Management of the pediatric OSAS: what about simultaneously expand the maxilla and advance the mandible? A retrospective non-randomized controlled cohort study.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: This retrospective non-randomized controlled cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of simultaneous maxillary expansion and mandibular advancement for the management of pediatric OSAS. PATIENTS/METHODS: The sample was composed of 94 children treated with an innovative orthopedic device to correct a Class II malocclusion associated with an OSAS. Polysomnographic recordings were performed before and after the treatment. We also included a group of 113 age-matched control patients who had the same pathologies, but who did not receive the orthopedic treatment at the time they undergone polysomnographic exams. Statistical tests evaluated the significance of the evolution of these data, both in treated and untreated control patients. RESULTS: After nine months (±3 months) of treatment, respiratory OSAS symptoms significantly improved: the AHI significantly decreased as it became inferior to the pathological threshold (<1) for 53% of the treated patients' sample, with a greater proportion within the youngest age group (63%). Only two patients still presented a moderate OSAS after treatment, with an AHI slightly superior to 5. This positive evolution of OSAS respiratory symptoms was not observed within the control group, highlighting the real impact of the orthopedic treatment over the children's natural growth. However, sleep remained fragmented following the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that simultaneous maxillary expansion and mandibular advancement induced a modification of the maxilla-mandibular anatomy, helping in the significant improvement of the respiratory OSAS symptoms. Then, considering these preliminary results, pediatric OSAS can be managed with this new orthopedic strategy, especially if it is performed early.

The Hypoplasic Mandible: What Makes it Different From the Healthy Child?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the morphology of the hypoplasic mandible and its evolution during the growth period to better understand how it differs from the pediatric healthy mandible. METHOD: Three-dimensional mandibular models of hypoplasic and healthy children aged from 39 gestational weeks to 7 years old were analyzed with a morphometric method including data clustering. Morphological distinctions between pathological and healthy mandibles were highlighted. Bilateral and unilateral mandibular hypoplasia were distinguished. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 31 hypoplasic children and as many sex- and age-matched healthy children. Morphological distinctions between pathological and healthy mandibles were highlighted only from the first year of life. In bilateral hypoplasia, the overall mandibular dimensions were reduced while there was only a ramus asymmetry in unilateral mandibular hypoplasia (mean ± SD of the difference between the Grp03c and Grp03b subgroups: 6.80 ± 6.37 - P value = 1.64e-3 for the height of the left ramus versus 0.18 ± 4.18 - P value = .82 for the height of the right ramus). Supervised classification trees were built to identify the pathology and discriminate unilateral from bilateral mandibular hypoplasia (prediction rates = 81% and 84%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a morphometric analysis, we demonstrated that mandibular hypoplasia significantly impacts the mandibular morphology only from the first year of life, with a distinction between bilateral and unilateral hypoplasia.

Morphometric characterization of the very young child mandibular growth pattern: What happen before and after the deciduous dentition development?

OBJECTIVES: Numerous tools have been developed to characterize the morphometry of 3D models. The aim of this study was to apply these techniques to better understand the morphometric growth pattern of healthy children's mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study sample was composed of 480 very young children aged from 36 gestational weeks to 7 years old. The sample was divided into three subsamples according to the development stages of their deciduous dentition. Several biometric data were collected on 3D mandibular models. RESULTS: There was homothetic growth during the first years of life. Once all deciduous teeth were fully erupted, the mandibular corpus warped more independently of the ramus, and the inter-individual variability was more pronounced. Throughout the growth period, several subgroups could be identified, highlighting the morphological growth pattern of the mandible. CONCLUSIONS: A particular morphogenesis of the mandible during the growth period was observed, which was correlated with deciduous dentition development. In younger individuals, this morphological pattern was mainly characterized by the progressive closure of the chin symphysis and ramus growth. The tongue movements in the oral space, depending on whether the child was bottle- or breast-fed, may explain this result. As the children grew older, the mandible widened to create sufficient space for the developing teeth buds. During the eruption of deciduous dentition, the mandible took on various morphologies, which was likely based on the child's sex and diet. Therefore, we assume that this mandibular morphogenesis is induced by the functional strains affecting the mandible during deciduous teeth development.