Evaluation of RNase therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised phase 2a clinical trial of RSLV-132.

BACKGROUND: Circulating, extracellular RNA is the primary trigger of type I interferon in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and interferon is known to play a central pathogenic role in the disease. RSLV-132 is a catalytically active human RNase molecule fused to human IgG1 Fc designed to digest RNA and thereby decrease the chronic inflammation associated with SLE. The drug was evaluated in a cohort of patients with SLE with moderate-severe cutaneous disease activity and the presence of RNA immune complexes. The primary objective of the study was the assessment of the impact of 13 doses of 10 mg/kg RSLV-132 over 6 months on the mean Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) score. METHODS: Sixty-five patients meeting the entry criteria of a baseline CLASI score of 10 or greater and positivity of at least one of five autoantibodies to RNA-binding proteins (SM/RNP, SSA/Ro, SSB/La, Sm, RNP) were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 13 doses of RSLV-132 10 mg/kg or placebo, respectively. Participants received study drug for 24 weeks on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 141 and 155 with an end-of-treatment visit on day 169 and a follow-up visit at the end of the study on day 215. The primary objective was assessed on days 85 and 169. Secondary objectives included assessment of systemic disease activity using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 Index and the Physician's Global Assessment. Data from these instruments were used to calculate the SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) scores. RESULTS: The mean CLASI score change from baseline at day 169 was -5.7 (±7.0) in the placebo group and -6.2 (±8.5) in the RSLV-132 group. A subgroup of participants with moderate-severe systemic disease activity and high baseline SLEDAI scores (≥9) were analysed with respect to BICLA and SRI-4 responses. The RSLV-132 treated participants in the high SLEDAI subgroup had a greater percentage of BICLA responses (62% vs 44%) and SRI-4 responses (23% vs 11%) as compared with placebo. A second subgroup of participants with high baseline CLASI scores (≥21) were analysed with respect to BICLA and SRI-4 responses. The RSLV-132 treated participants in the high CLASI subgroup had a greater percentage of BICLA responses (28% vs 8%) and SRI-4 responses (39% vs 8%) as compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of RSLV-132 therapy consisting of a weekly loading dose of RSLV-132 for 1 month, followed by 5 months of biweekly administrations did not significantly improve the mean CLASI score relative to placebo in this cohort of patients with SLE. The study entry criteria selected patients with moderate-severe cutaneous disease activity and no minimum SLEDAI score, which resulted in a wide range of systemic disease activity from inactive to severe as measured by SLEDAI. When the participants with higher SLEDAI and CLASI scores were analysed, a trend towards clinical improvement favouring RSLV-132 was observed. The results warrant further evaluation of RSLV-132 in SLE and suggest that patients with more active systemic disease are most likely to benefit from RNase therapy.

Improvement of Severe Fatigue Following Nuclease Therapy in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of RSLV-132, an RNase Fc fusion protein, in a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS). METHODS: Thirty patients with primary SS were randomized to receive treatment with RSLV-132 or placebo intravenously once per week for 2 weeks, and then every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. Eight patients received placebo and 20 patients received RSLV-132 at a dose of 10 mg/kg. Clinical efficacy measures included the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index, EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Profile of Fatigue (ProF), and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). RESULTS: Patients randomized to receive RSLV-132 experienced clinically meaningful improvements in the ESSPRI score (P = 0.27), FACIT-F score (P = 0.05), ProF score (P = 0.07), and DSST (P = 0.02) from baseline to day 99, whereas patients who received placebo showed no changes in any of these clinical efficacy measures. This improvement was significantly correlated with increased expression of selected interferon-inducible genes (Pearson's correlations, each P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Administration of RSLV-132 improved severe fatigue, as determined by 4 independent patient-reported measures of fatigue, in patients with primary SS.

Certolizumab pegol for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: Results through 48 weeks from 2 phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies (CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2).

BACKGROUND: Certolizumab pegol, the only Fc-free, PEGylated anti-tumor necrosis factor biologic, demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements suggestive of a positive risk-benefit balance in phase 2 studies in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: Assess certolizumab efficacy and safety versus placebo in phase 3 studies. METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis were randomized 2:2:1 to certolizumab 400 mg, certolizumab 200 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks. At week 16, certolizumab-treated patients achieving a 50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index continued treatment through week 48. Coprimary endpoints were week 16 responder rates, defined as a 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Physician's Global Assessment 0/1 (clear/almost clear) and ≥2-point improvement. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: Week-16 endpoints were significantly greater for both doses of certolizumab versus placebo, and the responses were maintained through week 48. For most measures, improvement was numerically greater for certolizumab 400 mg. No unexpected safety signals were identified. LIMITATION: There was no active comparator. CONCLUSION: Treatment with either certolizumab 400 mg or 200 mg every 2 weeks was associated with significant and clinically meaningful improvements in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The 400-mg dose could provide additional clinical benefit. The safety profile was consistent with the therapeutic class.

Certolizumab pegol for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: Results through 48 weeks of a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, etanercept- and placebo-controlled study (CIMPACT).

BACKGROUND: Phase 2 psoriasis studies with the Fc-free, PEGylated, anti-tumor necrosis factor biologic certolizumab pegol demonstrated meaningful clinical activity. OBJECTIVE: Assess safety and efficacy of certolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Patients were randomized 3:3:1:3 to certolizumab 400 mg, certolizumab 200 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks or etanercept 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks. Certolizumab-treated patients achieving a ≥75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at week 16 from baseline PASI were rerandomized to certolizumab or placebo for 32 weeks. The primary endpoint was responder rate (≥75% reduction in PASI from baseline PASI) versus placebo (primary analysis) and etanercept (secondary analysis) at week 12; secondary endpoints included responder rates on various measures versus placebo at weeks 12, 16, and 48. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: All endpoints were significantly greater for certolizumab versus placebo with the greatest response seen with 400 mg. Certolizumab 400 mg was superior to and 200 mg was noninferior to etanercept. Adverse events were consistent with the anti-tumor necrosis factor class of drugs. LIMITATIONS: Etanercept was administered by unblinded study staff or self-administered, but efficacy assessments were performed by a blinded assessor. CONCLUSION: Both certolizumab regimens improved psoriasis symptoms, with a greater response seen with the higher dose. No new safety signals were observed.

Blood-Borne RNA Correlates with Disease Activity and IFN-Stimulated Gene Expression in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

The loss of tolerance and the presence of circulating autoantibodies directed against nuclear Ags is the hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Many of these Ags are complexed with short, noncoding RNAs, such as U1 and Y1. The amount of U1 and Y1 RNA complexed with SLE patient Abs and immune complexes was measured in a cross-section of 228 SLE patients to evaluate the role of these RNA molecules within the known biochemical framework of SLE. The study revealed that SLE patients had significantly elevated levels of circulating U1 and/or Y1 RNA compared with healthy volunteers. In addition, the blood-borne RNA molecules were correlated with SLE disease activity and increased expression of IFN-inducible genes. To our knowledge, this study provides the first systematic examination of the role of circulating RNA in a large group of SLE patients and provides an important link with IFN dysregulation.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of TRU-015, a CD20-directed small modular immunopharmaceutical protein therapeutic, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation clinical study.

BACKGROUND: TRU-015 is a small modular immunopharmaceutical protein drug that binds to CD20 and effectively depleted B cells in nonhuman primates. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this clinical study was to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties, immunogenicity, and tolerability of TRU-015 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation clinical study was conducted at 4 medical centers in the United States. Patients with RA who were receiving stable-dose methotrexate were enrolled in 1 of 8 dose groups and received TRU-015 as a single IV dose of 0.015, 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, or 15, or 2 IV doses of 15 mg/kg, administered 7 days apart (30 mg/kg). Patients were enrolled in the next higher dose cohort based on the tolerability observed in the prior cohort. Prior to TRU-015 infusion, patients were premedicated with an antihistamine and acetaminophen and may have received a corticosteroid at the investigator's discretion. Serum samples were collected for analysis of PK properties (serum t((1/2))) and neutralizing antibodies to TRU-015; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and a cell-based neutralizing assay were used to evaluate samples from patients. PD response was measured using B-cell (CD19(+)-cell) count using flow cytometry at prespecified time points. Tolerability was assessed during drug infusion and at prespecified time points after infusion using physical examination and laboratory analysis. Patients were followed for >or=4 weeks and until B-cell recovery. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled. Most were female (81%) and white (95%); the mean age was 53 years. Serum t((1/2)) ranged from 12 to 19 days. B-cell depletion generally increased in degree and duration with increasing doses. No neutralizing antibodies to TRU-015 were detected. Mild adverse events (AEs) included back pain, headache, peripheral edema, and upper respiratory infection (5 patients each). Mild urticaria occurred in 1 patient. Grade 3 AEs included hypertension, arthralgia, and urticaria and bronchospasm (1 patient each). No dose-limiting toxicity was found. CONCLUSIONS: In this small population of patients with RA, the C(max) and the AUC appeared to increase in a dose-proportional manner. The mean t((1/2)) ranged from 12 to 19 days. TRU-015 was associated with dose-dependent B-cell depletion and an acceptable tolerability profile.

Pneumococcal vaccine response in psoriatic arthritis patients during treatment with etanercept.

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutics used to treat inflammatory diseases, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA), may potentially interfere with normal immune system function. Immune system function can be assessed by evaluating response to vaccination. We assessed the ability of patients with PsA treated with etanercept to produce antibodies in response to pneumococcal antigen challenge. METHODS: Patients with PsA (n = 205) were stratified by methotrexate (MTX) use and randomly assigned to receive either placebo or etanercept 25 mg twice weekly by subcutaneous injection. After 4 weeks of treatment with study drug, a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccination was administered. Antibody levels to 5 antigens (9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) were measured by ELISA before and 4 weeks after vaccination in 184 patients. The proportion (%) of patients with 2- and 4-fold increases in antibody titers was analyzed. RESULTS: Patients treated with etanercept or placebo had similar responses to the vaccine. A 2-fold increase in titer to at least 2 antigens was achieved by 67% of patients, and a 4-fold increase to at least 2 antigens was achieved by 47% of patients. Approximately 20% of patients in each group failed to show a 2-fold response to any antigens. Logistic regression analysis showed MTX use and age were predictors of a poor response. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PsA treated with etanercept were able to produce antibodies in response to pneumococcal vaccination. Patients receiving MTX had lower mean antibody levels in response to the vaccine. There was no increased risk of poor response with etanercept treatment given alone or with MTX.

Once-weekly administration of 50 mg etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of 50 mg etanercept administered subcutaneously once weekly in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Four hundred twenty RA patients were randomized to receive, in a blinded manner, the study drug for up to 16 weeks: 214 patients received 50 mg etanercept once weekly, 153 received 25 mg etanercept twice weekly, and 53 received placebo for 8 weeks followed by 25 mg etanercept twice weekly for 8 weeks. Efficacy and safety were assessed at weeks 8 and 16. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on serum samples from patients at selected study sites. The primary efficacy end point was achievement of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement criteria (ACR20 response) at week 8. RESULTS: An ACR20 response was achieved at week 8 by 50% of the patients receiving 50 mg etanercept once weekly, by 49% of the patients receiving 25 mg etanercept twice weekly, and by 19% of the patients in the placebo group (P

Etanercept added to background methotrexate therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: continued observations.

OBJECTIVE: To observe the long-term safety and efficacy of combination therapy with etanercept and methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to determine whether the addition of etanercept allowed reductions in methotrexate or corticosteroid dosages while maintaining a clinical response. METHODS: Patients with RA who received methotrexate plus etanercept in a previous randomized, placebo-controlled trial were offered the opportunity to enroll in an open-label extension study for further evaluation of treatment with etanercept and methotrexate. RESULTS: Seventy-nine of the 89 patients in the original blinded study enrolled in the extension study, and 65 of these patients continue in the study. Patients have received etanercept therapy for up to 47 months (median 44 months). The types and rate of adverse events noted during the extension trial were similar to those observed in the controlled trial. At the 3-year assessment, 77% of the 57 patients available for evaluation met American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) criteria for improvement in RA, 47% met the ACR50 criteria, and 23% met the ACR70 criteria. Of the 36 patients assessed at 3 years in the extension study, 30 (83%) were able to decrease their dosages of corticosteroids, and 20 (56%) were able to discontinue corticosteroid therapy. At 3 years, the dosage of methotrexate was decreased in 41 of 66 patients (62%), and methotrexate therapy was discontinued in 19 patients (29%). CONCLUSION: In this observational continuation study, the addition of etanercept to background methotrexate provided sustained clinical benefit over a median period of 44 months. With etanercept therapy, there were trends toward dosage reduction or discontinuation of methotrexate and corticosteroids, without apparent worsening of ACR response rates. Compared with the controlled trial, no increases in the rate of adverse events were observed.

Long-term efficacy and safety of etanercept in children with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: interim results from an ongoing multicenter, open-label, extended-treatment trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of etanercept in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) participating in an ongoing multicenter, open-label, extended-treatment trial. All patients had been participants in an initial randomized efficacy and safety trial of etanercept. METHODS: Etanercept was administered at a dosage of 0.4 mg/kg (maximum 25 mg) subcutaneously twice each week. Safety and efficacy evaluations were performed every 3-4 months. The JRA 30% definition of improvement (DOI) was defined as improvement of > or =30% in at least 3 of 6 response variables used to assess disease activity, with no more than 1 variable worsening by more than 30%. RESULTS: At the time of analysis, 48 of the 58 patients (83%) were still enrolled in the study; 43 of them (74%) had completed 2 years of treatment. Of these 43 patients, 81% met the JRA 30% DOI, 79% met the JRA 50% DOI, and 67% met the JRA 70% DOI. Ten children started low-dose methotrexate after year 1. Of the 32 children taking prednisone, the dosage was decreased to <5 mg/day in 26 (81%). Two children had serious infections (varicella with aseptic meningitis in one and complicated sepsis in the other). In general, adverse events were of the types seen in a general pediatric patient population. CONCLUSION: Children with severe, longstanding, methotrexate-resistant polyarticular JRA demonstrated sustained clinical improvement with >2 years of continuous etanercept treatment. Etanercept was generally well-tolerated. There were no increases in the rates of adverse events over time. However, children taking etanercept should be monitored closely for infections.