Athletes treated for inguinal-related groin pain by endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair: long-term benefits of a prospective cohort.

PURPOSE: Inguinal-related groin pain (IRGP) in athletes is a multifactorial condition, posing a therapeutic challenge. If conservative treatment fails, totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair is effective in pain relief. Because there are only few long-term follow-up results available, this study was designed to evaluate effectiveness of TEP repair in IRGP-patients years after the initial procedure. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the original, prospective cohort study (TEP-ID-study) were subjected to two telephone questionnaires. The TEP-ID-study demonstrated favorable outcomes after TEP repair for IRGP-patients after a median follow-up of 19 months. The questionnaires in the current study assessed different aspects, including, but not limited to pain, recurrence, new groin-related symptoms and physical functioning measured by the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS). The primary outcome was pain during exercise on the numeric rating scale (NRS) at very long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Out of 32 male participants in the TEP-ID-study, 28 patients (88%) were available with a median follow-up of 83 months (range: 69-95). Seventy-five percent of athletes were pain free during exercise (p < 0.001). At 83 months follow-up, a median NRS of 0 was observed during exercise (IQR 0-2), which was significantly lower compared to earlier scores (p <0.01). Ten patients (36%) mentioned subjective recurrence of complaints, however, physical functioning improved on all HAGOS subscales (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the safety and effectivity of TEP repair in a prospective cohort of IRGP-athletes, for whom conservative treatment had failed, with a follow-up period of over 80 months.

Patients' experiences with pre-test genetic counseling provided by breast cancer healthcare professionals: Results from a large prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Pre-test genetic counseling of patients with breast cancer is increasingly being offered by non-genetic healthcare professionals. We aimed to evaluate the experiences of patients with breast cancer receiving pre-test genetic counseling from a non-genetic healthcare professional (i.e., surgeon or nurse). METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer and received pre-test counseling from their surgeon or nurse (mainstream group), and patients who received pre-test counseling from a clinical geneticist (usual care group) were invited to participate in our multicenter study. Between September 2019 and December 2021, patients received a questionnaire after pre-test counseling (T0) and four weeks after receiving their test results (T1) to evaluate psychosocial outcomes, knowledge, discussed topics and satisfaction. RESULTS: We included 191 patients in our mainstream and 183 patients in our usual care group and received, respectively 159 and 145 follow-up questionnaires. Levels of distress and decisional regret were comparable in both groups. Decisional conflict was higher in our mainstream group (p = 0.01), but only 7% had clinically relevant decisional conflict (vs 2% in usual care group). The possible implications of a genetic test on (secondary) breast or ovarian cancer risks were less frequently discussed in our mainstream group (p = 0.03 and p = 0.000, respectively). In both groups knowledge about genetics was comparable, satisfaction was high and the majority of patients in both groups preferred to give both verbal and written consent for genetic testing. CONCLUSION: Mainstreamed genetic care provides sufficient information for the majority of breast cancer patients to decide about genetic testing with minimal distress.

Feasibility of a smartphone application for inguinal hernia care: a prospective pilot study.

The Inguinal Hernia Application (IHAPP) is designed to overcome current limitations of regular follow-up after inguinal hernia surgery. It has two goals: Minimizing unnecessary healthcare consumption by supplying patient information and facilitating registration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by offering simple questionnaires. In this study we evaluated the usability and validity of the app. Patients (≥18 years) scheduled for elective hernia repair were assessed for eligibility. Feasibility of the app was evaluated by measuring patient satisfaction about utilization. Validity (internal consistency and convergent validity) was tested by comparing answers in the app to the scores of the standardized EuraHS-Quality of Life instrument. Furthermore, test-retest reliability was analyzed correlating scores obtained at 6 weeks to outcomes after 44 days (6 weeks and 2 days). During a 3-month period, a total of 100 patients were included. Median age was 56 years and 98% were male. Most respondents (68%) valued the application as a supplementary tool to their treatment. The pre-operative information was reported as useful by 77% and the app was regarded user-friendly by 71%. Patient adherence was mediocre, 47% completed all questionnaires during follow-up. Reliability of the app was considered excellent (α > 0.90) and convergent validity was significant (p = 0.01). The same applies to test-retest reliability (p = 0.01). Our results demonstrate the IHAPP is a useful tool for reliable data registration and serves as patient information platform. However, further improvements are necessary to increase patient compliance in recording PROMs.

Value and patient appreciation of follow-up after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.

PURPOSE: There is some consensus on inguinal hernia surgery follow-up in research settings. However, consensus on regular follow-up is lacking. Therefore, patients and surgeons are unnecessarily burdened and not cost-efficient. Moreover, the purpose of follow-up is barely questioned. This study aims to evaluate follow-up after inguinal hernia repair and determine patient satisfaction. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was executed in a high-volume specialized hernia clinic. All totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair patients between July and October 2016 were included. Telephone follow-up was performed at 1 day, 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. One year postoperatively it was assessed whether patients visited other healthcare organizations, had remaining inguinal complaints, a Post-INguinal-repair-Questionnaire by telephone (PINQ-PHONE) was executed, and appreciation with follow-up was determined. RESULTS: Respectively, 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively, 138 (79.3%) and 130 (74.7%) of 174 included patients were reached. One year postoperatively 15 patients (11.5%) had remaining inguinal complaints, of which only four patients (3.1%) had not already reported their symptoms. Nineteen patients (14.6%) presented with self-reported complaints between 6 weeks and 1 year, and no patients went to other hospitals. Respectively, 107 (82.3%), 61 (46.9%) and 117 (90.0%) patients considered follow-up useful at 6 weeks, 1 year and in general. One hundred nineteen patients (91.5%) preferred telephone follow-up to outpatient clinic appointments. CONCLUSION: TEP patients value a telephone follow-up time-point, however, long-term follow-up is not considered useful. Patients report postoperative complaints themselves, therefore performing follow-up serves no clinical purpose. The purpose of follow-up is patient satisfaction and registration for quality objectives.

Recurrence after totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: the role of physical examination and ultrasound.

PURPOSE: Physical examination (PE) combined with ultrasound (US) is recommended to confirm a recurrent hernia. However, the evidence is rather weak. The aim of this study was to evaluate PE and appraise the added value of US in alleged recurrent inguinal hernias after totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: All adult patients who were re-operated for suspicion of a recurrent hernia after a primary unilateral or bilateral TEP between 2006 and 2017 were identified and investigated retrospectively. Patient characteristics, PE, additional imaging and intra-operative findings were registered. PE outcomes were compared with intra-operative findings to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of PE. In case of clinical doubt, the added value of US was evaluated by comparing US findings with the intra-operative findings. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were re-operated for suspicion of 137 recurrent hernias. In 75 patients, US was performed. PE was positive for an inguinal hernia in 101 groins (73.7%), negative in 30 (21.9%) and inconclusive in 6 (4.4%). PE matched the operative findings in 75.2%. The PPV of diagnosing a recurrent hernia (or lipoma) on PE was 97%. In case of clinical doubt (n = 36), positive US matched the operative findings in 20 cases (87.0%). CONCLUSION: US does not necessarily need to be incorporated in the standard diagnostic workup of a recurrent inguinal hernia. After PE alone, a recurrent hernia (or lipoma) can be diagnosed with a PPV of 97%. Only in case of clinical doubt, US has additional value.

Experience with the PINQ-PHONE telephone questionnaire for detection of recurrences after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

PURPOSE: The PINQ-PHONE is a 4-question telephone questionnaire designed and validated as a recurrence detection method after laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The study aim was to evaluate the PINQ-PHONE by describing our experience with the questionnaire in a high-volume randomized-controlled trial. METHODS: The PINQ-PHONE was performed 5 years postoperatively after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. Positive PINQ-PHONE responses were compared with clinical assessments for a recurrence. An "experience with the PINQ-PHONE"-survey was conducted among the executing researchers. Furthermore, positive predictive values (PPV) for the separate questions and overall PINQ-PHONE were determined. RESULTS: Fifty-two of 769 responding patients (6.8%) had positive PINQ-PHONE responses and were invited to visit the outpatient clinic, thus preventing follow-up visits in 93.2% of included patients. Two recurrences were detected (0.3%). The overall PPV of the PINQ-PHONE was low (0.057). The PPV of question 1 (0.040) and 2 (0.100) was lower than that of question 3 (0.222) and 4 (0.286). The PPV of only question 3 and 4 combined was 0.183, and no recurrence would have been missed. The researcher survey unanimously produced that the PINQ-PHONE was user-friendly and executed in < 5 min, and questions 3 and 4 were considered adequate for recurrence detection. The majority found questions 1 and 2 to be inadequate questions. CONCLUSIONS: The PINQ-PHONE proved to be a valuable tool in TEP repair follow-up for recurrences. Enhancement of the PINQ-PHONE using only question 3 and 4 is recommended, since more patients refrain from outpatient clinic visits, and nevertheless, recurrences are safely detected.

Is young age a risk factor for chronic postoperative inguinal pain after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair?

PURPOSE: A generally known risk factor for developing chronic postoperative inguinal pain after inguinal hernia repair is young age. However, studies discussing young age as a risk factor are mainly based on open repairs. The aim of this study was to determine if young adults (age 18-30) are also more prone to experience chronic postoperative inguinal pain after totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair, compared to older adults (age ≥ 31). METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in a high-volume TEP hernia clinic in 919 patients. Patients were assessed using the Numeric (Pain) Rating Scale, Inguinal Pain Questionnaire and Carolina Comfort Scale preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years after TEP mesh repair. The primary outcome was clinically relevant pain in young adults compared to older adults at 3 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were pain 1 and 2 years postoperatively, the impact of pain on daily living, foreign body feeling and testicular pain. Furthermore, age categories were analyzed to determine potential age-dependent risk factors. RESULTS: Follow-up was completed in 867 patients. No significant difference was found between young adults and older adults for clinically relevant pain at 3 months follow-up (p = 0.723). At all follow-up time points, no significant differences were found for clinically relevant pain, any pain, mean pain scores, the Inguinal Pain Questionnaire and the Carolina Comfort Scale. The subgroup analyses showed no age-dependent risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Young age is not associated with a higher risk of chronic postoperative inguinal pain after endoscopic TEP hernia repair.

An 11-year analysis of reoperated groins after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair in a high volume hernia center.

BACKGROUND: Developments in inguinal hernia surgery have substantially lowered recurrence rates, yet recurrences remain an important outcome parameter of inguinal hernia repair. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of all reoperated groins after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair in a high-volume hernia clinic in the Netherlands. METHODS: All groins with recurrence-like symptoms reoperated after previous TEP inguinal hernia repair between January 2006 and December 2016 were analyzed. Patient characteristics, imaging findings, primary hernia type, time to recurrence and recurrence type were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 137 groins were reoperated in 130 patients. The median age at the TEP procedure was 55 years [interquartile range (IQR) 45-64 years]. Fifty-seven groins were initially part of a bilateral procedure (42%). Median time until recurrence was 9 months (IQR 4-26 months). Reoperation findings were a hernia recurrence in 76%, an isolated lipoma in 18%, and no recurrence or lipoma in 6%. The majority of hernias recurred at their initial site (70%), of which the greatest part involved direct hernias. Isolated lipomas were more frequently seen after indirect hernia repair. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal hernia recurrences were still observed in this high-volume hernia clinic. Recurrences were most frequently seen at their initial hernia site, the majority involving direct hernias. Isolated lipomas presenting as a pseudorecurrence were most frequently seen after correction of indirect hernias. In accordance with the current guidelines, reducing recurrence rates can be achieved by mesh fixation in bilateral, large and direct defects and by thoroughly reducing lipomas.

[Inguinal hernia repair: bringing order to variety]. / Liesbreukchirurgie: orde in verscheidenheid.

- With around 30,000 interventions a year, correction of an inguinal hernia is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in the Netherlands. One would therefore expect the same technique to be used all over the world by now. There are nevertheless different procedures, depending on a patient's age and history, the type of inguinal hernia and the expertise of the surgeon.- When the pathophysiology of an inguinal hernia became clear at the end of the 19th century, Bassini laid the foundation of modern inguinal hernia surgery: reinforcing the posterior wall of the inguinal canal after repositioning the hernial sac with its contents.- Although current surgical treatment still follows this principle, there are now many different techniques for this. Some are named after the 'inventor' of such an operation (Shouldice, Lichtenstein and Stoppa) while others are indicated with an abbreviation (TEP, TAPP, TIPP and TREPP).- In this review article, we describe the surgical techniques currently most common in the Netherlands and bring order to the chaos of proper names and abbreviations.

Athletes with inguinal disruption benefit from endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair.

PURPOSE: Inguinal disruption, a common condition in athletes, is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair in athletes with inguinal disruption, selected through a multidisciplinary, systematic work-up. METHODS: An observational, prospective cohort study was conducted in 32 athletes with inguinal disruption. Athletes were assessed by a sports medicine physician, radiologist and hernia surgeon and underwent subsequent endoscopic TEP repair with placement of polypropylene mesh. The primary outcome was pain reduction during exercise on the numeric rating scale (NRS) 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were sports resumption, physical functioning and long-term pain intensity. Patients were assessed preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively and after a median follow-up of 19 months. RESULTS: Follow-up was completed in 30 patients (94%). The median pain score decreased from 8 [interquartile range (IQR) 7-8] preoperatively to 2 (IQR 0-5) 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). At long-term follow-up, the median pain score was 0 (IQR 0-3) (p < 0.001). At 3 months, 60% of patients were able to complete a full training and match. The median intensity of sport was 50% (IQR 20-70) preoperatively, 95% (IQR 70-100) 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001), and 100% (IQR 90-100) at long-term follow-up (p < 0.001). The median frequency of sport was 4 (IQR 3-5) times per week before development of symptoms and 3 (IQR 3-4) times per week 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.025). Three months postoperatively, improvement was shown on all physical functioning subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with inguinal disruption, selected through a multidisciplinary, systematic work-up, benefit from TEP repair.

Bilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair does not impair male fertility.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair with polypropylene mesh has become a well-established technique. However, since the mesh is placed in close contact with the spermatic cord, mesh-induced inflammation may affect its structures, possibly resulting in impaired fertility. The aim of this observational prospective cohort study was to assess fertility after bilateral endoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair in male patients. METHODS: Fifty-seven male patients (22-60 years old) with primary, reducible, bilateral inguinal hernias underwent elective bilateral endoscopic TEP hernia repair with use of polypropylene mesh. The primary outcome was testicular perfusion; secondary outcomes were testicular volume, endocrinological status, and semen quality. All patients were assessed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Follow-up was completed in 44 patients. No statistically significant differences in measurements of testicular blood flow parameters or testicular volume were found. Postoperative LH levels were significantly higher [preoperative median 4.3 IU/L (IQR 3.4-5.3) versus postoperative median 5.0 IU/L (IQR 3.6-6.5), p = 0.03]. Levels of inhibin B were significantly lower postoperatively [preoperative median 139.0 ng/L (IQR 106.5-183.0) versus postoperative median 27.0 ng/L (IQR 88.3-170.9), p = 0.01]. No significant changes in FSH or testosterone levels were observed. There were no differences in semen quality. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that bilateral endoscopic TEP hernia repair with polypropylene mesh does not impair fertility, as no differences in testicular blood flow, testicular volume, or semen quality were observed. Postoperative levels of LH and inhibin B differed significantly from preoperative measurements, yet no clinical relevance could be ascribed to these findings.

Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair for inguinal disruption (Sportsman's hernia): rationale and design of a prospective observational cohort study (TEP-ID-study).

INTRODUCTION: Chronic inguinal pain is a frequently occurring problem in athletes. A diagnosis of inguinal disruption is performed by exclusion of other conditions causing groin pain. Up to now, conservative medical management is considered to be the primary treatment for this condition. Relevant large and prospective clinical studies regarding the treatment of inguinal disruption are limited; however, recent studies have shown the benefits of the totally extraperitoneal patch (TEP) technique.This study provides a complete assessment of the inguinal area in athletes with chronic inguinal pain before and after treatment with the TEP hernia repair technique. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We describe the rationale and design of an observational cohort study for surgical treatment with the endoscopic TEP hernia repair technique in athletes with a painful groin (inguinal disruption).The study is being conducted in a high-volume, single centre hospital with specialty in TEP hernia repair. Patients over 18 years, suffering from inguinal pain for at least 3 months during or after playing sports, and whom have not undergone previous inguinal surgery and have received no benefit from physiotherapy are eligible for inclusion. Patients with any another cause of inguinal pain, proven by physical examination, inguinal ultrasound, X-pelvis/hip or MRI are excluded.Primary outcome is reduction in pain after 3 months. Secondary outcomes are pain reduction, physical functioning, and resumption of sport (in frequency and intensity). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: An unrestricted research grant for general study purposes was assigned to the Hernia Centre. This study itself is not directly subject to the above mentioned research grant or any other financial sponsorship. We intend to publish the outcome of the study, regardless of the findings. All authors will give final approval of the manuscript version to be published.

Chronic pain after TEP inguinal hernia repair, does MRI reveal a cause?

PURPOSE: Persistent pain is a known side effect after TEP inguinal repair disabling 2-5% of patients. A standardized diagnostic work-up so far is not available. MRI is a diagnostic tool in the work-up of inguinal hernias. In the present study the yield of MRI in evaluating chronic pain after TEP hernia repair is addressed. METHODS: In our database patients receiving an MRI scan for groin pain lasting more than 3 months after TEP inguinal hernia repair were identified. A checklist with potential pathologic findings was filled out for each groin by two blinded observers. Findings in painful, pain-free and unoperated groins were compared and statistical analysis done based upon their relative incidences. Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated to determine interobserver agreement. RESULTS: Imaging studies of 53 patients revealed information regarding 106 groins. Fifty-five groins were painful after the initial operation, 12 were pain-free postoperatively and 39 groins were not operated. None of the predefined disorders was observed statistically more often in the patients with painful groins. Only fibrosis appeared more prevalent in patients with chronic pain (P = 0.11). Interobserver agreement was excellent for identifying the mesh (κ = 0.88) and observing bulging or a hernia (κ = 0.74) and was substantial for detecting fibrosis (κ = 0.63). In 40% of the patients, MRI showed a correct mesh position and observed nothing else than minor fibrosis. A wait and see policy resolved complaints in the majority of the patients. In 15 % of the patients, MRI revealed treatable findings explanatory for persisting groin pain. CONCLUSION: For patients with post-TEP hernia groin pain, MRI is useful to confirm a correct flat mesh position and to identify possible not operation-related causes of groin pain. It is of little help to identify a specific cause of groin repair-related pain.

Geriatric consultation can aid in complex treatment decisions for elderly cancer patients.

Treatment decisions for elderly cancer patients can be challenging. A geriatric assessment may identify unknown medical conditions, give insight on patients' ability to tolerate treatment and guide treatment decisions. Our aim was to study the value of a geriatric consultation in oncological decision-making. Data on cancer patients referred for geriatric consultation for clinical optimisation or due to uncertainty regarding their optimal treatment strategy were prospectively analysed. Outcome of geriatric evaluations, non-oncological interventions and suggested adaptations of oncological treatment proposals were evaluated. Seventy-two patients were referred for consultation, over half of which in a curative treatment setting. Prevalence of geriatric syndromes was 93%, previously undiagnosed conditions were identified in 49% of patients and non-oncological interventions were initiated in 56%. Time was spent discussing patients' priorities (53% of consultations), expectations on treatment (50%) and advance care planning (14%). For 82% of patients, suggestions were made regarding the optimal treatment decision: a more intensive treatment was recommended in 39%, a less intensive therapy for 42% and in 19% only supportive care was suggested. The results demonstrate that a geriatric consultation can aid in complex treatment decisions and may allow for a reduction in over- and undertreatment of elderly cancer patients.

Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic hernia repair in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernias are common in elderly males. We addressed outcome following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair in patients older than 70 years. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of patients >70 years with a unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia operated in our hospital between January 2005 and January 2010 using the TEP technique. RESULTS: A total of 429 patients underwent TEP hernia repair under general anaesthesia, mostly men (n = 405; 94.4%). Median age was 74 years (range 70-89). The mean pre-operative pain score was 3.7 (SD ± 2.5). Ninety-four percent of patients had an ASA score of 1 or 2. Three hundred thirty-six patients underwent a unilateral repair (78%). The conversion rate to an anterior procedure was 0.7 % (n = 3). In 8 patients (1.9%), intra-operative complications occurred, and the postoperative course was complicated in 3 patients (0.7 %). Severe complications attributable to the endoscopic approach occurred in 6 patients (1.4%): a bladder injury (n = 5) and a trocar-induced bowel perforation (n = 1). The mean postoperative pain score after 6 weeks was 1.6 (SD ± 1.2). Patients were able to resume their daily activities after a median of 7 days (range 1-42). CONCLUSION: Totally, extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients is associated with low overall complication rates and a fast recovery. In a small proportion of patients, severe complications occur attributable to the endoscopic approach.

A Young Man With Severe and Disabling Complications of Septic Shock.

A young man had severe septic shock with multiorgan failure due to necrotizing fasciitis caused by group A streptococcus after endoscopic repair of a preperitoneal inguinal hernia. He was treated with surgical exploration and antibiotics and resuscitated with fluids, vasopressors, and inotropic agents. He survived this critical illness, but when he woke up from sedation, his vision was lost in both eyes. Ophthalmological evaluation revealed minimal peripapillary retinal hemorrhages without signs of papillary edema. Visually evoked potentials were negative. Magnetic resonance imaging did not show a cause of the visual damage. The patient had bilateral ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosed. Two weeks later, unilateral sudden deafness also developed. The acquired blindness and hearing loss were unchanged after more than 1 year and seem to be permanent, severely disabling this young survivor of septic shock.

An algorithm for assessment and treatment of postherniorrhaphy pain.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal pain after groin hernia repair is a challenging issue. About 50 % of postherniorrhaphy pain allegedly is neuropathic, treatment of which is cumbersome given the limited efficacy of current therapeutic modalities. Possibly a clear protocol assessing the type of pain and treating it accordingly could improve its treatment. METHODS: A prospective study was done to evaluate an algorithm in patients with chronic postherniorrhaphy groin pain, aiming to select those with neuropathic pain and to treat appropriately. Treatment consisted of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks as an initial treatment for neuropathic pain. If long-term pain reduction proved inadequate, peripheral nerve stimulation was offered. RESULT: After our diagnostic workup consisting of anamnesis, physical examination and imaging, 68 patients out of 105 were diagnosed as having non-neuropathic pain. These patients were referred to the most appropriate consultant, treated accordingly or sometimes pain appeared to be self-limiting. Thirty-seven (35 %) patients were diagnosed as having neuropathic pain with a median NRS of 7 (range 4-9) and were referred for further treatment to our pain clinic. The majority (21 of 28 patients) suffered ileo-inguinal nerve involvement. After ultrasound-guided nerve blocks, a permanent reduction in pain was achieved in 18 patients (62 %) with a median post-treatment NRS of 1 (range 0-3). In six patients to which an additional peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) was offered, pain reduction to a level of mild complaints with a median NRS of 2 (range 1-8) was observed. In total, 24 of the 28 patients (83 %) diagnosed with neuropathic postherniorrhaphy pain achieved significant pain reduction after algorithm-based treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we implemented a diagnostic workup for patients with postherniorrhaphy inguinal pain to select those with neuropathic pain. Eighty-three percent of the patients with neuropathic groin pain obtained significant improvement of their pain scores after our protocolled treatment. The effect was achieved by nerve infiltrations and in some cases by an implanted PNS when the former was unsuccessful.

Pain after totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair might fade out within a year.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of chronic pain after endoscopic hernia repair varies between 1 and 16 %. Studies regarding the course of pain in time after the operation are scarce. METHODS: 473 male patients ≥18 years of age, scheduled for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair (Prolene® mesh) between March 2010 and August 2012 were requested to record pain symptoms preoperative, and 1 day, 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year postoperatively and visit the outpatient department 3 months and 1 year postoperatively for a standardized interview and physical examination. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 25 % (n = 114) of the patients had moderate-to-severe pain (NRS 4-10). Six weeks postoperatively, 3 % (n = 12) of the patients still experienced moderate-to-severe pain. Three months after TEP, only 3 patients (0.6 %) had moderate-to-severe pain, while 83 patients (18 %) experienced mild pain. One year after TEP, 39 patients experienced mild pain (8 %) and 3 patients moderate pain (0.7 %), no patients experienced severe pain after 1 year. Patients with moderate-to-severe pain preoperatively had a higher risk of pain persisting until 3 months and 1 year postoperatively (p = 0.03). In most patients who had pain 3 months postoperatively and were pain-free 1 year after TEP, pain 'faded out' at 4-6 months postoperatively. Two patients had a not-painful recurrent hernia, diagnosed 2 and 5 months after TEP repair. CONCLUSION: Moderate-to-severe pain after TEP hernia repair is self-limiting, with less than 1 % of the patients reporting moderate pain 1 year postoperatively.

Three-month results of the effect of Ultrapro or Prolene mesh on post-operative pain and well-being following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TULP trial).

BACKGROUND: Recurrence rates after inguinal hernia repair have been reduced to a few per cent, since mesh repair has become standard of care. Lightweight meshes reduce post-operative pain and stiffness in open anterior repair, but for endoscopic repair, the discussion about this benefit is ongoing. This study was done to analyse the effects of lightweight mesh versus heavyweight mesh following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair. METHODS: In a single-centre double-blindly randomized clinical trial, 950 patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernia were randomized to undergo endoscopic TEP using either an Ultrapro(®) or a Prolene(®) mesh. Data were collected by validated questionnaires at day 1, day 7, after 6 weeks and after 3 months, and clinical assessment was performed after 3 months. The presence of groin pain after 3 months, defined as an NRS score >3, was evaluated as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were foreign body feeling and the impact of pain and foreign body feeling on daily activities. RESULTS: At 3-month follow-up, the incidence of pain (NRS 4-10) was 2 versus 0.9 % in the lightweight and heavyweight mesh group, respectively (p = 0.17). Pain interfered with daily activities in 1.7 % of the lightweight and 1.5 % of heavyweight group. In the lightweight group, 20 % of patients reported a foreign body feeling versus 18 % in the heavyweight group (p = 0.62). No differences between the groups were observed regarding time to return to work, interference with sports and sexual activities, testicular pain and ejaculatory pain. Severe preoperative pain (OR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.21-3.35, p = 0.01) was the only independent predictor of any post-operative pain after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Three months after TEP inguinal repair, there were no significant differences between lightweight and heavyweight mesh use regarding the incidence of pain, foreign body feeling or any other endpoint.