Clinical comparison of remifentanil-sevoflurane vs. remifentanil-propofol for endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal surgery has been recently proposed as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of pituitary adenomas. The main objective of the anaesthesiologist is to induce sufficient haemodynamic control together with rapid recovery at the end of surgery. The aim of this study was to examine recovery profile, surgical operative conditions and haemodynamic differences using remifentanil infusion with either propofol target controlled infusion system or sevoflurane. METHOD: Forty-four adult patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-group study: Group P received propofol target controlled infusion system and remifentanil; Group S received sevoflurane and remifentanil for maintenance of anaesthesia. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between the two groups with regards to the haemodynamic changes, operative conditions as assessed by a four-step bleeding score (0-3), were obtained. Recovery times were considerably shorter after remifentanil-sevoflurane in comparison with remifentanil-propofol target controlled infusion system group (7.4 vs. 12.8 min, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that sevoflurane-remifentanil gives a faster recovery and equivalent intraoperative status compared with propofol target controlled infusion system with remifentanil for the endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal approach.

Analgesic transition after remifentanil-based anesthesia in neurosurgery. A comparison of sufentanil and tramadol.

AIM: Transition from the end of remifentanil infusion and postoperative analgesia must be planned carefully owing to remifentanil's (R) rapid offset. Intraoperative morphine has been used for the transition to postoperative analgesia following remifentanil-based anesthesia. Sufentanil (S) is a very potent opioid with high micro-receptor affinity, a much wider therapeutic index and a lower fractional receptor occupancy. These pharmacological and dynamics features make sufentanil an interesting alternative to morphine for immediate postoperative analgesia. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: perspective, randomized, single blinded and comparative study. Institution: neurosurgical operating theatre at University. PATIENTS: 96 patients, aging from 25 to 67 years, ASA class I-III, undergoing neurosurgical operations, were studied. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: the anesthetic management was: premedication: atropine 0.01 microg kg(-1) + remifentanil 0.20 microg kg(-1) min(-1); induction: propofol 2.0 microg kg(-1) + cisatracurium 0.15 microg kg(-1); maintenance: sevoflurane 0.8% + remifentanil (titrated infusion) cisatracurium. All patients received ketorolac 30 mg i.v. 1 hour before the end of surgery and ketorolac (60-90 mg) + tramadol (200-300 mg) by elastomeric pump; patients were divided into 2 groups: group T receiving tramadol 100 mg and group S receiving a bolus dose of sufentanil 0.10 microg kg(-1), 30 and 15 minutes before the end of surgery respectively. Recovery time, postoperative analgesia evaluated by VAS, cardiocirculatory parameters and side effects like nausea, vomiting, shivering, muscle rigidity, sedation and respiratory depression were recorded. RESULTS: VAS was significantly lower in Group S. Recovery time was shorter in Group T than in Group S (8.8 +/- 3.6 vs 11.6 +/- 4.6 min), no statistically significant differences between groups as regards nausea, vomiting and shivering. Short-lasting respiratory depression was detected in 3 cases in Group S. CONCLUSION: At the emergence much better control of the transition phase in patients treated with sufentanil: smooth recovery with better tolerability of the endotracheal tube; efficacious analgesia along with cardiocirculatory stability.

Remifentanil for intraoperative analgesia during the endoscopic surgical treatment of pituitary lesions.

AIM: The authors have evaluated remifentanil for intraoperative analgesia in endonasal endoscopic surgery for pituitary lesions. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: a perspective, randomized and comparative study between remifentanil and fentanyl for intraoperative analgesia was performed in an operating room of the neurosurgical department at University. Sixty patients of both sexes were studied and randomly divided into 2 groups. Patients were premedicated with fentanyl 0.15 microg.kg(-1) and atropine 0.01 microg.kg(-1) (group F) or with atro-pine and remifentanil 0.25 microg.kg(-1) min-1 (group R); induction was with propofol 2.0 microg.kg(-1) and maintenance with titrated infusion of propofol and for intraoperative analgesia, fentanyl as bolus injection of 1.0-1.5 microg.kg(-1) (group F) or a titrated infusion of remifentanil (group R). The following parameters were studied: MAP, HR, bleeding, awakening times, adverse effects and VAS. RESULTS: Much more stable hemodynamic parameters during surgery in patients treated with remifentanil; labetalol was administered in 10% of patients in group F; no significant differences as regards the adverse effects and VAS. Faster awakening time was obtained in the remifentanil group as compared with the fentanyl group. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil analgesia (mean dose of 0.37 microg.kg(-1).min-1) in patients undergoing endonasal endoscopic surgery of the sellar region provides a more efficacious cardiocirculatory control with reduced bleeding and faster psychosensorial recovery.

[Tracheal intubation in a case of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants]. / Intubazione tracheale in un paziente con fibrosi polmonare idiopatica previa somministrazione di remifentanil e propofol senza l'uso di miorilassanti.

The anesthetic management of a 58 year-old-male suffering from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis associated with a previous experience of altered dose-response relationship to muscle relaxants is reported. He underwent a gastroendoscopic surgical procedure. After intravenous atropine, remifentanil 3.0 microg kg(-1) was injected over 90 sec. Sixty seconds after the start of remifentanil bolus dose, propofol 2.0 mg kg(-1) was injected and intubation was performed 1 min after the administration of propofol. Anesthesia was maintained by N(2)O, oxygen, sevoflurane (0.5-0.8%) and remifentanil titrated infusion (mean dose of 0.15 mg kg(-1) min(-1)) under spontaneous respiration or assisted ventilation, if the patient was apnoic. The intubating conditions were good, a 30 per cent reduction in MAP was observed after propofol administration. The patient regained consciousness 5 minutes after the end of remifentanil administration and his trachea was extubated without any troubles. Recovery was uneventful without the need of long-term intensive therapy.

[The effects of remifentanil on hemodynamic response to intubation. A comparative study with fentanyl] . / Gli effetti del remifentanil sulla risposta emodinamica all'intubazione. Studio comparativo con il fentanyl.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of remifentanil in comparison with those of fentanyl on the hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: prospective comparative and randomized study. SETTING: operating room in a neurosurgery department at University. PATIENTS: 50 patients, ASA I or II with age ranging from 32 to 64 years were divided in two groups randomly. INTERVENTIONS: 25 patients received fentanyl as single bolus dose of 2.0 micrograms/kg and atropine 0.01 mg/kg i.v. as premedication while the remainders received atropine 0.01 mg/kg i.v. and remifentanil 0.2 microgram/kg/min as infusion. All patients were induced with propofol 2.0 mg/kg and cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg for muscle relaxation and were intubated 4 min after induction of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS: Heart rate, SAP, DAP, MAP and RPP were recorded at different times: baseline, induction, intubation, 1, 2, 3 and 4 min after intubation; ECG and pulsoximetry were monitored continuously. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA for repeated measures and Bonferroni t-test a value of p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: Significant increases in PAS were recorded, at intubation and at 1 min after in patients treated with fentanyl; in the remifentanil group significant decreases in SAP at induction and at 4 min after intubation were recorded. HR increased significantly at intubation and at 1, 2 and 3 min after in the fentanyl group. RPP showed a significant decrease at induction in the remifentanil group and significant increases at intubation and at 1, 2 and 3 min after in patients treated with fentanyl. CONCLUSION: In conclusion remifentanil was found to properly control the hemodynamic response to intubation in comparison with fentanyl.