'They're all individuals, none of them are on the same boat': barriers to weight management in general practice from the rural nurse perspective.

AIM: To explore nurses' experiences with, and barriers to, obesity healthcare in rural general practice. BACKGROUND: Obesity is a significant health risk worldwide, which can lead to many other physical and psychosocial health issues that contribute to a poor quality of life. Primary care is considered the most suitable context to deliver obesity management healthcare across the world, including New Zealand, which reportedly has 34% of all adults (and 51% Indigenous Maori) classed as obese. Nurses in primary care have a significant role in the multidisciplinary team and deliver obesity healthcare in general practice contexts. Yet, there is little focus on the nurse perspective of weight management, specifically in rural areas where medical staff and resources are limited, and obesity rates are high. METHODS: This was a qualitative research design. Semi-structured interviews with 10 rural nurses from indigenous and non-indigenous health providers were analyzed guided by Braun and Clarke () approach to thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Three themes were identified: limitations of a nurse role; patient-level barriers; and cultural barriers. Nurses reported experiencing significant barriers to delivering effective weight management in their practice due to factors outside the scope of their practice such as patient-level factors, social determinants of health, rural locality restrictions, and limitations to their role. While this study highlights that practice nurses are versatile with an invaluable skill repertoire, it also demonstrates the near impossibility for rural nurses to meet their rural patient's complex weight management needs, as there are many social determinants of health, sociocultural, and rural locality factors acting as barriers to effective weight management. Nurses experienced a lack of systemic support in the form of time, resources, funding, and effective weight management referral options. Future investigation should look to address the unique rural weight management healthcare needs that experience many barriers.

Barriers to obesity health care in general practice from rural Waikato GP perspectives: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Over 34% of New Zealand (NZ) adults are classed as obese, which reduces quality of life for many individuals. Those living in rural areas, high-deprivation communities, and indigenous Maori populations are more likely to experience obesity and related co-morbidities than other cohorts. General practice is positioned as most suitable to deliver effective weight management health care; however, little is understood about the rural general practitioner (GP) experience in NZ, despite having the majority of patients at high risk of developing obesity. The aim of this study was to investigate rural GP perspectives on barriers to delivering weight management. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive design guided by Braun and Clarke (2006) using semi-structured interviews and analysed using deductive reflexive thematic approach. SETTING: Rural Waikato general practice which has significant rural, Maori and high-deprivation communities. PARTICIPANTS: Six rural Waikato GPs. RESULTS: Three significant themes were identified: communication barriers, rural health care barriers, and social and cultural barriers. GPs reported not wanting to jeopardise the doctor-patient relationship by discussing weight. GPs felt unsupported by the health system through lack of rurally appropriate obesity intervention options, funding and resources. The unique rural lifestyle and health needs were reportedly not understood at the wider health system level, making the role of a rural GP working in high-deprivation communities more difficult. Additional barriers to delivering effective weight management included factors outside the clinical practice such as obesity stigma, an obesogenic environment and sociocultural factors shaping rural patients' lives. CONCLUSION: Rural GPs have a lack of weight management referral options that are considered effective for their patients, as the options available reportedly do not cater for their patients' unique rural health needs. GPs position addressing the individualised and complex weight management health issue as challenging. Navigating stigma, wider sociocultural issues, and limited intervention options were difficult and found to be questionable to achieve in a short 15-min consult. There is a need for rural health support in the form of funding, staff (indigenous and non-indigenous), and rurally feasible resources to improve health outcomes and reduce inequity. Effective primary care weight management strategies need to be appropriate for high-deprivation rural communities, including tailored, affordable and reliable interventions that GPs can offer patients if future weight management efforts are to be successful in this space.

Understanding weight management experiences from patient perspectives: qualitative exploration in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a complex health issue affecting the quality of life of individuals and contributing to an unsustainable strain on healthcare professionals and national health systems. National policy guidelines indicate that general practice is best suited to deliver obesity healthcare, however, obesity rates continue to rise worldwide indicating interventions are ineffective in this space. The aim of this study was to explore the weight management experiences from patient perspectives. METHODS: This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 16 rural Waikato general practice patients. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: Inconsistent Information, Significance of Holistic Factors, Obesity Centre Need, and Education. Participants expressed frustration at contradictory health messages, commercial company and 'expert' definition distrust, and that 'holistic' aspects to health significant to the weight management journey were unable to be addressed in general practice. CONCLUSION: Whilst primary care is positioned as suitable for delivering obesity healthcare, this study found that participants do not perceive general practice to be equipped to deliver this care. Instead, participants argued for a specialist obesity centre capable of meeting all their obesity healthcare needs. Further, wider issues including on-line commodification of health and neo-liberal capitalism - factors that exploit people with a stigmatised health issue - can cause further harm to the participant. A radical modernisation of education, information, and resources from regulated, qualified and 'trusted' healthcare professionals who can provide safe, non-stigmatising supportive services is recommended to meet the unique and changing food climate, reduce obesity rates and improve health outcomes.

"Sometimes choices are not made, because we have 'a' choice, they're made because they are 'the' choice": Barriers to weight management for clients in rural general practice.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is an international health issue which currently affects over 34% of New Zealand adults and leads to further physical and psychosocial health complications. People living in rural communities experience health inequities and have a high-risk of becoming obese. The aim of this study was to explore and identify barriers to effective weight management in rural Waikato general practice. METHODS: Using semi-structured interviews, 16 rural Waikato participants shared their experiences with barriers to weight management. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: resource constraints, rural locality barriers, rural sociocultural norms barriers, and participants' understanding the solutions needed to overcome their specific barriers to effective weight management. For these participants, finding a feasible weight management strategy was a challenging first step in their weight management journey. A programme that would 'work' meant one that was economically viable for low-income persons, accessible, even if living rurally with less resources, and did not cause harm or jeopardise their social connections within family or community. CONCLUSION: Overall, participants noted a lack of weight management strategy 'choice' because of income, isolation or accessibility of their rural location and/or the sociocultural norms of the community they lived in restricted options available to them. Future weight management initiatives may be better devised from within communities themselves and will need to be cognisant of the barriers specific to rural communities. Rural perspectives have much to offer in any such reconsideration of weight management initiatives.

Holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of Indigenous Peoples' of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: Research into the effectiveness of antenatal education classes is crucial for Indigenous Peoples from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States who experience poorer maternal and infant health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous populations. Our systematic review questions were intended to determine the extent of Indigenous Peoples prioritisation and involvement in antenatal education classes, and to understand the experience of Indigenous Peoples from these countries in antenatal education classes. METHODS: Using a standardised protocol, we systematically searched five electronic databases for primary research papers on antenatal education classes within the four countries noted and identified 17 papers that met the criteria. We undertook a qualitative meta-synthesis using a socio-critical lens. RESULTS: Systematic review of the academic literature demonstrates that Indigenous Peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States are not prioritised in antenatal education classes with only two of 17 studies identifying Indigenous participants. Within these two studies, Indigenous Peoples were underrepresented. As a result of poor engagement and low participation numbers of Indigenous Peoples in these antenatal education classes, it was not possible to understand the experiences of Indigenous Peoples. CONCLUSION: Given that Indigenous Peoples were absent from the majority of studies examined in this review, it is clear little consideration is afforded to the antenatal health needs and aspirations of Indigenous Peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States. To address the stark antenatal health inequities of Indigenous Peoples, targeted Indigenous interventions that consider culture, language, and wider aspects of holistic health must be privileged. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD4202017658.

Barriers to obesity health care from GP and client perspectives in New Zealand general practice: A meta-ethnography review.

Obesity is a complex international health concern affecting individual quality of life and contributing to an unsustainable strain on national health systems. General practice is positioned as best suited to deliver weight management health care, yet, obesity rates remain high suggesting barriers are experienced within this space. The aim of this review is to synthesize general practitioner and client perspectives of weight management to identify barriers experienced in New Zealand general practice. Six databases were searched resulting in eight articles being included in this review. This interpretive synthesis was guided by principles of meta-ethnography and grounded theory. Four overarching themes were identified from client and general practitioner perspectives: stigma, communication, inadequate health care (system limitations for general practitioners and lack of tailored advice for clients), and sociocultural influences. These four barriers were found to be interdependent, influencing each other outside the general practice context, highlighting the intersectionality of weight management health-care barriers and further complicating effective weight management within general practice. Clients reported wanting tailored, non-stigmatized, effective weight management health care, yet, general practitioners reported being ill-equipped to provide this due to barriers both within and outside the limits of their practice. General practice requires more systemic support to deliver effective weight management including public health campaigns and indigenous health information to reduce health inequities. An appraisal of general practice being "best suited" to deliver effective weight management health care that is culturally appropriate is urgently required to improve obesity related health outcomes in New Zealand.

Waikato GP perspectives on obesity management in general practice: a short report.

Introduction Obesity is a multifaceted clinical and public health issue affecting over 34% of New Zealand adults. The Ministry of Health has positioned general practice as the best-suited location for addressing the health effects of obesity. Previous literature has identified barriers to the delivery of effective obesity management in general practice. Aim To explore Waikato GP perspectives to determine areas for improving the care of adults with weight problems. Methods A short exploratory questionnaire was used to collect data from 29 GPs across the Waikato region. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used. Results The majority of GPs reported: they would wait for their patient to raise the issue of their weight; would offer weight advice themselves as a first option before considering referral; did not view general practice as best suited in tackling the obesity epidemic; and utilised bariatric surgery as a referral option while noting the inequities in access. Discussion The survey identified barriers to discussing weight with patients and in finding effective treatment options. Psychosocial and sociocultural aspects were recognised as contributing factors to obesity, but not highlighted as available treatment options. Bariatric surgery was reported as a viable option for treatment, but with barriers to access in the public system. This study found strong trends and themes, which identify an urgent need for further exploration into weight management pathways in New Zealand.

Adult obesity management in New Zealand general practice: a review.

INTRODUCTION Obesity is an important issue that leads to further health complications, increases the strain on the national health system and lowers quality of life. There is little available information on obesity management to guide best practice in general practice, despite 32% of New Zealand adults reported to be obese. AIM To review obesity management in New Zealand general practice. METHODS We searched six online databases for peer-reviewed research about adult obesity management. Inclusion criteria were original research, a New Zealand adult sample aged 25-64 years with a body mass index (BMI) >30 (or >25 BMI if participants had comorbidities) with weight loss (kg) as a measurable outcome. RESULTS Eleven articles were identified: nine studies reported statistically significant weight loss from baseline, and two studies reported no significant weight loss. Three studies used a Kaupapa Maori approach. Weight loss results ranged from 0.56 to 12.1 kg. Weight loss interventions varied in strategy and suitability for individual patients. DISCUSSION We found that there are effective weight loss interventions available for primary health-care professionals to refer to. Although most interventions did produce some weight loss, patients may need more comprehensive interventions that include a combination of diet, exercise and behaviour modifications in culturally appropriate ways. Future research should aim to identify and mitigate potential barriers to obesity management in primary care, as well as develop comprehensive, multileveled interventions that are effective for the local population.