Psoas Versus Femoral Blocks: A Registry Analysis of Risks and Benefits.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Psoas blocks are an alternative to femoral nerve blocks and have the potential advantage of blocking the entire lumbar plexus. However, the psoas muscle is located deeply, making psoas blocks more difficult than femoral blocks. In contrast, while femoral blocks are generally easy to perform, the inguinal region is prone to infection. We thus tested the hypothesis that psoas blocks are associated with more insertion-related complications than femoral blocks but have fewer catheter-related infections. METHODS: We extracted 22,434 surgical cases from the German Network for Regional Anesthesia registry (2007-2014) and grouped cases as psoas (n = 7593) and femoral (n = 14,841) blocks. Insertion-related complications (including single-shot blocks and catheter) and infectious complications (including only catheter) in each group were compared with χ tests. The groups were compared with multivariable logistic models, adjusted for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounding factors, psoas blocks were associated with more complications than femoral blocks including vascular puncture 6.3% versus 1.1%, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 3.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-4.6; P < 0.001), and multiple skin punctures 12.6% versus 7.7%, with an aOR of 2.6 (95% CI, 2.1-3.3; P <0.001). Psoas blocks were also associated with fewer catheter-related infections: 0.3% versus 0.9% (aOR of 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8; P = 0.016), and with improved patient satisfaction (mean ± SD 0- to 10-point scale score, 9.6 ± 1.2 vs 8.4 ± 2.9; P < 0.001). Results from a propensity-matched sensitivity analysis were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Psoas blocks are associated with more insertion-related complications but fewer infectious complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ID NCT02846610.

Diabetes: a risk factor for catheter-associated infections.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The incidence of infectious complications associated with continuous regional anesthesia techniques is a matter of concern. Our objective was to determine whether patients suffering from diabetes are at an increased risk of catheter-related infectious complications. METHODS: The German Network for Regional Anaesthesia database was analyzed between 2007 and 2012. After proof of plausibility, data of 36,881 patients undergoing continuous regional anesthesia were grouped in I: no diabetes (n = 32,891) and II: any diabetes (n = 3990). The analysis focused on catheter-related infections after strict definition. Differences among the groups were tested with t and χ tests. Odds ratios were calculated with logistic regression and adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes had an increased incidence of catheter-related infections (no diabetes 3.0% vs any diabetes 4.2%; P < 0.001). Among all patients, diabetes remained an independent risk factor for infections for all sites after the adjustment for potential confounders (odds ratio [OR] = 1.26; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02-1.55; P = 0.036). The risk of infection was significantly increased in peripheral catheters only in the lower limb (adjusted OR = 2.42; 95% CI, 1.05-5.57; P = 0.039). If neuraxial catheters were used, the risk was significantly increased only in lumbar epidural (adjusted OR = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.18-3.73; P = 0.012) for diabetic patients compared with nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of diabetes is associated with an increased risk for catheter-related infections in lower limb and lumbar epidural. Specific care should be taken to avoid and detect infections in this population.