Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Oncol ; 14(2): 248-57, 2003 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12562652

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the cost of prophylactic antibiotics during chemotherapy is offset by cost savings due to a decreased incidence of febrile leukopenia (FL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients were randomised to standard or intensified chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to assess the impact on survival (n = 244). In addition, patients were randomised to prophylactic ciprofloxacin and roxithromycin or placebo to assess the impact on FL (n = 161). The economic evaluation examined the costs and effects of patients taking antibiotics versus placebo. Medical resource utilisation was documented prospectively, including 33 patients from one centre in The Netherlands (NL) and 49 patients from one centre in Germany (GE). The evaluation takes the perspective of the health insurance systems and of the hospitals. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the main trial, prophylactic antibiotics reduced the incidence of FL, hospitalisation due to FL and use of therapeutic antibiotics by 50%. In GE, the incidence of FL was not reduced by prophylaxis. This resulted in an average cost difference of only 35 Euros [95% confidence interval (CI) (-)1.713-2.263] in favour of prophylaxis (not significant). In NL, prophylaxis reduced the incidence of FL by nearly 50%, comparable with the results of the main trial, resulting in a cost difference of 2706 Euros [95% CI 810-5948], demonstrating savings in favour of prophylactic antibiotics of nearly 45%. Sensitivity analyses indicate that with an efficacy of prophylaxis of 50%, and with expected costs of antibiotic prophylaxis of 500 Euros or less, cost savings will incur over a broad range of baseline risks for FL; that is, a risk >10-20% for FL per cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Giving oral prophylactic antibiotics to SCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy is the dominant strategy in both GE and NL, demonstrating both cost-savings and superior efficacy. The sensitivity analyses demonstrate that, due to the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics and their low unit cost, cost savings will incur over a broad range of baseline risks for FL. We recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients at risk for FL during chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Leucopenia/induzido quimicamente , Leucopenia/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Febre , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Leucopenia/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Risco , Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA