Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Can J Surg ; 46(6): 432-40, 2003 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14680350

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The benefits of the laparoscopic approach to colon and rectal surgery do not seem as great as for other laparoscopic procedures. To study this further we decided to review the current literature and the 10-year experience of a surgical group from university teaching hospitals in Montréal, Québec and Toronto in performing laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery. METHODS: The prospectively designed case series comprised all patients having laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery. The procedures were carried out by a group of 4 surgeons between April 1991 and November 2001. We noted intraoperative complications, any conversions to open surgery, operating time, postoperative complications and postoperative length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The group attempted 750 laparoscopic colon and rectal procedures of which 669 were completed laparoscopically. Malignant disease was the indication for surgery in 49.6% of cases. Right hemicolectomy and sigmoid colectomy accounted for 54.5% of procedures performed. Intraoperative complications occurred in 8.3%, with 29.0% of these resulting in conversion to open surgery. The overall rate of conversion to open surgery was 10.8%, most commonly for oncologic concerns. Median operating time was 175 minutes for all procedures. Postoperative complications occurred in 27.5% of procedures completed laparoscopically but were mostly minor wound complications. Pulmonary complications occurred in only 1.0%. The anastomotic leak rate was 2.5%. The early reoperation rate was 2.4%. Postoperative mortality was 2.2%. No port site metastases have yet been detected. The median postoperative length of stay was 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery in this 10-year experience are consistent with numerous cohort studies and randomized clinical trials. Laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery in the hands of well-trained surgeons can be performed safely with short hospital stay, low analgesic requirements and acceptable complication rates compared with historical controls and other reports in the literature. Evidence from published randomized clinical trials is emerging that under these conditions laparoscopic resection represents the better treatment option for most benign conditions, but concerns regarding its appropriateness for malignant disease are still to be resolved.


Assuntos
Colonoscopia , Proctoscopia , Competência Clínica/normas , Colectomia/métodos , Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas Cólicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Colonoscopia/efeitos adversos , Colonoscopia/normas , Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colostomia/métodos , Colostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Estudos de Viabilidade , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Proctoscopia/efeitos adversos , Proctoscopia/normas , Proctoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Can J Surg ; 46(5): 340-4, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14577705

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The differential outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy are not well described. Therefore, we evaluated these outcomes in the 3 groups most often seen clinically: bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing's disease (group 1), pheochromocytoma (group 2) and unilateral adrenalectomy for non-pheochromocytoma (group 3). METHODS: We reviewed a longitudinal database of 72 consecutive cases of laparoscopic adrenalectomy carried out between 1997 and 2001 at the Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of Toronto. RESULTS: Patients in group 1 tended to be older (median 49 yr) and heavier (median 87 kg). They had a longer operating time (median 255 min), more postoperative complications (15%) and a longer median postoperative stay (4 d). Patients in group 2 had intermediate outcomes: a median operating time of 198 minutes, complication rate of 8.3% and a median postoperative hospital stay of 3 days. However, they had more intraoperative blood loss (median 150 mL). Group 3 patients had the best outcomes with the shortest median operating time (125 min), least blood loss (median 50 mL), fewer complications (6%) and shortest hospital stay (median 2 d). CONCLUSIONS: Although the outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy are uniformly good, on the basis of the underlying pathologic characteristics, patients can be divided into groups that have different expected outcomes. Patients requiring a unilateral adrenalectomy except for pheochromocytoma have the best recorded outcomes. Surgeons transferring to laparoscopic adrenalectomy would benefit from selecting patients in this group during their learning curve.


Assuntos
Adenoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/cirurgia , Adrenalectomia , Síndrome de Cushing/cirurgia , Hiperaldosteronismo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Paraganglioma/cirurgia , Feocromocitoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Córtex Suprarrenal/cirurgia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Peso Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...