[(68)Ga]DOTATATE PET/MRI and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT are complementary and superior to diffusion-weighted MR imaging for radioactive-iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether [(68)Ga]DOTATATE PET/MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can replace or complement [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with radioactive-iodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). METHODS: The study population comprised 12 patients with elevated thyroglobulin and a negative RAI scan after thyroidectomy and RAI remnant ablation who underwent both [(18)F]FDG PET/CT and [(68)Ga]DOTATATE PET/MRI within 8 weeks of each other. The presence of recurrent cancer was evaluated on a per-patient, per-organ and per-lesion basis. Histology, and prior and follow-up examinations served as the standard of reference. RESULTS: Recurrent or metastatic tumour was confirmed in 11 of the 12 patients. [(68)Ga]DOTATATE PET(/MRI) correctly identified the tumour burden in all 11 patients, whereas in one patient local relapse was missed by [(18)F]FDG PET/CT. In the lesion-based analysis, overall lesion detection rates were 79/85 (93 %), 69/85 (81 %) and 27/82 (33 %) for [(18)F]FDG PET/CT, [(68)Ga]DOTATATE PET/MRI and DWI, respectively. [(18)F]FDG PET(/CT) was superior to [(68)Ga]DOTATATE PET(/MRI) in the overall evaluation and in the detection of pulmonary metastases. In the detection of extrapulmonary metastases, [(68)Ga]DOTATATE PET(/MRI) showed a higher sensitivity than [(18)F]FDG PET(/CT), at the cost of lower specificity. DWI achieved only poor sensitivity and was significantly inferior to [(18)F]FDG PET in the lesion-based evaluation in the detection of both extrapulmonary and pulmonary metastases. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]FDG PET/CT was more sensitive than [(68)Ga]DOTATATE PET/MRI in the evaluation of RAI-refractory DTC, mostly because of its excellent ability to detect lung metastases. In the evaluation of extrapulmonary lesions, [(68)Ga]DOTATATE PET(/MRI) was more sensitive and [(18)F]FDG PET(/CT) more specific. Furthermore, DWI did not provide additional information and cannot replace [(18)F]FDG PET for postoperative monitoring of patients with suspected RAI-refractory DTC.

[(18)F]FDG PET/CT outperforms [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI in differentiated thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of PET/MRI with [(18)F]FDG in comparison to PET/CT in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer suspected or known to have dedifferentiated. METHODS: The study included 31 thyroidectomized and remnant-ablated patients who underwent a scheduled [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scan and were then enrolled for a PET/MRI scan of the neck and thorax. The datasets (PET/CT, PET/MRI) were rated regarding lesion count, conspicuity, diameter and characterization. Standardized uptake values were determined for all [(18)F]FDG-positive lesions. Histology, cytology, and examinations before and after treatment served as the standards of reference. RESULTS: Of 26 patients with a dedifferentiated tumour burden, 25 were correctly identified by both [(18)F]FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI. Detection rates by PET/CT and PET/MRI were 97 % (113 of 116 lesions) and 85 % (99 of 113 lesions) for malignant lesions, and 100 % (48 of 48 lesions) and 77 % (37 of 48 lesions) for benign lesions, respectively. Lesion conspicuity was higher on PET/CT for both malignant and benign pulmonary lesions and in the overall rating for malignant lesions (p < 0.001). There was a difference between PET/CT and PET/MRI in overall evaluation of malignant lesions (p < 0.01) and detection of pulmonary metastases (p < 0.001). Surgical evaluation revealed three malignant lesions missed by both modalities. PET/MRI additionally failed to detect 14 pulmonary metastases and 11 benign lesions. CONCLUSION: In patients with thyroid cancer and suspected or known dedifferentiation, [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI was inferior to low-dose [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for the assessment of pulmonary status. However, for the assessment of cervical status, [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI was equal to contrast-enhanced neck [(18)F]FDG PET/CT. Therefore, [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI combined with a low-dose CT scan of the thorax may provide an imaging solution when high-quality imaging is needed and high-energy CT is undesirable or the use of a contrast agent is contraindicated.