The Spatial Distribution of Late Gadolinium Enhancement of Left Atrial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the spatial distribution of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) of the left atrium (LA) by LGE-magnetic resonance imaging in an atrial fibrillation (AF) population. BACKGROUND: LGE of the LA can be a surrogate of pre-existing structural remodeling of LA. METHODS: LGE-magnetic resonance imaging scans were used for 160 patients with AF (mean age 66 ± 11 years) before AF ablation. To know the spatial distribution of LGE, the extent of LGE in 6 LA subregions was examined. Overall LGE distribution was also summarized as a spatial frequency histogram using an atlas of LA shape. These data were also compared between paroxysmal AF (87 patients) and persistent AF (73 patients). RESULTS: LGE coverage (%) in each subregion was as follows: 41.8 ± 18.9% in the left pulmonary vein (PV) antrum, 27.1 ± 16.7% in the left lateral wall, 25.8 ± 15.3% in the posterior wall, 19.7 ± 15.3% in the anterior wall, 17.1 ± 15.0% in the right PV antrum, and 12.0 ± 13.2% in the septum wall. LGE was heterogeneously distributed in the LA and was found with the highest frequency in the posterior wall near the inferior left PV antrum by the LGE histogram. A comparison of paroxysmal AF with persistent AF suggests that LGE was more expected in persistent AF compared with paroxysmal AF, particularly with a spread on the posterior and the anterior wall. CONCLUSIONS: LGE in the LA was heterogeneously distributed. LGE was highly distributed in the inferior left PV antrum near the posterior wall side, and spread on the posterior and anterior wall with AF progression.

Exercise Capacity Correlates With Left Atrial Structural Remodeling as Detected by Late Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study hypothesized that left atrial structural remodeling (LA-TR) correlates with exercise capacity (EC) in a cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging provides a method of assessing LA-TR in patients with AF. METHODS: A total of 145 patients (32% female, mean age 63.4 ± 11.6 years of age) with AF (66 paroxysmal, 71 persistent, 8 long-standing persistent) presenting for catheter ablation were included in the study. All patients underwent LGE-CMR imaging as well as maximal exercise test using the Bruce protocol prior to catheter ablation of AF. EC was quantified by minutes of exercise and metabolic equivalent (MET) level achieved. LA-TR was quantified from LGE-CMR imaging and classified according to the Utah classification of LA structural remodeling (Utah stage I: <10% LA wall enhancement; Utah II: 10% to <20%; Utah III: 20% to <30%; and Utah IV: >30%). AF recurrence was assessed at 1 year from the date of ablation. RESULTS: The average duration of exercise was 8 ± 3 min, and the mean MET achieved was 9.7 ± 3.2. METs achieved were inversely correlated with LA-TR (R2 = 0.061; p = 0.003). The duration of exercise was also inversely correlated with LA-TR (R2 = 0.071; p = 0.001). Both EC and LA-TR were associated with AF recurrence post ablation in univariate analysis, but only LA-TR and age were independently predictive of recurrence in multivariate analysis (p = 0.001). For every additional minute on the treadmill, subjects were 13% more likely to be free of AF 1 year post ablation (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: EC is inversely associated with LA-TR in patients with AF and is predictive of freedom from AF post-ablation.

Comparison of left atrial area marked ablated in electroanatomical maps with scar in MRI.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (EAM) is routinely used to mark ablated areas during radiofrequency ablation. We hypothesized that, in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, EAM overestimates scar formation in the left atrium (LA) when compared to the scar seen on late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 235 patients who underwent initial ablation for AF at our institution between August 2011 and December 2012, we retrospectively identified 70 patients who had preprocedural magnetic resonance angiography merged with LA anatomy in EAM software and had a 3-month postablation LGE-MRI for assessment of scar. Ablated area was marked intraprocedurally using EAM software and quantified retrospectively. Scarred area was quantified in 3-month postablation LGE-MRI. The mean ablated area in EAM was 30.5 ± 7.5% of the LA endocardial surface and the mean scarred area in LGE-MRI was 13.9 ± 5.9% (P < 0.001). This significant difference in the ablated area marked in the EAM and scar area in the LGE-MRI was present for each of the 3 independent operators. Complete pulmonary vein (PV) encirclement representing electrical isolation was observed in 87.8% of the PVs in EAM as compared to only 37.4% in LGE-MRI (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In AF ablation, EAM significantly overestimates the resultant scar as assessed with a follow-up LGE-MRI.

Atrial fibrillation ablation outcome is predicted by left atrial remodeling on MRI.

BACKGROUND: Although catheter ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) is becoming more common, results vary widely, and patient selection criteria remain poorly defined. We hypothesized that late gadolinium enhancement MRI (LGE-MRI) can identify left atrial (LA) wall structural remodeling (SRM) and stratify patients who are likely or not to benefit from ablation therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: LGE-MRI was performed on 426 consecutive patients with AF without contraindications to MRI before undergoing their first ablation procedure and on 21 non-AF control subjects. Patients were categorized by SRM stage (I-IV) based on the percentage of LA wall enhancement for correlation with procedure outcomes. Histological validation of SRM was performed comparing LGE-MRI with surgical biopsy. A total of 386 patients (91%) with adequate LGE-MRI scans were included in the study. After ablation, 123 patients (31.9%) experienced recurrent atrial arrhythmias during the 1-year follow-up. Recurrent arrhythmias (failed ablations) occurred at higher SRM stages with 28 of 133 (21.0%) in stage I, 40 of 140 (29.3%) in stage II, 24 of 71 (33.8%) in stage III, and 30 of 42 (71.4%) in stage IV. In multivariate analysis, ablation outcome was best predicted by advanced SRM stage (hazard ratio, 4.89; P<0.0001) and diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio, 1.64; P=0.036), whereas increased LA volume and persistent AF were not significant predictors. LA wall enhancement was significantly greater in patients with AF versus non-AF controls (16.6±11.2% versus 3.1±1.9%; P<0.0001). Histological evidence of remodeling from surgical biopsy specimens correlated with SRM on LGE-MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial SRM is identified on LGE-MRI, and extensive LGE (≥30% LA wall enhancement) predicts poor response to catheter ablation therapy for AF.

Higher degree of left atrial structural remodeling in patients with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation significantly improves the left ventricular (LV) function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and LV systolic dysfunction. In this study, we compared the degree of left atrial structural remodeling (LA-SRM) in patients with normal versus reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF). We also studied the impact of LA-SRM on LVEF improvement in patients undergoing ablation of AF. METHOD AND RESULTS: We categorized 384 patients into 2 groups based on their cardiac function: reduced LVEF group (LVEF ≤50%; n = 105) and normal LVEF group (LVEF > 50%; n = 279). LVEF was determined prior and mean 8 ± 3 months after catheter ablation for AF. Percentage of LA-SRM was quantified using LGE-MRI and patients were classified into 4 groups based on the amount of structural remodeling in their LA wall: minimal ≤ 5%, mild = 5-20%, moderate = 20-35%, and extensive ≥ 35%. The average preablation LA-SRM (21.5 ± 13.2% vs 15.4 ± 10.0%; P < 0.001) was significantly higher in reduced LVEF group than normal LVEF group. Among the 105 patients with reduced LVEF, while there was a modest 11.7 ± 8.4% average increase in LVEF following ablation, the greatest increase was seen in patients with less extensive LA-SRM (minimal = 19.3 ± 5.1%, n = 3, P = 0.02 and mild = 16.6 ± 9.9%, n = 48, P < 0.001). Patients with moderate and extensive fibrosis had an average EF improvement of 8.7 ± 11.1% and 2.8 ± 6.4%, respectively (n = 39, P < 0.001 and n = 15, P = 0.11, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with LV systolic dysfunction displayed a comparatively greater LA-SRM than patients with normal LVEF. Patients with lesser LA-SRM experienced a greater improvement in LVEF after catheter ablation for AF.

The effect of fat pad modification during ablation of atrial fibrillation: late gadolinium enhancement MRI analysis.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can visualize locations of both the ablation scar on the left atrium (LA) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and epicardial fat pads (FPs) containing ganglionated plexi (GP). METHODS: We investigated 60 patients who underwent pulmonary vein antrum (PVA) isolation along with LA posterior wall and septal debulking for AF. FPs around the LA surface in well-known GP areas (which were considered as the substitution of GP areas around the LA) were segmented from the dark-blood MRI. Then the FP and the ablation scar image visualized by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-MRI on the LA were merged together. Overlapping areas of FP and the ablation scar image were considered as the ablated FP areas containing GP. Patients underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring after ablation for the analysis of heart rate variability. RESULTS: Ablated FP area was significantly wider in patients without AF recurrence than those in patients with recurrence (5.6 ± 3.1 cm(2) vs 4.2 ± 2.7 cm(2) , P = 0.03). The mean values of both percentage of differences greater than 50 ms in the RR intervals (pRR > 50) and standard deviation of RR intervals over the entire analyzed period (SDNN), which were obtained from 24-hour Holter monitoring 1-day post-AF ablation, were significantly lower in patients without recurrence than those in patients with recurrence (5.8 ± 6.0% vs 14.0 ± 10.1%; P = 0.0005, 78.7 ± 32.4 ms vs 109.2 ± 43.5 ms; P = 0.005). There was a significant negative correlation between SDNN and the percentage of ablated FP area (Y = -1.3168X + 118.96, R(2) = 0.1576, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Extensively ablating LA covering GP areas along with PVA isolation enhanced the denervation of autonomic nerve system and seemed to improve procedural outcome in patients with AF.

Association of left atrial fibrosis detected by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study tried to determine the association between left atrial (LA) fibrosis, detected using delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI), and the CHADS(2) score (point system based on individual clinical risk factors including congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, and prior stroke) variables, specifically stroke. BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), conventional markers for the risk of stroke base their higher predictive effect on clinical features, particularly previous stroke history, and not individual LA pathophysiological properties. We aimed to determine the association between LA fibrosis, detected using DE-MRI, and the CHADS(2) score variables, specifically stroke. METHODS: Patients with AF who presented to the AF clinic and received a DE-MRI of the LA were evaluated. Their risk factor profiles, including a CHADS(2) score, were catalogued. The degree of LA fibrosis was determined as a percentage of the LA area. Any history of previous strokes, warfarin use, or cerebrovascular disease was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 387 patients, having a mean age of 65 ± 12 years, 36.8% female, were included in this study. A history of previous stroke was present in 36 (9.3%) patients. Those patients with previous strokes had a significantly higher percentage of LA fibrosis (24.4 ± 12.4% vs. 16.2 ± 9.9%, p < 0.01). A larger amount of LA fibrosis was also seen in those patients with a higher CHADS(2) score (≥ 2: 18.7 ± 11.4 vs. <2: 14.7 ± 9.2, p < 0.01). A logistic regression analysis of all variables except strokes (CHAD score) demonstrated that LA fibrosis independently predicted cerebrovascular events (p = 0.002) and significantly increased the predictive performance of the score (area under the curve = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary, multicenter results suggest DE-MRI-based detection of LA fibrosis is independently associated with prior history of strokes. We propose that the amount of DE-MRI-determined LA fibrosis could represent a marker for stroke and a possible therapeutic target with potential applicability for clinical treatment for patients with AF.

Echocardiographic left atrial reverse remodeling after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is predicted by preablation delayed enhancement of left atrium by magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrosis is a hallmark of atrial structural remodeling (SRM) and leads to structural and functional impairment of left atrial (LA) and persistence of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was conducted to assess LA reverse remodeling after catheter ablation of AF in mild and moderate-severe LA SRM. METHODS: Catheter ablation was performed in 68 patients (age 62 ± 14 years, 68% males) with paroxysmal (n = 26) and persistent (n = 42) AF. The patients were divided into group 1 with mild LA SRM (<10%, n = 31) and group 2 with moderate-severe LA SRM (>10%, n = 37) by delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DEMRI). Two-dimensional echocardiography, LA strain, and strain rate during left ventricular systole by velocity vector imaging were performed pre and at 6 ± 3 months postablation. The long-term outcome was monitored for 12 months. RESULTS: Patients in group 1 were younger (57 ± 15 vs 66 ± 13 years, P = .009) with a male predominance (80% vs 57%, P < .05) as compared to group 2. Postablation, group 1 had significant increase in average LA strain (Δ↑: 14% vs 4%, P < .05) and strain rate (Δ↑: 0.5 vs 0.1 cm/s, P < .05) as compared to group 2. There was a trend toward more patients with persistent AF in group 2 (68% vs 55%, P = .2), but it was not statistically significant. Group 2 had more AF recurrences (41% vs 16%, P = .02) at 12 months after ablation. CONCLUSION: Mild preablation LA SRM by DEMRI predicts favorable LA structural and functional reverse remodeling and long-term success after catheter ablation of AF, irrespective of the paroxysmal or persistent nature of AF.

Evaluation of the left atrial substrate in patients with lone atrial fibrillation using delayed-enhanced MRI: implications for disease progression and response to catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: Lone atrial fibrillation (AF) is thought to be a benign type or an early stage of the disease. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the left atrium (LA) substrate using delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) in patients with lone AF versus those with comorbidities. METHODS: Forty of 333 included patients met criteria for lone AF. All patients underwent DE-MRI to quantify atrial fibrosis as a marker for structural remodeling (SRM) and underwent catheter ablation. Based on the degree of SRM, patients were staged into 4 groups: Utah I (≤5% LA wall enhancement), Utah II (>5% to ≤20%), Utah III (>20% to ≤35%), or Utah IV (>35%). RESULTS: Distribution in Utah I to IV was comparable in patients with lone AF and non-lone AF. In both groups, a number of patients showed extensive SRM. Mean enhancement (14.08 ± 8.94 vs. 16.94 ± 11.37) was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .0721). In the lone AF group, catheter ablation was successful in suppressing AF in all of Utah I, 81.82% of Utah II, 62.5% of Utah III, and none of Utah IV patients. Similar results were achieved in the non-lone AF group. Outcome after ablation was significantly dependent on the SRM of the LA (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The degree of LA structural remodeling as detected using DE-MRI is independent of AF type and associated comorbidities. Selecting appropriate treatment candidates based on the quality and quantity of atrial fibrosis using DE-MRI would improve procedural outcome and avoid unnecessary intervention.

Evaluation of left atrial lesions after initial and repeat atrial fibrillation ablation: lessons learned from delayed-enhancement MRI in repeat ablation procedures.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated scar lesions after initial and repeat catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and correlated these regions to low-voltage tissue on repeat electroanatomic mapping. We also identified gaps in lesion sets that could be targeted and closed during repeat procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients underwent AF ablation and received a delayed-enhancement MRI at 3 months after ablation. The number of pulmonary veins (PV) with circumferential lesions were assessed and correlated with procedural outcome. Eighteen patients with AF recurrence underwent repeat ablation. MRI scar regions were compared with electroanatomic maps during the repeat procedure. Regions of incomplete scar around the PVs were then identified and targeted during repeat ablation to ensure complete circumferential lesions. After the initial procedure, complete circumferential scarring of all 4 PV antrum (PVA) was achieved in only 7% of patients, with the majority of patients (69%) having <2 completely scarred PVA. After the first procedure, the number of PVs with complete circumferential scarring and total left atrial wall (LA) scar burden was associated with better clinical outcome. Patients with successful AF termination had higher average total left atrial wall scar of 16.4%+/-9.8 (P=0.004) and percent PVA scar of 66.2+/-25.4 (P=0.01) compared with patients with AF recurrence who had an average total LA wall scar 11.3%+/-8.1 and PVA percent scar 50.0+/-24.7. In patients who underwent repeat ablation, the PVA scar percentage was 56.1%+/-21.4 after the first procedure compared with 77.2%+/-19.5 after the second procedure. The average total LA scar after the first ablation was 11.0%+/-4.1, whereas the average total LA scar after second ablation was 21.2%+/-7.4. All patients had an increased number of completely scarred pulmonary vein antra after the second procedure. MRI scar after the first procedure and low-voltage regions on electroanatomic mapping obtained during repeat ablation demonstrated a positive quantitative correlation of R(2)=0.57. CONCLUSIONS: Complete circumferential PV scarring difficult to achieve but is associated with better clinical outcome. Delayed-enhancement MRI can accurately define scar lesions after AF ablation and can be used to target breaks in lesion sets during repeat ablation.

Left atrial strain and strain rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: relationship to left atrial structural remodeling detected by delayed-enhancement MRI.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a progressive condition that begins with hemodynamic and/or structural changes in the left atrium (LA) and evolves through paroxysmal and persistent stages. Because of limitations with current noninvasive imaging techniques, the relationship between LA structure and function is not well understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (age, 61.2+/-14.2 years; 67% men) with paroxysmal (44%) or persistent (56%) AF underwent 3D delayed-enhancement MRI. Segmentation of the LA wall was performed and degree of enhancement (fibrosis) was determined using a semiautomated quantification algorithm. Two-dimensional echocardiography and longitudinal LA strain and strain rate during ventricular systole with velocity vector imaging were obtained. Mean fibrosis was 17.8+/-14.5%. Log-transformed fibrosis values correlated inversely with LA midlateral strain (r=-0.5, P=0.003) and strain rate (r=-0.4, P<0.005). Patients with persistent AF as compared with paroxysmal AF had more fibrosis (22+/-17% versus 14+/-9%, P=0.04) and lower midseptal (27+/-14% versus 38+/-16%, P=0.01) and midlateral (35+/-16% versus 45+/-14% P=0.03) strains. Multivariable stepwise regression showed that midlateral strain (r=-0.5, P=0.006) and strain rate (r=-0.4, P=0.01) inversely predicted the extent of fibrosis independent of other echocardiographic parameters and the rhythm during imaging. CONCLUSIONS: LA wall fibrosis by delayed-enhancement MRI is inversely related to LA strain and strain rate, and these are related to the AF burden. Echocardiographic assessment of LA structural and functional remodeling is quick and feasible and may be helpful in predicting outcomes in AF.

Magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed ablative debulking of the left atrial posterior wall and septum for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: rationale and initial experience.

INTRODUCTION: Though pulmonary vein (PV) isolation has been widely adopted for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), recurrence rates remain unacceptably high with persistent and longstanding AF. As evidence emerges for non-PV substrate changes in the pathogenesis of AF, more extensive ablation strategies need further study. METHODS: We modified our PV antrum isolation procedure to include abatement of posterior and septal wall potentials. We also employed recently described image-processing techniques using delayed-enhancement (DE) MRI to characterize tissue injury patterns 3 months after ablation, to assess whether each PV was encircled with scar, and to assess the impact of these parameters on procedural success. RESULTS: 118 consecutive patients underwent debulking procedure and completed follow-up, of which 86 underwent DE-MRI. The total left atrial (LA) radiofrequency delivery correlated with percent LA scarring by DE-MRI (r = 0.6, P < 0.001). Based on DE patterns, complete encirclement was seen in only 131 of 335 PVs (39.1%). As expected, Cox regression analysis showed a significant relationship between the number of veins encircled by delayed enhancement and clinical success (hazard ratio of 0.62, P = 0.015). Also, progressive quartile increases in postablation posterior and septal wall scarring reduced recurrences rates with a HR of 0.65, P = 0.022 and 0.66, P = 0.026, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pathologic remodeling in the septal and posterior walls of the LA helps form the pathogenic substrate for AF, and these early results suggest that more aggressive treatment of these regions appears to correlate with improved ablation outcomes. Noninvasive imaging to characterize tissue changes after ablation may prove essential to stratifying recurrence risk.

Initial experience of assessing esophageal tissue injury and recovery using delayed-enhancement MRI after atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal wall thermal injury after atrial fibrillation ablation is a potentially serious complication. However, no noninvasive modality has been used to describe and screen patients to examine whether esophageal wall injury has occurred. We describe a noninvasive method of using delayed-enhancement MRI to detect esophageal wall injury and subsequent recovery after atrial fibrillation ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the delayed-enhancement MRI scans of 41 patients before ablation and at 24 hours and 3 months after ablation to determine whether there was evidence of contrast enhancement in the esophagus after atrial fibrillation ablation. In patients with contrast enhancement, 3D segmentation of the esophagus was performed using a novel image processing method. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was then performed. Repeat delayed-enhancement MRI and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed 1 week later to track changes in lesions. The wall thickness of the anterior and posterior wall of the esophagus was measured at 3 time points: before ablation, 24 hours after ablation, and 3 months after ablation. Evaluation of preablation MRI scans demonstrated no cases of esophageal enhancement. At 24 hours, 5 patients showed contrast enhancement. Three of these patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, which demonstrated esophageal lesions. Repeat upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and MRI 1 week later demonstrated resolution of the lesions. All 5 patients had confirmed resolution of enhancement at 3 months. All patients with esophageal tissue enhancement demonstrated left atrial wall enhancement directly adjacent to the regions of anterior wall esophageal enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results indicate delayed-enhancement MRI can assess the extent and follow progression of esophageal wall injury after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. It appears that acute esophageal injury recovers within 1 week of the procedure.

Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with diffuse left atrial fibrosis and a reduction in endocardial voltage. These changes are indicators of AF severity and appear to be predictors of treatment outcome. In this study, we report the utility of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) in detecting abnormal atrial tissue before radiofrequency ablation and in predicting procedural outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-one patients presenting for pulmonary vein antrum isolation for treatment of AF underwent 3-dimensional DE-MRI of the left atrium before the ablation. Six healthy volunteers also were scanned. DE-MRI images were manually segmented to isolate the left atrium, and custom software was implemented to quantify the spatial extent of delayed enhancement, which was then compared with the regions of low voltage from electroanatomic maps from the pulmonary vein antrum isolation procedure. Patients were assessed for AF recurrence at least 6 months after pulmonary vein antrum isolation, with an average follow-up of 9.6+/-3.7 months (range, 6 to 19 months). On the basis of the extent of preablation enhancement, 43 patients were classified as having minimal enhancement (average enhancement, 8.0+/-4.2%), 30 as having moderate enhancement (21.3+/-5.8%), and 8 as having extensive enhancement (50.1+/-15.4%). The rate of AF recurrence was 6 patients (14.0%) with minimal enhancement, 13 (43.3%) with moderate enhancement, and 6 (75%) with extensive enhancement (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DE-MRI provides a noninvasive means of assessing left atrial myocardial tissue in patients suffering from AF and might provide insight into the progress of the disease. Preablation DE-MRI holds promise for predicting responders to AF ablation and may provide a metric of overall disease progression.

Temporal left atrial lesion formation after ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation uses radiofrequency (RF) energy to induce thermal damage to the left atrium (LA) in an attempt to isolate AF circuits. This injury can be seen using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe DE-MRI findings of the LA in the acute and chronic stages postablation. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were scanned at two time points postablation. The first group (n = 10) underwent DE-MRI at 24 hours and at 3 months. The second group (n = 16) was scanned at 3 months and at 6 or 9 months. One patient had three scans (24 hours, 3 months, 9 months) and was included in both groups. The location and extent of enhancement were then analyzed between both groups. RESULTS: The median change in LA wall injury between 24 hours and 3 months was -6.38% (range -11.7% to 12.58%). The median change in LA wall injury between 3 months and later follow-up was +2.0% (range -4.0% to 6.58%). There appears to be little relationship between the enhancement at 24 hours and 3 months (R(2) = 0.004). In contrast, a strong correlation is seen at 3 months and later follow-up (R(2) = 0.966). Qualitative comparison revealed a stronger qualitative relationship between MRI findings at 3 months and later follow-up than at 24 hours and 3 months. CONCLUSION: RF-induced scar appears to have formed by 3 months postablation. At 24 hours postablation, DE-MRI enhancement appears consistent with a transient inflammatory response rather than stable LA scar formation.