatest risk of clinically important bleeding as they have been associated with nosocomial pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection and increased hospital cost. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to reduce inappropriate utilization of SUP in 2 adult medical and surgical ICU settings at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center. Secondary objectives included reduction of inappropriate continuation of SUP at ICU and hospital discharge. METHODS: To attain the study objective, an interprofessional team developed a bundled quality improvement initiative, including an institution SUP guideline, pharmacist-led intervention, and an education and awareness campaign. To assess the impact of these interventions, we conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing data on prescribing practices at baseline before and after the intervention. Since computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) was implemented during this time frame, preintervention data collection consisted of 2 periods, one before and one after CPOE implementation. RESULTS: The incidence of the inappropriate use of SUP was not significantly different between the pre-CPOE and post-CPOE groups (20 and 19 per 100 patient-days, respectively; P = .88), but the incidence of inappropriate use of SUP was significantly lower in the postintervention group versus the post-CPOE group (9 and 19 per 100 patient-days, respectively; P = .03). At ICU discharge, 4% of patients in the post-intervention group were discharged inappropriately on SUP compared with 8% in the post-CPOE group (P = .54). At hospital discharge, none of the patients in the postintervention group were discharged inappropriately on SUP compared with 7% in the post-CPOE group (P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an interprofessional bundled quality improvement initiative is effective in decreasing inappropriate use of SUP in adult medical and surgical ICUs at a university-affiliated, tertiary care academic medical center.