Sensibilización durante la asistencia circulatoria de corta duración. Determinantes, tratamiento y pronóstico después del trasplante cardiaco / Sensitization during short-term mechanical circulatory support. Determinants, therapeutic management, and outcomes after heart transplant

Introducción y objetivos: El desarrollo de anticuerpos contra antígenos leucocitarios humanos es una complicación conocida de la asistencia ventricular de larga duración. El propósito del presente estudio es evaluar su incidencia durante el empleo de dispositivos de asistencia ventricular de corta duración (DAVC) (CentriMag), sus determinantes y su repercusión en los resultados del trasplante cardiaco. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo con pacientes tratados con DAVC como puente al trasplante entre 2009 y 2019. Se consideró sensibilización un panel reactivo de anticuerpos calculado> 10%. Las variables de respuesta fueron supervivencia y supervivencia libre de rechazo agudo (RA). Resultados: Se trató con DAVC a 89 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 56,0 [intervalo intercuartílico, 50,0-59,9] años y el 16,8% de mujeres, durante una mediana de 23,6 [16,6-35,0] días. El 12,4% se sensibilizó durante la asistencia. El único determinante independiente de la sensibilización fue el sexo femenino (OR=8,67; IC95%, 1,93-38,8; p=0,005). De los 89 pacientes, 21 fallecieron durante la asistencia y 68 se sometieron a trasplante. De los pacientes trasplantados, 8 (11,8%) fallecieron y 20 (29,4%) tuvieron algún episodio de RA tras un seguimiento promedio de 49,6 ±31,2 meses tras el trasplante. Tras ajuste multivariable, la sensibilización aumentó el riesgo de RA (HR=3,64; IC95%, 1,42-9,33; p=0,007), con una tendencia no significativa a mayor mortalidad (HR=4,07; IC95%, 0,96-17,3; p=0,057). Conclusiones: La sensibilización relacionada con los DAVC es posible, predomina en el sexo femenino y se asocia de manera significativa con el RA, con una tendencia no significativa a mayor mortalidad (AU)

Introduction and objectives: The development of human-leukocyte antigen antibodies is a well-known adverse effect of the use of long-term ventricular assist devices (VADs). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of sensitization during short-term mechanical circulatory support with VAD (CentriMag), its determinants, and its impact on posttransplant outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who were bridged to transplant with short-term VAD from 2009 to 2019. Sensitization was defined as a calculated panel-reactive antibody> 10%. The endpoints included overall survival and rejection-free survival. Results: A total of 89 patients (median age 56.0 [interquartile range, 50.0-59.9] years, 16.8% female) received a short-term VAD as a bridge to transplant. The median duration of support was 23.6 [interquartile range, 16.6-35.0] days. Eleven patients (12.4%) became sensitized during support. The only factor significantly associated with sensitization was female sex (OR, 8.67; 95%CI, 1.93–38.8; P=.005). Of the 89 patients, 21 patients died during support; 68 patients underwent heart transplant. After a mean follow-up of 49.6 ±31.2 months, 8 patients (11.8%) died and 20 (29.4%) had at least 1 rejection episode. On multivariate analysis, sensitization was an independent predictor of acute rejection (HR, 3.64; 95%CI, 1.42-9.33; P=.007), with a nonstatistically significant trend to higher mortality (HR, 4.07; 95%CI, 0.96-17.3; P=.057). Conclusions: Sensitization with short-term VADs can occur and is significantly associated with female sex and with rejection. Sensitization also showed a nonstatistically significant trend to higher mortality (AU)

Fracturas de radio distal: ¿es necesario el aporte de injerto o sustitutivo óseo en los casos con osteoporosis o conminución severa? / Distal radius fractures: Should we use supplemental bone grafts or substitutites in cases of severe osteoporotic or conminution?

Objetivo: Evaluar la necesidad de injertos o sustitutivos óseos en el tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas de radio distal (FDR) con placas bloqueadas (LCP). Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo observacional de 60 pacientes con FDR A3 o C3 tratadas mediante placa LCP sin aporte de injerto o sustitutivo óseo. Se comparó la movilidad en flexión (F), extensión (E), supinación (S) y pronación (P) de la muñeca fracturada con respecto a la sana; y los parámetros radiográficos de inclinación palmar (IP), inclinación radial (IR), varianza cubital (VC) y altura radial (AR) de la muñeca fracturada al año de la cirugía respecto a la muñeca contralateral sana y a la fracturada en el postoperatorio. Evaluamos el grado de satisfacción del paciente mediante las escalas PRWE y DASH. Resultados: Las diferencias de movilidad de la muñeca fracturada con respecto a la muñeca contralateral sana fueron F 12° ± 16,1°, E 9° ± 13,1°, P 2,5° ± 7,5° y S 5° ± 10°, pero se mantuvieron dentro de rangos funcionales y obtuvimos un buen nivel de satisfacción de los pacientes (DASH 12,6 ± 14,16 y PRWE 6,31 ± 9,5). El 100% de FDR consolidaron sin colapso significativo (IP 0,55 ± 1,7°, IR 0,31 ± 1,5°, VC 0,25 ± 0,8 mm, AR 0,1 ± 0,9 mm). Conclusiones: Todas las fracturas consolidaron sin problemas y la pérdida de reducción no fue estadísticamente significativa. El uso de injertos o sustitutivos óseos no es imprescindible en el tratamiento de las FDR inestables con placas LCP, cuya utilización encarece el procedimiento y no está exenta de morbilidades. Como conclusión secundaria, el estudio afianza el papel de las placas LCP en el tratamiento de las FDR (AU)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the need of bone graft or bone substitutes in unstable distal radius fractures (DRF) treated with locking compression plates (LCP) Patients and Methods: An observational and prospective study was conducted on 60 patients with DRF AO-type A3 and AO-type C3, treated surgically by LCP plates without bone grafts or substitutes. Ranges of motion in flexion (F), extension (E), pronation (P), and supination (S) were measured in the injured wrist and compared with the healthy contralateral wrist. X-ray parameters: palmar tilt (PT), radial inclination (RI), ulnar variance (UV), and radial height (RH) were calculated in the injured wrist one year after surgery and then compared, with those parameters in the healthy contralateral wrist and in the follow-up postoperative x-ray of the injured wrist. PRWE and DASH scores were used to evaluate patient satisfaction. Results: The range of motion loss was F 12° ± 16.1°, E 9° ± 13.1°, P 2.5° ± 7.5°, and S 5°±10°, but they remained within functional parameters. Good results were also obtained in the PRWE and DASH scores (DASH 12.6 ± 14.16 and PRWE 9.5 ± 9.5). All the fractures were healed without significant collapse (IP 0.55 ± 1.7°, IR 0.31 ± 1.5°, VC 0.25 ± 0.8 mm, and AR 0.1 ± 0.9 mm). Conclusions: All fractures healed without problems or with significant loss of reduction. Bone graft and bone substitutes are not mandatory for treatment of unstable DRF with LCP plates. Their use increases the cost and is not exempt of morbidities. This study also reinforces the role of LCP plates in surgical treatment of unstable DRF (AU)

Distal radius fractures: Should we use supplemental bone grafts or substitutites in cases of severe osteoporotic or conminution?

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the need of bone graft or bone substitutes in unstable distal radius fractures (DRF) treated with locking compression plates (LCP) PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational and prospective study was conducted on 60 patients with DRF AO-type A3 and AO-type C3, treated surgically by LCP plates without bone grafts or substitutes. Ranges of motion in flexion (F), extension (E), pronation (P), and supination (S) were measured in the injured wrist and compared with the healthy contralateral wrist. X-ray parameters: palmar tilt (PT), radial inclination (RI), ulnar variance (UV), and radial height (RH) were calculated in the injured wrist one year after surgery and then compared, with those parameters in the healthy contralateral wrist and in the follow-up postoperative x-ray of the injured wrist. PRWE and DASH scores were used to evaluate patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The range of motion loss was F 12° ± 16.1°, E 9° ± 13.1°, P 2.5° ± 7.5°, and S 5°±10°, but they remained within functional parameters. Good results were also obtained in the PRWE and DASH scores (DASH 12.6 ± 14.16 and PRWE 9.5 ± 9.5). All the fractures were healed without significant collapse (IP 0.55 ± 1.7°, IR 0.31 ± 1.5°, VC 0.25±0.8mm, and AR 0.1 ± 0.9 mm). CONCLUSIONS: All fractures healed without problems or with significant loss of reduction. Bone graft and bone substitutes are not mandatory for treatment of unstable DRF with LCP plates. Their use increases the cost and is not exempt of morbidities. This study also reinforces the role of LCP plates in surgical treatment of unstable DRF.

Epilepsia y marcapasos: una curiosa asociación / Epilepsy and pacemakers: an interesting association

Algunos pacientes epilépticos pueden presentar alteraciones del ritmo cardiaco potencialmente mortales durante una crisis comicial y, de modo inverso, algunas arritmias cardiacas pueden provocar crisis epilépticas. Presentamos el caso de un varón de 71 años diagnosticado de epilepsia generalizada primaria y portador de un marcapasos definitivo por bloqueo trifascicular, que desarrolló crisis convulsivas coincidentes con una disfunción intermitente de su dispositivo cardiaco, que fue evidenciada mientras se realizaba un ECG. Los clínicos deben considerar que, aunque de forma infrecuente, la disfunción de un marcapasos puede ser la causa de una crisis convulsiva. En estos pacientes un ECG normal no debe ser suficiente para descartar esta disfunción y, si la sospecha clínica es alta, debe indicarse una revisión reglada del marcapasos (AU)

Some epileptic patients may have potentially fatal cardiac rhythm disorders during seizures, and inversely, some cardiac arrhythmias may induce seizures. We present the case of a 71-year-old man diagnosed with primary generalized epilepsy who had a permanent pacemaker because of a trifascicular block. He developed generalized seizures coinciding with intermittent dysfunction of the cardiac device, which we observed while performing an electrocardiogram (ECG). Clinicians should keep in mind that, although it is uncommon, a pacemaker dysfunction may be the cause of seizures. In these patients, a normal ECG may not be enough to rule out this dysfunction, and if there is a high clinical suspicion, a standard pacemaker revision should be performed (AU)