Trends in inpatient burden from pressure injuries in the United States: Cross-sectional study National Inpatient Sample 2009-2019.

Pressure injuries are a significant comorbidity and lead to increased overall healthcare costs. Several European and global studies have assessed the burden of pressure injuries; however, no comprehensive analysis has been completed in the United States. In this study, we investigated the trends in the burden of pressure injuries among hospitalised adults in the United States from 2009 to 2019, stratified by sociodemographic subgroups. The length of admission, total cost of hospitalisation, and sociodemographic data was extracted from the National Inpatient Sample provided by the Healthcare Cost and Utilisation Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Overall, the annual prevalence of pressure injuries and annual mean hospitalisation cost increased ($69,499.29 to $102,939.14), while annual mean length of stay decreased (11.14-9.90 days). Among all races, minority groups had higher average cost and length of hospitalisation. Our findings suggest that while the length of hospitalisation is decreasing, hospital costs and prevalence are rising. In addition, differing trends among racial groups exist with decreasing prevalence in White patients. Further studies and targeted interventions are needed to address these differences, as well as discrepancies in racial groups.

Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: Fatal Outcomes.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, highly aggressive cutaneous malignancy. Immunosuppression increases the risk of MCC and is associated with poor prognosis. Organ transplant recipients (OTR) have worse overall survival (OS) than patients with immunosuppression due to other causes. Treating MCC after organ transplantation is challenging, as checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, the standard of care for treating MCC, increases the risk of transplant rejection. This paper reviews the cases of two simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients with MCC and explores the role of immunosuppression in the development of MCC. Immunosuppression was discontinued and checkpoint inhibitor therapy was initiated in the first patient and considered by the second patient. In both cases, treatment failed, and the patients died shortly after developing metastatic MCC. These cases illustrate the need for improved multidisciplinary treatment regimens for MCC in OTRs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(5):376-377.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8234  .

Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Neurotoxicity in a Case of Metastatic Melanoma.

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are increasingly being used in the treatment of malignant melanoma. While showing promise in metastatic melanoma treatment, CPIs are associated with immune-related adverse events in various organ systems. Among these events, checkpoint inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity stands out as a particularly rare yet diagnostically challenging and potentially life-threatening occurrence. We report a unique case of checkpoint inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity in a patient with metastatic melanoma directly after beginning treatment with checkpoint inhibitor encorafenib. The patient presented with an unclear clinical course, with features of Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenia gravis, and brainstem encephalitis.  We followed a recently established management algorithm for checkpoint inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity with positive outcomes. This case report highlights the importance of recognizing checkpoint inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity as a potential adverse effect of CPIs when treating metastatic melanoma. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):e25-e27.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7991e.

Heidenhain variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease masquerading as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: recognizing when apheresis is not the answer.

The Heidenhain variant of Creutzfeld-Jakob disease (CJD) is a rare form that initially presents with visual disturbances. In early stages, the presentation can mimic neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and lead to unnecessary treatment modalities. Herein, we describe a case of a 66-year-old man who presented with bilateral vision loss and retro-orbital discomfort. In addition to immunosuppressive therapy, he received 4 rounds of therapeutic plasma exchange after his preliminary diagnosis of NMOSD. We were surprised to note that his condition did not show improvement but deteriorated, with severe neurocognitive symptoms. Eventually, CJD was suspected, and real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) was performed. By the time the diagnosis of Heidenhain variant of CJD was confirmed, the patient was discharged to hospice care and died shortly after.

Approach to diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of generalized and nonlocal dysesthesia: A review.

Dysesthesia is an abnormal sensation in the skin that occurs in the absence of any extraordinary stimulus or other primary cutaneous disorders, excluding any delusions or tactile hallucinations. Clinicians have characterized dysesthesias to include sensations such as burning, tingling, pruritus, allodynia, hyperesthesia, or anesthesia. The etiology and pathogenesis of various generalized dysesthesias is largely unknown, though many dysesthesias have been associated with systemic pathologies including malignancy, infection, autoimmune disorders, and neuropathies. Dermatologists are often the first-line clinicians for patients presenting with such cutaneous findings, thus it is crucial for these physicians to be able to methodically work-up generalized dysesthesias to build a working differential diagnosis, follow up with key labs and/or imaging, and offer patients evidence-based treatment to relieve their symptoms. This broad literature review is an attempt to centralize key studies, cases, and series to help guide dermatologists in their assessment and evaluation of complaints of abnormal cutaneous sensations.

Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, prostate cancer, and older adults: a global Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology drug review.

Prostate cancer is a disease of older adults that has undergone a significant therapeutic paradigm shift in the last decade with the emergence of novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPis). One of the more commonly used ARPis is enzalutamide. This drug, along with darolutamide and apalutamide, initially received approvals in the metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer setting but is now utilized frequently in the metastatic castrate-sensitive and non-metastatic castration-resistant settings. Landmark phase III data illustrating ARPi efficacy in older adults are limited to those with excellent performance status. However, its role in unfit older prostate cancer patients remains to be explored in the context of a narrative review. This first-of-its-kind drug review aims to shed light on the most up-to-date evidence behind the unique toxicity profile of ARPis in the context of geriatric vulnerabilities such as cognitive and functional impairment, along with potential solutions and supporting evidence that exists to circumvent these issues in the vulnerable older adult.

Use of Prescribed Psychotropic Medications in an Opioid Substitution Therapy Cohort.

Objective: Comorbid mental illness is extremely common in individuals receiving opioid substitution therapy. The use of common psychiatric medications is complex in this cohort with increased risks of drug-drug interaction, overdose, and diversion or abuse of prescribed medication. We have therefore investigated rates of co-prescribing and psychiatric comorbidity in a cohort of individuals receiving therapeutic methadone or buprenorphine. Methods: Comprehensive electronic medical records were accessed for a cohort of individuals (n = 698) receiving opioid substitution therapy at a single center in London, United Kingdom. The following was collected for each individual: demographic data, current prescribed medications (including opioid substitution therapy agents), duration of prescription, indication for each prescription, and psychiatric diagnoses. Results: A total of 610 individuals were included in the final analysis. High rates of psychotropic co-prescribing were observed, with 36.7% of individuals receiving a psychotropic medication in addition to their opioid substitution drug, including 35.4% receiving an antidepressant, 9.2% an antipsychotic, 8.6% a benzodiazepine, and 4.5% a gabapentinoid, rates that are far in excess of the local population prescription frequency; 75.5% of antipsychotic prescriptions and 47.7% of benzodiazepine prescriptions were for an unlicensed indication. Conclusions: This highlights the need for evidence-based treatment of comorbid mental illness for individuals receiving opioid substitution therapy.

Introducing a reserve waiting list initiative for elective general surgery at a District General Hospital.

Cancelled operations represent a significant burden on the National Health Service in terms of theatre efficiency, financial implications and lost training opportunities. Moreover, they carry considerable physical and psychological effects to patients and their relatives. Evidence has shown that up to 93% of cancelled operations are due to patient-related factors. An analysis at our District General Hospital revealed that approximately 18 operations are cancelled on the day of surgery each month. This equates to 27 hours of allocated operating time valued by the trust as £67 500, not being used effectively. This retrospective quality improvement report aims to reduce unused theatre time due to cancelled elective operations in general surgery theatres-thereby improving theatre efficiency and patient care. To ascertain the baseline number of cancelled operations, an initial review of theatre cases was undertaken. Further review was then completed after implementation of two improvements-a short notice surgical waiting list and fast track pre-assessment clinics. The results showed that implementation of the reserve surgical waiting list reduced unused operating time by an average of 2.25 hours per month. By further adding in the fast track preassessment clinic, these figures increased to an average of 11.5 hours over the next 3 months. This precipitated a reutilisation of otherwise wasted theatre time. Economic impact of this time amounts around £28 750 a month, after implementation of both improvements. Simple protocol changes can lead to large improvements in the efficient running of theatres. The resultant change has improved patient satisfaction, led to greater training opportunities and improved theatre efficiency. Extrapolation of our results show better usage of previously underused theatre time, to the equivalent worth of £345 000. Further implementation of these improvements in other surgical specialities and hospitals would be beneficial.

Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial.

BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation was examined among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) Pilot Trial of low-dose CT screening. METHODS: High-risk individuals aged 50-75 years who completed baseline questionnaires were randomised to CT screening (intervention) or usual care (no screening control). Smoking habit was determined at baseline using self-report. Smokers were asked whether they had quit smoking since joining UKLS at T1 (2 weeks after baseline scan results or control assignment) and T2 (up to 2 years after recruitment). Intention-to-treat (ITT) regression analyses were undertaken, adjusting for baseline lung cancer distress, trial site and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Of a total 4055 individuals randomised to CT screening or control, 1546 were baseline smokers (759 intervention, 787 control). Smoking cessation rates were 8% (control n=36/479) versus 14% (intervention n=75/527) at T1 and 21% (control n=79/377) versus 24% (intervention n=115/488) at T2. ITT analyses indicated that the odds of quitting among screened participants were significantly higher at T1 (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.38, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.64, p<0.001) and T2 (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.18, p=0.003) compared with control. Intervention participants who needed additional clinical investigation were more likely to quit in the longer term compared with the control group (aOR 2.29, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.22, p=0.007) and those receiving a negative result (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.84, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT lung cancer screening for high-risk participants presents a teachable moment for smoking cessation, especially among those who receive a positive scan result. Further behavioural research is needed to evaluate optimal strategies for integrating smoking cessation intervention with stratified lung cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Results, ISRCTN 78513845.

Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial is a randomised pilot trial of low-dose CT (LDCT) screening for individuals at high risk of lung cancer. We assessed the long-term psychosocial impact on individuals participating in the UKLS trial. METHODS: A random sample of individuals aged 50-75 years was contacted via primary care. High-risk individuals who completed T0 questionnaires (baseline) were randomised to LDCT screening (intervention) or usual care (no screening control). T1 questionnaires were sent 2 weeks after baseline scan results or control assignment. T2 questionnaires were sent up to 2 years after recruitment. Measures included cancer distress, anxiety, depression and decision satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 4037 high-risk individuals were randomised and they completed T0 questionnaires (n=2018 intervention, n=2019 control). Cancer distress was higher at T1 in intervention arm participants who received positive screening results (p≤0.001), but not at T2 (p=0.04). T2 anxiety (p≤0.001) and depression (p≤0.01) were higher in the control arm, but the absolute differences were small and not clinically relevant. At both time points, fewer control than screened participants were satisfied with their decision to participate in UKLS (p≤0.001). Regardless of trial allocation, cancer distress was higher in women (p≤0.01), participants aged ≤65 years (p≤0.001), current smokers (p≤0.001), those with lung cancer experience (p≤0.001) and those recruited from the Liverpool area (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Lung cancer screening using LDCT appears to have no clinically significant long-term psychosocial impact on high-risk participants. Strategies for engaging and supporting underserved groups are the key to implement routine lung cancer screening in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 78513845; results.