Association between attendance and overall academic performance on a module within a professional pharmacy degree.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As the higher education (HE) classroom begins to adopt newer internet-based technologies, the relationship between attendance and performance needs to be re-evaluated, particularly for professional degree courses such as pharmacy. In the present study, we aimed to establish if an association exists between attendance at all timetabled classes and academic performance, in a Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (CPT) module, as part of the Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) degree course at Ulster University. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Data on attendance, final examination and coursework performance were collected over two academic years (2013-14 and 2014-15) of the CPT module at Ulster. In total 67 students were analysed. The MPharm degree at Ulster University implements an attendance policy, both as a pastoral support tool and to reinforce the need for professional conduct as a pharmacist. FINDINGS: Student (2013-14 and 2014-15, n = 35 and 32, respectively) attendance on the module across both year groups was approximately 80%. We observed positive, and statistically significant relationships between attendance and performance on the examination, and especially in the coursework elements of the module. Student failure (below 40%) in the final examination was linked to attendance below an 80% threshold in nine of 12 cases. Reasons for not attending class varied, but illness was unquestionably the most commonly cited extenuation. DISCUSSION: Taken together, these data confirm a convincing association between student attendance and academic achievement. SUMMARY: Our studies promote the use of attendance monitoring policies for professional degree courses such as pharmacy.

Effects of an integrated medicines management program on medication appropriateness in hospitalized patients.

PURPOSE: The effects of an integrated medicines management (IMM) program on medication appropriateness are discussed. METHODS: Patients enrolled in an IMM project within a hospital were randomly allocated to either a control or an intervention group. Patients in the control group received standard pharmaceutical care, while the intervention patients received the IMM service. The appropriateness of the medications prescribed was estimated on admission and discharge using the Medicines Appropriateness Index (MAI), which ranged from 0 (no prescribing problems) to 18 (most prescribing problems). For each medication scored, the difference between admission and discharge MAI scores for individual patients was calculated. RESULTS: Scoring was completed on 1711 medications prescribed for 117 patients. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.03) in the mean MAI scores on discharge between the intervention and control groups (5.69 versus 9.97, respectively). There was also a statistically significant difference (p = 0.00003) in the mean MAI scores on admission and discharge (17.48 versus 5.69, respectively) for the intervention group. The intervention group had a mean +/- S.D. difference of -11.78 +/- 14.64, while the control group had a mean +/- S.D. difference of -3.19 +/- 11.80. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0011) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significant improvements in the appropriateness of medications on discharge for patients receiving an IMM service compared with patients who did not receive this service.

The identification of barriers preventing the successful implementation of a surgical prophylaxis protocol.

AIM: The aim of this study was to introduce a protocol for the use of antimicrobials in surgical prophylaxis for the described procedures in Antrim Area Hospital. METHOD: Historical data of antimicrobial use were obtained from retrospective analysis of patients' charts, for those patients identified as having one of the following 'clean/contaminated' surgical procedures over the previous six months; cholecystectomy or abdominal hysterectomy. These data were analysed, and a protocol was introduced providing guidelines for the choice of antimicrobial agent, its administration time, route, dose, duration and frequency of treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was the success of the uptake of the protocol following its implementation. RESULTS: There was a total of 285 patients identified, 105 prior to and 180 post implementation. Overall, 68% of patients received some form of prophylaxis in the first cycle, and 72% in the second. CONCLUSION: Although the introduction of the protocol led to slight improvements in compliance with standard prescribing procedures, with an increase in single-dose prophylaxis, and a reduction in prolonged prophylactic treatment, the improvements did not reach expectations. This paper attempts to identify the possible barriers to protocol implementation.