Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
1.
Rev Med Suisse ; 20(879): 1209-1213, 2024 Jun 19.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898757

RESUMO

The majority of patients following musculoskeletal rehabilitation are taking painkillers. However, apart from one recent observational study, there is a lack of data. The use of analgesics, particularly opioids, is associated with higher scores for pain, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing and disability, as well as poorer results in functional tests. Prescribing analgesic treatment with precise objectives (improving pain and function) should also include identifying psychosocial factors associated with a poor prognosis. Regular reassessment of the treatment should make it possible to limit side-effects and the risk of misuse and help patients to engage in an active rehabilitation programme and resume regular physical activity.


La majorité des patients effectuant une réadaptation musculosquelettique consomme des antalgiques. Cependant, en dehors d'une étude observationnelle récente, les données manquent. La prise d'antalgiques, en particulier les opioïdes, est associée à des scores de douleur, d'anxiété, de dépression, de catastrophisme et de handicap élevés, ainsi qu'à des résultats plus faibles aux tests fonctionnels. La prescription d'un traitement antalgique avec des objectifs précis (amélioration de la douleur et de la fonction) doit également comporter une détection des facteurs psychosociaux de mauvais pronostic. Une réévaluation régulière de la prescription devrait permettre de limiter les effets secondaires, les risques de mésusage et aider les patients à s'engager dans un programme de réadaptation actif et à reprendre une activité physique régulière.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Humanos , Dor Crônica/reabilitação , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/reabilitação , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor Musculoesquelética/reabilitação , Dor Musculoesquelética/terapia
2.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med ; 67(1): 101776, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38118341

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Consumption of opioids is increasing worldwide in people with chronic non-cancer pain, although their effectiveness is debated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to evaluate analgesic consumption and its association with different variables (demographic variables, pain, anxiety/depression, catastrophism, and kinesiophobia), in the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation, where no data are available. METHODS: This was a retrospective study over a period of 8 years on people hospitalised for rehabilitation after injury. Participants were classified into 3 categories: no analgesics (NA), non-opioid analgesics (NOA), and opioid analgesics (OPA). ANOVA or chi-squared tests were used to compare the 3 groups. RESULTS: A total of 4,350 people (84% men; mean [SD] age, 44 [11] years) were included. In total, 20% were taking OPA, 40% NOA and 40% NA. In the OPA group, tramadol was mainly used, and the morphine equivalent median dose was 8.3 mg/day. In the NOA group, paracetamol and ibuprofen were mostly used. Symptoms increased progressively across the 3 groups (NA/NOA/OPA), with increased levels of pain severity/interference, anxiety/depression and catastrophizing, and a higher prevalence of neuropathic pain in the OPA group versus the others. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with those found in groups of people with chronic pain taking larger doses of opioids and following opioid reduction or cessation programs. Opioid prescription did not increase over the 8 years, which was reassuring. These factors are important to emphasise because they can be modified in the rehabilitation setting with interdisciplinary management. REGISTRATION: Our database was registered on Mendeley Data.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Dor Crônica , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Feminino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico
3.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 399, 2023 May 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37202747

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Constant-Murley Score (CMS) is a relatively unique shoulder assessment tool because it combines patient-reported outcomes (pain and activity), performance measurement and clinician-reported outcomes (strength and mobility). With these characteristics, the effect of patient-related psychological factors on the CMS remains debated. We aimed to investigate which parameters of the CMS are influenced by psychological factors by assessing the CMS before and after rehabilitation for chronic shoulder pain. METHODS: This retrospective study screened all patients (18-65 years old) who were admitted for interdisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic shoulder pain (≥ 3 months) between May 2012 and December 2017. Patients with unilateral shoulder injuries were eligible. Exclusion criteria were shoulder instability, concomitant neurological injuries, complex regional pain syndrome (including Steinbrocker syndrome), heavy psychiatric issues, and missing data. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing scale, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia were administered before and after treatment. Regression models were used to estimate associations between psychological factors and the CMS. RESULTS: We included 433 patients (88% male, mean age 47±11 years) with a median duration of symptoms of 392.2 days (interquartile range: 266.5-583.5). Rotator cuff issue was present in 71% of patients. During interdisciplinary rehabilitation, patients were followed for a mean of 33.6±7.5 days. The mean CMS at entry was 42.8 ±15.5. The mean gain in CMS after treatment was 10.6 ±10.9. Before treatment, psychological factors were significantly associated with only the pain CMS parameter: -0.37 (95% CI: -0.46 to -0.28), p <0.001. After treatment, psychological factors were associated with the evolution of the four CMS parameters: -0.12 (-0.23 to -0.01) to -0.26 (95% CI: -0.36 to -0.16), p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: This study raises the question of a distinct assessment of pain when assessing shoulder function with CMS in patients with chronic shoulder pain. The separation of the "pain parameter" from the overall CMS score seems illusory with this tool that is used worldwide. However, clinicians should be aware that psychological factors can negatively influence the evolution of all CMS parameters during follow-up, which argues for a biopsychosocial approach to patients with chronic shoulder pain.


Assuntos
Instabilidade Articular , Lesões do Manguito Rotador , Articulação do Ombro , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Feminino , Dor de Ombro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med ; 66(5): 101747, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37037157

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous previous studies, predicting the ability to work (ATW) after an upper limb injury (ULI) remains difficult for those still not working 3-24 months after their initial injury. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify simple prognostic characteristics that were associated with the long-term ATW for individuals who remained unable to work several months after the accident that caused their ULI. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study in a rehabilitation center in the French-speaking part of Switzerland. We included participants who were 18-60 years old, still unable to work because of persistent pain/disability 3-24 months after an ULI, and who were referred to our rehabilitation center for a 1-month intensive interdisciplinary treatment. Data were collected on personal characteristics, body function/structure variables, activity limitations/participation restrictions, and environmental factors. Participants' evolution during rehabilitation was assessed using functional tests/questionnaires and the 7-level self-reported Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) assessment at discharge. Participant outcomes after 1 year were categorized as either able (ATW>0%) or unable (ATW=0%) to work. The best prognostic characteristics were selected by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 317 participants, 202 (64%) had an ATW>0% at 1 year. A grip strength ≥16 kg (Jamar Hand Dynamometer score - affected side) and "(I) do not take pain medicine" were independent predictors. Overall, 96% (26/27) of participants with these 2 characteristics had an ATW>0% at 1 year. The simultaneous absence of these characteristics predicted an unfavorable prognosis in 50% (59/119) of participants. For those who also had a positive PGIC score then 100% (25/25) of participants with these 3 characteristics had an ATW>0%; for those without, only 42% (19/45) had an ATW>0%. CONCLUSIONS: Grip strength (≥16 kg) and not taking pain medicine are favorable prognostic factors for an ATW after an ULI. Their absence is associated with a poor ATW prognosis for half of people with ULI and should alert caregivers to risk of long-term absenteeism ("red flags"). Including data from a PGIC further improves the ATW prediction. We recommend that these 3 criteria be systematically evaluated.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Braço , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismos do Braço/terapia , Extremidade Superior , Mãos , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
J Pain Res ; 16: 683-693, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36915280

RESUMO

Purpose: To assess and compare the healthcare costs, time to fitness for work (TFW) between chronic complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and non-CRPS; and identify factors associated with these outcomes in a comparative longitudinal study. Patients and Methods: 148 patients with chronic CRPS of the hand and 273 patients with chronic hand impairments but without CRPS (non-CRPS) were admitted at a Swiss rehabilitation clinic between 2007 and 2016. Healthcare costs and TFW were retrieved from insurance data over 5 years after the accident. Socio-demographic factors, biopsychosocial complexity measured by means of the INTERMED questionnaire, pain intensity and DASH disability scores were collected during rehabilitation. Generalized estimation equations and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify factors associated with outcomes. Results: Healthcare costs were increased by 20% for the CRPS versus non-CRPS group (coefficient = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.08-1.35, p<0.001). The median TFW was longer for CRPS than non-CRPS patients (816 vs 672 days, p = 0.02). After adjusting for covariates, TFW did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.73-1.21, p=0.61). For CRPS patients, higher healthcare costs were associated with severe or moderate initial injury, high INTERMED or DASH disability scores. Longer TFW were associated with severe initial injury, low educational level, no work contract, and high INTERMED or DASH disability scores. Conclusion: Overall, the healthcare costs were higher for CRPS than non-CRPS patients, but the TFW was comparable. We demonstrated also the significant associations of disability and biopsychosocial factors with the healthcare costs and TFW in CRPS patients.

6.
J Pain Res ; 16: 153-167, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36711115

RESUMO

Purpose: Chronic pain is a complex phenomenon. Understanding its multiple dimensions requires the use of a combination of several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, completing multiple PROMs is time-consuming and can be a burden for patients. The objective of our study was to simultaneously reduce the French versions of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) questionnaires to enable their use in an ambulatory and clinical settings. Patients and Methods: We conducted a clinical study between May 2014 and August 2020 in our rehabilitation center. 1428 chronic musculoskeletal pain patients (CMSP) were included. The originality of our approach is that the reduction method included qualitative as well as quantitative analyses. The study was divided into two parts: 1) reduction of the questionnaires (n=1363) based on internal consistency (item-to-total correlation), principal component analysis (item loadings), Rasch analysis (infit/outfit), floor and ceiling effect (quantitative analyses) and expert judgment of items (qualitative analysis), and 2) validation of the reduced questionnaires (n=65), including test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), homogeneity (Cronbach α), criterion validity (Pearson correlation [r] with the long-version score), determination of the pathological cutoff and Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). The two full-length questionnaires include 30 items in total. Results: The reduction resulted in a 5-item PCS (score 0-20) and 6-item TSK (score 0-24). Psychometric properties of the reduced questionnaires were all acceptable as compared with other version (α=0.89 and 0.71, ICC=0.75 and 0.60, r=0.86 and 0.70, MCID=2 and 2 for PCS and TSK, respectively) while keeping the structure and coherence of the long versions. Conclusion: The two reduced versions of the PCS and TSK can be used in CMSP patient. As their administration only requires a few minutes, they can be implemented in outpatient consultation as well as in clinical settings.

7.
J Pain ; 23(2): 326-336, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34547430

RESUMO

Nociceptive pain involves the activation of nociceptors without damage to the nervous system, whereas neuropathic pain is related to an alteration in the central or peripheral nervous system. Chronic pain itself and the transition from acute to chronic pain may be epigenetically controlled. In this cross-sectional study, a genome-wide DNA methylation analysis was performed using the blood DNA reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) technique. Three prospective cohorts including 20 healthy controls (CTL), 18 patients with chronic nociceptive pain (NOCI), and 19 patients with chronic neuropathic pain (NEURO) were compared at both the single CpG and differentially methylated region (DMR) levels. Genes with DMRs were seen in the NOCI and NEURO groups belonged to the neuro-musculoskeletal system and differed between NOCI and NEURO patients. Our results demonstrate that the epigenetic disturbances accompanying nociceptive pain are very different from those accompanying neuropathic pain. In the former, among others, the epigenetic disturbance observed would affect the function of the opioid analgesic system, whereas in the latter it would affect that of the GABAergic reward system. This study presents biological findings that help to characterize NOCI- and NEURO-affected pathways and opens the possibility of developing epigenetic diagnostic assays. PERSPECTIVE: Our results help to explain the various biological pathways modifications underlying the different clinical manifestations of nociceptive and neuropathic pains. Furthermore, the new targets identified in our study might help to discover more specific treatments for nociceptive or neuropathic pains.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/genética , Epigenoma/genética , Estudos de Associação Genética , Neuralgia/genética , Dor Nociceptiva/genética , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Metilação de DNA/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema Musculoesquelético/metabolismo , Sistema Nervoso/metabolismo
8.
J Occup Rehabil ; 31(4): 822-830, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33761082

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the levels of perceived work demand capacity corresponding to the Modified Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS) score and precise reliability validity and responsiveness. METHODS: This prospective validation study included patients with chronic musculoskeletal impairments who underwent multidisciplinary occupational rehabilitation. After determining the percentiles of the work demand thresholds corresponding to the spinal function sort (SFS), the percentiles were transposed to the M-SFS. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and limits of agreement. Correlations with other questionnaires and a lifting task were measured to assess validity. Responsiveness was determined using anchor- and distribution-based approaches. RESULTS: 288 patients were included. The following thresholds were obtained for the M-SFS: 0-43 points, minimal; 44-50, very light; 51-58, light; 59-64, light to medium; 65-70, medium; 71-76, heavy; and 77-80, very heavy. Reliability was confirmed. The correlation between the M-SFS and SFS scores was good at 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91) and moderate according to the PILE-test result of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.50-0.67). We could not calculate a valid anchor-based minimal clinically important difference. The standard error of measurement was 3.9 points, and the smallest detectable change was 10.8 points. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the comparison of the M-SFS and SFS scores, the M-SFS score can be interpreted in relation to the levels of work demand. This study confirms the good reliability and validity of the M-SFS questionnaire in assessing perceived physical capacity. Further studies are needed to determine its responsiveness.


Assuntos
Coluna Vertebral , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
9.
Clin Rehabil ; 35(1): 135-144, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32851861

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To use the self-assessment INTERMED questionnaire to determine the relationship between biopsychosocial complexity and healthcare and social costs of patients after orthopaedic trauma. DESIGN: Secondary prospective analysis based on the validation study cohort of the self-assessment INTERMED questionnaire. SETTING: Inpatients orthopaedic rehabilitation with vocational aspects. SUBJECTS: In total, 136 patients with chronic pain and impairments were included in this study: mean (SD) age, 42.6 (10.7) years; 116 men, with moderate pain intensity (51/100); suffering from upper (n = 55), lower-limb (n = 51) or spine (n = 30) pain after orthopaedic trauma; with minor or moderate injury severity (severe injury for 25). MAIN MEASURES: Biopsychosocial complexity, assessed with the self-assessment INTERMED questionnaire, and other confounding variables collected prospectively during rehabilitation. Outcome measures (healthcare costs, loss of wage costs and time for fitness-to-work) were collected through insurance files after case settlements. Linear multiple regression models adjusted for age, gender, pain, trauma severity, education and employment contract were performed to measure the influence of biopsychosocial complexity on the three outcome variables. RESULTS: High-cost patients were older (+3.6 years) and more anxious (9.0 vs 7.3 points at HADS-A), came later to rehabilitation (+105 days), and showed higher biopsychosocial complexity (+3.2 points). After adjustment, biopsychosocial complexity was significantly associated with healthcare (ß = 0.02; P = 0.003; expß = 1.02) and social costs (ß = 0.03; P = 0.006, expß = 1.03) and duration before fitness-to-work (ß = 0.04; P < 0.001, expß = 1.04). CONCLUSION: Biopsychosocial complexity assessed with the self-assessment INTERMED questionnaire is associated with higher healthcare and social costs.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesões , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Adulto , Emprego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Adulto Jovem
10.
J Pain Res ; 13: 3235-3245, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33311997

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity between patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) of the hand and non-CRPS patients and to assess the association between biopsychosocial (BPS) complexity profiles and psychiatric comorbidity in a comparative study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included a total of 103 patients with CRPS of the hand and 290 patients with chronic hand impairments but without CRPS. Psychiatric comorbidities were diagnosed by a psychiatrist, and BPS complexity was measured by means of the INTERMED. The odds ratios (OR) of having psychiatric comorbidities according to BPS complexity were calculated with multiple logistic regression (adjusted for age, sex, and pain). RESULTS: Prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity was 29% in CRPS patients, which was not significantly higher than in non-CRPS patients (21%, relative risk=1.38, 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.01 p=0.10). The median total scores of the INTERMED were the same in both groups (23 points). INTERMED total scores (0-60 points) were related to an increased risk of having psychiatric comorbidity in CRPS patients (OR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.23-1.73) and in non-CRPS patients (OR=1.21; 95% CI: 1.13-1.30). The four INTERMED subscales (biological, psychological, social, and health care) were correlated with a higher risk of having psychiatric comorbidity in both groups. The differences in the OR of having psychiatric comorbidity in relation to INTERMED total and subscale scores were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The total scores, as well as all four dimensions of BPS complexity measured by the INTERMED, were associated with psychiatric comorbidity, with comparable magnitudes of association between the CRPS and non-CRPS groups. The INTERMED was useful in screening for psychological vulnerability in the two groups.

11.
Pain Res Manag ; 2020: 1765456, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32655723

RESUMO

Purpose: Pacing, avoidance, and overdoing are considered the three main behavioral strategies, also labeled activity patterns. Their relationship with functioning of patients with chronic pain is debated. The purpose of this study was to measure the influence of activity patterns on lifting tasks commonly used in daily life. Method: We performed a monocentric observational study and included patients performing Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE). Avoidance, pacing, and persistence were assessed with using the Patterns of Activity Measures-Pain (POAM-P). Maximal safe performance was measured for floor-to-waist, waist-to-overhead, horizontal lift, and carrying with dominant-hand tests according to the FCE guidelines. Descriptive statistics, associations of POAM-P subscales with various sociodemographic variables, and correlations are presented. Standard multiple linear regression models were applied to measure the associations between FCE tests and POAM-P subscales, adjusting for the following potential confounders: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pain severity, trauma severity, localization of injury, and education. Results: Persistence was significantly positively associated with performance on the 4 FCE tests: floor-to-waist (coefficient = 0.20; p=0.001), waist-to-overhead (coefficient = 0.13; p=0.004), horizontal lift (coefficient = 0.31; p ≤ 0.001), and dominant-handed lifting (coefficient = 0.19; p=0.001). Pacing was found to have a negative influence on the carrying dominant-hand test (coefficient = -0.14; p=0.034), and avoidance was not found to have an influence on the 4 FCE tests. Conclusion: This study shows that task-persistence pattern is positively associated with physical performance in FCE, whereas pacing can have a negative influence on some tests.


Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Aprendizagem da Esquiva , Dor Crônica , Dor Musculoesquelética , Adulto , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Musculoesquelética/psicologia , Avaliação da Capacidade de Trabalho
12.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 21(1): 313, 2020 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32434509

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hand rehabilitation needs valid evaluation tools; the 400-point Hand Assessment (HA) is an exhaustive but not standardised tool. The aim of this study was to validate a standardised version of this test. METHODS: A modified version and a standardised prototype was made for this prospective validation study (four centres, three countries). Psychometric properties studied: reliability (intra-rater and inter-rater, standard error of measurement [SEM], minimum detectable change [MDC],internal consistency); content validity, construct validity with Jebsen Taylor hand function test, QuickDASH, MOS-SF 36 and pain; responsiveness, using an anchor-based approach (ROC curve with area under curve, mean response change) with calculation of MCID. For SEM, MDC and responsiveness, QuickDASH was used for comparison. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-six patients with hand/wrist injuries were included between May 2013 and February 2015. One hundred and seventy were available for final analysis: 67% men; mean age 43.4 ± 13.2 years; both manual and office workers (46, 5% of each); 37% had a hand or wrist fracture. Reliability: ICC intra-rater = 0.967 [0.938-0.982]; inter-rater = 0.868 [0.754-0.932]. Distribution-based approach: for 400-point HA/QuickDASH: SEM = 3.48/4.52, MDC = 9.065/12.53, internal consistency of 400-point HA: Cronbach α = 0.886. VALIDITY: Content validity was good according to COSMIN guidelines. Construct validity: correlation coefficient: Jebsen-Taylor hand function test = - 0.573 [- 0.666-0.464], QuickDASH = - 0.432 at T0 [- 0.545-0.303], - 0.551 at T3 [- 0.648-0.436]; MOS-SF 36 physical component = 0.395 [0.263-0.513]; no correlation with MOS-SF 36 mental component = 0.142 [- 0.009 + 0.286] and pain = - 0.166 [- 0.306 + 0.018]. Responsiveness: Anchor-based approach: AUC Δ400-point HA = 0.666 [0.583-0.749], AUC ΔQuickDASH = 0.556 [0.466-0.646]. MCID (optimal ROC curve cut-off): 6.07 for 400-point HA, - 2.27 for QuickDASH. MCID with mean response change + 12.034 ± 9.067 for 400-point HA and - 8.03 ± -9.7 for QuickDASH. The patient's global impression of change was only correlated with the Δ400-point HA. CONCLUSIONS: The 400-point HA standardised version has good psychometric properties. For responsiveness, we propose an MCID of at least 12.3/100. However, these results must be confirmed in other populations and pathologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered into ISCTRN registry (Number ISRCTN25874481) the 07/02/2019.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/reabilitação , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/fisiopatologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicometria , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
13.
J Occup Rehabil ; 28(3): 513-522, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29094284

RESUMO

Purpose Measuring the predictive value of the Fear-Avoidance Model (FAM) on lifting tasks in Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE), and on reasons for stopping the evaluation (safe maximal effort, versus self-limited). Methods A monocentric prospective study was conducted on 298 consecutive inpatients. Components of the FAM were analyzed using the Cumulative Psychosocial Factor Index (CPFI: kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, depressive mood) and perceived disability (Hand/Spinal Function Sort: HFS/SFS). Floor-to-waist, waist-to-overhead and dominant-hand lifting tests were measured according to the FCE guidelines. Maximal safe performance was judged by certified FCE assessors. Analyses were conducted with linear multiple regression models. Results The CPFI was significantly associated with the 3 FCE lifting tests: floor-to-waist (ß = - 1.12; p = 0.039), waist-to-overhead (ß = - 0.88; p = 0.011), and dominant-handed lifting (ß = - 1.21; p = 0.027). Higher perceived disability was also related to lower performances: floor-to-waist (ß = 0.09; p < 0.001), waist-to-overhead (ß = 0.04; p < 0.001), and dominant-handed lifting (ß = 0.06; p < 0.001). The CPFI was not related to performances of patients with self-limited effort despite higher psychological scores, while a relationship was found for patients who achieved a safe maximal performance. Higher perceived disability was related to performances in both situations. Conclusions FAM components should be taken into account when interpreting maximal physical performance in FCE. This study also suggests that factors other than pain-related fears may influence patients with self-limited effort.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência/psicologia , Remoção/efeitos adversos , Modelos Psicológicos , Dor Musculoesquelética/psicologia , Dor/etiologia , Avaliação da Capacidade de Trabalho , Adulto , Aprendizagem da Esquiva , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Medo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos
14.
Rev Med Suisse ; 13(577): 1704-1709, 2017 Oct 04.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28980784

RESUMO

A century and a half after its first description, adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) has revealed only part of its secrets. Its definition remains clinical since the imaging technology we have at our dis-posal is insufficiently sensitive and specific. Next to its idiopathic form, the most frequent and the most characteristic, there are numerous situations inducing a functional limitation of the glenohumeral joint and of its environment. The clinical course inexorably takes place in one to two years, and develops in 3 phases where successively pain, retraction, and then recovery, as a rule complete recovery, dominate. No treatment is likely to shorten it. In the absence of clearly established proof, our therapeutic approach must be prudent and conservative.


Un siècle et demi après sa première description, la capsulite rétractile de l'épaule n'a dévoilé qu'une partie de ses secrets. Sa définition reste clinique puisqu'on ne dispose d'aucune méthode d'imagerie suffisamment sensible et spécifique. A côté de la forme idiopathique, la plus fréquente et la mieux caractérisée, il existe une multitude de situations induisant une limitation fonctionnelle de l'articulation gléno-humérale et de son environnement. L'évolution se déroule inexorablement sur un à deux ans et comporte trois phases où dominent successivement la douleur, la rétraction puis la récupération en principe complète. Aucun traitement n'est susceptible de l'écourter. En l'absence de preuve clairement établie, l'approche thérapeutique doit être prudente et conservatrice.


Assuntos
Bursite , Articulação do Ombro , Bursite/diagnóstico , Bursite/terapia , Humanos , Dor , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Articulação do Ombro/patologia
15.
Psychosom Med ; 79(4): 485-492, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28033198

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The INTERMED Self-Assessment questionnaire (IMSA) was developed as an alternative to the observer-rated INTERMED (IM) to assess biopsychosocial complexity and health care needs. We studied feasibility, reliability, and validity of the IMSA within a large and heterogeneous international sample of adult hospital inpatients and outpatients as well as its predictive value for health care use (HCU) and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A total of 850 participants aged 17 to 90 years from five countries completed the IMSA and were evaluated with the IM. The following measurement properties were determined: feasibility by percentages of missing values; reliability by Cronbach α; interrater agreement by intraclass correlation coefficients; convergent validity of IMSA scores with mental health (Short Form 36 emotional well-being subscale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), medical health (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale) and QoL (Euroqol-5D) by Spearman rank correlations; and predictive validity of IMSA scores with HCU and QoL by (generalized) linear mixed models. RESULTS: Feasibility, face validity, and reliability (Cronbach α = 0.80) were satisfactory. Intraclass correlation coefficient between IMSA and IM total scores was .78 (95% CI = .75-.81). Correlations of the IMSA with the Short Form 36, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, and Euroqol-5D (convergent validity) were -.65, .15, .28, and -.59, respectively. The IMSA significantly predicted QoL and also HCU (emergency department visits, hospitalization, outpatient visits, and diagnostic examinations) after 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results were comparable between hospital sites, inpatients and outpatients, as well as age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The IMSA is a generic and time-efficient method to assess biopsychosocial complexity and to provide guidance for multidisciplinary care trajectories in adult patients, with good reliability and validity across different cultures.


Assuntos
Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Avaliação das Necessidades , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
16.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med ; 60(4): 258-262, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27839683

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Constant-Murley score (CS) has been used for more than 25 years to assess shoulder function. Strength by itself accounts for 25% of the total score. The measurement at 90° abduction seems to be sometimes limited by pain, particularly with tendinopathy or subacromial impingement. We compared the assessment of isometric strength in anterior forward flexion and abduction and its effect on pain and total CS. METHODS: Strength was assessed by CS at both 90° forward flexion and abduction in the scapular plane by using an Isobex dynamometer, the first position tested being randomized. Pain was assessed on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and total CS was assessed. RESULTS: We included 54 patients with unilateral shoulder problems; 50% had rotator cuff injury. Mean strength on the affected side was 4.7±2.5kg in forward flexion and 4.6±2.8kg in abduction. Induced pain and total CS did not differ between the 2 positions tested. CONCLUSIONS: Strength can be measured by the CS in forward flexion or abduction, because the measurement does not affect strength, pain intensity or total score. The choice of direction for measurement should be based on the underlying pathology, related contraindications and patient preference.


Assuntos
Artrometria Articular/estatística & dados numéricos , Dinamômetro de Força Muscular/estatística & dados numéricos , Força Muscular , Dor de Ombro/fisiopatologia , Ombro/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Artrometria Articular/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Contração Isométrica/fisiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/fisiopatologia
17.
PLoS One ; 9(4): e94268, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24718689

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Workers with persistent disabilities after orthopaedic trauma may need occupational rehabilitation. Despite various risk profiles for non-return-to-work (non-RTW), there is no available predictive model. Moreover, injured workers may have various origins (immigrant workers), which may either affect their return to work or their eligibility for research purposes. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model that estimates the likelihood of non-RTW after occupational rehabilitation using predictors which do not rely on the worker's background. METHODS: Prospective cohort study (3177 participants, native (51%) and immigrant workers (49%)) with two samples: a) Development sample with patients from 2004 to 2007 with Full and Reduced Models, b) External validation of the Reduced Model with patients from 2008 to March 2010. We collected patients' data and biopsychosocial complexity with an observer rated interview (INTERMED). Non-RTW was assessed two years after discharge from the rehabilitation. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and calibration was evaluated with a calibration plot. The model was reduced with random forests. RESULTS: At 2 years, the non-RTW status was known for 2462 patients (77.5% of the total sample). The prevalence of non-RTW was 50%. The full model (36 items) and the reduced model (19 items) had acceptable discrimination performance (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.78 and 0.74, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.76, respectively) and good calibration. For the validation model, the discrimination performance was acceptable (AUC 0.73; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.77) and calibration was also adequate. CONCLUSIONS: Non-RTW may be predicted with a simple model constructed with variables independent of the patient's education and language fluency. This model is useful for all kinds of trauma in order to adjust for case mix and it is applicable to vulnerable populations like immigrant workers.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Modelos Teóricos , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/reabilitação , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/reabilitação , Retorno ao Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidentes de Trânsito/psicologia , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Traumatismos do Braço/etnologia , Traumatismos do Braço/psicologia , Traumatismos do Braço/reabilitação , Lesões nas Costas/etnologia , Lesões nas Costas/psicologia , Lesões nas Costas/reabilitação , Cultura , Escolaridade , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/psicologia , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Idioma , Traumatismos da Perna/etnologia , Traumatismos da Perna/psicologia , Traumatismos da Perna/reabilitação , Atividades de Lazer , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/etnologia , Traumatismo Múltiplo/psicologia , Traumatismo Múltiplo/reabilitação , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/etnologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/psicologia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/etnologia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/psicologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicologia , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suíça/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
18.
J Occup Rehabil ; 21(1): 43-53, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20623164

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess the association between remembered previous work place environment and return to work (RTW) after hospitalisation in a rehabilitation hospital. METHODS: A cohort of 291 orthopedic trauma patients discharged from hospital between 15 December 2004 and 31 December 2005 was included in a study addressing quality of life and work-related questions. Remembered previous work environment was measured by Karasek's 31-item Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), given to the patients during hospitalisation. Post-hospitalisation work status was assessed 3 months, 1, and 2 years after discharge, using a questionnaire sent to the ex-patients. Logistic regression models were used to test the role of four JCQ variables on RTW at each time point while controlling for relevant confounders. RESULTS: Subjects perceiving a higher physical demand were less likely to return to work 1 year after hospital discharge. Social support at work was positively associated with RTW at all time points. A high job strain appeared to be positively associated with RTW 1 year after rehabilitation, with limitations due to large confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of previous work environment may influence the probability of RTW. In a rehabilitation setting, efforts should be made to assess those perceptions and, if needed, interventions to modify them should be applied.


Assuntos
Emprego , Rememoração Mental , Reabilitação Vocacional/psicologia , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/reabilitação , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Percepção , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicometria , Qualidade de Vida , Reabilitação Vocacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Licença Médica , Apoio Social , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suíça , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 90(9): 1499-505, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19735777

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of nonresponse to a self-report study of patients with orthopedic trauma hospitalized for vocational rehabilitation between November 15, 2003, and December 31, 2005. The role of biopsychosocial complexity, assessed using the INTERMED, was of particular interest. DESIGN: Cohort study. Questionnaires with quality of life, sociodemographic, and job-related questions were given to patients at hospitalization and 1 year after discharge. Sociodemographic data, biopsychosocial complexity, and presence of comorbidity were available at hospitalization (baseline) for all eligible patients. Logistic regression models were used to test a number of baseline variables as potential predictors of nonresponse to the questionnaires at each of the 2 time points. SETTING: Rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=990) hospitalized for vocational rehabilitation over a period of 2 years. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Nonresponse to the questionnaires was the binary dependent variable. RESULTS: Patients with high biopsychosocial complexity, foreign native language, or low educational level were less likely to respond at both time points. Younger patients were less likely to respond at 1 year. Those living in a stable partnership were less likely than singles to respond at hospitalization. Sex, psychiatric, and somatic comorbidity and alcoholism were never associated with nonresponse. CONCLUSIONS: We stress the importance of assessing biopsychosocial complexity to predict nonresponse. Furthermore, the factors we found to be predictive of nonresponse are also known to influence treatment outcome and vocational rehabilitation. Therefore, it is important to increase the response rate of the groups of concern in order to reduce selection bias in epidemiologic investigations.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Reabilitação Vocacional/métodos , Reabilitação Vocacional/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ferimentos e Lesões/reabilitação , Adolescente , Adulto , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centros de Reabilitação , Viés de Seleção , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...